Home 1. A Critical Appraisal of Theories of Menstrual Symbolism
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

1. A Critical Appraisal of Theories of Menstrual Symbolism

View more publications by University of California Press
Blood Magic
This chapter is in the book Blood Magic
1 A Critical Appraisal of Theories of Menstrual Symbolism Thomas Buckley Alma Gottlieb The topic of menstruation has long been a staple of anthropol-ogy, for this apparently ordinary biological event has been subject to extraordinary symbolic elaboration in a wide variety of cultures. The symbolic potency so often attributed to menstrual blood and the exotic-seeming stringency of rules for the conduct of menstruating women have placed menstru-ation in the foreground of anthropological studies of "taboo" and, more recently, of symbolic "pollution." Menstrual taboos have been seen by turn as evidence of primitive irra-tionality and of the supposed universal dominance of men over women in society. The widespread occurrence of menstrual taboos and their cross-cultural similarities has spurred a search for their universal origins, once identified with the very wellsprings of social organization (Durkheim 1897:50) and, more recently, of religious thought (Douglas 1966:6). Yet for all of the significance attributed to menstrual sym-bolism by anthropologists and others, and for all of the fasci-nation with which its origins and functions have been pur-sued, little has been firmly established. While menstruation itself has at least a degree of biological regularity, its symbolic voicings and valences are strikingly variable, both cross-cul-turally and within single cultures. It is perplexing, then, that the study of menstrual symbolism has been limited by a paucity of detail regarding such variations, by imbalances in ethnographic reporting, and by overly reductionistic theoreti-cal frameworks.
© 2020 University of California Press, Berkeley

1 A Critical Appraisal of Theories of Menstrual Symbolism Thomas Buckley Alma Gottlieb The topic of menstruation has long been a staple of anthropol-ogy, for this apparently ordinary biological event has been subject to extraordinary symbolic elaboration in a wide variety of cultures. The symbolic potency so often attributed to menstrual blood and the exotic-seeming stringency of rules for the conduct of menstruating women have placed menstru-ation in the foreground of anthropological studies of "taboo" and, more recently, of symbolic "pollution." Menstrual taboos have been seen by turn as evidence of primitive irra-tionality and of the supposed universal dominance of men over women in society. The widespread occurrence of menstrual taboos and their cross-cultural similarities has spurred a search for their universal origins, once identified with the very wellsprings of social organization (Durkheim 1897:50) and, more recently, of religious thought (Douglas 1966:6). Yet for all of the significance attributed to menstrual sym-bolism by anthropologists and others, and for all of the fasci-nation with which its origins and functions have been pur-sued, little has been firmly established. While menstruation itself has at least a degree of biological regularity, its symbolic voicings and valences are strikingly variable, both cross-cul-turally and within single cultures. It is perplexing, then, that the study of menstrual symbolism has been limited by a paucity of detail regarding such variations, by imbalances in ethnographic reporting, and by overly reductionistic theoreti-cal frameworks.
© 2020 University of California Press, Berkeley
Downloaded on 23.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1525/9780520340565-003/html?srsltid=AfmBOoqlxYCmgHs0SaBRbo_x-g8eW0elUcOfHnxjcq8cpLrs9co9JFKg
Scroll to top button