Home Applying the concept of entrepreneurial ecosystems in Estonia
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Applying the concept of entrepreneurial ecosystems in Estonia

  • Merli Reidolf EMAIL logo , Merle Küttim , Aleksandr Michelson , Helena Rozeik and Marianne Kallaste
Published/Copyright: November 13, 2019

Abstract

Similar to natural ecosystems, entrepreneurs and other entrepreneurial actors are locally interdependent and affect the performance of each other. Mostly economically larger and more successful regions have been studied by using the framework of entrepreneurial ecosystems (EEs). The current study aims at further developing the theoretical understanding of EEs and applying the proposed EE model in the context of Estonia. In the study, a conceptual model of an EE is proposed, the uniqueness of which lies in merging three aspects into a single framework: the nine components of an EE, its value-added, and its phase of development. The model was applied for analysing by means of a qualitative methodology four sector-based subEEs in Estonia.

The study showed that even in a small country like Estonia the components of the EE were partly similar, but also partly unique for the subEEs. This was not due to the location, but because of sectoral differences. The difference of the development phase seemed to be related to the knowledge base of the sector.

The policy relevance of the model is that it allows looking at the elements of an EE as well as its economic value-added and development prospects. The EE approach allows addressing jointly the difficulties and challenges in the development of EEs, including the issues of digitalisation, skilled labour, and production costs, which would allow the subEEs to develop into mature and resilient networks. Not all the components of an EE have to be equally strong, but their interconnectedness determines the strength of an EE. Policy solutions need to be tailored to the needs of specific subEEs based on the knowledge base and inner dynamics of the sectors.

JEL Classification: L26; O31; R12

Article note

The article is based on a study commissioned by Foresight Centre of Parliament of Estonia and forms a part of the development of the productivity scenarios and looks for possibilities for increasing the level of competitiveness of Estonian enterprises during the next 10–15 years. The study was conducted in cooperation with Tallinn University of Technology and Praxis Centre for Policy Studies.


References

Asheim, B. T./Gertler, M. S. (2005): The geography of innovation: regional innovation systems. In: Fagerberg, J./Mowery D.C./Nelson R. (Eds.): The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford, 291–317.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0011Search in Google Scholar

Asheim, B. T./Coenen, L./Vang, J. (2007): Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge bases: sociospatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy. In: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25(5), 655–670.10.1068/c0648Search in Google Scholar

Aspen Network of Development Entrepreneurs (ANDE). (2013): Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Diagnostic Toolkit. Aspen Network of Development Entrepreneurs.Search in Google Scholar

Audretsch, D. B./Belitski, M. (2017): Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions. In: The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1030–1051 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9473-810.1007/s10961-016-9473-8Search in Google Scholar

Boschma, R. (2005): Role of proximity in interaction and performance: Conceptual and empirical challenges. In: Regional Studies, 39(1), 41–45.10.1080/0034340052000320878Search in Google Scholar

Brown, R./Mason, C. (2017): Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems. In: Small Business Economics, 49(1), 11–30 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9865-710.1007/s11187-017-9865-7Search in Google Scholar

Cukier, D./Kon, F./Krueger, N. (2015): Towards a Software Startup Ecosystems Maturity Model, PROFES’2015 Workshop on Software Startups. Bolzano, 600–606. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8edb/9fff98fa7fe91006d9ed3966b28b2bc037f4.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

GEM 2016/2017 Global Report. (2017): The Global Entrepreneurship Research Association (GERA). http://www.gemconsortium.org/report/49812Search in Google Scholar

GEDI. Global Entrepreneurship Index 2017. (2017): The Global Entrepreneurship and Development Institute (GEDI), Washington, D.C., USA. http://thegedi.org/product/2017-global-entrepreneurship-index/Search in Google Scholar

Hsieh, H. F./Shannon, S. E. (2005): Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. In: Qual. Health Res., 15 (9), 1277–1288.10.1177/1049732305276687Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Isaksen, A. (2005): Regional clusters building on local and non- local relationships: a European comparison. In: A. Lagendijk, A./Oinas, P. (Eds.): Proximity, Distance and Diversity: Issues on Economic Interaction and Local Development. Aldershot, 129–152.10.4324/9781315245768-7Search in Google Scholar

