Home Imaging Gently: A Call for Awareness
Article Open Access

Imaging Gently: A Call for Awareness

  • Sue C. Kaste
Published/Copyright: March 1, 2012
Download Article (PDF)
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
From the journal Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Volume 112 Issue 3

Since publication of a study by Brenner and colleagues in the American Journal of Roentgenology1 about 10 years ago, concern about possible induction of added cancers due to patient exposure to ionizing radiation from medical imaging—particularly computed tomography (CT)—has continued to grow.2,3 Increasing concern by the public and health care providers alike about overuse of medical imaging and the appreciation of the potential for excessive patient exposure has prompted reassessment of the use of these critical patient care tools.

Of particular concern is that pediatric patients may be exposed to excessive and sometimes unnecessary ionizing radiation associated with medical imaging. Children are up to 10 times more susceptible to potential radiation-induced toxicities for several reasons.1 The younger the child, the more radiation-sensitive are their developing tissues.4,5 Children have a longer expected lifetime during which adverse sequelae such as radiation-induced cancers, cataracts, and marrow suppression may manifest. Compared with adults, children's small size and typically low percentage of body fat, especially in very young patients, allow increased absorption of the radiation beam.5 Do these concerns mean that CT, radiography, and fluoroscopy should be abandoned? Of course not. Results from these tests provide information critical to the care of patients. However, as with any drug, imaging should be used only for appropriate indications and should be sized for the patient.5-9

In response to these concerns, the Society for Pediatric Radiology, led by Marilyn Goske, MD, spearheaded the organization of the Alliance for Radiation Safety in Pediatric Imaging—or the Image Gently Alliance—in 2007. The goal of the Alliance is straightforward: to change practice, and to raise awareness of the opportunities to lower radiation dose in the imaging of children.7,10-12 Notably, the founding organizations represented a wide spectrum of health care providers whose roles related to medical imaging: the Society for Pediatric Radiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Society of Radiologic Technologists, and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Supporting groups have expanded the initiatives even more broadly to include equipment manufacturers, governmental agencies, multiple disciplines, and international societies; now numbering 69 organizations (including the American Osteopathic College of Radiology), these groups are working together to improve patient care through medical imaging while controlling patient exposure to ionizing radiation.10 In other words, this large international multidisciplinary alliance is working to promote the principles of using radiation doses in medical imaging that are As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) while obtaining critical diagnostic information.

Numerous publications address methods for limiting patient exposures to ionizing radiation while obtaining diagnostic quality studies. However, evidence-based usage of imaging often lags behind incorporation of techniques into the clinical arena. Further, children and adolescents are often imaged using adult techniques. Examinations frequently lack tailoring for their age and size, risking exposure of pediatric patients to excessive and potentially unnecessary radiation.

Investigations are now emerging to guide imaging usage as applicable to a given clinical scenario. One such example is evidenced by numerous studies addressing the diagnosis of appendicitis in pediatric patients and the roles and limitations of imaging in these patients.13-22 Unlike the clinical presentation in adults, the clinical diagnosis of appendicitis in children is often-times “atypical.” To improve diagnostic accuracy, several pediatric-specific scoring systems that have been devised23,24 and evaluated25 incorporate clinical signs and symptoms with laboratory values. Patient demographics and imaging findings may then be used to augment decision making. Because of the difficulty in diagnosing appendicitis in the pediatric population, imaging assessment may be used to optimize diagnostic accuracy, minimize misdiagnosis, and curtail “negative appendectomy rates.”26,27

In this month's issue of JAOA—The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, Anandan and Marino28 report the findings from their investigation of the usage patterns of abdominal-pelvic CT and ultrasonograhy when assessing pediatric patients in whom appendicitis was clinically suspected. During the 3-month study period, 36 pediatric patients aged 8 to 22 years were identified who had surgical proof of appendicitis. Using a modification of the Samuel scoring system,23 the authors retrospectively correlated imaging findings with surgical findings and through medical record review sought whether or not imaging impacted clinical decisions. Thirty-three of the 36 patients who made up the study cohort underwent CT evaluation; 30 of those CT evaluations were ordered by the emergency department of a large regional teaching hospital. In none of the medical records were the authors able to identify a comment indicating that results of imaging critically impacted patient care.28

Although the study is limited by the small retrospectively assessed patient cohort, it highlights the responsibility of health care providers to critically assess diagnostic schema, re-evaluate limitations and strengths of imaging, and assess strategies for imaging use in patient care. Specifically related to ALARA principles, such an exercise provides an opportunity to raise awareness of potential risks associated with pediatric patient exposure to ionizing radiation from medical imaging and prompts us to critically consider alternate approaches to patient assessment.

