Abstract
In the present paper, I present a pilot study on fronting in six South Asian Varieties of English, i.e. Indian English (IndE), Bangladeshi English (BgE), Sri Lankan English (SLE), Nepali English (NpE) and Pakistani English (PkE) as compared to their historical input variety, i.e. British English (BrE). For each of these varieties, based on the South Asian Varieties of English (SAVE) newspaper corpus and the news section of the British National Corpus, 500 sentences per variety were manually parsed and the sentence-initial elements were annotated for their information status. Methodologically, I apply regression and CART classification tree analysis to test for variety-specific as well as universal features of fronting in SAVEs. The analysis reveals that constituents are mainly likely to be fronted when the information they represent is given (regardless of variety). Within this category, there are also clear variety-specific differences between IndE, PkE, SLE and BdE on the one hand (showing a generally higher frequency of object fronting), and BrE, MdE and NpE on the other (with a higher frequency of fronted adjuncts).
Acknowledgement
I would like to thank Ronja Jassmann for her invaluable help with the data coding and the editors for their helpful comments on a previous version of this paper. All remaining flaws are my responsibility alone.
Works Cited
Alsagoff, Lubna and Ho Chee Lick (1998). “The Grammar of Singapore English.” Joseph Foley, ed. English in New Cultural Contexts: Reflections from Singapore. Singapore: Oxford University Press, 127–151.10.1111/1467-971X.00087Search in Google Scholar
Baumgardner, Robert J., ed. (1996). South Asian English: Structure, Use, and Users. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bernaisch, Tobias and Claudia Lange (2012). “The Typology of Focus Marking in South Asian Englishes.” Indian Linguistics 73.1–4, 1–18.Search in Google Scholar
Bernaisch, Tobias, Christopher Koch, Joybrato Mukherjee and Marco Schilk (2011). Manual for the South Asian Varieties of English (SAVE) Corpus: Compilation, Cleanup Process, and Details on the Individual Components. Giessen: Justus Liebig University, Department of English.Search in Google Scholar
Bernaisch, Tobias, Stefan Th. Gries and Joybrato Mukherjee (2014). “The Dative Alternation in South Asian English(es): Modelling Predictors and Predicting Prototypes.” English World-Wide 35.1, 7–31.10.1075/eww.35.1.02berSearch in Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rakesh M. (2004). “Indian English: Syntax.” Bernd Kortmann and Edgar W. Schneider, eds. A Handbook of Varieties of English: A Multimedia Reference Tool. Volume 1: Phonology. Volume 2: Morphology and Syntax. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1016–1030. <http://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/books/9783110175325/9783110175325.2.1016/9783110175325.2.1016.xml> (January 3 2017).10.1515/9783110197181-133Search in Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rakesh M. (2008). “Indian English: Syntax.” Rajend Meshtrie, ed. Varieties of English 4: Africa, South and Southeast Asia. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 546–562.10.1515/9783110197181-133Search in Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Search in Google Scholar
Birner, Betty J. and Gregory Ward (1998). Information Status and Noncanonical Word-Order in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.40Search in Google Scholar
Bolton, Kingsley (2008). “English in Asia, Asian Englishes, and the Issue of Proficiency.” English Today 24.2, 3–12.10.1017/S026607840800014XSearch in Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald and Michael McCarthy (1995). “Grammar and the Spoken Language.” Applied Linguistics 16.2, 141–158.10.1093/applin/16.2.141Search in Google Scholar
Deshors, Sandra C. (2017). “Structuring Subjectivity in Asian Englishes: Multivariate Approaches to Mental Predicates across Genres and Functional Uses.” English Text Construction 10.1, 132–163.10.1075/etc.10.1.07desSearch in Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger (2007). “Frequency Effects in Language Acquisition, Language Use and Diachronic Change.” New Ideas in Psychology 25.2, 108–127.10.1016/j.newideapsych.2007.02.002Search in Google Scholar
