Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Why Mickey Mouse is Not Subject to Congestion: A Letter on 'Eldred and Fair Use'
-
Michele Boldrin
Published/Copyright:
October 20, 2004
In “Eldred and Fair Use,” Posner comments that awarding a monopoly over Mickey Mouse avoids the congestion problem that occurs with open access highways. Is the public domain a commons like an open access highway? No, it is not.
Published Online: 2004-10-20
©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Feature
- Experimental Political Betting Markets and the 2004 Election
- The Real Lesson of Enron's Implosion: Market Makers Are In the Trust Business
- Column
- Election 2004: Fiction vs. Reality
- The Budget Outlook: Projections and Implications
- Sense and Nonsense About Federal Deficits and Debt
- Economic Illiteracy on the Campaign Trail
- Letter
- Why Mickey Mouse is Not Subject to Congestion: A Letter on 'Eldred and Fair Use'
- Posner responds to "Why Mickey Mouse is Not Subject to Congestion," by Michele Boldrin and David Levine
Articles in the same Issue
- Feature
- Experimental Political Betting Markets and the 2004 Election
- The Real Lesson of Enron's Implosion: Market Makers Are In the Trust Business
- Column
- Election 2004: Fiction vs. Reality
- The Budget Outlook: Projections and Implications
- Sense and Nonsense About Federal Deficits and Debt
- Economic Illiteracy on the Campaign Trail
- Letter
- Why Mickey Mouse is Not Subject to Congestion: A Letter on 'Eldred and Fair Use'
- Posner responds to "Why Mickey Mouse is Not Subject to Congestion," by Michele Boldrin and David Levine
