Home La2FSeTaO4: lanthanum fluoride selenide oxotantalate or lanthanum fluoride oxoselenotantalate?
Article Publicly Available

La2FSeTaO4: lanthanum fluoride selenide oxotantalate or lanthanum fluoride oxoselenotantalate?

  • Constantin Buyer , Hagen Grossholz and Thomas Schleid EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 14, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Following up the recently reported example La3F2Se2TaO4, colorless needle-shaped single crystals of the new compound La2FSeTaO4 were obtained as an unexpected by-product from solid-state reactions between lanthanum metal, lanthanum trifluoride, lanthanum sesquioxide and selenium in a sodium-chloride flux designed to yield lanthanum oxide fluoride selenides. Silica-jacketed tantalum capsules served as reaction containers at 850 °C, but an undesired activation of the metal tubes led to the formation of a new oxotantalate. La2FSeTaO4 crystallizes orthorhombically in the space group Pnma with the lattice parameters a = 1146.51(6), b = 395.16(2) and c = 1281.32(7) pm for Z = 4. The crystallographically unique Ta5+ cations are surrounded by five oxygen atoms as square pyramids [TaO5]5–, which share trans-oriented vertices (d(Ta–O4) = 202 pm, 2×) to form straight 1 Ta O 1 , 2 , 3 3 / 1 t O 4 2 / 2 v 3 chains propagating along [010] with isotactically aligned tips (d(Ta–O1) = 183 pm). Embedded into a matrix of lanthanum fluoride selenide according to 3 La 2 FSe 3 + (d(La–F) = 236–244 pm, d(La–Se) = 312–318 pm), which consists of two different La3+ cations as well as singular F and Se2− anions, via La–O contacts (d(La–O) = 247–274 pm), the coordination number of the La3+ cation towards the anions F, O2− and Se2–amounts to nine with tricapped trigonal prisms or capped square antiprisms as coordination polyhedra models. The tantalum cation has a distant contact with a Se2− anion (d(Ta⋯Se) = 317 pm), not efficiently counting to its first coordination sphere, but completing it to a quasi-octahedron.

1 Introduction

For the ternary system LaF3/La2Se3 two different compounds are known: LaFSe and La2F4Se [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. The first one is dimorphic with tetragonal LaFSe (a ≈ 413.8 pm, c ≈ 715.2 pm) [4] as the room-temperature polymorph adopting the PbFCl-type structure, and hexagonal LaFSe (a ≈ 421.7 pm, c ≈ 818.8 pm) [2, 4] as a quenchable high-temperature form with a prototypic crystal structure. With V m = 36.88 cm3 mol−1, tetragonal LaFSe, called A-type LaFSe in the following, is the slightly more dense modification as compared to hexagonal (or A′-type) LaFSe with V m = 36.97 cm3 mol−1, although La3+ shows the same coordination number (C.N. = 9) in both polymorphs. The mixed-anionic distribution with four F and five Se2− anions in A-LaFSe versus three F and six Se2− anions in A′-LaFSe makes the difference, however. In trigonal La2F4Se [4] (a ≈ 417.9 c ≈ 2326.9 pm) with Ce2F4Se-type structure [5] there are ten anionic ligands (seven F and three Se2− anions) coordinating the unique La3+ cations, so this arrangement serves as a missing link between tysonite-type LaF3 (trigonal: a ≈ 719.0, c ≈ 736.7 pm) [6, 7] with eleven F anions for each La3+ cation and cation-deficient Th3P4-type La2Se3 (cubic: a ≈ 905.5 pm) [8] exhibiting eight Se2− anions in the La3+ coordination sphere.

By adding oxide-anion contributions to the LaF3/La2Se3 system, mixed-anionic quaternary compounds with three different anions (F, O2− and Se2−) become possible, which are interesting candidates for host materials of lanthanoid(III)-luminescent phosphors. Examples for these systems are dimorphic La2OF2Se [9], [10], [11] (trigonal: a ≈ 418.1, c ≈ 4478.2 pm; hexagonal: a ≈ 1396.8, c ≈ 401.1 pm) and La6O2F8Se3 [10] (hexagonal: a ≈ 1394.3, c ≈ 403.0 pm). Whenever oxygen is involved in the starting materials of a reaction mixture, tantalum containers as reaction vessels become vulnerable, manifested in the formation of lanthanum-oxotantalate derivatives, e. g. La2Ta3Se2O8 [12], La2FSeTaO4 or La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] as by-products.

