Combine merits of both sacrificial and impressed current cathodic protection in one system to mitigate chloride-induced corrosion in reinforcement concrete
-
Mohamed A. Deyab
, Mofida Allam
, Ahmed M. Haggar
, Mostafa A. Azab , Mohsen Mohammed Al-Qhatani , Mahmud M. Barakat und Nevine Mohamed
Abstract
The protection of Egyptian reinforcing concrete infrastructures from corrosion is a pressing and critical task for construction engineering and industry, particularly in coastal locations. The primary aim of this case study is to integrate the advantages of both sacrificial anode cathodic protection (SACP) and impressed current cathodic protection (ICCP) in a single cathodic protection (CP) system and to use the new system in Alamein New Place near the Mediterranean sea (Egypt). The results showed that the new cathodic protection system is running very well to protect the concrete iron bars from corrosion. With the passage of time, the protective system’s efficiency and stability improve. During 30 days, the zinc anode’s potentials remain much more negative, indicating that the zinc anode can retain strong electrochemical activity for an extended length of time. The application of the CP method decreases the corrosion rate of rebar steel in concrete samples over time, according to electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS).
-
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
-
Research funding: Cathodic Protection Unit, Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute (EPRI), Egypt. Laboratories Dept., Arab Contractors Company, Cairo, Egypt. Taif University Researchers Supporting Project number (TURSP – 2020/19), Taif University, Saudi Arabia.
-
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
1. Bahekar, P. V., Gadve, S. S. Impressed current cathodic protection of rebar in concrete using carbon FRP laminate. Construct. Build. Mater. 2017, 156, 242–251; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.145.Suche in Google Scholar
2. Goyal, A., Pouya, H. S., Ganjian, E. Performance assessment of specialist conductive paint for cathodic protection of steel in reinforced concrete structures. Construct. Build. Mater. 2019, 223, 1083–1094; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.344.Suche in Google Scholar
3. Polder, R. B., Leegwater, G., Worm, D., Courage, W. Service life and life cycle cost modelling of cathodic protection systems for concrete structures. Cement Concr. Compos. 2014, 47, 69–74; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.05.004.Suche in Google Scholar
4. Cheung, M. M. S., Cao, C. Application of cathodic protection for controlling macrocell corrosion in chloride contaminated RC structures. Construct. Build. Mater. 2013, 45, 199–207; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.04.010.Suche in Google Scholar
5. Guo, W., Hu, J., Yuwei, M., Huang, H., Yin, S., Jiangxiong, W., Yu, Q. The application of novel lightweight functional aggregates on the mitigation of acidification damage in the external anode mortar during cathodic protection for reinforced concrete. Corrosion Sci. 2020, 165, 108366; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2019.108366.Suche in Google Scholar
6. Krishnan, N., Kamde, D. K., Veedu, Z. D., Pillai, R. G., Shah, D., Velayudham, R. Long-term performance and life-cycle-cost benefits of cathodic protection of concrete structures using galvanic anodes. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 42, 102467; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102467.Suche in Google Scholar
7. Qiao, G., Guo, B., Ou, J., Xu, F., Li, Z. Numerical optimization of an impressed current cathodic protection system for reinforced concrete structures. Construct. Build. Mater. 2016, 119, 260–267; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.012.Suche in Google Scholar
8. Carmona Calero, J., Climent Llorca, M. A., Garcés Terradillos, P. Influence of different ways of chloride contamination on the efficiency of cathodic protection applied on structural reinforced concrete elements. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2017, 793, 8–17; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2016.08.029.Suche in Google Scholar
9. Wang, F., Xu, J., Xu, Y., Jiang, L., Ma, G. A comparative investigation on cathodic protections of three sacrificial anodes on chloride-contaminated reinforced concrete. Construct. Build. Mater. 2020, 246, 118476; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118476.Suche in Google Scholar
10. Guo, B., Qiao, G., Li, Z., Li, D., Dai, J., Wang, Y. Impressed current cathodic protection of chloride-contaminated RC structures with cracking: a numerical study. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 44, 102943; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102943.Suche in Google Scholar
11. Anwar, M. S., Sujitha, B., Vedalakshmi, R. Light-weight cementitious conductive anode for impressed current cathodic protection of steel reinforced concrete application. Construct. Build. Mater. 2014, 71, 167–180; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.032.Suche in Google Scholar
12. Redaelli, E., Lollini, F., Bertolini, L. Throwing power of localised anodes for the cathodic protection of slender carbonated concrete elements in atmospheric conditions. Construct. Build. Mater. 2013, 39, 95–104; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.05.014.Suche in Google Scholar
13. Loto, C. A., Loto, R. T., Popoola, P. A. Evaluation of cathodic protection of mild steel with magnesium anodes in 0.5 M HCL. Chem. Data Collect. 2019, 22, 100246.10.1016/j.cdc.2019.100246Suche in Google Scholar
14. Yan, L., Song, G., Zheng, D. Magnesium alloy anode as a smart corrosivity detector and intelligent sacrificial anode protector for reinforced concrete. Corrosion Sci. 2019, 155, 13–28; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2019.04.027.Suche in Google Scholar
15. Zhang, E. Q., Abbas, Z., Tang, L. Predicting degradation of the anode–concrete interface for impressed current cathodic protection in concrete. Construct. Build. Mater. 2018, 185, 57–68; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.025.Suche in Google Scholar
