Chapter 6. Franz Kern
-
Timothy Osborne
Abstract
An examination of Franz Kern’s main works (1883a, 1883b, 1884, 1886, 1888) quickly reveals that his concept of sentence structure is closely similar to many modern analyses in the tradition of dependency grammar (DG). Kern took the finite verb as the sentence root and positioned the subject and object phrases as equi-level dependents of the verb in a like manner. In so doing, he was rejecting the binary subject-predicate division associated with the works of some of his contemporaries, most notably, Reed and Kellogg (1876). The aspect of Kern’s understanding of sentence structure that is particularly valuable in tracing the development of dependency syntax was his use of sentence diagrams. Kern produced numerous diagrams that are similar to the stemmas Tesnière used approximately 60 years later. Thus, Kern’s works on sentence structure stand as a particularly clear manifestation of dependency syntax long before dependency grammar became associated primarily with Tesnière’s efforts (1953, 1959). Interestingly, Tesnière did not cite Kern. This situation raises a basic question about whether Tesnière knew about Kern’s works at all, or whether he was indirectly influenced by Kern through the ideas of other German grammarians following in a tradition that Kern had helped establish many decades earlier.
Abstract
An examination of Franz Kern’s main works (1883a, 1883b, 1884, 1886, 1888) quickly reveals that his concept of sentence structure is closely similar to many modern analyses in the tradition of dependency grammar (DG). Kern took the finite verb as the sentence root and positioned the subject and object phrases as equi-level dependents of the verb in a like manner. In so doing, he was rejecting the binary subject-predicate division associated with the works of some of his contemporaries, most notably, Reed and Kellogg (1876). The aspect of Kern’s understanding of sentence structure that is particularly valuable in tracing the development of dependency syntax was his use of sentence diagrams. Kern produced numerous diagrams that are similar to the stemmas Tesnière used approximately 60 years later. Thus, Kern’s works on sentence structure stand as a particularly clear manifestation of dependency syntax long before dependency grammar became associated primarily with Tesnière’s efforts (1953, 1959). Interestingly, Tesnière did not cite Kern. This situation raises a basic question about whether Tesnière knew about Kern’s works at all, or whether he was indirectly influenced by Kern through the ideas of other German grammarians following in a tradition that Kern had helped establish many decades earlier.
Chapters in this book
- Prelim pages i
- Table of contents v
- Aspects of the theory and history of dependency grammar 1
- Chapter 1. Syntactic relations in ancient and medieval grammatical theory 23
- Chapter 2. The notion of dependency in Latin grammar in the Renaissance and the 17th century 59
- Chapter 3. How dependency syntax appeared in the French Encyclopedia 85
- Chapter 4. Dependency in early sentence diagrams 133
- Chapter 5. Sámuel Brassai in the history of dependency grammar 163
- Chapter 6. Franz Kern 189
- Chapter 7. Some aspects of dependency in Otto Jespersen’s structural syntax 215
- Chapter 8. The Russian trail 253
- Index nominum 277
- Index rerum 279
Chapters in this book
- Prelim pages i
- Table of contents v
- Aspects of the theory and history of dependency grammar 1
- Chapter 1. Syntactic relations in ancient and medieval grammatical theory 23
- Chapter 2. The notion of dependency in Latin grammar in the Renaissance and the 17th century 59
- Chapter 3. How dependency syntax appeared in the French Encyclopedia 85
- Chapter 4. Dependency in early sentence diagrams 133
- Chapter 5. Sámuel Brassai in the history of dependency grammar 163
- Chapter 6. Franz Kern 189
- Chapter 7. Some aspects of dependency in Otto Jespersen’s structural syntax 215
- Chapter 8. The Russian trail 253
- Index nominum 277
- Index rerum 279
