Stop Place Coding: An Acoustic Study of CV, VC#, and C#V Sequences

References

1 Bell, A.: Some patterns of occurrence and formation of syllable structure. Working Papers Lang. Universals 6: 23–137 (1971).Search in Google Scholar

2 Bell, A.; Hooper, J.B.: Issues and evidence in syllabic phonology; in Bell, Hooper, Syllables and segments, pp. 3–22 (North Holland, Amsterdam 1978).Search in Google Scholar

3 Bladon, R.A.W.; Al-Bamerni, A.: Coarticulation resistance in English. J. Phonet. 4: 137–150 (1976).10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31234-3Search in Google Scholar

4 Blevins, J.: The syllable in phonological theory; in Goldsmith, The handbook of phonological theory, pp. 206–244 (Blackwell, Oxford 1995).10.1111/b.9780631201267.1996.00008.xSearch in Google Scholar

5 Brancazio, L.; Fowler, C.A.: On the relevance of locus equations for production and perception of stop consonants. Percept. Psychophys. 60: 24–50 (1998).10.3758/BF03211916Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6 Browman, C.P.; Goldstein, L.: Gestural syllable position effects in American English; in Bell-Berti, Raphael, Producing speech: contemporary issues (for Katherine Harris), pp. 19–33 (AIP Press, Woodbury 1995).Search in Google Scholar

7 Celdan, E.M.; Villalba, X.: Locus equations as a metric for place of articulation in automatic speech recognition. Proc. 19th Int. Congr. Phon. Sci., Stockholm 1995, vol. 1, pp. 30–33.Search in Google Scholar

8 Chennoukh, S.; Carré, R.; Lindblom, B.: Locus equations in the light of articulatory modeling. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 102: 2380–2388 (1997).10.1121/1.419622Search in Google Scholar

9 Delattre, P.C.; Liberman, A.M.; Cooper, F.S.: Acoustic loci and transitional cues for consonants. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 27: 769–773 (1955).10.1121/1.1908024Search in Google Scholar

10 Diehl, R.; Kluender, K.: On the objects of speech perception. Ecol. Psychol. 1: 121–144 (1989).10.1207/s15326969eco0102_2Search in Google Scholar

11 Fowler, C.A.: Invariants, specifiers, cues: An investigation of locus equations as information for place of articulation. Percept. Psychophys. 55: 597–610 (1994).Search in Google Scholar

12 Hardcastle, W.J.; Hewlett, N.: Coarticulation: theory, data, techniques (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1999).10.1017/CBO9780511486395Search in Google Scholar

13 Hoequist, C.: Sum: interword vs. intraword coarticulation. Linguist List Home page: http://www.linguistlist.org/issues/14/14-1251.html (2003).Search in Google Scholar

14 Kingston, J.; Diehl, R.: Phonetic knowledge. Language 70: 419–454 (1994).10.1353/lan.1994.0023Search in Google Scholar

15 Kiparsky, P.: Phonological change; in Newmeyer, Linguistics: the Cambridge Survey, vol. 1: Linguistic theory: foundations, pp. 363–415 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1988).Search in Google Scholar

16 Kozhevnikov, V.A.; Chistovich, L.A.: Rech: Artikulyatsiya i vospriyatiye (Moscow-Leningrad 1965). Transl.: Speech: articulation and perception, No. 30, p. 543 (Joint Publication Research Service, Washington 1965).Search in Google Scholar

17 Krull, D.: Acoustic properties as predictors of perceptual properties. Phon. Exp. Res. Inst. Ling. (PERILUS) V11: 66–70 (1988).Search in Google Scholar

18 Krull, D.: Relating acoustic properties to perceptual responses: a study of Swedish voiced stops. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 88: 2557–2570 (1990).10.1121/1.399977Search in Google Scholar

19 Liberman, A.M.: Afterthoughts on modularity and the motor theory; in Mattingly, Studdert-Kennedy, Modularity and the motor theory of speech perception, pp. 443–446 (Erlbaum, New York 1991).Search in Google Scholar

20 Liberman, A.M.; Cooper, F.; Shankweiler, D.: Studdert-Kennedy, M.: Perception of the speech code. Psychol. Rev. 74: 431–461 (1967).10.1037/h0020279Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21 Liljencrants, J.; Lindblom, B.: Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems: the role of perceptual contrast. Language 48: 839–862 (1972).10.2307/411991Search in Google Scholar