Isenberg, D. (2011): The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Strategy as a New Paradigm for Economic Policy: Principles for Cultivating Entrepreneurship. Dublin.Search in Google Scholar

Lagerspetz, M. (2017) Ühiskonna uurimise meetodid: sissejuhatus ja väljajuhatus. Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikooli Kirjastus.Search in Google Scholar

Mack, E./Mayer, H. (2016): The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Urban Studies, 53(10), 2118–2133. https://doi.org/10.1177/004209801558654710.1177/0042098015586547Search in Google Scholar

Malecki, E. J. (2018): Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Geography Compass (In Press). https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.1235910.1111/gec3.12359Search in Google Scholar

Mason, C/Brown, R. (2014): Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Background paper prepared for the workshop organised by the OECD LEED Programme and the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs on Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Growth Oriented Entrepreneurship. The Hague.Search in Google Scholar

Miles, M. B./Huberman, M. A./Saldaña, J. (2014) Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. Los Angeles: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar

Nicotra, M./Romano, M./Del Giudice, M./Schillaci, C. E. (2017): The Causal Relation Between Entrepreneurial Ecosystem and Productive Entrepreneurship. In: The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10961-017-9628-210.1007/s10961-017-9628-2Search in Google Scholar

Raudsaar, M. (2010): Silicon Valley ökosüsteem, selle kasutus- ja rakendusvõimalused Eestis. Fenomenoloogiline uurimus. Silicon Valley; Tartu.Search in Google Scholar

Roundy, P. T. (2017): “Small town” entrepreneurial ecosystems: Implications for developed and emerging economies. In: Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 9(3), 238–262 https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-09-2016-004010.1108/JEEE-09-2016-0040Search in Google Scholar

Spigel, B./Harrison, R. (2017): Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. In: Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.126810.1002/sej.1268Search in Google Scholar

Spigel, B. (2017): The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.1216710.1111/etap.12167Search in Google Scholar

Stam, E. (2015): Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.106148410.1080/09654313.2015.1061484Search in Google Scholar

Sternberger, Bloh, Coduras (2019): A new framework to measure entrepreneurial ecosystems at the regional level. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, xx(x), xx-xx. DOI…10.1515/zfw-2018-0014Search in Google Scholar

The Global Competitiveness Report 2017–2018. (2017): World Economic Forum. Geneva. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-competitiveness-report-2017-2018Search in Google Scholar

Tödtling, F./Grillitsch, M. (2014): Does combinatorial knowledge lead to a better innovation performance of firms? In: SRE – Discussion Papers, 2014/07. WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna.10.1080/09654313.2015.1056773Search in Google Scholar

Tödtling, F./Trippl, M. (2005): Networking and project organisation in the Styrian automotive industry. In: Lagendijk, A./Oinas, P. (Eds.): Proximity, Distance and Diversity: Issues on Eco- nomic Interaction and Local Development. Aldershot, 89–110.10.4324/9781315245768-5Search in Google Scholar

World Economic Forum (WEF). (2013): Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Around the Globe and Company Growth Dynamics. Report Summary for the Annual Meeting of the New Champions 2013. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_EntrepreneurialEcosystems_Report_2013.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

World Economic Forum (WEF). (2014): Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Around the Globe and Early-Stage Company Growth Dynamics. Geneva: World Economic Forum. http://reports.weforum.org/entrepreneurial-ecosystems-around-the-globe-and-early-stage-company-growth-dynamics/wp-content/blogs.dir/34/mp/files/pages/files/nme-entrepreneurship-report-jan-8-2014.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Yin, R.K. (2009): Case Study Research. Design and Methods, 4th ed. Los Angeles.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-10-23
Accepted: 2019-08-30
Published Online: 2019-11-13
Published in Print: 2019-11-01

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zfw-2018-0028/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button