In the future, the diagnosis of appendicitis may use a combination of clinical assessment, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), obviating any patient exposure to ionizing radiation. Preliminary reports on the use of MRI in children show promise and adhere to ALARA principles.29-32 As MRI techniques evolve, sequences become faster, and MRI availability becomes more universal, its utility might expand.

Thus, MRI may modify the use of CT in evaluating cases in which findings from clinical assessment and ultrasonography are inconclusive.

Dr Kaste is the president-elect of the Society for Pediatric Radiology, a member of the Image Gently Steering Committee, a member of the departments of radiological sciences and oncology at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, and a professor in the Department of Radiology at the University of Tennessee School of Health Sciences, also in Memphis.

Address correspondence to Sue C. Kaste, DO, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place MSN 220, Memphis, TN 38105-3678. E-mail:

  1. Financial Disclosures: None reported.

References

1 Brenner D Elliston C Hall E Berdon W . Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(2):289-296.10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760289Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2 Larson DB Johnson LW Schnell BM Goske MJ Salisbury SR Forman HP . Rising use of CT in child visits to the emergency department in the United States, 1995-2008[published online ahead of print April 5, 2011]. Radiology. 2011;259(3):793-801.10.1148/radiol.11101939Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3 Broder JS . CT utilization: the emergency department perspective[published online ahead of print September 23, 2008]. Pediatr Radiol. 2008;38(suppl 4):S664-S669.10.1007/s00247-008-0892-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

4 Hall EJ . Introduction to session I: helical CT and cancer risk[published online ahead of print March 6, 2002]. Pediatr Radiol. 2002;32(4):225-227.10.1007/s00247-002-0670-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5 Hall EJ . Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology[published online ahead of print July 19, 2002]. Pediatr Radiol. 2002;32(10):700-706.10.1007/s00247-002-0774-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6 Brenner DJ . Slowing the increase in the population dose resulting from CT scans[published online ahead of print August 23, 2010]. Radiat Res. 2010;174(6):809-815.10.1667/RR1859.1Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7 Goske MJ Applegate KE Boylan J et al. . The Image Gently campaign: working together to change practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(2):273-274.10.2214/AJR.07.3526Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8 Strauss KJ Goske MJ Kaste SC et al. . Image gently: ten steps you can take to optimize image quality and lower CT dose for pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(4):868-873.10.2214/AJR.09.4091Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9 Hall EJ Brenner DJ . Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Br J Radiol. 2008;81(965):362-378.10.1259/bjr/01948454Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10 The Alliance for Radiation Safety in Pediatric Imaging. ImageGently Web site. http://www.pedrad.org/associations/5364/ig/. Accessed February 8, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

11 Goske MJ Frush DP Schauer DA . Image Gently campaign promotes radiation protection for children. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2009;135(4):276.10.1093/rpd/ncp114Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12 Goske MJ Applegate KE Boylan J et al. . The ‘Image Gently’ campaign: increasing CT radiation dose awareness through a national education and awareness program[published online ahead of print January 17, 2008]. Pediatr Radiol. 2008;38(3):265-269.10.1007/s00247-007-0743-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13 Zakaria OM Sultan TA Khalil TH Wahba T Abd El Bari E . Role of clinical judgment and tissue harmonic imaging ultrasonography in diagnosis of paediatric acute appendicitis. World J Emerg Surg. 2011;6:39.10.1186/1749-7922-6-39Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14 Emil S Mikhail P Laberge JM et al. . Clinical versus sonographic evaluation of acute appendicitis in children: a comparison of patient characteristics and outcomes. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36(5):780-783.10.1053/jpsu.2001.22960Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15 Stephen AE Segev DL Ryan DP et al. . The diagnosis of acute appendicitis in a pediatric population: to CT or not to CT. J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38(3):367-371.10.1053/jpsu.2003.50110Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16 Bachur RG Hennelly K Callahan MJ Monuteaux MC . Advanced radiologic imaging for pediatric appendicitis, 2005-2009: trends and outcomes[published online ahead of print December 20, 2011]. J Pediatr. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.11.037.10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.11.037Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17 Poletti PA Platon A De Perrot T et al. . Acute appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a diagnostic algorithm integrating ultrasound and low-dose CT to reduce the need of standard CT[published online ahead of print July 30, 2011]. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(12):2558-2566.10.1007/s00330-011-2212-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18 Abo A Shannon M Taylor G Bachur R . The influence of body mass index on the accuracy of ultrasound and computed tomography in diagnosing appendicitis in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011;27(8):731-736.10.1097/PEC.0b013e318226c8b0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19 Krishnamoorthi R Ramarajan N Wang NE et al. . Effectiveness of a staged US and CT protocol for the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis: reducing radiation exposure in the age of ALARA[published online ahead of print January 28, 2011]. Radiology. 2011;259(1):231-239.10.1148/radiol.10100984Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20 Reed MH . Imaging utilization commentary: a radiology perspective[published online ahead of print September 23, 2008]. Pediatr Radiol. 2008;38(suppl 4):S660-S663.10.1007/s00247-008-0982-ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed

