Home How Money for Legal Scholarship Disadvantages Feminism
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

How Money for Legal Scholarship Disadvantages Feminism

  • Martha T. McCluskey
Published/Copyright: December 20, 2011
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Author Information Explore this Subject
Issues in Legal Scholarship
From the journal Issues in Legal Scholarship Volume 9 Issue 2

A dramatic infusion of outside money has shaped legal theory over the last several decades, largely to the detriment of feminist theory. Nonetheless, the pervasive influence of this funding is largely ignored in scholarly discussions of legal theory. This denial helps reinforce the marginal position of feminist scholarship and of women in legal theory. Conservative activists and funders have understood the central role of developing community culture and institutions, and have helped shift the prevailing framework for discussion of many questions of theory and policy through substantial investments in law-and-economics centers and in the Federalist Society. Comparing the institutional resources and structures of support for feminist or gender scholarship to those developed for economic analysis of law focused on free-market or neoliberal policy and business interests reveals substantial differences. Further, much of this conservative institution building has been dominated by men and has served to promote legal scholarship by white men in particular. I conclude by considering how feminist legal scholarship might better develop institutional support despite access to much less money.

Keywords: legal theory; jurisprudence; law and economics; Olin foundation; feminism; feminist legal theory; Federalist Society; critical legal studies; critical race theory; Cass Sunstein; Richard Posner; gender; law schools
Published Online: 2011-12-20

©2012 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Article
  2. Introduction: The Distinctive Energies of "Normal Science"
  3. What I Learned About Feminism From the Early Women Law Professors
  4. Backlash, Covering, and the State of Feminist Legal Theory
  5. On Que(e)rying Feminism: Reclaiming the F Word
  6. Where Did Feminism Go? Reflections from a Slightly Lapsed Feminist
  7. Architecture of Legal Feminism
  8. Feminism's Family
  9. Feminism Without Feminism
  10. How Money for Legal Scholarship Disadvantages Feminism
  11. Pulling the Ladder Up Behind You: Feminism and Family
  12. Tough Guise
  13. What Ever Happened to Feminist Legal Theory?
https://doi.org/10.2202/1539-8323.1142
Keywords for this article
legal theory; jurisprudence; law and economics; Olin foundation; feminism; feminist legal theory; Federalist Society; critical legal studies; critical race theory; Cass Sunstein; Richard Posner; gender; law schools

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Article
  2. Introduction: The Distinctive Energies of "Normal Science"
  3. What I Learned About Feminism From the Early Women Law Professors
  4. Backlash, Covering, and the State of Feminist Legal Theory
  5. On Que(e)rying Feminism: Reclaiming the F Word
  6. Where Did Feminism Go? Reflections from a Slightly Lapsed Feminist
  7. Architecture of Legal Feminism
  8. Feminism's Family
  9. Feminism Without Feminism
  10. How Money for Legal Scholarship Disadvantages Feminism
  11. Pulling the Ladder Up Behind You: Feminism and Family
  12. Tough Guise
  13. What Ever Happened to Feminist Legal Theory?
Sign up now to receive a 20% welcome discount
Institutional Access
How does access work?
Have an idea on how to improve our website?
Please write us.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Downloaded on 28.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.2202/1539-8323.1142/html
Scroll to top button