Esser, Jürgen (2002). “Sampling and Categorizing Fronted Constructions in the BNC.” Andreas Fischer, Gunnel Tottie and Hans Martin Lehmann, eds. Text Types and Corpora. Studies in Honour of Udo Fries. Tübingen: Gunter Narr, 131–138.Search in Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy (1983). “Topic Continuity in Discourse. An introduction.” Talmy Givón, ed. Topic Continuity in Discourse. A Quantitative Cross-Language Study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–45.10.1075/tsl.3.01givSearch in Google Scholar
Gregory, Michelle and Laura A. Michaelis (2001). “Topicalization and Left-Dislocation: A Functional Opposition Revisited.” Journal of Pragmatics 33, 1665–1706.10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00063-1Search in Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan, Th. (2013). Statistics for Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110307474Search in Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. and Joybrato Mukherjee (2010). “Lexical Gravity Across Varieties of English: an ICE-Based Study of N-Grams in Asian Englishes.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15.4, 520–548.10.1075/ijcl.15.4.04griSearch in Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. and Tobias Bernaisch (2016). “Exploring Epicentres Empirically: Focus on South Asian Englishes.” English World-Wide 37.1, 1–25.10.1075/eww.37.1.01griSearch in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd and Tania Kuteva (2010). “Contact and grammaticalization.” Raymond Hickey, ed. The Handbook of Language Contact. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 86–105.10.1002/9781444318159.ch4Search in Google Scholar
Heller, Benedikt, Tobias Bernaisch and Stefan Th. Gries (2017). “Empirical Perspectives on Two Potential Epicenters: The Genitive Alternation in Asian Englishes.” ICAME Journal 41, 111–144.10.1515/icame-2017-0005Search in Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian, Marianne Hundt and Joybrato Mukherjee (2011). “Indian English – an Emerging Epicentre? A Pilot Study on Light Verbs in Web-Derived Corpora of South Asian Englishes.” Anglia 129.3–4, 258–280.10.1515/angl.2011.083Search in Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian, Anne-Kathrin Blass and Joybrato Mukherjee (2014). “Canonical Tag Questions in Asian Englishes: Forms, Functions and Frequencies in Hong Kong English, Indian English and Singapore English.” Mark Filppula, Juhani Klemola and Devyani Sharma, eds. The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 411–435.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199777716.013.025Search in Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum (2002). Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530Search in Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne, Sebastian Hoffmann and Joybrato Mukherjee (2012). “The Hypothetical Subjunctive in South Asian Englishes: Local Developments in the Use of a Global Construction.” English World-Wide 33.2, 147–164.10.1075/eww.33.2.02hunSearch in Google Scholar
Kachru, Brach B. (2005). Asian Englishes: Beyond the Canon. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.10.1515/9789882200104Search in Google Scholar
Koch, Christopher and Tobias Bernaisch (2013). “Verb Complementation in South Asian Englishes: The Range and Frequency of New Ditransitives.” Gisle Andersen and Kristin Bech, eds. English Corpus Linguistics: Variation in Time, Space and Genre: Selected Papers from ICAME 32. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 69–89.10.1163/9789401209403_006Search in Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud (1994). Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620607Search in Google Scholar
Lange, Claudia (2012). The Syntax of Spoken Indian English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/veaw.g45Search in Google Scholar
Lange, Claudia (2016). “The ‘intrusive as’-construction in South Asian Varieties of English.” World Englishes 35.1, 133–146.10.1111/weng.12173Search in Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend (1992). English in Language Shift. The History, Structure and Sociolinguistics of South African Indian English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511597893Search in Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend and Rakesh M. Bhatt. 2008. World Englishes. The Study of New Linguistic Varieties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791321Search in Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato (2008). “Sri Lankan English: Evolutionary Status and Epicentral Influence from Indian English.” Klaus Stierstorfer, ed. Anglistentag 2007 Münster: Proceedings. Trier: WVT, 359–368.Search in Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato (2010). “The Development of the English Language in India.” Andy Kirkpatrick, ed. The Routledge Handbook of World Englishes. London/New York: Routledge, 167–180.10.4324/9781003128755-12Search in Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato and Stefan Th. Gries (2009). “Collostructional Nativisation in New Englishes: Verb-Construction Associations in the International Corpus of English.” English World-Wide 30.1, 27–51.10.1075/eww.30.1.03mukSearch in Google Scholar
