Home Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Genetics, and Risk Stratification: Data Overload or Ready for a Breakthrough?
Article Open Access

Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Genetics, and Risk Stratification: Data Overload or Ready for a Breakthrough?

  • Simon B. Zeichner
Published/Copyright: July 1, 2012

To the Editor:

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) consists of a group of relatively well-defined hematopoietic neoplasms involving precursor cells committed to the myeloid line of cellular development. These neoplasms account for 80% of all adult leukemias, with an incidence of approximately 3 to 5 cases per 100,000.1,2

Until 2010, AML was classified according to the French-American-British classification system.3 This classification scheme, proposed in 1976, divided AML into 8 distinct subtypes (M0-M7) on the basis of type of cell from which the leukemia developed and the condition's degree of maturity. Classification relied heavily on the appearance of the malignant cells as seen with light microscopy.

With advancing technology and increasing insight provided by cytogenetics research, a new AML classification scheme was devised. In 2008, the World Health Organization (WHO) classified AML on the basis of a combination of morphologic, immunophenotypic, genetic, and clinical features.4 The 4 main groups in this WHO system were (1) AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities—inv(3), inv(16), t(1;22), t(6;9), t(8;21), t(9;11), t(15;17), mutated CEBPA, or mutated NPM1; (2) AML with features related to myelodysplastic syndromes; (3) therapy-related AML; and (4) AML not otherwise specified. This landmark WHO classification4 was notable not only because it allowed the incorporation of clinical and immunohistochemistry data with new genetic data, but also because it introduced genetic risk stratification into treatment for patients with AML.

Risk stratification was nothing new in cancer research. Since 1952, when Pierre Denoix of the Institute Gustave-Roussy devised the TNM (tumor, lymph nodes, metastasis) staging system for solid tumors, physicians around the world had been determined to devise improved ways to predict tumor behavior and patient survival.5 During the late 20th century—despite the advances in risk stratification for solid tumors—prognostication in hematologic malignancies, such as AML, remained difficult. Overall survival rates with AML treatment were extremely heterogeneous, and no one could easily predict which patients would do poorly. The only poor prognostic signs that had been identified for AML were advanced age at diagnosis (>55 years), poor performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score ⩾3), exposure to cytotoxic agents or radiation therapy, and history of previous myelodysplasia.6-15

In the early 21st century, with additional research and increased emphasis on cytogenetics, AML has been further subdivided on the basis of karyotype—favorable, intermediate, and unfavorable.16 Favorable karyotypes (occurring in 16% of patients) consist of inv(16), t(8;21), t(15;17), and t(16;16). Intermediate karyotypes (20% of patients) are those abnormalities not described as favorable or unfavorable. Unfavorable karyotypes (13% of patients) include add(5q), add(7q), del(5q), del(7q), inv(3), t(3;3), t(6;11), t(9;22), t(10;11), 17p abnormalities, monosomies 5 or 7, monosomy 17, and many others. Attesting to the heterogeneity of the disease, 10-year survival rates have been found to be 69%, 38%, 33%, and 12% for patients with favorable risk, normal karyotype, intermediate risk, and unfavorable risk, respectively.16

With the outpouring of genetics research and data in the 2000s, there have been continual questions within the research community regarding whether patient characteristics in the new WHO classification scheme correspond to other genetic abnormalities. Patients with therapy-related AML secondary to DNA topoisomerase inhibitors typically have been found to have abnormalities involving the MLL gene at chromosome locus 11q2317 or the RUNX1 gene at chromosome locus 21q22.18-22 There is a high frequency of the loss of the long arms of chromosomes 5 and 7 among patients with myelodysplasia-associated AML.23,24 In addition, patients with AML not otherwise specified have been found to have mutations in the FLT-3ITD/TKD, NRAS, BAALC, and WTI genes.25-41

Although correlating studies continue to this day, physicians currently have an abundance of prognostic information for their patients with AML. This information allows physicians to accurately risk-stratify patients on the basis of their extensive tumor profiles.

Despite the wealth of information acquired over the past 10 to 15 years, overall patient survival—the gold standard in cancer research—remains unchanged. Current standards of hematologic practice dictate that patients with poor cytogenetic profiles be evaluated for bone marrow transplant. However, no randomized, controlled trials have described benefits from this approach or whether certain chemotherapeutic regimens (excluding treatments for acute promyelocytic leukemia) are more effective for patients with certain cytogenetic abnormalities.

