Sensitive Potentiometric Method for Determination of Micromolar Level of Polyethoxylated Nonionic Surfactants in Effluents
-
M. Sak-Bosnar
Abstract
The Metrohm NIO surfactant electrode has been used as end-point indicator for potentiometric titration of low concentration level of polyethoxylated nonionic surfactants. This can be achieved by using of a diluted titrant concentration, thus reducing the amount of precipitate formed during titration and preventing the electrode deterioration. The solutions of low levels (down to 10−6 mol/L) of selected nonionic surfactants containing 5 to 23 EO groups were successfully titrated with diluted (as low as 10−4 mol/L) sodium tetraphenylborate as standard anionic titrant, increasing up to 20 times the sensitivity of the method. The low surfactant concentration has been determined in synthetic formulations of widely used detergent products and industrial waste waters. The titration end-point has been determined by applying extended Savitzky-Golay least-squares regression. The accuracy and precision has been evaluated by using the standard addition method. Relative standard deviation within results was between 3.4 and 12.8 % depending on the sample complexity and the surfactant concentration level.
Kurzfassung
Eine Metrohm NIO-Tensidelektrode wurde bei der potentiometrischen Titration polyethoxylierter nichtionischer Tenside in niedriger Konzentration zur Endpunktbestimmung verwendet. Das kann mit Hilfe einer verdünnten Titrant-Konzentration erreicht werden, wodurch die während der Titration gebildete Niederschlagsmenge reduziert und eine Elektrodenschädigung verhindert wird. Die Lösungen mit geringem Gehalt (bis zu 10−6 mol/L) an ausgewählten nichtionischen Tensiden, die 5 bis 23 EO-Gruppen enthalten, wurden mit verdünntem (bis zu 10−4 mol/L) Natriumtetraphenylborat als anionischer Standard-Titrant erfolgreich titriert. Die Empfindlichkeit der Methode wurde dadurch bis zu 20 mal erhöht. Die niedrige Tensidkonzentration wurde in synthetischen Formulierungen weit verbreiteter Wasch- und Reinigungsmitteln und in industriellen Abwässern bestimmt. Der Titrationsendpunkt wurde mittels einer erweiterten Savitzky-Golay-Regressionsanalyse bestimmt. Die Genauigkeit und Präzision wurde durch Verwendung der Standard-Additions-Methode bewertet. Die relative Standardabweichung innerhalb der Ergebnisse lag je nach Probenkomplexität und Tensidekonzentration zwischen 3,4 und 12,8 %.
References
1.Levins, R. J. and Ikeda, R. M.: Direct potentiometric titration of polyethylene glycols and their derivatives with sodium tetraphenylboron, Anal. Chem.37(1965)671–675. 10.1021/ac60225a010Search in Google Scholar
2.Delduca, P. G., Jaber, A. M. Y., Moody, G. J. and Thomas, J. D. R.: Tetraphenylborate salts of alkali and alkaline earth metal complex cations, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem.40(1978)187–193. 10.1016/0022-1902(78)80108-0Search in Google Scholar
3.Vytras, K., Dvorakova, V. and Zeman, I.: Titrations of non-ionic surfactants with sodium tetraphenylborate using simple potentiometric sensors, Analyst114(1989)1435–1441. 10.1039/an9891401435Search in Google Scholar
4.Vytras, K., Varmuzova, I. and Kalous, J.: A potentiometric study and determination of compounds containing poly(oxypropylene) chains, Electrochim. Acta40(1995)3015–3020. 10.1016/0013-4686(95)00236-8Search in Google Scholar
5.Jones, D. L., Moody, G. J. and Thomas, J. D. R.: Potentiometry of alkoxylates, Analyst106(1981)439–447. 10.1039/an9810600439Search in Google Scholar
6.Jones, D. L., Moody, G. J., Thomas, J. D. R. and Birch, B. J.: Barium-polyethoxylate complexes as potentiometric sensors and their application to the determination of non-ionic surfactants, Analyst106(1981)974–984. 10.1039/an9810600974Search in Google Scholar
7.Alexander, P. H. V., Moody, G. J. and Thomas, J. D. R.: Electrode membrane and solvent extraction parameters relating to the potentiometry of polyalkoxylates, Analyst112(1987)113–120. 10.1039/an9871200113Search in Google Scholar
8.Moody, G. J. and Thomas, J. D. R.: Potentiometry of oxyalkylates in nonionic surfactants chemical analysis, M. Dekker Inc., New York, (1987)117–136.Search in Google Scholar
9.Moody, G. J., Thomas, J. D. R., Lima, J. L. F. C. and Machado, A. S. C.: Characterisation of poly(vinyl chloride) barium ion-selective electrodes without an internal reference solution, Analyst113(1988)1023–1027. 10.1039/an9881301023Search in Google Scholar
10.Ivanov, V. N. and Pravshin, Yu. S.: Determination of nonionogenic surfactants using ion-selective electrodes, J. Anal. Chem.41(1986)291–295.Search in Google Scholar
11.Okada, T.: Complexation of poly(oxyethylene) in analytical chemistry, A review, Analyst118(1993)959–971. 10.1039/an9931800959Search in Google Scholar
12.Chernova, R. K., Kulapina, E. G., Materova, E. A., Kulapin, A. I. and Tret'yachenko, E. V.: Electrochemical and analytical properties of surfactant-selective electrodes, J. Anal. Chem.50(1995)643–651.Search in Google Scholar