Ortega, Lourdes (2009). Second Language Acquisition. London: Hodder Education.Search in Google Scholar
Platt, John Talbot, Heidi Weber and Mian Lian Ho (1984). The New Englishes. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F. (1985). “Fancy syntax and ‘shared knowledge’.” Journal of Pragmatics 9, 65–81.10.1016/0378-2166(85)90048-7Search in Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2015). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. <http://R-project.org> (accessed September 16 2016).Search in Google Scholar
Sand, Andrea (2004). “Shared Morpho-Syntactic Features in Contact Varieties of English: Article Use.” World Englishes 23.2, 281–298.10.1111/j.0883-2919.2004.00352.xSearch in Google Scholar
Schilk, Marco, Tobias Bernaisch and Joybrato Mukherjee (2012). “Mapping Unity and Diversity in South Asian English lexicogrammar: Verb-Complementational Preferences across Varieties.” Marianne Hundt and Ulrike Gut, eds. Mapping Unity and Diversity World-Wide: Corpus-based studies of New Englishes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 137–165.10.1075/veaw.g43.06schSearch in Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. (2003). “The Dynamics of New Englishes: From Identity Construction to Dialect Birth.” Language 79.2, 233–281.10.1353/lan.2003.0136Search in Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. (2004). “How to Trace Structural Nativization: Particle Verbs in World Englishes.” World Englishes 23.2, 227–249.10.1111/j.0883-2919.2004.00348.xSearch in Google Scholar
Sharma, Devyani (2003). “Discourse Clitics and Constructive Morphology in Hindi.” Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, eds. Nominals: Inside and Out. Stanford, CA: CSLI, 59–84.Search in Google Scholar
Sharma, Devyani (2012). “Shared Features in New Englishes.” Raymond Hickey, ed. Areal Features of the Anglophone World. Berlin: De Gruyter, 211–232.10.1515/9783110279429.211Search in Google Scholar
Sinclair, John (1990). Collins Cobuild English Grammar. London: Collins.Search in Google Scholar
Timofeev, Roman (2004). Classification and Regression Trees (CART): Theory and Applications. Master Thesis, Humboldt University Berlin. <https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwj98KSW8qXRAhXFkCwKHRoqDLoQFggdMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fedoc.hu-berlin.de%2Fmaster%2Ftimofeev-roman-2004-12-20%2FPDF%2Ftimofeev.pdf&usg=AFQjCNGLy1EjYXU_iA0T6yDBW0mzBfBVNQ&cad=rja> (January 3 2017).Search in Google Scholar
Williams, Jessica (1987). “Non-Native Varieties of English: A Special Case of Language Acquisition?” English World-Wide 8.2, 161–199.10.1075/eww.8.2.02wilSearch in Google Scholar
Winkle, Claudia (2015). Non-Canonical Structures, They Use them Differently: Information Packaging in Spoken Varieties of English. PhD Dissertation, University of Freiburg. <https://www.freidok.uni-freiburg.de/fedora/objects/freidok:10600/datastreams/FILE1/ content> (January 3 2017).Search in Google Scholar
©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Non-Canonical Grammar!?
- Articles
- “Hard to Beat Dickens’ Characters”: Non-Canonical Syntax in Evaluative Texts
- Non-Canonical Syntax in South Asian Varieties of English: A Corpus-Based Pilot Study on Fronting
- Typological Interference in Information Structure: The Case of Topicalization in Asia
- Non-Canonical Speech Acts in the History of English
- Shoulda, Coulda, Woulda – Non-Canonical Forms on the Move?
- Chosen
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Non-Canonical Grammar!?
- Articles
- “Hard to Beat Dickens’ Characters”: Non-Canonical Syntax in Evaluative Texts
- Non-Canonical Syntax in South Asian Varieties of English: A Corpus-Based Pilot Study on Fronting
- Typological Interference in Information Structure: The Case of Topicalization in Asia
- Non-Canonical Speech Acts in the History of English
- Shoulda, Coulda, Woulda – Non-Canonical Forms on the Move?
- Chosen