Functional roles of the microbiota-gut-brain axis in Alzheimer’s disease: Implications of gut microbiota-targeted therapy
-
Si-Ran Zhong
,
Ben Chen
Abstract
Increasing scientific evidence demonstrates that the gut microbiota influences normal physiological homeostasis and contributes to pathogenesis, ranging from obesity to neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Gut microbiota can interact with the central nervous system (CNS) through the microbiota-gut-brain axis. The interaction is mediated by microbial secretions, metabolic interventions, and neural stimulation. Here, we review and summarize the regulatory pathways (immune, neural, neuroendocrine, or metabolic systems) in the microbiota-gut-brain axis in AD pathogenesis. Besides, we highlight the significant roles of the intestinal epithelial barrier and blood–brain barrier (BBB) in the microbiota-gut-brain axis. During the progression of AD, there is a gradual shift in the gut microbiota and host co-metabolic relationship, leading to gut dysbiosis, and the imbalance of microbial secretions and metabolites, such as lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). These products may affect the CNS metabolic state and immune balance through the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Further, we summarize the potential microbiota-gut-brain axis-targeted therapy including carbohydrates, probiotics, dietary measures, and propose new strategies toward the development of anti-AD drugs. Taken together, the data in this review suggest that remodeling the gut microbiota may present a tractable strategy in the management and development of new therapeutics against AD and other neurodegenerative diseases.
1 Introduction
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, affecting 50 million people across the world. Between 2000 and 2013, deaths as a result of cerebrovascular disease decreased by 20%, whereas AD mortality increased by 71% [1].
The most prevalent clinical manifestation of AD is progressive memory deficit with multiple cognitive impairments. Based on the “amyloid cascade” hypothesis, AD results from amyloid-β (Aβ) deposition and neurofibrillary tangles. They are characterized by hyperphosphorylated tau protein and neuronal loss in multiple brain sections including the hippocampus, neocortex, amygdala, and the nucleus basalis of Meynert [2,3]. However, the exact cause of AD remains elusive. Despite the fact that many patients with mild cognitive impairment show no Aβ deposits in the brain, some nondemented elderly people have Aβ deposits or senile plaques [4]. In recent years, more than 20 anti-AD compounds that target Aβ or tau aggregation have shown no efficacy in slowing cognitive deficit [5], raising a great challenge to the “amyloid cascade” hypothesis.
On the other hand, neuroinflammation theory suggests that chronic inflammation characterized by microglia activation and innate immune response both in the brain and in the periphery mediates AD progression [6].
Microglia is the key player in this process. It is involved in AD pathogenesis by releasing inflammatory mediators, manifested as a major regulator of inflammation, NF-κB dysregulation, resulting in Aβ accumulation and oxidative stress.
More importantly, Aβ itself is a microglia activator. This cycle has been considered as an underlying factor in AD pathogenesis [7,8]. Persistent neuroinflammatory and astrocytes activation contributes to the blood–brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction, and thus, to neuronal death and cognitive impairment. Whereas huge efforts have been made towards the development of new drugs targeting inflammation and immune regulation [9,10,11], the options for clinical treatment remain limited [12]. Nevertheless, this reasoning led to the development of the amyloid hypothesis and subsequent pharmacology development, which also faced tremendous challenges. Therefore, the need for the development of new therapeutics against AD remains alive.
In the last decade, the human microbiome project has expanded our understanding of the human microbiome and disease development [13,14,15,16,17]. The intestinal microorganisms encode 4 × 106 genes, which is about 150× higher than humans [13,15], which ultimately contributes to the sophisticated microbial diversity. A plethora of evidence has suggested that dysbiosis of gut microbiota in human beings is closely associated with many illnesses, especially metabolic-related diseases [18,19,20] (insulin resistance Type 2 diabetes, obesity, and liver diseases), cardiovascular diseases [21], or malnutrition [22].
A growing number of studies have demonstrated variations in the composition of gut microbiota, which contribute to the alteration in brain function and behavior, a phenomenon referred to as the microbiota-gut-brain axis [23,24,25].
Studies based on germ-free (GF) animals [26], antibiotics [27], probiotics [28], or fecal microbiota transplantation [29] support the pivotal role of gut microbiota in modulating cognition, behavior, and central nervous system (CNS) physiology. Whereas there is evidence that gut microbiota affects brain physiology and Aβ accumulation and even AD, its regulatory role in AD still remains elusive. A newly developed drug, GV-971, has been shown to work by regulating gut microbiota dysbiosis, which elucidated a novel way in the development of new anti-AD drugs [30].
