Abstract
Many single parents (SPs) receive means-tested benefits (MTBs) in Switzerland. As a risk-management policy, MTBs can alleviate phases of financial hardship in SPs’ life courses. Conversely, when SPs experience non-take-up (NTU), MTBs may turn into a stressor and impinge on their lives. This paper investigates how NTU can shape SPs’ life courses. Thirteen SPs with full custody of their children who experienced NTU while facing economic hardship were interviewed in a qualitative panel in French-speaking Switzerland. A three-step analytical strategy involving thematic, categorical and chronological analysis of the qualitative data was conducted. The results show that SPs can compensate for the lack of MTBs by looking for alternative support from their families, friends and acquaintances or the labour market; by trying to bypass the MTB regulations so as to access them; by making changes to their lives to comply with MTB eligibility criteria or by giving up on the MTBs. NTU not only affects SPs financially but can also delay their professional careers, jeopardise their relationships with the children; delay new couple relationships and force them to live in an unpleasant environment. Intergroup inequalities affect SPs’ paths as MTB clients. By overlooking the implications of SPs’ childcare obligations and the hidden costs linked to separation, targeting practices may lead to tertiary NTU.
Zusammenfassung
Viele Alleinerziehende in der Schweiz erhalten bedarfsgeprüfte Leistungen. Diese können, im Sinne des Risikomanagements, finanzielle Notlagen im Lebenslauf ausgleichen. Umgekehrt kann auch die Nichtinanspruchnahme bedarfsgeprüfter Leistungen einen Stressfaktor darstellen und sich negativ auf den Lebenslauf auswirken. Dieser Beitrag untersucht, wie die Nichtinanspruchnahme solcher Leistungen den Lebenslauf von Alleinerziehenden prägen kann. Dafür wurden in einem qualitativen Panel in der französischsprachigen Schweiz dreizehn Alleinerziehende mit alleinigem Sorgerecht interviewt, die bedarfsgeprüfte Leistungen trotz finanzieller Not nicht in Anspruch nehmen konnten. Die qualitativen Daten wurden mit einer dreistufigen Auswertungsstrategie mittels thematischer, kategorialer und chronologischer Analyse untersucht. Die Studie zeigt, wie Alleinerziehende die aufgrund der Nichtinanspruchnahme fehlenden Mittel durch alternative Ressourcen über Familien, Freunde und Bekannte oder einer Arbeitsmarktbeteiligung ausgleichen. Einige versuchen auch, die Anspruchsvoraussetzungen zu umgehen oder ihre Lebensführung zu verändern, um Zugang zu den Leistungen zu erhalten. Andere geben das Ziel der Inanspruchnahme ganz auf. Die Nichtinanspruchnahme bedarfsgeprüfter Leistungen führt nicht nur zu finanziellen Nachteilen für die Alleinerziehenden, sie kann auch berufliche Karrieren verzögern, Beziehungen zu den Kindern beeinträchtigen, neue Paarbeziehungen erschweren und sich negativ auf die Wohnumgebung auswirken. Die (Nicht-)Inanspruchnahme von bedarfsgeprüften Leistungen wird außerdem von Ungleichheiten zwischen Gruppen beeinflusst. Selektive Zugangsvoraussetzungen berücksichtigen die Folgen fehlender Kinderbetreuungsmöglichkeiten und versteckte Kosten der Trennung oft nicht, was zu tertiärer Nichtinanspruchnahme bedarfsgeprüfter Leistungen führen kann.