The present contribution is well placed in a special issue dedicated to the 60th birthday of Martin Lerch, who studied the crystal structures and the properties of several new mixed-anionic tantalum compounds. Especially his article about the synthesis and crystal structure of metastable γ-TaON in Angewandte Chemie has so far been cited more than 55 times [14]. By adding europium as a rare-earth element to the tantalum oxide-nitride system he found pyrochlore-type Eu2Ta2(O,N)7+δ and measured its magnetic properties [15]. Furthermore, he described rutile-type ScTa2O5N [16]. By replacing O2− with N3− and Ba2+ with La3+ in Ba3Ta5O14N [17], he managed to synthesize LaBa2Ta5O13N2, a quinary compound containing lanthanum, tantalum and two different anions, so no better follow-up can be imagined as a contribution in honor of Martin Lerch.

2 Results and discussion

The new compound La2FSeTaO4 was found as a by-product from the synthesis of lanthanum oxide fluoride selenides (La2OF2Se [9], [10], [11] or La6O2F8Se3 [10]) in sealed tantalum capsules. It is the first representative with this composition and crystal structure, but already the second known compound, which contains the components lanthanum, fluorine, selenium, tantalum and oxygen. As the first quinary representative of these five elements, La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] is known to crystallize with the La3F2Se2NbO4-type structure [18]. La2FSeTaO4 shows a strong structural and metrical relationship to the representatives of the formula Ln 3F2SeTaO4 (Ln = La–Nd) [13]. With a = 1146.51(6), b = 395.16(2) and c = 1281.32(7) pm for La2FSeTaO4, it has nearly the same a- and b-axes as La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] with a = 1132.59(6), b = 399.84(2) and c = 1811.72(9) pm. In fact the a- and b-axes of both compounds differ only by 1.2%, while the c-axis of the title compound is only about 2/3 of the previously reported one. Moreover, both compounds crystallize in the orthorhombic space group type Pnma with Z = 4. The crystallographic data of La2FSeTaO4 is summarized in Table 1, while the fractional atomic coordinates and the equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (U eq) can be taken from Table 2. Figure 1 shows six unit cells of La2FSeTaO4 viewed along [010] alongside with four unit cells of La3F2Se2TaO4 [13]. La2FSeTaO4 and La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] exhibit some striking structural similarities. Thus, La3F2Se2TaO4 can be written formally as La2FSeTaO4 ⋅ LaFSe. While La2FSeTaO4 contains two crystallographically different La3+ cations, but only one F and one Se2− anion each, the LaFSe-richer compound La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] has one more of all of them. The coordination sphere of (La1)3+ is the same in both compounds, and the second one, (La2)3+, differs only by an oxide anion in La2FSeTaO4, which is replaced by a fluoride anion in La3F2Se2TaO4. The (La3)3+ cation, which is missing in La2FSeTaO4, is present in La3F2Se2TaO4 and shows the same coordination sphere as the formally missing LaFSe [4] in its tetragonal A-type polymorph. All La3+ coordination spheres of nine anions can be described as tricapped trigonal prisms [(La1)O5FSe3]14− and [(La2)O5F2Se2]13− (Figure 2, top), which are connected by a triangular face of two Se2− anions and the (O4)2– anion. From a different point of view, the polyhedra can be described as capped square antiprisms, while in La2FSeTaO4 the capped square antiprisms of anions around the lanthanum cations create just dinuclear units (Figure 2, bottom), they form trinuclear units in La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] or even strands in the fluoride-free La2Se2Ta3O8 [12]. All La3+–Se2– distances in La2FSeTaO4 are with 315 pm in average a little longer than in La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] with 312 pm. The mean La3+–O2– and La3+–F distances in La2FSeTaO4 amount to 233 and 242 pm, respectively. The tantalum(V) cations in both La2FSeTaO4 and La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] are octahedrally surrounded by five O2− anions and one Se2− anion each. The [TaO5Se]7– octahedra build up chains along [010] by trans-oxygen corner-connection (Figure 3) in both cases with O4 as the linking oxygen atom. In the fluoride-free compound La2Se2Ta3O8 [12] the situation is different, because it features two crystallographically independent tantalum atoms, which are octahedrally surrounded. The first octahedron consists of six oxygen atoms, which form a double chain by trans-corner connectivity within the chains and edge-connectivity between the chains, but the second one exhibits two trans-oriented oxygen atoms and four selenium atoms building up a chain by selenium trans-edge connectivity. The major difference, however, results from the tantalum charge, as Ta5+ cations center the oxygen polyhedra [TaO6]7–, whereas Ta4+ cations are featured by the [TaO2Se4]8– ions in La2Se2Ta3O8 [12]. The distances between tantalum and oxygen in both fluoride-containing compounds are nearly the same (195 pm, see Table 3 for details), but d(Ta5+–Se2–) is only 292 pm long in La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] as compared to 317 pm in La2FSeTaO4. So the tantalum coordination sphere in La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] can be assigned C.N. = 6, but in La2FSeTaO4 only C.N. = 5 + 1. The Effective Coordination Number (ECoN after Hoppe [19, 20]) of Ta5+ with respect to Se2− in La2FSeTaO4 is only 0.04, while it amounts to 0.21 in La3F2Se2TaO4 [13]. The ECoNs of tantalum with respect to oxygen range in both compounds between 0.7 and 1.3. Hence they are very similar to those in monoclinic LaTaO4 [21, 22], again with values from 0.7 to 1.3 (Table 4). In La2Se2Ta3O8 [12] the first tantalum atom (Ta5+ only coordinated by oxide anions) shows ECoN values between 0.5 and 1.3 plus one deviant O2− with 0.1, and the second one (Ta4+ surrounded by two oxygen and four selenium atoms) has ECoN values between 0.7 and 1.1 for Ta4+ against Se2− and 1.1 with respect to O2−. While in La2Se2Ta3O8 [12] there is a strong attraction between Ta4+ and Se2− in accord with Pearson’s HSAB concept [23], there are only weak Ta5+–Se2– interactions in both fluoride-containing compounds. The ECoN values within the tantalum coordination polyhedra in selected compounds are compared in Table 4. While the ECoNs of Ta5+ in La2FSeTaO4 and La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] are very similar and described with values of about 5, geometric considerations reveal that tantalum is only surrounded square-pyramidally in La2FSeTaO4, but octahedrally in La3F2Se2TaO4 [13].

