Abstract
The main research question posed in the article is whether the mixed electoral systems are separate third class of electoral systems? Although, they were primarily designed as a tool for implementing completely contradictory objectives of the majoritarian and proportional representation, as a consequence, they created fully new quality, which cannot be reduced to the sum of effects being produced by their components. Reasons for this include, among others, their genesis and political purpose (the desire to combine the best features and characteristics of the majoritarian and proportional systems into one system), mechanics (multi-formula and multiple-tiered seat allocation mechanism), multiplicity of variants and detailed technical solutions (presence or lack of mandate transfer and/or of vote transfer between majoritarian and proportional subsystems). The distinctiveness of mixed electoral systems is, however, determined primarily by self-relevant political consequences generated within strategies of nominating party candidates (the number of candidates listed within single-mandate constituencies of the majority part has a positive effect on the party’s results in proportional subsystem), electorate voting behaviors (the psychological effect is acting on voters toward honest and not strategic voting), the level of disproportionality of election results (the mixed system are in general less proportional than traditional systems of proportional representation, however, they are more proportional than the majoritarian voting systems) and the degree of party dispersion (the mixed systems are usually correlated with three-body format of the party system).
References
Banaszak, Bogusław and Ryszard Balicki (2006) “Prawo wyborcze do Parlamentu Republiki Federalnej Niemiec.” In: (S. Grabowska and K. Składowski, eds.) Prawo wyborcze do parlamentu w wybranych państwach europejskich. Kraków, pp. 163–78.Search in Google Scholar
Blais, André and Louis Massicotte (1996a) “Mixed Electoral Systems: An Overview,” Representation, 33(4):115–118.10.1080/00344899608522970Search in Google Scholar
Blais, André and Louis Massicotte (1996b). “Electoral Systems.” In: (L. LeDuc, R. G. Niemi and P. Norris, eds.) Comparing Democracies. Elections and Voting in Global Perspective. London: SAGE Publications, pp. 49–81.Search in Google Scholar
Bormann, Nils-Christian and Matt Golder (2013) “Democratic Electoral Systems around the world. 1946–2011,” Electoral Studies, 32(2):360–369.10.1016/j.electstud.2013.01.005Search in Google Scholar
Carter, Elisabeth and David M. Farrell (2010) “Electoral Systems and Election Management.” In: (L. LeDuc, R. G. Niemi and P. Norris, eds.) Comparing Democracies 3. Elections and Voting in the 21st Century. London: Sage Publications Ltd., pp. 25–44.10.4135/9781446288740.n2Search in Google Scholar
Colomer, Josep M. (ed.) (2004) Handbook of Electoral System Choice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230522749Search in Google Scholar
Cox, Karen E. and Leonard J. Schoppa (2002) “Interaction Effects in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems. Theory and Evidence From Germany Japan and Italy,” Comparative Political Studies, 35(9):1027–1053.10.1177/001041402237505Search in Google Scholar
D’Alimonte, Roberto (2005) “Italy: A Case of Fragmented Bipolarism.” In: (M. Gallagher and P. Mitchell, eds.) The Politics of Electoral Systems. New York: Oxford, pp. 253–276.10.1093/0199257566.003.0012Search in Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice (1964) Political Parties. Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London-New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Elklit, Jørgen (1992) “The Best of Both Worlds? The Danish electoral system 1915–1920 in a Comparative Perspective,” Electoral Studies, 11(3):189–205.10.1016/0261-3794(92)90014-WSearch in Google Scholar
Farrell, David (2001). Electoral Systems. A Comparative Introduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar
Farrell, David (2011). Electoral Systems. A Comparative Introduction, 2nd ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-137-28550-8Search in Google Scholar
Ferrara, Federico, Erik S. Herron and Misa Nishikawa (2005) Mixed Electoral Systems: Contamination and Its Consequences. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781403978851Search in Google Scholar
