The Short Story, the New Weird, and the Literary Market

References

Achilles, J., and I. Bergmann. 2015. Liminality and the Short Story. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315817040Search in Google Scholar

Aguirre, M., R. Quance, and P. Sutton. 2000. Margins and Thresholds: An Enquiry into the Concepts of Liminality in Text Studies. Madrid: The Gateway Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bishop, K. J. 2004 [2003]. The Etched City: A Novel. New York: Spectra.Search in Google Scholar

Bould, M. 2017. “Pulp SF and its Others, 1918–39.” In Science Fiction: A Literary History, edited by R. Luckhurst, 103–29. London: The British Library.Search in Google Scholar

Butler, A. M. 2003. “Thirteen Ways of Looking at the British Boom.” Science-Fiction Studies 30 (3): 374–93.Search in Google Scholar

Butler, A. M. 2013. “The Tain and the Tain: China Miéville’s Gift of Uncanny London.” CR: The New Centennial Review 13 (2): 133–53. The British Boom, https://doi.org/10.1353/ncr.2013.0021.Search in Google Scholar

Chabon, M. 2010. “Trickster in a Suit of Lights: Thoughts on the Modern Short Story.” In Maps and Legends: Reading and Writing Along the Borderlands, 13–26. London: Fourth Estate.Search in Google Scholar

Chekhov, A. 1994. “The Short Story.” In The New Short Story Theories, edited by C. E. May, 273–7. Athens: Ohio University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cortázar, J. 1980. “Some Aspects of the Short Story.” Arizona Quarterly 36 (1): 5–18. Trans. A. W. Hayes.Search in Google Scholar

Csicsery-Ronay, I.Jr. 2003. “Editorial Introduction: The British SF Boom.” Science-Fiction Studies 30 (3): 353–4.Search in Google Scholar

De Camp, L. S. 1975. Lovecraft: A Biography. New York: Doubleday & Company.Search in Google Scholar

Delaney, P., and A. Hunter. 2019. The Edinburgh Companion to the Short Story in English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9781474400664Search in Google Scholar

Drewery, C. 2011. Modernist Short Fiction by Women. Surrey: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

Edwards, E., and T. Venezia. 2015. “UnIntroduction: China Miéville’s Weird Universe.” In China Miéville: Critical Essays, 1–38. Canterbury: Gylphi.Search in Google Scholar

English, J. F. 2005. The Economy of Prestige: Prizes, Awards, and the Circulation of Cultural Value. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674036536Search in Google Scholar

Extrapolation 50 (2). 2009. (special issue on C. Miéville, edited by S. Vint).Search in Google Scholar

Freedman, C. 2015. Art and Idea in the Novels of China Miéville. Canterbury: Gylphi.Search in Google Scholar

Glover, D., and S. McCracken. 2012. Popular Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goodreads. n.d. Goodreads, Inc. http://www.goodreads.com (accessed February 22, 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Gordimer, N. 1994. “The Flash of Fireflies.” In The New Short Story Theories, edited by C. E. May, 263–7. Athens: Ohio University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hanson, C. 1985. Short Stories and Short Fictions, 1880–1980. London: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-17685-4Search in Google Scholar

Humble, N. 2012. “The Reader of Popular Fiction.” In Popular Fiction, edited by D. Glover, and S. McCracken, 86–102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL9780521513371.007Search in Google Scholar

Jameson, F. 2015. “In Hyperspace.” London Review of Books 37 (17): 17–22.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, T. 2019. “The Weird Tale.” In The Edinburgh Companion to the Short Story in English, edited by P. Delaney, and A. Hunter, 160–74. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9781474400664-013Search in Google Scholar

Lanzendörfer, T. 2021. “How to Read the ‘Literary’ in the Literary Market.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 69 (1): 9–23, https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2020-2026.Search in Google Scholar

Locke, J. 2018. The Thing’s Incredible! The Secret Origins of Weird Tales. Off-Trail Publications.Search in Google Scholar

March-Russell, P. 2009. The Short Story: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748632145Search in Google Scholar

May, C. E. 2002. The Short Story: The Reality of Artifice. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

May, C. E. 2004. “Why Short Stories Are Essential and Why They Are Seldom Read.” In The Art of Brevity: Excursions in Short Story Fiction Theory and Analysis, edited by P. Winther, J. Lothe, and H. Skei, 14–25. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Search in Google Scholar

Meteling, A. 2017. “Gothic London: On the Capital of Urban Fantasy in Neil Gaiman, China Miéville, and Peter Ackroyd.” Brumal: Revista de Investigaciõn sobre lo Fantãstico 5 (2): 65–84, https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/brumal.416.Search in Google Scholar

