Home Utilizing response surface methodology to evaluate the process parameters of indigenous cucumber fermentation
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Utilizing response surface methodology to evaluate the process parameters of indigenous cucumber fermentation

  • Hazal Gül ORCID logo and Mine Güngörmüşler ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 25, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Commercial pickled cucumbers are produced in variety of salt concentrations including brines up to 15% sodium chloride due to the preventive nature of the salt towards microbial growth. Although it is deemed necessary for manufacturers to utilize high amounts of salts to prolong shelf life, the high content creates a burden for the growth of beneficial microorganisms including probiotics. In this study, the production of naturally fermented cucumbers and their microbial viability were tested with the help of an experimental design tool, Box-Behnken Design (BBD), to evaluate the optimal conditions for the production process and to maintain the highest viability of potential beneficial microorganisms during storage. Accordingly, the operational conditions including salt concentration (2, 5, or 8%), fermentation temperature (20, 25, or 30 °C), and brine filling (pretreatment) temperature (80, 85, or 90 °C) were optimized with a significant fit to a quadratic model (p < 0.05). The trends for sugar consumption and total acid production were monitored to demonstrate the correlation between the above-mentioned operational parameters for the fermentation process of pickled cucumbers with indigenous microorganisms. Overall, 5% salt content, 70 °C filling temperature and 25 °C fermentation medium was determined to maintain over 6 log cfu/mL viability. The results represent a valuable contribution to the pickle industry including a know-how of process parameters.


Corresponding author: Mine Güngörmüşler, Division of Bioengineering, Graduate School, Izmir University of Economics, Sakarya Caddesi No: 156, 35330 Balçova, Izmir, Turkey, Phone: +90 2324888392, E-mail: ,

Funding source: EuroGıda Ind. Trade Inc. Co., Izmir, TURKEY

  1. Author contribution: H. Gül contributed to the paper for investigation, visualization and writing; M. Güngörmüşler contributed to the paper for methodology, writing – review and editing.

  2. Research funding: The authors gratefully acknowledge Euro Gıda Corporation, Izmir, Turkey for their financial contribution to the present research.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

  4. Code availability: Not applicable.

  5. Availability of data and materials: Supplementary data associated with this article can be provided upon request.

  6. Ethical approval: Not applicable.

  7. Consent to participate: Not applicable.

  8. Consent to publish: Not applicable.

References

1. Montaño, A, Sánchez, AH, Beato, VM, López-López, A, de Castro, A. Pickling. Encycl Food Health 2016:369–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-384947-2.00545-6.Search in Google Scholar

2. Hane İçi Hızlı Tüketim Ürünleri Satın Alımında İçecek Ürünleri Dikkat Çekti; 2020 [cited 2 March 2021]. Available from: https://www.ipsos.com/tr-tr/hane-ici-hizli-tuketim-urunleri-satin-aliminda-icecek-urunleri-dikkat-cekti.Search in Google Scholar

3. Thursby, E, Juge, N. Introduction to the human gut microbiota. Biochem J 2017;474:1823–36. https://doi.org/10.1042/bcj20160510.Search in Google Scholar

4. Who.int; 2021. https://www.who.int/foodsafety/fs_management/en/probiotic_guidelines.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

5. Tamminen, M, Joutsjoki, T, Sjoblom, M, Joutsen, M, Palva, A, Ryhanen, E. Screening of lactic acid bacteria from fermented vegetables by carbohydrate profiling and PCR-ELISA. Lett Appl Microbiol 2004;39:439–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765x.2004.01607.x.Search in Google Scholar

6. Bosnea, L, Kopsahelis, N, Kokkali, V, Terpou, A, Kanellaki, M. Production of a novel probiotic yogurt by incorporation of L. casei enriched fresh apple pieces, dried raisins and wheat grains. Food Bioprod Process 2017;102:62–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2016.11.010.Search in Google Scholar

7. Fidaleo, M. Functional data analysis and design of experiments as efficient tools to determine the dynamical design space of food and biotechnological batch processes. Food Bioprocess Technol 2020;13:1035–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-020-02449-2.Search in Google Scholar

8. Tsapatsaris, S, Kotzekidou, P. Application of central composite design and response surface methodology to the fermentation of olive juice by Lactobacillus plantarum and Debaryomyces hansenii. Int J Food Microbiol 2004;95:157–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.02.011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Darvishzadeh, P, Orsat, V, Martinez, J. Correction to: process optimization for development of a novel water kefir drink with high antioxidant activity and potential probiotic properties from Russian Olive Fruit (Elaeagnus angustifolia). Food Bioprocess Technol 2021;14:261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-021-02583-5.Search in Google Scholar