Table 1:

Crystallographic data of La2FSeTaO4 and their determination.

Formula La2FSeTaO4
Crystal system orthorhombic
Space group Pnma (no. 62)
Lattice constants
a/pm 1146.51(6)
b/pm 395.16(2)
c/pm 1281.32(7)
Cell volume (V c/nm³) 0.58051(5)
Formula units (Z) 4
molar volume (V m/cm3 mol−1) 87.40
Calculated density (D x /g cm−3) 7.10
Measurement parameters
Diffractometer IPDS-I (Stoe & Cie)
Wavelength Mo-Kα (λ = 71.07 pm)
F(000) 1048
hkl range −17 ≤ h ≤ 17
−5 ≤ k ≤ 5
−19 ≤ l ≤ 19
θ max 32.86
Absorption coefficient (µ/mm−1) 39.5
Temperature/K 293(2)
Data reduction
Measured reflections 8073
Unique reflections 1127
Absorption correction X-Shape [29]
R int /R σ 0.098/0.064
Number of reflections with |F o| ≥ 4σ(F o) 860
Structure determination and refinement
Program Shelx-97 [26], [27], [28]
R 1/R 1 with |F o | ≥ 4σ(F o) 0.060/0.039
wR2/GooF 0.078/0.962
Extinction coefficient (g) 0.0013(2)
Residual electron density
ρ max/min (e 10−6 pm−3) 2.61/−2.86
CSD number 2002488
Table 2:

Fractional atomic coordinates and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters for La2FSeTaO4 (all atoms occupy the Wyckoff site 4c).

Atom x/a y/b z/c U eq/pm2
La1 0.43145(6) 1/4 0.33783(5) 61(2)
La2 0.13818(6) 1/4 0.55757(5) 61(2)
F 0.4261(7) 1/4 0.1534(6) 78(16)
Se 0.15118(9) 1/4 0.01160(8) 84(3)
Ta 0.32931(4) 1/4 0.82284(3) 45(1)
O1 0.4378(8) 1/4 0.7180(7) 70(19)
O2 0.1780(8) 1/4 0.7578(7) 90(19)
O3 0.4227(8) 1/4 0.9500(7) 78(19)
O4 0.1948(8) 1/4 0.3496(7) 84(19)
Figure 1: 
Six unit cells of La2FSeTaO4 (left) and four unit cells of La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] (right) as viewed along [010].
Figure 1:

Six unit cells of La2FSeTaO4 (left) and four unit cells of La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] (right) as viewed along [010].

Figure 2: 
Coordination spheres of (La1)3+ and (La2)3+ in the crystal structure of La2FSeTaO4 as tricapped trigonal prisms (top) or as face-connected capped square antiprisms (bottom).
Figure 2:

Coordination spheres of (La1)3+ and (La2)3+ in the crystal structure of La2FSeTaO4 as tricapped trigonal prisms (top) or as face-connected capped square antiprisms (bottom).