Miéville, C. 2002. “Editorial Introduction.” Historical Materialism 10 (4): 39–49, https://doi.org/10.1163/15692060260474369.Search in Google Scholar

Miéville, C. 2008. “M.R. James and the Quantum Vampire: Weird; Hauntological: Versus and/or and and/or or?” In Collapse IV, edited by R. Mackay, 105–28. Falmouth: Urbanomic.Search in Google Scholar

Miéville, C. 2009. “Weird Fiction.” In The Routledge Companion to Science Fiction, edited by M. Bould, 510–5. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Miéville, C. 2011 [2005]. “Details.” Looking for Jake and Other Stories, 103–21. London: Pan Books.Search in Google Scholar

Morrison, B. 2017. “British Publishing and the Rise of Creative Writing: A Personal View.” In The Literary Market in the UK, edited by A. K. Nensel, and C. Reinfandt, 19–34. Tübingen: Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen.Search in Google Scholar

Naimon, D. 2011. “A Conversation with China Miéville.” The Missouri Review 34 (4): 52–66, https://doi.org/10.1353/mis.2011.0085.Search in Google Scholar

Patea, V. 2012. “The Short Story: An Overview of the History and Evolution of the Genre.” In Short Story Theories: A Twenty-first Century Perspective, 1–24. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.10.1163/9789401208390_002Search in Google Scholar

Poe, E. A. 1997 [1846]. “The Philosophy of Composition.” Graham’s Magazine XXvIII (4): 163–7. 04 April. Edgar Allen Poe Society of Baltimore. https://www.eapoe.org/ (accessed February 15, 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Pratt, M. L. 1994. “The Short Story: The Short and the Long of It.” In The New Short Story Theories, edited by C. E. May, 91–113. Athens: Ohio University Press.10.1016/0304-422X(81)90033-4Search in Google Scholar

Reinfandt, C. 2017a. “The Present in Perspective: Mapping the Literary Market Today.” In The Literary Market in the UK, edited by A. K. Nensel, and C. Reinfandt, 1–18. Tübingen: Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen.Search in Google Scholar

Reinfandt, C. 2017b. “Genres: The Novel between Artistic Ambition and Popularity.” In Handbook of the English Novel of the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries, edited by A. K. Nensel, and C. Reinfandt, 64–81. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110369489-004Search in Google Scholar

Rohrberger, M. 1998. “Where Do We Go from Here? The Future of the Short Story.” In The Tales We Tell: Perspectives on the Short Story, edited by B. Lounsberry, S. Lohafer, M. Rohrberger, S. Pett, and R. C. Feddersen, 201–6. Westport: Greenwood Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rohrberger, M. 2004. “Origins, Development, Substance, and Design of the Short Story: How I Got Hooked on the Short Story and Where It Led Me.” In The Art of Brevity: Excursions in Short Story Fiction Theory and Analysis, edited by P. Winther, J. Lothe, and H. Skei, 1–13. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sacido-Romero, J. 2018. “Liminality in Janice Galloway’s Short Fiction.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66 (4): 443–59, https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2018-0037.Search in Google Scholar

Sangster, M. 2015. “Iron Council, Bas-Lag and Generic Expectations.” In China Miéville: Critical Essays, edited by C. Edwards, and T. Venezia, 185–211. Gylphi: Canterbury.Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, C. W. 2017. “London’s Destructions, Dreamed-Up and Real’: The Apocalyptic City of China Miéville.” In London Post-2010 in British Literature and Culture, edited by O. V. Knebel Doeberitz, and R. Schneider, 254–82. Leiden and Boston: Brill Rodopi.10.1163/9789004344013Search in Google Scholar

Smith, E. N. 2012. “Pulp Sensations.” In Popular Fiction, edited by D. Glover, and S. McCracken, 141–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL9780521513371.010Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, J. B. 2012. Merchants of Culture: The Publishing Business in the Twenty-First Century, 2nd rev. ed. Cambridge: Polity.Search in Google Scholar

Unique Selling Proposition. n.d. Entrepreneur.com. https://www.entrepreneur.com/encyclopedia/unique-selling-proposition-usp (accessed January 24, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Watt, I. 1995 [1957]. The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding, 7th ed. London: Hogarth.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, M. 2010. “The Weird of Globalization: Esemplastic Power in the Short Fiction of China Miéville.” The Irish Journal of Gothic and Horror Studies 8: 30–40.Search in Google Scholar

Wolfe, G. K. 2011. Evaporating Genres: Essays on Fantastic Literature. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Young, E., and J. Bailey. 2015. British Women Short Story Writers: The New Woman to Now. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9781474401395Search in Google Scholar

Zähringer, R. 2017. “China Miéville, Embassytown.” In Handbook of the English Novel of the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries, edited by C. Reinfandt, 518–35. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110369489-027Search in Google Scholar