Home Chapter 4. The role of inferencing in the interpretation of two expressive speech act constructions
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter 4. The role of inferencing in the interpretation of two expressive speech act constructions

  • Klaus-Uwe Panther and Linda L. Thornburg
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Constructing Families of Constructions
This chapter is in the book Constructing Families of Constructions

Abstract

We analyze two illocutionary constructions, viz. an autonomous complement clause construction, instantiated by That it should come to this!, and a wh-interrogative construction, such as What do think you are doing? Both constructions convey emotive and evaluative senses and have a factual presupposition. Conceptually and pragmatically, they are members of a large family of expressive constructions, albeit morphosyntactically unrelated. The first construction is directly associated with a non-compositional illocutionary meaning. In contrast, the interpretation of the second construction requires a number of inferential steps leading from a still extant source meaning (neutral question) to a conventionalized indirect expressive and directive target meaning. The chapter finishes with some reflections on the relation between semantics and pragmatics as well as on the necessity of integrating an inferential component into cognitive linguistic theory.

Abstract

We analyze two illocutionary constructions, viz. an autonomous complement clause construction, instantiated by That it should come to this!, and a wh-interrogative construction, such as What do think you are doing? Both constructions convey emotive and evaluative senses and have a factual presupposition. Conceptually and pragmatically, they are members of a large family of expressive constructions, albeit morphosyntactically unrelated. The first construction is directly associated with a non-compositional illocutionary meaning. In contrast, the interpretation of the second construction requires a number of inferential steps leading from a still extant source meaning (neutral question) to a conventionalized indirect expressive and directive target meaning. The chapter finishes with some reflections on the relation between semantics and pragmatics as well as on the necessity of integrating an inferential component into cognitive linguistic theory.

Downloaded on 1.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/hcp.58.05pan/html
Scroll to top button