References
Bernardi, Laura; Mortelmans, Dimitri; Larenza, Ornella (2018): “Changing lone parents, changing life courses”, in: Laura Bernardi; Dimitri Mortelmans (eds.): Lone parenthood in the life course. Cham: Springer, 1–26.10.1007/978-3-319-63295-7_1Search in Google Scholar
Besley, Timothy (1990): “Means testing versus universal provision in poverty alleviation programmes”, Economica 57(225): 119–129.10.2307/2554085Search in Google Scholar
Bidart, Claire; Longo, María Eugenia; Mendez, Ariel (2013): “Time and process: an operational framework for processual analysis”, European Sociological Review 29: 743–751.10.1093/esr/jcs053Search in Google Scholar
Bonoli, Giuliano; Berclaz, Michel (2007): Besoins sociaux et prestations d’aide sociale en ville de Genève. Eléments pour une réorientation des aides communales. IDHEAP (February 2007). Download at : http://www.ville-geneve.ch/fileadmin/public/Departement_5/Publications/Rapport-IDHEAP-final-27-02-2007.pdf (accessed 6th January 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Brady, David; Burroway, Rebekah (2012): “Targeting, universalism, and single-mother poverty: a multilevel analysis across 18 affluent democracies”, Demography 49: 719–746.10.1007/s13524-012-0094-zSearch in Google Scholar
Cooke, Martin; Gazso, Amber (2009): “Taking a life course perspective on social assistance use in Canada: a different approach”, The Canadian Journal of Sociology 34: 349–372.10.29173/cjs1825Search in Google Scholar
Edin, Kathryn; Lein, Laura (1997): “Work, welfare, and single mothers’ economic survival strategies”, American Sociological Review 62: 253–266.10.2307/2657303Search in Google Scholar
Elder, Glen H. (1995): “The life course paradigm: social change and individual development”, in: Phyllis Moen; Glen H. Elder; Kurt Lüscher (eds.), Examining lives in context. Perspectives on the ecology of human development. Washington: American Psychological Association, 101–139.10.1037/10176-003Search in Google Scholar
Fereday, Jennifer; Muir-Cochrane, Eimear (2006): “Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development”, International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5: 80–92.10.1177/160940690600500107Search in Google Scholar
FSO (2020): Système de sécurité sociale https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/fr/home/statistiques/securite-sociale/analyses-parcours-systeme/rapport-social-statistique-suisse/systeme-securite-sociale.html (accessed 22 May 2023).Search in Google Scholar
FSO (2021): Les familles en Suisse. Rapport statistique 2021. Federal Statistical Office, 2021.Search in Google Scholar
Gilbert, Neil (2002): Transformation of the Welfare State: The Silent Surrender of Public Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195140745.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Kohli, Martin (1985): “Die Institutionalisierung des Lebenslaufs: Historische Befunde und theoretische Argumente”, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 37: 1–29.Search in Google Scholar
Kohli, Martin (1986): “The world we forgot: a historical review of the life course”, in: Victor W. Marshall (ed.): Later life: The social psychology of ageing. Beverly Hills: Sage, 271–303.Search in Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter; Palme, Joachim (1998): “The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: welfare state institutions, inequality, and poverty in the Western countries”, American Sociological Review 63: 661–687.10.2307/2657333Search in Google Scholar
Larenza, Ornella (2019): Social policy shaping the life-course: a study on lone parents’ vulnerability. Doctoral thesis, Social sciences institute, Lausanne, Switzerland.Search in Google Scholar
Le Grand, Julian (1982): The strategy of equality: redistribution and the social services. London: George Allen and Unwin.Search in Google Scholar
Leisering, Lutz (2003): “Government and the life course”, in: Jeylan T. Mortimer; Michael J. Shanahan (eds.): Handbook of the life course. New York: Springer, 205–225.10.1007/978-0-306-48247-2_10Search in Google Scholar
Longo, María Eugenia; Mendez, Ariel; Tchobanian, Robert (2010): “Le découpage temporel du processus: l’analyse par sequences”, in: Ariel Méndez (ed.): Processus. Concepts et méthode pour l’analyse temporelle en sciences sociales. Louvain-la-Neuve: Academia Bruylant, 73–89.Search in Google Scholar
Lucas, Barbara; Bonvin, Jean-Michel; Hümbelin, Oliver (2021): “The non-take-up of health and social benefits: What implications for social citizenship?” Swiss Journal of Sociology 47: 161–180.10.2478/sjs-2021-0013Search in Google Scholar
Lucas, Barbara; Ludwig, Catherine; Chapuis, Jérome; Maggi, Jenny; Crettaz, Eric (2019): Le non-recours aux prestations sociales à Genève. HES-SO, Haute école de travail social et Haute école de santé, Genève.Search in Google Scholar
Mayer, Karl Ulrich (2004): “Whose lives? How history, societies, and institutions define and shape life courses”, Research in Human Development 1: 161–187.10.1207/s15427617rhd0103_3Search in Google Scholar
Mayer, Karl Ulrich; Schoepflin, Urs (1989): “The state and the life course”, Annual Review of Sociology 15: 187–209.10.1146/annurev.so.15.080189.001155Search in Google Scholar