Figure 3: 
Square-pyramidal surrounding of Ta5+ by oxygen atoms and the trans-vertex connection of the [TaO5]5–
 units along [010]. The resulting chains in La2FSeTaO4 show bridging O4 atoms and an isotactic orientation of the O1 pyramid tops. An extra Se2− anion at a distance of 317 pm to Ta5+ in trans-orientation to O1 completes each coordination sphere pseudo-octahedrally.
Figure 3:

Square-pyramidal surrounding of Ta5+ by oxygen atoms and the trans-vertex connection of the [TaO5]5 units along [010]. The resulting chains in La2FSeTaO4 show bridging O4 atoms and an isotactic orientation of the O1 pyramid tops. An extra Se2− anion at a distance of 317 pm to Ta5+ in trans-orientation to O1 completes each coordination sphere pseudo-octahedrally.

Table 3:

Selected interatomic distances (d/pm) for La2FSeTaO4 (left) and La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] (right).

La2FSeTaO4 d/pm La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] d/pm
La1 – F (1✕) 236.4 La1 – F1 (1✕) 239.3
    –O1 (2✕) 258.1     –O1 (2✕) 251.8
    –O2 (2✕) 255.5     –O2 (2✕) 262.3
    –O4 (1✕) 271.7     –O4 (1✕) 275.5
    –Se1 (2✕) 312.4     –Se1 (2✕) 306.8
    –Se2 (1✕) 317.3     –Se2 (1✕) 312.2
La2 – F (2✕) 244.0 La2 – F1 (2✕) 241.2
    –O2 (1✕) 260.6     –F2 (1✕) 252.3
    –O3 (1✕) 247.2     –F2′ (2✕) 261.7
    –O3′ (2✕) 250.8     –O2 (1✕) 259.3
    –O4 (1✕) 274.3     –O3 (1✕) 252.5
    –Se (2✕) 317.5     –Se2 (2✕) 313.6
La3 – F2 (1✕) 254.0
    –O3 (2✕) 250.2
    –O4 (1✕) 272.3
    –Se1 (2✕) 313.4
    –Se1′ (1✕) 315.2
    –Se2 (2✕) 311.8
Ø (La – F) 241.5 Ø (La – F) 250.2
Ø (La – O) 233.2 Ø (La – O) 258.8
Ø (La – Se) 315.4 Ø (La – Se) 311.9
Ta – O1 (1✕) 183.1 Ta – O1 (1✕) 181.7
   –O2 (1✕) 192.5    –O2 (1✕) 189.3
   –O3 (1✕) 195.0    –O3 (1✕) 199.6
   –O4 (2✕) 202.4    –O4 (2✕) 202.8
   –Se (1✕) 316.6    –Se1 (1✕) 292.1
Ø (Ta–O) 195.1 Ø (Ta–O) 195.2
Table 4:

Effective coordination numbers (ECoN) of tantalum in La2FSeTaO4, La3F2Se2TaO4 [13], La2Se2Ta3O8 [12] and LaTaO4 [21, 22].

La2FSeTaO4 ECoN La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] ECoN LaTaO4 [21, 22] ECoN
Ta –O1 (1×) 1.31 Ta –O1 (1×) 1.35 Ta –O4 (1×) 1.23
–O2 (1×) 1.01 –O2 (1×) 1.11 –O2 (1×) 1.09
–O3 (1×) 0.94 –O3 (1×) 0.79 –O1 (1×) 0.99
–O4 (2×) 0.72 –O4 (2×) 0.70 –O3 (1×) 0.89
–Se (1×) 0.05 –Se (1×) 0.21 –O1’ (1×) 0.86
–O2’ (1×) 0.79
Σ 4.75 4.86 5.85
La2Se2Ta3O8 [12] ECoN La2Se2Ta3O8 [12] ECoN
Ta1a) –O3 (1×) 1.29 Ta2b) –Se2 (2×) 1.10
–O2 (1×) 1.01 –O1 (2×) 1.10
–O5 (1×) 0.96 –Se1 (2×) 0.71
–O4 (1×) 0.90
–O1 (1×) 0.51
–O2’ (1×) 0.11
Σ 4.78 5.82
  1. a)representing Ta5+, b)representing Ta4+.