In this review, we summarize the gut microbiota alteration in crosstalk between the gut and the brain, mediated by the microbiota-gut-brain axis in AD pathogenesis. We highlight the significance of gut microbiota in maintaining host metabolic and immune homeostasis, as well as a potential therapeutic target for neurodegenerative diseases and AD. Furthermore, we discuss recent research on AD therapy advances, especially in remodeling the gut microbiota. We highlight the potential drug candidate targeting the microbiota-gut-brain axis that may define the discovery of novel therapeutic agents.
2 Gut ecosystem and dysbiosis in AD
Gut microbiota is a symbiotic system having bacteria, viruses, and fungi in the human gut, which affect human digestion, intestinal biosynthesis, metabolism, and inflammation [31,32]. There are up to 1,000 microbial species that are composed of 90% Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, and 10% Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia. Like in the legume-rhizobia symbiotic relationship, gut microbiota and the human body is unique ecosystem and is an outcome of biological evolution. Recently, a cohort study of around 2,100 gut microbiota metagenomes uncovered over 22.3 million nonredundant prokaryotic genes, with half of the genes being unique in a single person [33]. Collectively, the gut microbiota is a highly active, extremely dynamic, and vast heterogenetic ecosystem, which is defined by the host’s age, disease status, diet, environment, and ethnicity [34].
The gut microbiota ecosystem is beneficial to human health in several ways:
Metabolism of products such as cleavage of dietary fiber into short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), which can modulate intestinal epithelial barrier (IEB) permeability, maintain homeostasis of the host immune system and glucose homeostasis [37,38]; On the other hand, microbiota and its metabolism can drive immune functions, which is characterized by cytokine signal release, and consequently, alter the activation status and physiology of neurons and glial cells [39].
Provision of protection against pathogens, as well as maintenance of the homeostasis of the microbiota composition [40,41]. On the contrary, when the IEB is dysfunctional, the secretory neurotoxins or metabolites of enterotoxigenic strains can leak through the barrier causing substantial inflammatory pathology or metabolic diseases.
The neuroendocrine system regulated by microbiota can modulate neurotransmitter production, such as 5-hydroxytryptamine and tyramine. The neurotransmitter production in the intestine and delivery to the brain may play a central role in brain neurodevelopment [42]. Meanwhile, the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis form the bidirectional communication between the gut microbiota and the brain [43]. Together, the neuroendocrine system can maintain the integrity of the immune system, IEB, and BBB.
More importantly, through these ways, gut microbiota can regulate neurological outcomes and maintain the behavior and development of neural and immune systems [44,45].
GF animals are microbial-deficient animals, in a sterile environment. These animals offer unique opportunities to explore how the gut microbiota participate in AD pathogenesis. The GF mice showed deficits in the nonspatial task (object recognition test) and reduced brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the hippocampus [46]. On the other hand, the GF mice exhibited innate immune response impairment, manifested as microglial immaturity. Whereas the GF amyloid precursor protein (APP)/PS1 mice showed a reduction in Aβ pathology, the cerebral Aβ were rescued by fecal microbiota transplantation from conventionally raised APP/PS1 control mice [26]. Fujii et al. demonstrated that mice transplanted with gut microbiota from a patient with AD exhibited behavior and cognition dysfunction [47].
To identify specific microbiota shifts, several studies have performed 16S rRNA sequencing in APP/PS1 transgenic mice and AD patients (Table 1). Those results highlight the significant effect of Bacteroides fragilis in cognitive impairment and brain amyloidosis [48,49,50]. From the data, we inferred that gut microbiota may participate in AD pathogenesis.
Summary of intestinal microbiota change in AD
| Fecal sample source | Altered gut microbiota (AD versus control) | References | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upregulated | Downregulated | ||
| AD patients | Bacteroidetes, Escherichia/Shigella, Ruminococcus | Firmicutes, Bifidobacterium, Eubacterium rectale, Lachnospiraceae, Selenomonadales | [48,49,50] |
| APP/PS1 transgenic mice | Bacteroidetes, Tenericutes | Firmicutes, Verrucomicrobia, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Allobaculum, Akkermansia | [26] |
3 The function of intestinal–blood barrier and brain–blood barrier in the AD microbiota-gut-brain axis
The single-layer epithelial cells make up the mucosal interface, which separates the host and microorganisms, allowing selective small compounds to permeate, thus limiting the access of pathogens and metabolic antigens, forming the IEB. The IEB contains a plethora of immune effector cells, which provide physiological and defense support to the host. The permeability and functions of the IEB are mainly modulated by substances in the tract, such as microbiota, immune cells, inflammatory substances, or metabolites. More recently, the concept gut-vascular barrier (GVB) was proposed [51], which is a cellular barrier below the epithelium. GVB is the second layer of defence, which controls the antigens translocation and prohibits the entry of the gut microbiota.
