Global Victimhood: On the Charisma of the Victim in Transitional Justice Processes
-
Thorsten Bonacker
Abstract
Since the 1990s, transitional justice has become almost synonymous with the concern for the rights of victims. Compared with the Nuremberg Trials – in which victims did not even appear as witnesses – this is a major change and one for which an explanation will be sought here with recourse to neo-institutional research perspective. The core argument put forward in this article is that the change in transitional justice towards a stronger inclusion of victims could be explained as the result of the expansion of a rationalist world culture in which a model of victimhood is created and diffused worldwide, primarily through international organizations and NGOs. This notion of global victimhood developed only after World War II, following the global diffusion of human rights, the change in academic conceptions of traumatic experiences and the advocacy of International NGOs, so that the development of normative pressure on national transitional justice processes placed victims at the centre of processes dealing with the past.
©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Article
- The Production of Institutional Facts in Economic Discourse
- Different Paths of Transitional Justice in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland
- Homo Politicus – Towards a Theory of Political Action and Motivation
- Global Victimhood: On the Charisma of the Victim in Transitional Justice Processes
- Intervention and Promotion of Democracy. The Paradoxes of External Democratization and the Power-Sharing Between International Officials and Local Political Leaders
- Foreign Impacts Revisited: Islamists’ Struggles in Post-War Iraq
- Concentration of Decision-Making Power: Investigating the Role of the Norwegian Cabinet Subcommittee
- Referendum: A Complement or a Threat to Representative Democracy?
- MKs Usage of Personal Internet Tools, 2009: On the verge of a New Decade
- Ten Years of European Impact Assessment: How It Works, for What and for Whom
- Political Parties and Pension Generosity in Times of Permanent Austerity
- The Electoral Consequences of Welfare State Reforms for the Danish Social Democrats
- Electoral Competition and the Constituent-Representative Relationship
- Austria Inc. Forever? On the Stability of a Coordinated Corporate Network in Times of Privatization and Internationalization
- Development of Health Care in Lithuania and Estonia: Similar Conditions, Different Results
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Article
- The Production of Institutional Facts in Economic Discourse
- Different Paths of Transitional Justice in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland
- Homo Politicus – Towards a Theory of Political Action and Motivation
- Global Victimhood: On the Charisma of the Victim in Transitional Justice Processes
- Intervention and Promotion of Democracy. The Paradoxes of External Democratization and the Power-Sharing Between International Officials and Local Political Leaders
- Foreign Impacts Revisited: Islamists’ Struggles in Post-War Iraq
- Concentration of Decision-Making Power: Investigating the Role of the Norwegian Cabinet Subcommittee
- Referendum: A Complement or a Threat to Representative Democracy?
- MKs Usage of Personal Internet Tools, 2009: On the verge of a New Decade
- Ten Years of European Impact Assessment: How It Works, for What and for Whom
- Political Parties and Pension Generosity in Times of Permanent Austerity
- The Electoral Consequences of Welfare State Reforms for the Danish Social Democrats
- Electoral Competition and the Constituent-Representative Relationship
- Austria Inc. Forever? On the Stability of a Coordinated Corporate Network in Times of Privatization and Internationalization
- Development of Health Care in Lithuania and Estonia: Similar Conditions, Different Results