10. Cappato, LP, Martins, AMD, Ferreira, EHR, Rosenthal, A. Effects of hurdle technology on Monascus ruber growth in green table olives: a response surface methodology approach. Braz J Microbiol 2018;49:112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.05.009.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Jaiswal, A, Gupta, S, Abu-Ghannam, N. Optimisation of lactic acid fermentation of York cabbage for the development of potential probiotic products. Int J Food Sci Technol 2012;47:1605–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.03010.x.Search in Google Scholar

12. Vegas, C, Zavaleta, A, Zarzoso, B. Optimization of fermentation process conditions for chili pepper (Capsicum frutescens) fruit using response surface methodology. Agron Colomb 2018;36:88–96. https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v36n1.69164.Search in Google Scholar

13. Keerthika, T, Devaki, C, Suma, P, Urooj, A. Development of cucumber fermented beverage using response surface methodology. Int J Food Ferment Technol 2017;7:181. https://doi.org/10.5958/2277-9396.2017.00020.Search in Google Scholar

14. Montgomery, DC. Design and analysis of experiments, 8th ed. Design; 2012.10.1002/ep.11743Search in Google Scholar

15. Güney, D, Güngörmüşler, M. Development and comparative evaluation of a novel fermented juice mixture with probiotic strains of lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 2020;13:495–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-020-09710-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Prasirtsak, B, Thitiprasert, S, Tolieng, V, Assabumrungrat, S, Tanasupawat, S, Thongchul, N. D-Lactic acid fermentation performance and the enzyme activity of a novel bacterium Terrilactibacillus laevilacticus SK5–6. Ann Microbiol 2019;69:1537–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-019-01538-8.Search in Google Scholar

17. Kim, K, Chun, B, Baek, J, Roh, S, Lee, S, Jeon, C. Genomic and metabolic features of Lactobacillus sakei as revealed by its pan-genome and the metatranscriptome of kimchi fermentation. Food Microbiol 2020;86:103341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2019.103341.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Sabra, W, Quitmann, H, Zeng, A, Dai, J, Xiu, Z. Microbial production of 2,3-butanediol. Compr Biotechnol 2017;2011:87–97.10.1016/B978-0-08-088504-9.00161-6Search in Google Scholar

19. Novik, G, Meerovskaya, O, Savich, V. Chapter 5 waste degradation and utilization by lactic acid bacteria: use of lactic acid bacteria in production of food additives, bioenergy and biogas. In: Food additives. London: InTechOpen; 2017:176 p.10.5772/intechopen.69284Search in Google Scholar

20. Berthels, N, Corderootero, R, Bauer, F, Thevelein, J, Pretorius, I. Discrepancy in glucose and fructose utilisation during fermentation by wine yeast strains. FEMS Yeast Res 2004;4:683–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsyr.2004.02.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Esmaeili, H, Keikhosro, K. Optimization of fermentation conditions for efficient ethanol production by Mucor hiemalis. Turk J Biochem 2018;43:587–94. https://doi.org/10.1515/tjb-2017-0290.Search in Google Scholar

22. Zieliński, H, Surma, M, Zielińska, D. The naturally fermented sour pickled cucumbers. Chapter 21. In: The naturally fermented sour pickled cucumbers in fermented foods health and disease prevention. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press; 2017:503–16 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-802309-9.00021-2Search in Google Scholar

23. Sekoai, P. Modelling and optimization of operational setpoint parameters for maximum fermentative biohydrogen production using Box-Behnken design. Fermentation 2016;2:15. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation2030015.Search in Google Scholar

24. Singracha, P, Niamsiri, N, Visessanguan, W, Lertsiri, S, Assavanig, A. Application of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts as starter cultures for reduced-salt soy sauce (moromi) fermentation. LWT 2017;78:181–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.12.019.Search in Google Scholar

25. Chen, H, Chen, T, Giudici, P, Chen, F. Vinegar functions on health: constituents, sources, and formation mechanisms. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2016;15:1124–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12228.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Mani-López, E, García, H, López-Malo, A. Organic acids as antimicrobials to control Salmonella in meat and poultry products. Food Res Int 2012;45:713–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.04.043.Search in Google Scholar

27. Guan, N, Liu, L. Microbial response to acid stress: mechanisms and applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2019;104:51–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-10226-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

28. Government Printing Office (Code of Federal Regulations). Acidified foods title 21, 114. Washington D.C; 1999. 21CFR114.Search in Google Scholar

29. Mokoena, M. Lactic acid bacteria and their bacteriocins: classification, biosynthesis and applications against Uropathogens: a mini-review. Molecules 2017;22:1255. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22081255.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Ward, B. Bacterial energy metabolism. Mol Med Microbiol 2015:201–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-397169-2.00011-1.Search in Google Scholar