The selenide anions are surrounded in the form of capped square pyramids by five La3+ cations with one additional tantalum cap. These [SeLa5Ta]18+ polyhedra build a double chain along the [010] direction by edge-connections (Figure 4). Oxygen and fluorine atoms show the same tetrahedral and trigonal-planar surroundings as in La3F2Se2TaO4 [13]. The assignment of O2− and F to the anions with the coordinates (0.438, 1/4, 0.718) and (0.426, 1/4, 0.153) was enabled by bond-valence calculations (Table 5). Both sites are coordinated by a triangle of La3+ cations (and an extra Ta5+ cation in the case of the (0.438, 1/4, 0.718) position), but one of them should be oxide and the other one fluoride, for charge-balance reasons. The bond-valence sum for fluoride at (0.426, 1/4, 0.153) is close to 1 and at (0.438, 1/4, 0.718) higher than 1.5, so fluoride should be at (0.426, 1/4, 0.153) and oxide at the other Wyckoff site. The cationic coordination polyhedra of the light anions F and O2− can be seen in Figure 5. Selected interatomic distances of the title compound La2FSeTaO4 compared to the LaFSe-richer one La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] are summarized in Table 3. The motifs of mutual adjunction for La2FSeTaO4 as compared to those in La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] are shown in Table 6.

Figure 4: 
Ta5+-capped [SeLa5]13+ polyhedra form a double chain along [010] in La2FSeTaO4 by edge condensation.
Figure 4:

Ta5+-capped [SeLa5]13+ polyhedra form a double chain along [010] in La2FSeTaO4 by edge condensation.

Table 5:

Bond-valence calculations for La2FSeTaO4.

Atom Bond-valence sum Coordination number
La1 3.06 9
La2 2.85 9
Ta 4.86 5+1
Se 1.81 5+1
F 1.15 3
O1 1.93 3
O2 2.01 4
O3 2.18 4
O4 1.95 4
Figure 5: 
Cationic triangular and tetrahedral surroundings of the fluoride and oxide anions in La2FSeTaO4.
Figure 5:

Cationic triangular and tetrahedral surroundings of the fluoride and oxide anions in La2FSeTaO4.

Table 6:

Motifs of mutual adjunction for La2FSeTaO4 (top) and La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] (bottom).

F Se O1 O2 O3 O4 C.N.
La1 1/1 3/3 2/2 2/2 0/0 1/1 9
La2 2/2 2/2 0/0 1/1 3/3 1/1 9
Ta 0/0 (0+1)/(0+1) 1/1 1/1 1/1 2/2 5+1
C.N. 3 5+1 3 4 4 4
F1 F2 Se1 Se2 O1 O2 O3 O4 C.N.
La1 1/1 0/0 2/2 1/1 2/2 2/2 0/0 1/1 9
La2 2/2 3/3 0/0 2/2 0/0 1/1 1/1 0/0 9
La3 0/0 1/1 3/3 2/2 0/0 0/0 2/2 1/1 9
Ta 0/0 0/0 1/1 0/0 1/1 1/1 1/1 2/2 6
C.N. 3 4 6 5 3 4 4 4

The quinary compound La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] is formally consisting of La2FSeTaO4 and LaFSe, so the Madelung Part of Lattice Energy (MAPLE according to Hoppe [19, 20, 24]) of La2FSeTaO4 should be the one of La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] minus the one of LaFSe [4]. For LaFSe [4], there is a hexagonal (A′-type) and a tetragonal (A-type) polymorph, but the agreement of MAPLE for both with a difference of less than 0.6% is just striking. The detailed MAPLE values are given in Table 7 for comparison also with the summed up data of La2Se3 [25], LaF3 [7] and LaTaO4 [22], which are the compounds that can be found in the powder pattern of the product from attempts to synthesize La2FSeTaO4 as the target compound. With a 4% difference of these values it is not surprising, that the title compound La2FSeTaO4 or its LaFSe-richer homologue La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] can only be found as minor by-products through serendipitous attack of the tantalum capsules. A targeted synthesis had not yet been successful.

Table 7:

MAPLE values of La2FSeTaO4 compared to those of La3F2Se2TaO4 [13], LaF3 [7], La2Se3 [25], LaFSe [4] and LaTaO4 [22].

MAPLE/kJ mol−1 MAPLE/kJ mol−1 MAPLE/kJ mol−1
LaF3 5360 A-LaFSe 5626 A′-LaFSe 5450
La2Se3 14,491 La3F2Se2TaO4 37,155 La3F2Se2TaO4 37,155
LaTaO4 26,078
Σ(educts)* 32,695 La3F2Se2TaO4 – A-LaFSe 31,529 La3F2Se2TaO4 – A′-LaFSe 31,705
La2FSeTaO4 31,437
Δ/% 4.00 0.29 0.85
  1. *Σ(educts) = 1/3 MAPLE(La2Se3) + 1/3 MAPLE(LaF3) + MAPLE(LaTaO4).