16. Rhee, J., Lee, J. Electrochemical evaluation of corrosion properties of aluminum alloy as a sacrificial anode for offshore structure protection. J. Korean Instit. Surf. Eng. 2015, 48, 68–72; https://doi.org/10.5695/jkise.2015.48.2.68.Suche in Google Scholar
17. Wilson, K., Jawed, M., Ngala, V. The selection and use of cathodic protection systems for the repair of reinforced concrete structures. Construct. Build. Mater. 2013, 39, 19–25; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.05.037.Suche in Google Scholar
18. Goyal, A., Kehinde Olorunnipa, E., Sadeghi Pouya, H., Ganjian, E., Omotayo Olubanwo, A. Potential and current distribution across different layers of reinforcement in reinforced concrete cathodic protection system – a numerical study. Construct. Build. Mater. 2020, 262, 120580; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120580.Suche in Google Scholar
19. Christodoulou, C., Glass, G., Webb, J., Austin, S., Goodier, C. Assessing the long term benefits of impressed current cathodic protection. Corrosion Sci. 2010, 52, 2671–2679; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2010.04.018.Suche in Google Scholar
20. Bertolini, L., Gastaldi, M., Pedeferri, M., Redaelli, E. Prevention of steel corrosion in concrete exposed to seawater with submerged sacrificial anodes. Corrosion Sci. 2002, 44, 1497–1513; https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-938x(01)00168-8.Suche in Google Scholar
21. Bertolini, L., Bolzoni, F., Pedeferri, P., Lazzari, L., Pastore, T. Cathodic protection and cathodic preventionin concrete: principles and applications. J. Appl. Electrochem. 1998, 28, 1321–1331; https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1003404428827.10.1023/A:1003404428827Suche in Google Scholar
22. Presuel-Moreno, F. J., Sagüés, A. A., Kranc, S. C. Steel activation in concrete following interruption of long-term cathodic polarisation. Corrosion 2005, 61, 428–436, 02259.10.5006/1.3280642Suche in Google Scholar
23. Broomfield, J. P., Tinnea, J. S. Cathodic Protection of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Components. Final Report. ID No: SHRPCUWP92618, 1992.Suche in Google Scholar
24. Deyab, M. A. Ionic liquid as an electrolyte additive for high performance lead-acid batteries. J. Power Sources 2018, 390, 176–180; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.053.Suche in Google Scholar
25. Abd El-Rehim, S. S., Hassan, H. H., Deyab, M. A., Abd El Moneim, A. Experimental and theoretical investigations of adsorption and inhibitive properties of tween 80 on corrosion of aluminum alloy (A5754) in alkaline media. Z. Phys. Chem. 2016, 230, 67–78; https://doi.org/10.1515/zpch-2015-0614.Suche in Google Scholar
26. Morgan, J. Cathodic Protection; Macmillan: New York, 1960; p. 140.10.1149/1.2427725Suche in Google Scholar
27. Pacheco, J., Polder, R. B., Fraaij, A. L. A., Mol, J. M. C. Concrete Solutions; Taylor & Francis: Oxfordshire, UK, 2011; pp. 147–156.10.1201/b11570-24Suche in Google Scholar
28. Geiker, M. R., Polder, R. B. Mat. Corr. 2016, 67, 600; https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.201608942.Suche in Google Scholar
29. Zaky, M. T., Nessim, M. I., Deyab, M. A. Synthesis of new ionic liquids based on dicationic imidazolium and their anti-corrosion performances. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 290, 111230; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111230.Suche in Google Scholar
30. Deyab, M. A., Hamdi, N., Lachkar, M., El Bali, B. Clay/phosphate/epoxy nanocomposites for enhanced coating activity towards corrosion resistance. Prog. Org. Coating 2018, 123, 232–237; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2018.07.017.Suche in Google Scholar
31. Mart, I., Nez, I., Andrade, C. Application of EIS to cathodically protected steel: tests in sodium chloride solution and in chloride contaminated concrete. Corrosion Sci. 2008, 50, 2948–2958; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2008.07.012.Suche in Google Scholar
32. Goyal, A., Karade, S. R. Efficiency of cathodic prevention to control corrosion in seawater mixed concrete. J. Build. Rehabil. 2020, 5, 23; https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-020-00090-2.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Original Papers
- Combine merits of both sacrificial and impressed current cathodic protection in one system to mitigate chloride-induced corrosion in reinforcement concrete
- Differences in perchlorate adsorption to azobenzene monolayers on gold formed from thioacetate and thiol precursors
- Adsorption kinetics for the removal of toxic Congo red dye by polyaniline and citrus leaves as effective adsorbents
- Ionizing radiation based advanced oxidation process for reactive orange 122 dye degradation and kinetics studies
- Molecular interaction studies on the binding ability of hydrated zinc sulphate with aqueous solution of ascorbic acid at different temperatures
- Theoretical investigation of some 1,2,4-triazole-based molecules synthetized
- Review Article
- Heterogeneous nanocatalyst for biodiesel fuel production: bench scale from waste oil sources
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Original Papers
- Combine merits of both sacrificial and impressed current cathodic protection in one system to mitigate chloride-induced corrosion in reinforcement concrete
- Differences in perchlorate adsorption to azobenzene monolayers on gold formed from thioacetate and thiol precursors
- Adsorption kinetics for the removal of toxic Congo red dye by polyaniline and citrus leaves as effective adsorbents
- Ionizing radiation based advanced oxidation process for reactive orange 122 dye degradation and kinetics studies
- Molecular interaction studies on the binding ability of hydrated zinc sulphate with aqueous solution of ascorbic acid at different temperatures
- Theoretical investigation of some 1,2,4-triazole-based molecules synthetized
- Review Article
- Heterogeneous nanocatalyst for biodiesel fuel production: bench scale from waste oil sources