Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Experts on Eyewitness Identification: I Just Don't See It
-
Lee Stuesser
Published/Copyright:
February 14, 2006
This article deals with the admissibility of expert evidence on the frailties of eye witness identification in Canada. The author takes the position that such expert evidence is not necessary in the vast majority of cases. Reference is made to both American and British practices.
Published Online: 2006-2-14
©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Article
- Common Knowledge in Legal Reasoning about Evidence
- Experts on Eyewitness Identification: I Just Don't See It
- The Narrative Fallacy
- Fallacies on Fallacies: A Reply
- The Narrative Fallacy, the Relative Plausibility Theory, and a Theory of the Trial
- What Does It Mean To Be Free? The Concept of 'Free Proof' in the Western Legal Tradition
Articles in the same Issue
- Article
- Common Knowledge in Legal Reasoning about Evidence
- Experts on Eyewitness Identification: I Just Don't See It
- The Narrative Fallacy
- Fallacies on Fallacies: A Reply
- The Narrative Fallacy, the Relative Plausibility Theory, and a Theory of the Trial
- What Does It Mean To Be Free? The Concept of 'Free Proof' in the Western Legal Tradition
