Home Hematemesis Caused by Forgotten Corrective Device
Article Open Access

Hematemesis Caused by Forgotten Corrective Device

  • In Chul An and Iftiker K. Ahmad
Published/Copyright: July 1, 2017

A 77-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain, coffee-ground emesis, and melena. Her medical history included type 2 diabetes mellitus, a hiatal hernia that was repaired more than 20 years prior, and pulmonary embolism. Her current medication included anticoagulation therapy to prevent pulmonary embolisms. Her vital signs were normal, but she appeared pale. A complete blood cell count showed a hemoglobin level of 7.8 g/dL. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed old blood clots in the patient's stomach and foreign material in the gastric fundus with an ischemic ulcer (image A). A computed tomographic scan of her abdomen revealed an abnormally positioned Angelchik prosthesis, from her previous hiatal hernia repair, eroding into her gastric fundus without pneumoperitoneum (image B, arrow). Anticoagulation therapy was discontinued, and an inferior vena cava filter was placed. The patient remained stable and was discharged 4 days after admission with recommendation for outpatient evaluation and prosthesis removal.

The Angelchik prosthesis is a C-shaped silicon ring developed in 1979 to fit across the gastroesophageal junction to manage gastroesophageal reflux disease and hiatal hernia.1 Its use has been discontinued because of high rates of dysphagia, prosthesis migration and erosion, and development of esophageal adenocarcinoma from persistent acid reflux.2,3


From the Department of Gastroenterology at McLaren-Greater Lansing Hospital (Dr An) in Michigan and the Michigan Gastroenterology Institute (Dr Ahmad) in East Lansing.
Financial Disclosures:
None reported.
Support: None reported.

*Address correspondence to In Chul An, DO, McLauren-Greater Lansing Hospital, 401 W Greenlawn Ave, Lansing, MI 48910-2819. E-mail:


References

1. Angelchik JP , CohenR. A new surgical procedure for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux and hiatal hernia. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1979;148(2):246-248.Search in Google Scholar

2. Shetty VD , ThrumurthySG, PursnaniKG, WardJB, MughalMM. Angelchik prosthesis with oesophageal adenocarcinoma: our surgical approach. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92(5):W64-W68. doi:10.1308/147870810X12699662980835Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Mercer SJ , TohSK, SomersSS. Esophageal adenocarcinoma developing above an Angelchik prosthesis. Dis Esophagus. 2007;20(6):546-548.10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00698.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Accepted: 2016-10-03
Published Online: 2017-07-01
Published in Print: 2017-07-01

© 2017 American Osteopathic Association

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 25.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.7556/jaoa.2017.097/html
Scroll to top button