The answer to the question in the title of this article is that La2FSeTaO4 would be better described as lanthanum fluoride selenide oxotantalate than as lanthanum fluoride oxoselenotantalate. La2FSeTaO4 does not represent a new lanthanum fluoride selenide oxoselenotantalate as La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] before, since the latter contains two different selenide anions, namely one as a selenide anion to please La3+ and the other one as a ligand for Ta5+. The single selenide anion in La2FSeTaO4 tries to serve for both functions and becomes overtasked, as its distance to Ta5+ expands to 317 pm (ECoN = 0.05) compared to the dedicated one in La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] (294 pm, ECoN = 0.21). On the other hand, its role as a Se2− ligand in the coordination sphere of the La3+ cations is indeed also strongly reduced (d(La3+–Se2–) = 312–318 pm, d  = 315 pm in La2FSeTaO4 versus d(La3+–Se2–) = 307–315 pm, d  = 312 pm in La3F2Se2TaO4 [13]). So La2FSeTaO4 should be rather addressed as a lanthanum fluoride selenide oxotantalate without selenium in the first tantalum coordination sphere, even if the trans-influence in the [TaO5Se]7 quasi-octahedra with 183 vs. 317 pm for the O1–Ta⋅⋅⋅Se line in La2FSeTaO4 appears not any stronger than the analogous one with 182 vs. 292 pm in La3F2Se2TaO4 [13].

3 Experimental

Single crystals of La2FSeTaO4 emerged as a by-product from solid-state reactions between La, LaF3, La2O3 and Se designed to produce La2OF2Se [9], [10], [11] or La6O2F8Se3 [10]. The targeted synthesis of La2FSeTaO4 according to the equation

(1) 4     L a     +     2     L a F 3     +     3     L a 2 O 3     +   6     S e     +     3     T a 2 O 5         6     L a 2 F S e T a O 4

was not successful, but some colorless, lath-shaped single crystals of this compound were obtained as a by-product from reactions of lanthanum metal, lanthanum trifluoride, lanthanum sesquioxide (all ChemPur, Karlsruhe, 99.9%) and elemental selenium (Alfa Aesar, Karlsruhe, 99.999%) with a mass equivalent of sodium chloride (ChemPur, Karlsruhe, 99.96%) as fluxing agent in tantalum tubes (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, without any special pretreatment). The tantalum tubes were filled in an argon glove box with the reactants and welded in an electric arc. The welded containers were transferred into tubes (Figure 6) of fused silica to protect them from air and heated for 7 days at 850 °C. Needle-shaped single crystals of the composition La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] were found in similar experiments, but never as a pure target compound along the following equation

(2) 8     L a     +     4     L a F 3     +     3     L a 2 O 3   +     12     S e     +     3     T a 2 O 5         6     L a 3 F 2 S e 2 T a O 4

The crystal structure was solved after an X-ray diffraction experiment of a selected single crystal with Mo-K α radiation (λ = 71.07 pm) at ambient temperature with an IPDS-I diffractometer by STOE & Cie (Darmstadt). The structure determination succeeded with the program package Shelx-97 [26], [27], [28] and absorption correction with X-Shape [29]. The bond-valence calculations were made with Brese and O’Keeffe’s values [30] and for MAPLE calculations [19, 20] the software of Hübenthal and Hoppe [24] was used. The same software found also application for calculation of the Effective Coordination Numbers (ECoN).

Figure 6: 
Example of two filled and arc-welded tantalum capsules inside a fused silica tube.
Figure 6:

Example of two filled and arc-welded tantalum capsules inside a fused silica tube.

