Capacities, Expertise, Empowerment – Rethinking the Anthropology of Participation
-
Jean-Louis Genard
Abstract
Often studied in the context of political developments and the alleged shift from representative democracy to participatory democracy, participation is discussed here in terms of changes in our anthropological coordinates. The exigencies and expectations of participation are found in many areas that go beyond the political sphere, extending from the business world and its quality circles to the production of self-assembly kits calling for the buyer’s assembly skills. This extension of the field of participation is based on a certain number of anthropological presuppositions which ascribe to actors the capacities and competencies they are supposed to have, unless they are invited to enhance them through empowerment strategies in the event that they are failing or insufficient. This paper argues that evaluating people and the configuration of many recent social mechanisms tend increasingly to adjust to this new anthropological paradigm. Such is the case for political participation, new social policies, empowerment training, educational objectives, and development and health policies. Returning more specifically to political participation, the paper shows how these new anthropological coordinates reconfigure by redrawing the division between ordinary and specialized expertise and, in this way, the balance between spaces in which participatory democracy can take place and those that remain confined to technocratic expertise.
References
Bauman, Z. (2007) Le présent liquide. Paris: Seuil.Search in Google Scholar
Beck, U. (2001) La société du risque. Paris: Aubier.Search in Google Scholar
Berger, M. (2009) Répondre en citoyen ordinaire, Doctoral thesis in sociology. Université libre de Bruxelles.Search in Google Scholar
Berger, M., D. Cefaï and C. Gayet-Viaud, eds. (2011) Du civil au politique. Bruxelles: Peter Lang.10.3726/978-3-0352-6164-6Search in Google Scholar
Blondiaux, L. (2008) Le nouvel esprit de la démocratie. Paris: Seuil.Search in Google Scholar
Boltanski, L. and E. Chiapello (1999) Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar
Callon, M., P. Lascoumes and Y. Barthe (2001) Agir dans un monde incertain. Paris: Seuil.Search in Google Scholar
Cantelli, F. (2013) “Deux conceptions de l’empowerment,” Politiques et Sociétés, 32(1):63–87.10.7202/1018721arSearch in Google Scholar
Cantelli, F. and J. L. Genard (2007) Action publique et subjectivité. Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence (LGDJ).Search in Google Scholar
Castel, R. (1981) La gestion des risques. Paris: Minuit.Search in Google Scholar
Charles, J. (2012) Une participation éprouvante, Doctoral thesis en sociology. Université catholique de Louvain.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.21236/AD0616323Search in Google Scholar
de Tocqueville, A. (1992) De la démocratie en Amérique. Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar
Genard, J. L. (1999) La grammaire de la responsabilité. Paris: Cerf, coll. “Humanités.”.10.4000/books.pusl.19842Search in Google Scholar
Genard, J. L. (2005) “Raisons techniques, raisons publiques.” Les nouveaux Cahiers de la Cambre no 3, De la participation urbaine, la place Flagey, Bruxelles: La Lettre Volée-La Cambre, pp. 88–98.Search in Google Scholar
Genard, J. L. (2009) “Une réflexion sur l’anthropologie de la fragilité, de la vulnérabilité et de la souffrance.” In: (T. Périlleux and J. Cultiaux, eds.) Destins politiques de la souffrance, Intervention sociale, justice, travail. Paris: Eres, pp. 27–46.Search in Google Scholar
Genard, J. L. and F. Cantelli (2010) “Pour une sociologie politique des compétences,” Les Politiques sociales, 1/2:103–120.10.3917/lps.101.0103Search in Google Scholar
Gibson, J. (1977) “The Theory of Affordances.” In: (R.t. Shaw and J. Bransford, eds.) Perceiving, Acting and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, pp. 67–82.Search in Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1994) Les conséquences de la modernité. Paris: L’Harmattan.Search in Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1987) Logique des sciences sociales et autres essais. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar
