Home History 11. Romanization without Rome: China’s Latin New Script and Soviet Central Asia
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

11. Romanization without Rome: China’s Latin New Script and Soviet Central Asia

View more publications by Harvard University Press
Asia Inside Out
This chapter is in the book Asia Inside Out
Romanization without RomeChina’s Latin New Script and Soviet Central Asiajing tsuIn recent years, there has been a burgeoning interest in how things tie to-gether rather than stay apart. Th e growing awareness of historically fl uid, moveable boundaries has sparked new interpretations of Asia. Some of these connections are currently colliding in innovative ways. In search of a nar-rative that builds less on the indictment of any single state or past colonial power, humanists and social scientists turn their gaze to the inner and global dynamics of Asia—and even of multiple Asias. Still coming to light, the overlay of old and new linkages across its tight and vast regions has led crit-ics to choose diff erent bars of comparison. Some argue for Asia as a method (Takeuchi 2005; Frank 1988; Chen 2010), i.e., articulating its historical formation as not a resistance to the outside but an unfulfi lled path. Others turn to the borderlands and divided continents as a window into proprietary histories (Perdue 2005; Struve 2004; Lewis and Wigen 1997). Meanwhile, there are still those who prefer the analysis of national entities writ large. In this last instance, China is garnering special attention as a possible new breed of global power that diff ers in kind from the European and American variety of recent centuries.

Romanization without RomeChina’s Latin New Script and Soviet Central Asiajing tsuIn recent years, there has been a burgeoning interest in how things tie to-gether rather than stay apart. Th e growing awareness of historically fl uid, moveable boundaries has sparked new interpretations of Asia. Some of these connections are currently colliding in innovative ways. In search of a nar-rative that builds less on the indictment of any single state or past colonial power, humanists and social scientists turn their gaze to the inner and global dynamics of Asia—and even of multiple Asias. Still coming to light, the overlay of old and new linkages across its tight and vast regions has led crit-ics to choose diff erent bars of comparison. Some argue for Asia as a method (Takeuchi 2005; Frank 1988; Chen 2010), i.e., articulating its historical formation as not a resistance to the outside but an unfulfi lled path. Others turn to the borderlands and divided continents as a window into proprietary histories (Perdue 2005; Struve 2004; Lewis and Wigen 1997). Meanwhile, there are still those who prefer the analysis of national entities writ large. In this last instance, China is garnering special attention as a possible new breed of global power that diff ers in kind from the European and American variety of recent centuries.
Downloaded on 23.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.4159/9780674286320-011/html?lang=en&srsltid=AfmBOopipqzQftFXq2ceXaqByP1EfZ9K8bsBR7tUNKbD5ZAa-460_KZi
Scroll to top button