We have entered a new frontier in cancer research—a frontier full of hope and opportunity for improvement. Thousands of dedicated researchers have helped describe a multitude of genetic abnormalities associated with AML. However, this research is only a piece of the puzzle. We must expand our new knowledge and develop innovative approaches and treatment regimens for patients with AML to extend the overall survival rate of these individuals.

References

1 Sekeres MA Peterson B Dodge RK et al. Cancer and Leukemia Group B . Differences in prognostic factors and outcomes in African Americans and whites with acute myeloid leukemia[published online ahead of print February 19, 2004]. Blood. 2004;103(11):4036-4042.10.1182/blood-2003-09-3118Search in Google Scholar

2 Olesen LH Aggerholm A Andersen BL et al. . Molecular typing of adult acute myeloid leukaemia: significance of translocations, tandem duplications, methylation, and selective gene expression profiling. Br J Haematol.2005;131(4):457-467.10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05791.xSearch in Google Scholar

3 Bennett JM Catovsky D Daniel MT et al. . Proposals for the classification of the acute leukaemias. French-American-British (FAB) co-operative group. Br J Haematol.1976;33(4):451-458.10.1111/j.1365-2141.1976.tb03563.xSearch in Google Scholar

4 Vardiman JW Thiele J Arber DA et al. . The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes[published online ahead of print April 8, 2009]. Blood. 2009;114(5):937-951.10.1182/blood-2009-03-209262Search in Google Scholar

5 Denoix PF . Enquete permanent dans les centres anticancereaux [in French]. Bull Inst Nat Hyg.1946;1:70-75.Search in Google Scholar

6 Estey EH . Therapeutic options for acute myelogenous leukemia [review]. Cancer. 2001;92(5):1059-1073.10.1002/1097-0142(20010901)92:5<1059::AID-CNCR1421>3.0.CO;2-KSearch in Google Scholar

7 Creutzig U Büchner T Sauerland MC et al. . Significance of age in acute myeloid leukemia patients younger than 30 years: a common analysis of the pediatric trials AML-BFM 93/98 and the adult trials AMLCG 92/99 and AMLSG HD93/98A. Cancer. 2008;112(3):562-571.10.1002/cncr.23220Search in Google Scholar

8 Haferlach T Schoch C Löffler H et al. . Morphologic dysplasia in de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is related to unfavorable cytogenetics but has no independent prognostic relevance under the conditions of intensive induction therapy: results of a multiparameter analysis from the German AML Cooperative Group studies. J Clin Oncol.2003;21(2): 256-265.10.1200/JCO.2003.08.005Search in Google Scholar

9 Appelbaum FR Gundacker H Head DR et al. . Age and acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2006;107 (9):3481-3485.10.1182/blood-2005-09-3724Search in Google Scholar

10 Swerdlow SH Campo E Harris NL et al. , eds. WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2008.Search in Google Scholar

11 Leith CP Kopecky KJ Godwin J et al. . Acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly: assessment of multidrug resistance (MDR1) and cytogenetics distinguishes biologic subgroups with remarkably distinct responses to standard chemotherapy. A Southwest Oncology Group study. Blood. 1997;89(9): 3323-3329.10.1182/blood.V89.9.3323Search in Google Scholar

12 Manoharan A Baker RI Kyle PW . Low-dose combination chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia in elderly patients: a novel approach. Am J Hematol.1997;55(2):115-117.10.1002/(SICI)1096-8652(199706)55:2<115::AID-AJH12>3.0.CO;2-DSearch in Google Scholar

13 Wahlin A Markevärn B Golovleva I Nilsson M . Prognostic significance of risk group stratification in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol.2001;115(1):25-33.10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.03043.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

14 Letendre L Noel P Litzow MR Hoagland HC Tefferi A . Treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia in the older patient with attenuated high-dose ara-C. Am J Clin Oncol.1998;21(2):142-144.10.1097/00000421-199804000-00009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15 Bello C Yu D Komrokji RS et al. . Outcomes after induction chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia arising from myelodysplastic syndrome[published online ahead of print November 8, 2010]. Cancer. 2011;117(7):1463-1469. doi:10.1002/cncr.25598.10.1002/cncr.25598Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16 Grimwade D Hills RK Moorman AV et al. National Cancer Research Institute Adult Leukaemia Working Group . Refinement of cytogenetic classification in acute myeloid leukemia: determination of prognostic significance of rare recurring chromosomal abnormalities among 5876 younger adult patients treated in the United Kingdom Medical Research Council trials[published online ahead of print April 12, 2010]. Blood. 2010;116(3):354-365.10.1182/blood-2009-11-254441Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17 Libura J Slater DJ Felix CA Richardson C . Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia-like MLL rearrangements are induced by etoposide in primary human CD34+ cells and remain stable after clonal expansion[published online ahead of print November 4, 2004]. Blood. 2005;105(5):2124-2131.10.1182/blood-2004-07-2683Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18 Godley LA Larson RA . Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloid leukemia. In: SteensmaDP, ed. Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Pathobiology and Clinical Management. 2nd ed.New York, NY: Informa Healthcare; 2008:418-427.Search in Google Scholar