4 Conclusions

From reactions of mixtures of lanthanoid metals, lanthanoid trifluorides, their sesqiuoxides, and elemental selenium in a sodium chloride flux at 850 °C in sealed tantalum capsules products like Ln 2OF2Se [9], [10], [11], Ln 3OFSe3 [31], Ln 3OF3Se2 [31], Ln 5OF5Se4 [32], [33], [34], Ln 6O2F8Se3 [10] and Ln 6O4F4Se3 [35] (Ln = La–Ho) can be obtained as lanthanoid oxide fluoride selenides. In the case of lanthanum and with the use of tantalum tubes not subjected to any pretreatment, colorless needle-shaped single crystals of orthorhombic La2FSeTaO4 and La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] occurred as by-products. La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] as the first representative of this kind has a structure which is not only an arithmetic intergrowth of La2FSeTaO4 with LaFSe. In the new compound, the two crystallographic different La3+ cations are coordinated by nine anionic ligands in the shape of capped square antiprisms or tricapped trigonal prisms. The tantalum atom is surrounded by five oxygen atoms as a square pyramid and an additional selenium atom at a longer distance of 317 pm in La2FSeTaO4 and at 292 pm in La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] as a sixth neighbor. The [TaO5]5 units are trans-corner connected and build a chain along [010]. While Se2− is coordinated by five La3+ and one Ta5+ as an extra cap of the square pyramid, the four different oxygen and the fluorine atoms in La2FSeTaO4 are coordinated in a triangular or tetrahedral fashion. The oxide and fluoride sites were individually determined by bond-valence calculations. The MAPLE value of La2FSeTaO4 added to that of LaFSe [4] shows a good agreement with the one of La3F2Se2TaO4 [13] with a difference of only 0.2% for hexagonal A′-LaFSe [4] and 0.3% for the tetragonal A-LaFSe [4].


Dedicated to Professor Martin Lerch on the occasion of his 60th birthday



Corresponding author: Thomas Schleid, Institut für Anorganische Chemie, Universität Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 55, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany, E-mail:

  1. Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Filatkina, V. S., Kustova, G. N., Batsanov, S. S. Russ. Chem. Bull. 1972, 21, 2171, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00854528.Search in Google Scholar

2. Dung, Ng.-H. Bull. Soc. Franç. Mineral. Cristallogr. 1973, 96, 41.Search in Google Scholar

3. Zimmermann, D. D., Schleid, Th. Z. Kristallogr. S 2014, 34, 139.Search in Google Scholar

4. Buyer, C., Grossholz, H., Wolf, S., Zagorac, D., Schleid, Th. Cryst. Growth Des. 2022. in preparation.Search in Google Scholar

5. Dung, Ng.-H. Bull. Soc. Franç. Mineral. Cristallogr. 1973, 96, 44.Search in Google Scholar

6. Mansmann, M. Z. Kristallogr. 1965, 122, 375, https://doi.org/10.1524/zkri.1965.122.5-6.375.Search in Google Scholar

7. Müller-Bunz, H., Schleid, Th. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1999, 625, 1377.10.1002/(SICI)1521-3749(199908)625:8<1377::AID-ZAAC1377>3.0.CO;2-OSearch in Google Scholar

8. Guittard, M., Benacerraf, A., Flahaut, J. Ann. Chim. [France] 1964, 9, 25.Search in Google Scholar

9. Buyer, C., Grossholz, H., Schleid, Th. Crystals 2019, 9, 435; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst9090435.Search in Google Scholar

10. Zimmermann, D. D., Grossholz, H., Wolf, S., Janka, O., Müller, A. C., Schleid, Th. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2015, 641, 1926; https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.201500253.Search in Google Scholar

11. Buyer, C., Wolf, S., Schleid, Th. Z. Kristallogr. S 2019, 39, 95.Search in Google Scholar

12. Brennan, T. D., Aleandri, L. E., Ibers, J. A. J. Solid State Chem. 1991, 91, 312, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4596(91)90086-w.Search in Google Scholar

13. Grossholz, H., Buyer, C., Lotter, S. M. A., Wolf, S., Schleid, Th. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2020, 646, 1588–1594; https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.202000087.Search in Google Scholar

14. Schilling, H., Stork, A., Irran, E., Wolff, H., Bredow, T., Dronskowski, R., Lerch, M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 2931, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200604351.Search in Google Scholar

15. Anke, B., Hund, S., Lorent, C., Janka, O., Block, T., Pöttgen, R., Lerch, M. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2017, 643, 1824, https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.201700024.Search in Google Scholar

16. Cosgun, S., Rohloff, M., Göbel, C., Gernert, U., Fischer, A., Lerch, M. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2014, 640, 2771, https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.201400325.Search in Google Scholar

17. Anke, B., Bredow, T., Soldat, J., Wark, M., Lerch, M. J. Solid State Chem. 2016, 233, 282, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2015.10.042.Search in Google Scholar

18. Brennan, T. D., Mansuetto, M. F., Ibers, J. A. J. Solid State Chem. 1993, 107, 547, https://doi.org/10.1006/jssc.1993.1380.Search in Google Scholar

19. Hoppe, R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1966, 5, 95, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.196600951.Search in Google Scholar

20. Hoppe, R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1970, 9, 25, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.197000251.Search in Google Scholar

21. Kurova, T. A., Aleksandrov, V. B. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 1971, 201, 1095.Search in Google Scholar