Gallagher, Michael and Paul Mitchell (eds.) (2005) The Politics of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199257566.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Grabowska, Sabina and Konrad Składowski (eds.) (2006) Prawo wyborcze do parlamentu w wybranych państwach europejskich. Kraków.Search in Google Scholar
Jarentowski, Marek (2013) “Mieszany system wyborczy w wersji “kombinacyjnej” jako sposób wzmocnienia dużych partii politycznych na przykładzie Litwy,” Przegląd Politologiczny 4, pp. 237–262.10.14746/pp.2013.18.4.15Search in Google Scholar
Kaase, Max (1986) “Personalized Proportional Representation: The ‘Model’ of the West German Electoral System.” In: (A. Lijphart and B. Grofman, eds.) Choosing an Electoral System: Issues and Alternatives. Santa Barbara: Praeger, pp. 155–163.Search in Google Scholar
Karp, Jeffry A. (2009) “Candidate Effects and Spill-Over in Mixed Systems: Evidence from New Zealand,” Electoral Studies, 28(1):41–50.10.1016/j.electstud.2008.06.012Search in Google Scholar
Karp, Jeffry A., Jack Vowles, Susan A. Banducci and Todd Donovan (2002) “Strategic Voting, Party Activity, and Candidate Effects: Testing Explanations for Split Voting in New Zealand’s New Mixed System,” Electoral Studies, 21(1):1–22.10.1016/S0261-3794(00)00031-7Search in Google Scholar
Kostadinova, Tatiana (2002) “Do Mixed Electoral System Matter? A Cross-National Analysis of their Effects in Eastern Europe,” Electoral Studies, 21(1):23–34.10.1016/S0261-3794(00)00032-9Search in Google Scholar
Kunicova, Jana and Thomas Frederick Remington (2008) “Mandates Parties and Dissent. Effect of Electoral Rules on Parliamentary Party Cohesion in the Russian State Duma 1994–2003,” Party Politics, 14(5):555–574.10.1177/1354068808093390Search in Google Scholar
Lakeman, Enid (1974) How Democracies Vote: A Study of Electoral Systems. London: Faber and Faber.Search in Google Scholar
Lakeman, Enid and James Lambert (1955) Voting in Democracies. A Study of Majority and Proportional Electoral Systems. London: Faber and Faber.Search in Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend (1984a) “Advances in the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems,” World Politics, 36(3):424–436.10.2307/2010382Search in Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend (1984b) “Trying to Have the best of Both Worlds: Semi-Proportional and Mixed Systems.” In: (A. Lijphart and B. Grofman, eds.) Choosing an Electoral System: Issues and Alternatives. Santa Barbara: Praeger, 207–213.Search in Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend (1994) Electoral Systems and Party Systems. A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies 1945–1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198273479.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend (1999) Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lundell, Krister (2005) Contextual Determinants of Electoral System Choice. A Macro-Comparative Study 1945–2003. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Massicotte, Louis and André Blais (1999). “Mixed Electoral Systems: A Conceptual and Empirical Survey,” Electoral Studies, 18(3):341–366.10.1016/S0261-3794(98)00063-8Search in Google Scholar
Meyer, Hans (1995) “Prawo wyborcze,” In: (J. Isensee and P. Kirchof, eds.) Parlament Republiki Federalnej Niemiec. Warszwa, pp. 9–52.Search in Google Scholar
Michalak, Bartłomiej (2011) “Mieszane systemy wyborcze na przykładzie Włoch i Rosji. Ordynacja doskonała czy niespełnione nadzieje?,” Studia BAS, 3(27):51–71.Search in Google Scholar
Michalak, Bartłomiej (2013) Mieszane systemy wyborcze. Cele, rozwiązania, konsekwencje. Toruń.Search in Google Scholar
Moser, Robert G. and Ethan Scheiner (2004) “Mixed Electoral Systems and Electoral Systems Effects: Controlled Comparison and Cross-National Analysis,” Electoral Studies, 23(4):575–599.10.1016/S0261-3794(03)00056-8Search in Google Scholar
Nohlen, Dieter (2004) Prawo wyborcze i system partyjny. O teorii systemów wyborczych. Warszawa.Search in Google Scholar