21 Doria AS Moineddin R Kellenberger CJ et al. . US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? a meta-analysis[published online ahead of print August 23, 2006]. Radiology. 2006;241(1):83-94.10.1148/radiol.2411050913Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22 Rosen MP Ding A Blake MA et al. . ACR Appropriateness Criteria right lower quadrant pain—suspected appendicitis. J Am Coll Radiol. 2011;8(11):749-755.10.1016/j.jacr.2011.07.010Search in Google Scholar

23 Samuel M . Pediatric appendicitis score. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37(6):877-88110.1053/jpsu.2002.32893Search in Google Scholar

24 Alvarado A . A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. 1986;15(5):557-564.10.1016/S0196-0644(86)80993-3Search in Google Scholar

25 Schneider C Kharbanda A Bachur R . Evaluating appendicitis scoring systems using a prospective pediatric cohort[published online ahead of print March 26, 2007]. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49(6):778-784.e1.10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.12.016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26 Becker T Kharbanda A Bachur R . Atypical clinical features of pediatric appendicitis[published online ahead of print December 27, 2006]. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14(2):124-129.10.1197/j.aem.2006.08.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27 Terasawa T Blackmore CC Bent S Kohlwes RJ . Systematic review: computed tomography and ultrasonography to detect acute appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(7):537-546.10.7326/0003-4819-141-7-200410050-00011Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28 Anandan S Marino RV . Use of computed tomography in diagnosing appendicitis: redundant, expensive, toxic, and potentially unnecessary. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2012;112(3):121-125.Search in Google Scholar

29 Inci E Hocaoglu E Aydin S et al. . Efficiency of unenhanced MRI in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: comparison with Alvarado scoring system and histopathological results[published online ahead of print July 22, 2010]. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80 (2):253-258.10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.06.037Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30 Chabanova E Balslev I Achiam M et al. . Unenhanced MR Imaging in adults with clinically suspected acute appendicitis[published online ahead of print March 29, 2010]. Eur J Radiol. 2011;79(2):206-210.10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.03.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31 Hörmann M . MR imaging of the gastro-intestinal tract in children[published online ahead of print August 31, 2008]. Eur J Radiol. 2008;68(2):271-277.10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.07.019Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32 Nitta N Takahashi M Furukawa A Murata K Mori M Fukushima M . MR imaging of the normal appendix and acute appendicitis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;21(2):156-165.10.1002/jmri.20241Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Published Online: 2012-03-01
Published in Print: 2012-03-01

© 2012 The American Osteopathic Association

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Corrections
  2. Corrections
  3. Letters
  4. Support Legislation to Address Shortage of Chemotherapy Drugs
  5. Road Map for Curricular Development and Professional Success: The Life Cycle of a Primary Care Physician
  6. Editorials
  7. Realigning the JAOA: We Are Listening and Changing
  8. Imaging Gently: A Call for Awareness
  9. Original Contribution
  10. Use of Computed Tomography in Diagnosing Appendicitis: Redundant, Expensive, Toxic, and Potentially Unnecessary
  11. Review
  12. Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
  13. Case Report
  14. Elevated Factor VIII: An Unfamiliar Risk Factor for Cerebral Venous Thrombosis
  15. Clinical Images
  16. Unusual Case of Massive Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
  17. Book Reviews
  18. Charlotte Weaver: Pioneer in Cranial Osteopathy
  19. CME Quiz
  20. CME Quiz
https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2012.112.3.119
Creative Commons
BY-NC-ND 4.0

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Corrections
  2. Corrections
  3. Letters
  4. Support Legislation to Address Shortage of Chemotherapy Drugs
  5. Road Map for Curricular Development and Professional Success: The Life Cycle of a Primary Care Physician
  6. Editorials
  7. Realigning the JAOA: We Are Listening and Changing
  8. Imaging Gently: A Call for Awareness
  9. Original Contribution
  10. Use of Computed Tomography in Diagnosing Appendicitis: Redundant, Expensive, Toxic, and Potentially Unnecessary
  11. Review
  12. Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
  13. Case Report
  14. Elevated Factor VIII: An Unfamiliar Risk Factor for Cerebral Venous Thrombosis
  15. Clinical Images
  16. Unusual Case of Massive Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
  17. Book Reviews
  18. Charlotte Weaver: Pioneer in Cranial Osteopathy
  19. CME Quiz
  20. CME Quiz
Sign up now to receive a 20% welcome discount
Institutional Access
How does access work?
Have an idea on how to improve our website?
Please write us.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.7556/jaoa.2012.112.3.119/html
Scroll to top button