22. Hartenbach, I., Lissner, F., Nikelski, T., Meier, S. F., Müller-Bunz, H., Schleid, Th. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2005, 631, 2377; https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.200500278.Search in Google Scholar

23. Pearson, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 3533, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00905a001.Search in Google Scholar

24. Hübenthal, R., Hoppe, R. MAPLE, Program for the Calculation of the Madelung Part of Lattice Energy; Universität Gießen: Germany, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

25. Folchnandt, M., Schleid, Th. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2001, 627, 1411. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3749(200107)627:7<1411::aid-zaac1411>3.0.co;2-x.10.1002/1521-3749(200107)627:7<1411::AID-ZAAC1411>3.0.CO;2-XSearch in Google Scholar

26. Sheldrick, G. M. Acta Crystallogr. A 1990, 46, 467, https://doi.org/10.1107/s0108767390000277.Search in Google Scholar

27. Sheldrick, G. M. Shelxs-97, Program for the Refinement of Crystal Structures; Univ. Göttingen: Germany, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

28. Sheldrick, G. M. Acta Crystallogr. A 2008, 64, 112, https://doi.org/10.1107/s0108767307043930.Search in Google Scholar

29. Bärnighausen, W., Herrendorf, H. HABITUS: Program for the Optimization of the Crystal Shape for Numerical Absorption Correction in X-Shape; Karlsruhe: Gießen (Germany), 1993.Search in Google Scholar

30. Brese, N. E., O’Keeffe, M. Acta Crystallogr. B 1991, 47, 192, https://doi.org/10.1107/s0108768190011041.Search in Google Scholar

31. Zimmermann, D. D., Schleid, Th. Z. Kristallogr. S 2014, 34, 138.Search in Google Scholar

32. Zimmermann, D. D., Janka, O., Buyer, C., Niewa, R., Schleid, Th. Solid State Sci. 2021, 116, 106601; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2021.106601.Search in Google Scholar

33. Zimmermann, D. D. Dissertation; Universität: Stuttgart, Germany, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

34. Janka, O. Dissertation; Universität: Stuttgart, Germany, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

35. Zimmermann, D. D., Schleid, Th. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2014, 640, 2351.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-01-19
Accepted: 2022-01-29
Published Online: 2022-02-14
Published in Print: 2022-06-27

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. In this issue
  3. Editorial
  4. In celebration of Martin Lerch’s 60th birthday
  5. Research Articles
  6. Sodium rare earth metal amides Na3RE(NH2)6 (RE = La–Nd, Er, Yb) from ammonothermal synthesis
  7. Tm4IrIn and Lu4PtIn – In4 tetrahedra embedded in RE22 polyhedra
  8. Ternary rare-earth hydride oxides: stability in air and potential use as precursors for the synthesis of materials
  9. La2FSeTaO4: lanthanum fluoride selenide oxotantalate or lanthanum fluoride oxoselenotantalate?
  10. SrAl5Pt3 and Sr2Al16Pt9 – two new strontium aluminum platinides
  11. Hydrolysis and oxidation products of phosphine adducts to beryllium chloride
  12. An unusual member of the solid solution series between cristobalite and potassium ferrate(III) obtained from hydroflux
  13. Lithium ion transport in micro- and nanocrystalline lithium sulphide Li2S
  14. Partial substitution of the Mn atoms in CaMnO3 by first row transition metal atoms: effect on oxygen vacancy formation
  15. Cu(C2N4H4)2Br2·2H2O: an antiferromagnetic cyanoguanidine coordination compound and its characterization
  16. Metal-mediated C–C bond formation in a platinum(II)-coordinated dipyridylmethane ligand: an unusual example of “ipso-coupling” with solvent involvement
  17. Effect of composition on the Raman response of the Cu2(Fe x Zn1−x )SnS4 and Cu2(Mn x Zn1−x )SnS4 solid solutions
  18. Structural characterization of sodium and potassium 3-nitrohydrogenphthalate coordination polymers
  19. Quantum thermodynamics of hydrogen in nano-structured materials—H2 in carbon nanotubes
  20. Synthesis, crystal structure and magnetic properties of coordination compounds of Mn(NCS)2 with the 3-bromopyridine ligand
  21. Energy landscape for Li-ion diffusion in the garnet-type solid electrolyte Li6.5La3Zr1.5Nb0.5O12 (LLZO-Nb)
  22. Wüstite (Fe1−xO) – Thermodynamics and crystal growth
  23. Prediction of a model crystal structure for Ni2F5 by first-principles calculations
  24. Interfacial catalytic materials; challenge for inorganic synthetic chemistry
Downloaded on 24.7.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2022-0008/html
Scroll to top button