The BBB is composed of brain endothelial cells and pericytes, compartmentalized peripheral circulation, and CNS. Intestinal microbiota dysbiosis resulting in the alteration of the IEB permeability, referred to as the leaky gut, leads to the leakage of microbial metabolites or secretion (endotoxins like lipopolysaccharide) and peripheral circulation inflammation. The inflammation triggers activation of peripheral monocytes that cross the BBB leading to the production of inflammatory cytokines and microglia activation, which ultimately results in neuroinflammation in AD. Moreover, peripheral immune cell infiltration, such as 17 T-helper cells, plays an essential role in neuroinflammation [25].
Both the IEB and BBB play an essential role in the intestinal tract, peripheral circulation, and CNS. They limit the infiltration of harmful substances and have a significant effect on immune recognition and maintenance of homeostasis. In addition, the IEB and BBB are vital pathway regulators in the microbiota-gut-brain axis.
4 Regulation pathway in the AD microbiota-gut-brain axis
Potential pathways of gut microbiota affect CNS through the microbiota-gut-brain axis including the following aspects (Figure 1):
The gut microbiota composition can be influenced by daily diet preference, exogenously administered probiotics [52], potential bacteria, and medication. For example, the microbiota can compete for nutrients as growth substrates, produce fermentation products, compete for binding sites on the enteric wall, and reduce inflammation [24,52], which is the basis for the microbiota-gut-brain axis signaling.
Metabolites or secretory products, such as short-chain fatty acids and lipopolysaccharides, produced by gut microbial fermentation of fibers can interact with epithelial cells and immune cells on the mucosal interface. After that, it can be transported or diffused into host cells and peripheral circulation, and mediate cytokine secretions, innate immune or adaptive immune response, and peripheral inflammation [53]. The metabolites can further reach the brain and participate in neuroinflammation. These microbiota-gut-brain pathways participated in the gut-periphery-brain immune cascade reaction and are referred to as the immune pathway.
Apart from that, some metabolites can participate in enzyme biosynthesis, host metabolism, and bioactive signaling, resulting in the modification of energy supplement metabolism or neuroepigenetic modulation [54].
Gut microbiota can directly produce a vast array of neuroactive compounds that participate in neurotransmitter signaling [55]. For instance, Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium can directly produce γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) [56], while Escherichia and Serratia are associated with dopamine production. Besides, the gut microbiota is also able to indirectly take control of the neurotransmitter biosynthesis by modulating neurotransmitter precursors of neuroactive compounds [57]. Those directives and indirective ways for host and microbiota communication in the microbiota-gut-brain axis are called the neuroendocrine pathway.
Gut microbiota and its metabolites can affect brain cognition and behavior by vagus nerve or enteric nervous system (ENS) stimulation [58,59]. Meanwhile, activation of the vagus nerve has shown anti-inflammatory ability against microbial-induced sepsis through the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, which highlights the role of the neural immunomodulation system [60].
The microbiota-gut-brain axis regulatory pathways involved in AD pathology. An outline illustrating several important regulatory pathways between gut microbiota and the brain, including immune pathway, neural pathway, neuroendocrine pathway, biosynthesis or metabolism pathway, and their interaction relationship (Table 2). Microbial secretory products, such as LPS, play a key role in immune activation in the gut, periphery, and brain, which contribute to neuroinflammation. Neurotransmitters and neuroactive metabolites secreted by microbiota can interact with host neurotransmitter signaling and synthesis. Neural pathways including ENS and vagus nerve play a vital role in regulating gut physiologic and brain cognition behavior. Some microbial metabolites, such as SCFAs, have an important neuroprotective effect against neuroinflammation in the brain, and regulatory effects in modulating host metabolism and immunity. IEB and BBB functionality also play a significant role in host homeostasis. BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; ENS, enteric nervous system; LPS, lipopolysaccharides; IEB, intestinal epithelial barrier; BBB, blood–brain barrier; SCFAs, short-chain fatty acids.
These regulatory pathways play their role not only independently, but also collaboratively or interactively in the microbiota-gut-brain axis. For example, microbiota-neuroendocrine immunomodulation and neural immunomodulation effect in the microbiota-gut-brain axis were elucidated in several studies [61,62].
In the following section, we will discuss in detail how the gut ecosystem alteration contributes to AD pathogenesis through the microbiota-gut-brain axis regulatory pathway.