Hannerz, U. (1980) Explorer la ville. Paris: Minuit.Search in Google Scholar
Joseph, I. (1998) La ville sans qualités. Paris: Éditions de l’Aube.Search in Google Scholar
Lacourt, I. (2007) “Des catégories de l’action publique à l’épreuve de la subjectivité.” In: (F. Cantelli and J. L.Genard, eds.) Action publique et subjectivité. Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence (LGDJ), pp. 219–230.Search in Google Scholar
Morand, C.A. (1999) Le droit néo-moderne des politiques publiques. Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence (LGDJ).Search in Google Scholar
Nikkah, H. and M. Redzuan (2009) “Participation as a Medium of Empowerment in Community Development,” European Journal of Social Sciences 11(1):170–176.Search in Google Scholar
Ogien, R. (1993) La faiblesse de la volonté. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.10.3917/puf.ogien.1993.01Search in Google Scholar
Pattaroni, L. (2007) “Le sujet en l’individu. La promesse d’autonomie du travail social au risque d’une colonisation par le proche.” In: (F. Cantelli et J. L.Genard, eds.) Action publique et subjectivité. Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence (LGDJ), pp. 203–218.Search in Google Scholar
Périlleux, T. and J. Cultiaux (2007) “Être responsable de sa santé? Face, accents et limites d’un argumentaire de la responsabilisation des patients.” In: (F. Cantelli and J. L.Genard, eds.) Action publique et subjectivité. Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence (LGDJ), pp. 133–146.Search in Google Scholar
Stiegler, B. (2012). La campagne vue par Bernard Stiegler. Retrieved on April 23, 2012 from http://www.telerama.fr/idees/presidentielle-j-57-la-campagne-vue-par-bernardstiegler, 78318.php.Search in Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1998) Les sources du moi. Paris: Seuil.Search in Google Scholar
Thévenot, L. (2006) L’action au pluriel. Paris: La Découverte.10.3917/dec.theve.2006.02Search in Google Scholar
Vrancken, D. and C. Marquet (2006) Le travail sur soi, vers une psychologisation de la société? Paris: Belin.Search in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Switzerland’s Political Performance Compared: Determinants of a Success Story
- How Does May’s Law Work in Multi-dimensional Competition? Intra-party Opinion Structure in Catalonia
- Capacities, Expertise, Empowerment – Rethinking the Anthropology of Participation
- On Sensitivity and Disability: Political Consumerism, Social-Political Entrepreneurship and Social Justice
- Japan’s Economic Assistance to the Republic of Korea, 1977–1981: An Analysis within the Framework of the US-Japan Security Burden-sharing Scheme
- The Municipality as Negotiator in Multilevel Governance of Health Care
- Public Policy Design: How to Learn From Failures
- The Effects of Political Socialization Programmes: The Youth Parliament Experience in Brazil
- Using Discourse Network Analysis to Measure Discourse Coalitions: Towards a Formal Analysis of Political Discourse
- Paternalism, Public Health Ethics, and Equality
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Switzerland’s Political Performance Compared: Determinants of a Success Story
- How Does May’s Law Work in Multi-dimensional Competition? Intra-party Opinion Structure in Catalonia
- Capacities, Expertise, Empowerment – Rethinking the Anthropology of Participation
- On Sensitivity and Disability: Political Consumerism, Social-Political Entrepreneurship and Social Justice
- Japan’s Economic Assistance to the Republic of Korea, 1977–1981: An Analysis within the Framework of the US-Japan Security Burden-sharing Scheme
- The Municipality as Negotiator in Multilevel Governance of Health Care
- Public Policy Design: How to Learn From Failures
- The Effects of Political Socialization Programmes: The Youth Parliament Experience in Brazil
- Using Discourse Network Analysis to Measure Discourse Coalitions: Towards a Formal Analysis of Political Discourse
- Paternalism, Public Health Ethics, and Equality