19 Pedersen-Bjergaard J Rowley JD . The balanced and the unbalanced chromosome aberrations of acute myeloid leukemia may develop in different ways and may contribute differently to malignant transformation. Blood. 1994;83(10):2780-2786.10.1182/blood.V83.10.2780.2780Search in Google Scholar

20 Pedersen-Bjergaard J Pedersen M Roulston D Philip P . Different genetic pathways in leukemogenesis for patients presenting with therapy-related myelodysplasia and therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 1995;86(9):3542-3552.10.1182/blood.V86.9.3542.bloodjournal8693542Search in Google Scholar

21 Pui CH Relling MV . Topoisomerase II inhibitor-related acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol.2000;109(1):13-23.10.1046/j.1365-2141.2000.01843.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

22 Pedersen-Bjergaard J Philip P . Balanced translocations involving chromosome bands 11q23 and 21q22 are highly characteristic of myelodysplasia and leukemia following therapy with cytostatic agents targeting at DNA-topoisomerase II. Blood. 1991;78(4):1147-1148.10.1182/blood.V78.4.1147.1147Search in Google Scholar

23 Chen G Zeng W Miyazato A et al. . Distinctive gene expression profiles of CD34 cells from patients with myelodysplastic syndrome characterized by specific chromosomal abnormalities[published online ahead of print August 17, 2004]. Blood. 2004;104(13):4210-4218.10.1182/blood-2004-01-0103Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24 Le Beau MM Espinosa R III Neuman WL et al. . Cytogenetic and molecular delineation of the smallest commonly deleted region of chromosome 5 in malignant myeloid diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90(12):5484-5488.10.1073/pnas.90.12.5484Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25 Santamaría CM Chillón MC García-Sanz R et al. . Molecular stratification model for prognosis in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2009;114(1):148-152.10.1182/blood-2008-11-187724Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26 Marcucci G Mrózek K Bloomfield CD . Molecular heterogeneity and prognostic biomarkers in adults with acute myeloid leukemia and normal cytogenetics. Curr Opin Hematol.2005;12(1):68-75.10.1097/01.moh.0000149608.29685.d1Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27 Bienz M Ludwig M Leibundgut EO et al. . Risk assessment in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and a normal karyotype. Clin Cancer Res.2005;11(4): 1416-1424.10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1552Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28 Marcucci G Baldus CD Ruppert AS et al. . Overexpression of the ETS-related gene, ERG, predicts a worse outcome in acute myeloid leukemia with normal karyotype: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. J Clin Oncol.2005;23(36):9234-9242.10.1200/JCO.2005.03.6137Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29 Monzo M Brunet S Urbano-Ispizua A et al. CETLAM . Genomic polymorphisms provide prognostic information in intermediate-risk acute myeloblastic leukemia. Blood. 2006;107(12):4871-4879.10.1182/blood-2005-08-3272Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30 Pasqualucci L Liso A Martelli MP et al. . Mutated nucleophosmin detects clonal multilineage involvement in acute myeloid leukemia: impact on WHO classification. Blood. 2006;108(13):4146-4155.10.1182/blood-2006-06-026716Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31 Marcucci G Maharry K Whitman SP et al. . High expression levels of the ETS-related gene, ERG, predict adverse outcome and improve molecular risk-based classification of cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. J Clin Oncol.2007;25(22):3337-3343.10.1200/JCO.2007.10.8720Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32 Langer C Radmacher MD Ruppert AS et al. . High BAALC expression associates with other molecular prognostic markers, poor outcome, and a distinct gene-expression signature in cytogenetically normal patients younger than 60 years with acute myeloid leukemia: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) study. Blood. 2008;111(11):5371-5379.10.1182/blood-2007-11-124958Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

33 Andreeff M Ruvolo V Gadgil S et al. . HOX expression patterns identify a common signature for favorable AML. Leukemia. 2008;22(11):2041-2047.10.1038/leu.2008.198Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

