Home Literary Studies 13. Scourges of the Negro Family
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

13. Scourges of the Negro Family

View more publications by Rutgers University Press
E. Franklin Frazier Reconsidered
This chapter is in the book E. Franklin Frazier Reconsidered
13 Scourges of the Negro Family Frazier is variously celebrated and impugned for his pioneering studies of the Afro-American family. A close look suggests a more complex judgment about the originality of his scholarship, his innovative contri-butions, and problems in his analytical framework. It is necessary to get beyond a reductionist assessment—whether to idealize him as the "great man" of black sociology or to discredit him as the founder of the pathology perspective—and situate his ideas about the family in their historical and social context. Origins It has been argued that Frazier's work on the Afro-American family can be traced to the Chicago school. There is some truth to the claim, but, again, this one-dimensional interpretation underestimates both the va-riety of forces that influenced Frazier and also his own creativity and initiative. Frazier himself recalled that his first interest in the Afro-American family predated his studies in Chicago and was sparked by reading Du Bois's 1908 study, The Negro American Family, and work-ing as a social worker in the South. "My feeling in regard to the work which some of us are doing," Frazier wrote Du Bois in 1939, "has been that we are building upon a tradition inaugurated by you in the Atlanta studies."1 The tendency to ignore or underestimate Du Bois's influence on Frazier is echoed more generally by historians of sociology who typically do not take Du Bois seriously as a pioneer in the social sciences.2 Frazier's acknowledgment of Du Bois's influence was not just a po-lite gesture. His early work on the family was very much indebted to 133
© 1991 Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick

13 Scourges of the Negro Family Frazier is variously celebrated and impugned for his pioneering studies of the Afro-American family. A close look suggests a more complex judgment about the originality of his scholarship, his innovative contri-butions, and problems in his analytical framework. It is necessary to get beyond a reductionist assessment—whether to idealize him as the "great man" of black sociology or to discredit him as the founder of the pathology perspective—and situate his ideas about the family in their historical and social context. Origins It has been argued that Frazier's work on the Afro-American family can be traced to the Chicago school. There is some truth to the claim, but, again, this one-dimensional interpretation underestimates both the va-riety of forces that influenced Frazier and also his own creativity and initiative. Frazier himself recalled that his first interest in the Afro-American family predated his studies in Chicago and was sparked by reading Du Bois's 1908 study, The Negro American Family, and work-ing as a social worker in the South. "My feeling in regard to the work which some of us are doing," Frazier wrote Du Bois in 1939, "has been that we are building upon a tradition inaugurated by you in the Atlanta studies."1 The tendency to ignore or underestimate Du Bois's influence on Frazier is echoed more generally by historians of sociology who typically do not take Du Bois seriously as a pioneer in the social sciences.2 Frazier's acknowledgment of Du Bois's influence was not just a po-lite gesture. His early work on the family was very much indebted to 133
© 1991 Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick
Downloaded on 14.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.36019/9780813586953-015/pdf?licenseType=restricted&srsltid=AfmBOoqFuwtGtyyzxC9h7qLj5sTm0CYD0oJO7n8qqNu5D7g0opkiFGTP
Scroll to top button