Millar, Jane (2007): Staying in work: work and welfare for lone mothers and their children over time. ESRC, Full Research Report. (ESRC End of Award Report, RES-000-23-1079), 2007.Search in Google Scholar
Millar, Jane; Ridge, Tess (2009): “Relationships of care: working lone mothers, their children and employment sustainability”, Journal of Social Policy 38: 103–121.10.1017/S0047279408002572Search in Google Scholar
Millar, Jane; Ridge, Tess (2013): “Lone mothers and paid work: the ‘family-work project’”, International Review of Sociology 23: 564–577.10.1080/03906701.2013.856161Search in Google Scholar
Ritchie, Jane; Lewis, Jane; Elam, Gillian (2003): “Designing and selecting samples”, in: Jane Ritchie; Jane Lewis (eds.): Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage, 77–108.Search in Google Scholar
Saez, Emmanuel (2006): “Redistribution toward low incomes in richer countries”, in: Abhijit Bannerjee; Roland Benabou; Dilip Mookherjee (eds.): Understanding poverty. New York: Oxford University Press, 187–201.10.1093/0195305191.003.0013Search in Google Scholar
Saldaña, Johnny (2003): Longitudinal qualitative research: analysing change through time. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.Search in Google Scholar
Scheibelhofer, Elisabeth (2008): “Combining narration-based interviews with topical interviews: methodological reflections on research practices”, International Journal of Social Research Methodology 11: 403–416.10.1080/13645570701401370Search in Google Scholar
Settersten, Richard A.; Gannon, Lynn (2005): “Structure, agency, and the space between: on the challenges and contradictions of a blended view of the life course”, Advances in Life Course Research 10: 35–55.10.1016/S1040-2608(05)10001-XSearch in Google Scholar
Spini, Dario; Bernardi, Laura; Oris, Michel (2017): “Toward a life course framework for studying vulnerability”, Research in Human Development 14: 5–25.10.1080/15427609.2016.1268892Search in Google Scholar
Tabin, Jean-Pierre (2011): “Comprendre la sécurité sociale en Suisse”, in: Jean-Michel Bonvin; Pierre Gobet; Stéphane Rossini; Jean-Pierre Tabin (eds.): Manuel de politique sociale. Lausanne: EESP, 41–70.Search in Google Scholar
Thomson, Rachel (2007): “The qualitative longitudinal case history: practical, methodological and ethical reflections”, Social Policy and Society 6: 571–582.10.1017/S1474746407003909Search in Google Scholar
Titmuss, Richard M. (2006): “Universalism versus selection”, in: Christopher Pierson; Francis G. Castles (eds): The welfare state reader. Cambridge: Polity Press, 40–47 (Reprint of Commitment to welfare, 1968, London: Allen and Unwin).Search in Google Scholar
Van Mechelen, Natascha; Janssens, Julie (2017): Who is to blame? An overview of the factors contributing to the non-take-up of social rights. Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp, Working Paper 1708. https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/hdlwpaper/1708.htm (accessed 22 May 2023)Search in Google Scholar
Van Oorschot, Wim (1991): “Non-take-up of social security benefits in Europe”, Journal of European Social Policy 1(1): 15–30.10.1177/095892879100100103Search in Google Scholar
Widmer, Eric D.; Ritschard, Gilbert (2009): “The de-standardization of the life course: are men and women equal?”, Advances in Life Course Research 14: 28–39.10.1016/j.alcr.2009.04.001Search in Google Scholar
Yates, Lyn (2003): “Interpretive claims and methodological warrant in small-number qualitative, longitudinal research”, International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice 6: 223–232.10.1080/1364557032000091824Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial: Social policies as life course policies – normative ideas, institutions and individual agency
- Social policies and the life course – a complex relationship re-visited
- Reproduction policy as life course policy: normative modelling of reproductive life courses in Germany
- Education systems as life course policies? The example of subnational educational regimes and young adults’ family transitions
- Coping with non-take-up of means-tested benefits: a qualitative longitudinal study on single parents’ life courses in French-speaking Switzerland
- Between life course regimes and biographical orientations: labour market trajectories of refugee mothers in Germany from a gendered perspective
- Coping with old-age poverty – the role of agency and different forms of societal support
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial: Social policies as life course policies – normative ideas, institutions and individual agency
- Social policies and the life course – a complex relationship re-visited
- Reproduction policy as life course policy: normative modelling of reproductive life courses in Germany
- Education systems as life course policies? The example of subnational educational regimes and young adults’ family transitions
- Coping with non-take-up of means-tested benefits: a qualitative longitudinal study on single parents’ life courses in French-speaking Switzerland
- Between life course regimes and biographical orientations: labour market trajectories of refugee mothers in Germany from a gendered perspective
- Coping with old-age poverty – the role of agency and different forms of societal support