34 Metzeler KH Dufour A Benthaus T et al. . ERG expression is an independent prognostic factor and allows refined risk stratification in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia: a comprehensive analysis of ERG, MN1, and BAALC transcript levels using oligonucleotide microarrays. J Clin Oncol.2009;27(30):5031-5038.10.1200/JCO.2008.20.5328Search in Google Scholar PubMed

35 Marcucci G Maharry K Wu YZ et al. . IDH1 and IDH2 gene mutations identify novel molecular subsets within de novo cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. J Clin Oncol.2010;28(14):2348-2355.10.1200/JCO.2009.27.3730Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

36 Wagner K Damm F Göhring G et al. . Impact of IDH1 R132 mutations and an IDH1 single nucleotide polymorphism in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia: SNP rs11554137 is an adverse prognostic factor. J Clin Oncol.2010;28(14):2356-2364.10.1200/JCO.2009.27.6899Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37 Paschka P Schlenk RF Gaidzik VI et al. . IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are frequent genetic alterations in acute myeloid leukemia and confer adverse prognosis in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia with NPM1 mutation without FLT3 internal tandem duplication. J Clin Oncol.2010;28(22):3636-3643.10.1200/JCO.2010.28.3762Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38 Abbas S Lugthart S Kavelaars FG et al. . Acquired mutations in the genes encoding IDH1 and IDH2 both are recurrent aberrations in acute myeloid leukemia: prevalence and prognostic value. Blood. 2010;116(12):2122-2126.10.1182/blood-2009-11-250878Search in Google Scholar PubMed

39 Green CL Evans CM Hills RK et al. . The prognostic significance of IDH1 mutations in younger adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia is dependent on FLT3/ITD status. Blood. 2010;116(15): 2779-2782.10.1182/blood-2010-02-270926Search in Google Scholar PubMed

40 Schnittger S Haferlach C Ulke M Alpermann T Kern W Haferlach T . IDH1 mutations are detected in 6.6% of 1414 AML patients and are associated with intermediate risk karyotype and unfavorable prognosis in adults younger than 60 years and unmutated NPM1 status. Blood. 2010;116(25):5486-5496.10.1182/blood-2010-02-267955Search in Google Scholar PubMed

41 Schwind S Marcucci G Maharry K et al. . BAALC and ERG expression levels are associated with outcome and distinct gene and microRNA expression profiles in older patients with de novo cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. Blood. 2010;116(25):5660-5669.10.1182/blood-2010-06-290536Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Published Online: 2012-07-01
Published in Print: 2012-07-01

© 2012 The American Osteopathic Association

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. AOA Communication (Reprints)
  2. Official Call
  3. Proposed Amendments to the AOA Constitution and Code of Ethics and New “Rules and Guidelines”
  4. Letters
  5. Efficacy of a Physician's Words of Empathy: An Overview of State Apology Laws
  6. Ecthyma Gangrenosum Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa
  7. The Somatic Connection
  8. “How much lymph can a lymph pump pump if a lymph pump can pump lymph?”
  9. Myofascial Release Therapy's Effect on Immune System in Breast Cancer Survivors Modulated by Positive Attitude
  10. Myofascial Trigger Point Massage Reduces Pain of Chronic Tension-Type Headache
  11. Massage Shown to Benefit Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
  12. Oropharyngeal Exercises Improve Sleep Apnea
  13. Adjunctive OMT May Improve Exercise Capacity for Patients With Severe COPD
  14. Special Reports
  15. Joining Forces Initiative: Steps Toward Improved Care for Military Personnel
  16. Military Medicine Content in an Osteopathic Medical School's Curriculum
  17. Original Contributions
  18. Somatic Dysfunction and Its Association With Chronic Low Back Pain, Back-Specific Functioning, and General Health: Results From the OSTEOPATHIC Trial
  19. Cervical Spine Bending: A Factor Confounding Whole Trunk and Lumbar Forward Bending Range of Motion
  20. Use of and Attitudes Toward Complementary and Alternative Medicine Among Osteopathic Medical Students
  21. Special Communication
  22. A New Triadic Paradigm for Osteopathic Research in Real-World Settings
  23. Case Report
  24. Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment to Resolve Head and Neck Pain After Tooth Extraction
  25. Clinical Images
  26. Sister Mary Joseph Nodule From Prostate Cancer
  27. Letters
  28. Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Genetics, and Risk Stratification: Data Overload or Ready for a Breakthrough?
  29. Thinking Osteopathically
  30. Correction
  31. Correction
  32. CME Quiz
  33. CME Quiz
Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.7556/jaoa.2012.112.7.463/html
Scroll to top button