22 Lindblom, B.: On vowel reduction. Q. Prog. Status Rep., Speech Transm. Lab., R. Inst. Technol., Stockh., No. 29 (1963).Search in Google Scholar

23 Lindblom, B.: Economy of speech gestures; in MacNeilage, The production of speech, pp. 217–245 (Springer, New York 1983).10.1007/978-1-4613-8202-7_10Search in Google Scholar

24 Lindblom, B.: Phonetic universals in vowel systems; in Ohala, Jaeger, Experimental phonology, pp. 13–44 (Academic Press, Orlando 1986).Search in Google Scholar

25 Lindblom, B.: Developmental origins of adult phonology: the interplay between phonetic emergents and the evolutionary adaptations of sound patterns. Phonetica 57: 297–314 (2000).10.1159/000028482Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26 Lindblom, B.: A numerical model of coarticulation based on a Principal Components analysis of tongue shapes. Proc. 15th Int. Congr. Phonet. Sci., Barcelona 2003, Causal Productions, pp. 427–430.Search in Google Scholar

27 Lindblom, B.; Sussman, H.M.; Modarresi, G., Burlingame, E.: The trough effect: implications for speech motor programming. Phonetica 59: 245–262 (2002).10.1159/000068349Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28 Modarresi, G.: The effects of syllable boundary, stop consonant closure duration, and VOT on VCV coarticulation; doct. diss., University of Texas, Austin (2002).Search in Google Scholar

29 Modarresi, G.; Sussman, H.M.; Lindblom, B.; Burlingame, E.: An acoustic analysis of the bidirectionality of coarticulation in VCV utterances. J. Phonet. (2004).10.1016/j.wocn.2003.11.002Search in Google Scholar

30 Nearey, T.M.; Shammass, S.E.: Formant transitions as partly distinctive invariant properties in the identification of voiced stops. Can. Acoust. 15: 17–24 (1987).Search in Google Scholar

31 Recasens, D.: An acoustic analysis of V-to-C and V-to-V coarticulatory effects in Catalan and Spanish VCV sequences. J. Phonet. 15: 299–312 (1987).10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30580-7Search in Google Scholar

32 Recasens, D.; Pallarès, M.D.; Fontdevila, J.: A model of lingual coarticulation based on articulatory constraints. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 102: 544–561 (1997).10.1121/1.419727Search in Google Scholar

33 Stark, J.; Lindblom, B.; Sundberg, J.: APEX: an articulatory synthesis model for experimental and computational studies of speech production. Q. Prog. Status Rep., Speech Transm. Lab., R. Inst. Technol., Stockh., No. 2, pp. 45–48 (1996).Search in Google Scholar

34 Sussman, H.M.: A neural mapping hypothesis to explain why velar stops have an allophonic split. Brain Lang. 70: 294–304 (1999).10.1006/brln.1999.2182Search in Google Scholar PubMed

35 Sussman, H.M.; Bessell, N.; Dalston, E.; Majors, T.: An investigation of stop place of articulation as a function of syllable position: a locus equation perspective. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 101: 2826–2838 (1997).10.1121/1.418567Search in Google Scholar

36 Sussman, H.M.; Duder, C.; Dalston, E.; Cacciatore, A.: An acoustic study of the development of CV coarticulation: a case study. J. Speech Hear. Res. 42: 1080–1096 (1999).10.1044/jslhr.4205.1080Search in Google Scholar

37 Sussman, H.M.; Fruchter, D.; Hilbert, J.; Sirosh, J.: Linear correlates in the speech signal: the orderly output constraint. Behav. Brain Sci. 21: 241–299 (1998).10.1017/S0140525X98001174Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38 Sussman, H.M.; Hoemeke, K.; Ahmed, F.: A cross-linguistic investigation of locus equations as a relationally invariant descriptor for place of articulation. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 94: 1256–1268 (1993).10.1121/1.408178Search in Google Scholar

39 Sussman, H.M.; McCaffrey, H.A.; Matthews, S.: An investigation of locus equations as a source of relational invariance for stop place categorization. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 90: 1309–1325 (1991).10.1121/1.401923Search in Google Scholar

40 Sussman, H.M.; Shore, J.: Locus equations as phonetic descriptors of consonantal place of articulation. Percept. Psychophys. 58: 936–946 (1996).10.3758/BF03205495Search in Google Scholar PubMed

41 Warren, W.: Vowel to vowel coarticulation across Hindi stop consonants; Master’s thesis Department of Linguistics, University of Texas, Austin (submitted 2003).Search in Google Scholar