Teaching U.S. Evidence Law in the 21st Century

Articles in the same Issue

1. Case Note
2. Inadmissible but Material? Resolving the Circuit Split After Wood
3. Article
4. Clarifying Entrapment
5. Would a Market-based Test Clarify Entrapment?
6. Changing Approaches to Expert Evidence in England and Italy
7. Tyres with a 'Y' : An English Perspective on Kuhmo Tire and its Implications for the Admissibility of Expert Evidence
8. Lilly v. Virginia Glimmers of Hope for the Confrontation Clause?
9. Why Evidence Scholars Should Study Conversation
10. Narrative Relevance, Imagined Juries, and a Supreme Court Inspired Agenda for Jury Research
11. Teaching U.S. Evidence Law in the 21st Century
12. The Rules of Evidence in the Age of the Resurrection of the Jury
13. Book Review
14. A True Crime: A Review of Janet Malcolm, The Crime of Sheila McGough
15. Loyalty's Lawyer: A Review of Janet Malcolm: The Crime of Sheila McGough
16. Review of I.H. Dennis, The Law of Evidence
17. Evidence Rethought? A Commentary on Dennis' The Law of Evidence
18. Review of I.H. Dennis, The Law of Evidence (1999)
19. Response to an Article
20. Comment on: A True Crime, a Review of Janet Malcolm, The Crime of Sheila McGough