Nohlen, Dieter and Philip Stöver (eds.) (2010) Elections in Europe. A Data Handbook, Baden-Baden: Dieter Nohlen.10.5771/9783845223414Search in Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa (1997) “Choosing Electoral Systems: Proportional Majoritarian and Mixed Systems,” International Political Science Review, 18(3):297–312.10.1177/019251297018003005Search in Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa (2004) Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511790980Search in Google Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew, Ben Reilly and Andrew Ellis (2005) Electoral System Design: The New International IDEA Handbook. Stockholm: International IDEA.Search in Google Scholar
Royal Commission on the Electoral System (1986) Report of the Royal Commission on the Electoral System. Towards a Better Democracy, Wellington.Search in Google Scholar
Saalfeld, Thomas (2005) “German: Stability and Strategy in a Mixed-Member Proportional System.” In: (M. Gallagher and P. Mitchell, eds.) The Politics of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 209–229.10.1093/0199257566.003.0010Search in Google Scholar
Salomon, Jeremiasz (2012) “Wpływ kandydatów na głosowanie podzielone w mieszanych systemach wyborczych,” e-Poltikon, 3:182–214.Search in Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni (1997) Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures Incentives and Outcomes. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-25217-6Search in Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni (1999) “The Party-Effects of Electoral Systems,” Israel Affairs, 6(2):13–28.10.1080/13537129908719557Search in Google Scholar
Scarrow, Susan E. (2001) “Germany: The Mixed-Member System as a Political Compromise.” In: (M. S. Shugart and M. P. Wattenberg, eds.) Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 55–69.Search in Google Scholar
Shugart, Matthew Soberg and Martin P. Wattenberg (eds.) (2001) Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Siaroff, Alan (2000) Comparative European Party Systems. An Analysis of Parliamentary Elections Since 1945. New York-London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Sieberer, Ulrich (2010) “Behavioral Consequences of Mixed Electoral Systems: Deviating Voting Behavior of District and List MPs in the German Bundestag,” Electoral Studies, 29(3):484–496.10.1016/j.electstud.2010.04.012Search in Google Scholar
Taagepera, Rein (2007) Predicting Party Sizes. The Logic of Simple Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199287741.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Taagepera, Rein and Matthew Soberg Shugart (1989) Seats and Votes. The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Taylor, Peter J. and Ronald J. Johnston (1979) Geography of Elections. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Thames, Frank C. (2005). “A House Divide. Party Strenght and the Mandate Divide in Hungary Russia and Ukraine,” Comparative Political Studies, 38(3):282–303.10.1177/0010414004272526Search in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- A Comparison of the Economic Growth of the Baltic States between the Two World Wars
- The Controversy over Religious Arbitration Tribunals in Ontario: Unspoken Identity-Based Justifications?
- Human Rights, Institutions and the Division of Moral Labor
- From Parliamentarisation Towards Presidentialisation: Institutional Aspects of Local Political Leadership in Slovenia
- Mixed Electoral Systems: A Hybrid or a New Family of Electoral Systems?
- Signaling Legitimacy: Self-legitimation by the G8 and the G20 in Times of Competitive Multilateralism
- Central European MEPs and Their Roles: Behavioral Strategies in the European Parliament
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- A Comparison of the Economic Growth of the Baltic States between the Two World Wars
- The Controversy over Religious Arbitration Tribunals in Ontario: Unspoken Identity-Based Justifications?
- Human Rights, Institutions and the Division of Moral Labor
- From Parliamentarisation Towards Presidentialisation: Institutional Aspects of Local Political Leadership in Slovenia
- Mixed Electoral Systems: A Hybrid or a New Family of Electoral Systems?
- Signaling Legitimacy: Self-legitimation by the G8 and the G20 in Times of Competitive Multilateralism
- Central European MEPs and Their Roles: Behavioral Strategies in the European Parliament