13.Kulapina, E. G. and Apukhtina, L. V.: Selective electrodes based on Ba2+-polyethoxylate-tetraphenylborate, J. Anal. Chem.52(1997)1151–1156.Search in Google Scholar
14.Chernova, R. K., Kulapina, E. G., Materova, E. A., Chernova, M. A., Tret'yachenko, E. V., Novikova, L. V., Channova, G. K. and Ochneva, N. I.: Ionometric determination of the number of oxyethyl groups of nonionogenic surfactants, Zavod. Labor.58(1992)6–8.Search in Google Scholar
15.Gallegos, R. D.: Titration of non-ionic surfactants with sodium tetraphenylborate using the Orion surfactant electrode, Analyst118(1993)1137–1141. 10.1039/an9931801137Search in Google Scholar
16.Khmel'nitskaya, E. Yu. and Kolokolov, B. N.: Determination of the number of oxyethyl groups in nonionic surfactants using ion-selective electrodes, J. Anal. Chem.50(1995)1108–1110.Search in Google Scholar
17.Kulapina, E. G. and Apukhtina, L.V.: A study of the state of electroactive compounds of nonionic surfactant-selective electrodes in dibutyl phtalate, J. Anal. Chem.53(1998)140–143.Search in Google Scholar
18.Buschmann, N. and Hülskötter, F.: Titration procedure for low ethoxylated nonionic surfactants, Tenside Surf. Det.34(1997)8–11.10.1515/tsd-1997-340103Search in Google Scholar
19.Martinez-Barrachina, S., Alonso, J., Matia, L., Prats, R. and del Valle, M.: All-solid-state potentiometric sensors sensitive to nonionic surfactants based on ionophores containing ethoxylate units, Talanta54(2001)811–820. 10.1016/S0039-9140(01)00332-0Search in Google Scholar
20.Giannetto, M., Minari, C. and Mori, G.: Potentiometric determination of non-ionic surfactants by liquid membrane electrodes, Electroanalysis15(2003)1598–1600. 10.1002/elan.200302727Search in Google Scholar
21.Martinez-Barrachina, S., del Valle, M., Matia, L., Prats, R. and Alonso, J.: Potentiometric flow injection system for the determination of polyethoxylate nonionic surfactants using tubular ion-selective electrodes, Anal. Chim. Acta438(2001)305–313. 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)01342-8Search in Google Scholar
22.Martinez-Barrachina, S., del Valle, M., Matia, L., Prats, R. and Alonso, J.: Determination of polyethoxylated non-ionic surfactants using potentiometric flow injection systems. Improvement of the detection limits employing an on-line pre-concentration stage, Anal. Chim. Acta454(2002)217–227. 10.1016/S0003-2670(01)01572-0Search in Google Scholar
23.Feitkenhauer, H. and Meyer, U.: On-line titration of non-ionic surfactants in wastewater treatment plant using a specific electrode, Water Sci. Technol.45(2002)61–68.Search in Google Scholar
24.Lizunova, G. M., Orlova, A. O. and Zorin, A. D.: Liquid ion-selective electrodes for determining nonionic surfactants, J. Anal. Chem.59(2004)775–779. 10.1023/B:JANC.0000037285.74311.b9Search in Google Scholar
25.Application Bulletin No. 230/1e, Metrohm, Herisau, Switzerland.Search in Google Scholar
26.Umezawa, Y., Umezawa, K. and Sato, H.: Selectivity coefficients for ion-selective electrodes: Recommended methods for reporting KpotAB values, Pure Appl. Chem.67(1995)507–518.Search in Google Scholar
27.Bakker, E., Pretsch, E. and Buehlmann, P.: Selectivity of potentiometric ion sensors, Anal. Chem.72(2000)1127–1133. 10.1021/ac991146nSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
28.Barak, P.: Smoothing and differentiation by an adaptive-degree polynomial filter, Anal. Chem.67(1995)2758–2762. 10.1021/ac00113a006Search in Google Scholar
© 2007, Carl Hanser Publisher, Munich
Articles in the same Issue
- Contents/Inhalt
- Contents
- Abstracts
- Abstracts
- Application
- Different Tracer Stain Systems for Testing Laundry Detergent Performance
- Environmental Chemistry
- Sensitive Potentiometric Method for Determination of Micromolar Level of Polyethoxylated Nonionic Surfactants in Effluents
- Detergent Phosphates and their Environmental Relevance in Future European Perspectives
- Novel Surfactants
- Structure – Property Relationships of “Gemini” Surfactants and Synergism with Hydrotropes
- Synthesis
- The Synthesis and Properties of High Pure δ Layered Sodium Disilicate
- GDCh-News
- Second European Detergents Conference Report
Articles in the same Issue
- Contents/Inhalt
- Contents
- Abstracts
- Abstracts
- Application
- Different Tracer Stain Systems for Testing Laundry Detergent Performance
- Environmental Chemistry
- Sensitive Potentiometric Method for Determination of Micromolar Level of Polyethoxylated Nonionic Surfactants in Effluents
- Detergent Phosphates and their Environmental Relevance in Future European Perspectives
- Novel Surfactants
- Structure – Property Relationships of “Gemini” Surfactants and Synergism with Hydrotropes
- Synthesis
- The Synthesis and Properties of High Pure δ Layered Sodium Disilicate
- GDCh-News
- Second European Detergents Conference Report