31. Coman, M, Cecchini, C, Verdenelli, M, Silvi, S, Orpianesi, C, Cresci, A. Functional foods as carriers for SYNBIO®, a probiotic bacteria combination. Int J Food Microbiol 2012;157:346–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.06.003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Probiotics and Human Health; 2021. https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/TR/en/technical-documents/technical-article/food-and-beverage-testing-and-manufacturing/microbiological-analysis-for-food-and-beverage/probiotics-and-human.Search in Google Scholar

33. Kaur, N, Kaur, K, Aggarwal, P. Parameter optimization and nutritional evaluation of naturally fermented baby corn pickle. Agric Res J 2018;55:548. https://doi.org/10.5958/2395-146x.2018.00096.0.Search in Google Scholar

34. Song, D, Ibrahim, S, Hayek, S. Recent application of probiotics in food and agricultural science. Probiotics; 2012.10.5772/50121Search in Google Scholar

35. Al-Shawi, S, Swadi, W, Hussein, A. Production of probiotic (Turshi) pickled vegetables. J Pure Appl Microbiol 2019;13:2287–93. https://doi.org/10.22207/jpam.13.4.43.Search in Google Scholar

36. Geiger, E. Chapter 4 statistical methods for fermentation optimization. In: Fermentation biochemical engineering handbook. Norwich, NY: Noyes Publication; 2014; 415 p.10.1016/B978-1-4557-2553-3.00021-0Search in Google Scholar

37. Granato, D, de Araújo Calado, V, Jarvis, B. Observations on the use of statistical methods in food science and technology. Food Res Int 2014;55:137–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2013.10.02.Search in Google Scholar

38. Cox, D. Response surfaces, mixtures, and ridge analyses. 2nd ed. by George EP Box, Norman R Draper. Int Stat Rev 2007;75:265–6.10.1111/j.1751-5823.2007.00015_17.xSearch in Google Scholar

39. Feilizadeh, M, Mul, G, Vossoughi, ME. Coli inactivation by visible light irradiation using a Fe–Cd/TiO2 photocatalyst: statistical analysis and optimization of operating parameters. Appl Catal B Environ 2015;168-169:441–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.12.03.Search in Google Scholar

40. Lu, Z, Fleming, H, McFeeters, R. Differential glucose and fructose utilization during cucumber juice fermentation. J Food Sci 2001;66:162–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2001.tb15600.x.Search in Google Scholar

41. McFeeters, R. Single-injection HPLC analysis of acids, sugars, and alcohols in cucumber fermentations. J Agric Food Chem 1993;41:1439–43. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00033a016.Search in Google Scholar

42. Pérez-Díaz, IM, Breidt, F, Buescher, RW, Arroyo-López, FN, Jiménez-Díaz, R, Fernández, AG, et al.. Fermented and acidified vegetables. Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods; 2013. Chapter 51.10.2105/MBEF.0222.056Search in Google Scholar

43. Adesokan, I, Odetoyinbo, B, Okanlawon, M. Optimization of lactic acid production by lactic acid bacteria isolated from some traditional fermented food in Nigeria. Pakistan J Nutr 2009;8.Search in Google Scholar

44. Shu, G, Bao, C, Che, H, Wang, C, Yang, H. Fermentation optimization of goat milk with Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium bifidum by Box-Behnken design. Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment 2016;15:151. https://doi.org/10.17306/j.afs.2016.2.15.Search in Google Scholar

45. Zhou, Y, Domínguez, J, Cao, N, Du, J, Tsao, G. Optimization of l-lactic acid production from glucose by rhizopus oryzae atcc 52311. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 1999;78:401–8. https://doi.org/10.1385/abab:78:1-3:401.10.1007/978-1-4612-1604-9_37Search in Google Scholar

46. Song, H, Moon, E, Ha, J. Application of response surface methodology based on a box-behnken design to determine optimal parameters to produce brined cabbage used in kimchi. Foods 2021;10:1935. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10081935.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

47. Guillou, A, Floros, J. Multiresponse optimization minimizes salt in natural cucumber fermentation and storage. J Food Sci 1993;58:1381–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1993.tb06188.x.Search in Google Scholar

48. Zhang, LJ, Yang, JS, Ma, LW, Tan, HS. Optimization of fermentation process of papaya sauerkraut using response surface methodology. Int J Agric Biol Eng 2014;7:102–6.Search in Google Scholar

49. Ji, X, Wu, Y, Wu, X, Lin, Y, Xu, W, Ruan, H, et al.. Effects of Lactic acid bacteria inoculated fermentation on pickled cucumbers. Adv J Food Sci Technol 2013;5:1610–7. https://doi.org/10.19026/ajfst.5.3397.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-01-19
Accepted: 2022-03-29
Published Online: 2022-04-25
Published in Print: 2022-09-27

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 26.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znc-2022-0009/html
Scroll to top button