Band 21, Heft 4 - Special Issue on NBA basketball

Improvements in tracking technology through optical and computer vision systems have enabled a greater understanding of the movement-based behaviour of multiple agents, including in team sports. In this study, a multi-agent statistically discriminative sub-trajectory mining (MA-Stat-DSM) method is proposed that takes a set of binary-labelled agent trajectory matrices as input and incorporates Hausdorff distance to identify sub-matrices that statistically significantly discriminate between the two groups of labelled trajectory matrices. Utilizing 2015/16 SportVU NBA tracking data, agent trajectory matrices representing attacks consisting of the trajectories of five agents (the ball, shooter, last passer, shooter defender, and last passer defender), were truncated to correspond to the time interval following the receipt of the ball by the last passer, and labelled as effective or ineffective based on a definition of attack effectiveness that we devise in the current study. After identifying appropriate parameters for MA-Stat-DSM by iteratively applying it to all matches involving the two top- and two bottom-placed teams from the 2015/16 NBA season, the method was then applied to selected matches and could identify and visualize the portions of plays, e.g., involving passing, on-, and/or off-the-ball movements, which were most relevant in rendering attacks effective or ineffective.

Since the National Basketball Association (NBA) fined the San Antonio Spurs in 2012 for their decision to rest their best players during a nationally televised game, there has been much discussion surrounding player “load” management. In fact, more teams in the NBA have begun to adopt the Spurs approach of strategically resting players in an effort to avoid injury and ensure players are at peak performance towards the end of the season. Although there is general agreement that load management is important for some players to avoid injury, it isn’t clear that managing minutes during the beginning of a season results in peak performance towards the end. In this paper we attempt to address this. We do this by formulating a Bayesian hierarchical model that borrows strength among players to estimate a league-wide effect that average minutes played has on end-of-season performance based on 14 modern performance metrics. Generally speaking, it appears that end-of-season offensive and defensive performance tends be above average as average minutes played is increased.

In basketball, traditional methods of assessing individual rebounding ability are problematic because they depend on all players present on the court rather than just on the player of interest. Although there exist modeling approaches to correct for this dependence, they are generally unsuitable for events with binary outcomes. In this paper, a Bayesian two-stage model is proposed to predict both individual and team rebound allocation. This approach makes it possible to identify players who help their team win the fight for rebounds, regardless of their individual rebounding totals. Although similar in flavor to the popular Adjusted Plus-Minus (APM) framework, the proposed strategy is different in that it does not assume that individual contributions are linearly additive on the response scale. Furthermore, the regularization approach is improved through rebounding-specific heuristics. A simulation study is performed to show the effectiveness of the proposed model, and the parameters are estimated using data from the 2020–21 NBA season. Predictions are then made for rebounding in the 2021–22 season. This study confirms that relying exclusively on individual rebounding rates could lead to the mis-evaluation of players’ rebounding abilities.

If professional teams can accurately predict the order of their league’s draft, they would have a competitive advantage when using or trading their draft picks. Many experts and enthusiasts publish forecasts of the order players are drafted into professional sports leagues, known as mock drafts. Using a novel dataset of mock drafts for the National Basketball Association (NBA), we explore mock drafts’ ability to forecast the actual draft. We analyze authors’ mock draft accuracy over time and ask how we can reasonably aggregate information from multiple authors. For both tasks, mock drafts are usually analyzed as ranked lists, and in this paper, we propose ways to improve on these methods. We propose that rank-biased distance is the appropriate error metric for measuring accuracy of mock drafts as ranked lists. To best combine information from multiple mock drafts into a single consensus mock draft, we also propose a combination method based on the ideas of ranked-choice voting. We show that this method provides improved forecasts over the standard Borda count combination method used for most similar analyses in sports, and that either combination method provides a more accurate forecast across seasons than any single author.

In the last decade, the offensive and defensive philosophies employed by teams in the National Basketball Association (NBA) have changed substantially. As a result, most players can no longer be classified into only one of the five traditional positions (PG, SG, SF, PF, C) and instead spend a percentage of their playing time at multiple positions, making positional data compositional. Further, given the desirability for versatile players, an argument can be made that traditional positions themselves are archaic. Using data from the 2016–17, 2017–18, and 2018–19 seasons, I explore how Bayesian hierarchical models can be used to estimate team defensive strength in three ways. First, only considering players classified by their majority traditional position. Second, by using compositional traditional positional data. Third, using compositional data from modern positions (archetypes) defined by fuzzy k -means clustering. I find that the fuzzy k -means approach leads to a modest improvement in both the root mean squared error and median 95 % posterior predictive interval width for the test data, and, more importantly, identifies 11 modern archetypes that, when combined, are correlated with team win total and adjusted team defensive rating. The modern archetype compositions can be used by stakeholders to better understand team defensive strength.