4.1 Microbiota metabolism modulation and its neuroendocrine role in the AD microbiota-gut-brain axis
Gut metabolites are modified by the host and the microbiota. This co-metabolic mode is an essential part of human metabolic and immune homeostasis. Microbiota metabolism can also directly regulate the neurotransmitter biosynthesis through the neuroendocrine pathway directly. Meanwhile, the generated metabolites in the intestinal tract are diffused into the host body, thus modulating the BBB and affecting the innate immune activation, which indirectly affects the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Here, we focus on specific co-metabolism alteration and the neuroendocrine role, which contribute to the AD pathogenesis in the microbiota-gut-brain axis.
The microbiota metabolism can modulate the neurotransmitters or their precursor biosynthesis and consequently affect the microbiota-gut-brain axis through the neuroendocrine pathway. Tryptophan is a central amino acid precursor to 5-HT synthesis and other aminergic neurotransmitters serotonin. Meanwhile, it cannot be synthesized by the human body, but the gut bacteria are able to produce tryptophan through the shikimate pathway. The metabolism and catabolism of tryptophan affect several neuroactive compounds. More importantly, most bacterial strains harbor the tryptophanase enzyme, an enzyme that metabolizes tryptophan. Tryptophanase from Escherichia coli generates indole by tryptophan catabolism [63]. Hence, the metabolism of tryptophan modulates the brain neurotransmitter signaling through the microbiota-gut-brain axis. The kynurenine pathway (KP), on the other hand, is a major platform for tryptophan catabolism in the peripheral and CNS. The altered KP in the peripheral system was observed in AD patients [64]. The tryptophan catabolism enzymes such as hepatic tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) are key modulators in the neuroendocrine pathway. The KP can be upregulated by the cytokine-mediated innate immune system, in which interferon-γ activates the IDO, an enzyme for kynurenines catalysis. Kynurenine/tryptophan ratio (Kyn/Trp) is an index for tryptophan breakdown or KP activity. It is associated with not only immune activation but also cognitive performance in AD [65,66]. A larger community-based cohort study also revealed that, unlike tryptophan, the kynurenine levels increase with age [67]. Collectively, tryptophan and KP may contribute to AD pathogenesis mediated by the neuroendocrine pathway (Table 2).
Summary of regulatory factors in the microbiota-gut-brain axis involved in AD pathology
| Category | Regulator in the microbiota-gut-brain axis | Associated microbes | Associated regulatory pathway | Effect on barrier | Regulatory effect | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microbial secretory product | LPS | Bacteroides fragilis | Immune pathway; | IEB and BBB impairment | NF-κB (p50/p65) activation; stimulation of the innate immune system | [86,90,93] |
| Microbial amyloid | Escherichia coli; Salmonella enterica | Immune pathway; neural pathway | / | NF-κB (p50/p65) activation; amyloid proteins cross-seeding; stimulation of the innate immune system; Vagus nerve | [92,102,105] | |
| PSA | Bacteroides fragilis | Immune pathway; neural pathway | / | T regulatory cells migration to CNS | [112,113] | |
| Microbial metabolism related produce | SCFAs | Ruminococcus bromii (butyrate); Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Eubacterium rectale, Eubacterium hallii and R. bromii (major fraction of butyrate production); Akkermansia municiphilla (propionate) | Neuroepigenetic modulator and signaling molecule; biosynthesis or metabolic pathway; immune pathway; neuroendocrine pathway | IEB and BBB protection | Intertion of neurotransmitter biosynthesis; HDACs inhibitors; GPCR activator; NF-κB inactivation; downregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF | [66,67,68,69,70] |
| Tryptophan and KP | / | Neuroendocrine pathway; neuroendocrine-immune pathway | / | KP; aminergic neurotransmitter serotonin; inductor of innate immune system activation and infammation | [64,65] | |
| Microbiota related nerve | ENS | / | Neural pathway | IEB protection | Regulator of IEB permeability and function | [117,120] |
| vagus nerve | / | Neural pathway; Vagal immunomodulation pathway | / | Modulation of anxiety-like behavior; increased BDNF expression | [58,110] |
GPCR, G protein-coupled receptors; HDACs, histone deacetylases; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; IEB, intestinal epithelial barrier; BBB, blood–brain barrier; BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor.
SCFAs, including propionic acid, acetic acid, and butyric acid, are produced from undigested carbohydrates or dietary fiber, or complex polysaccharides by gut microbiota. The concentrations of SCFAs are affected by the microbiota composition and abundance, dietary fiber content, and metabolic flux of SCFAs. A comprehensive SCFA study revealed that the contents of propionic acid, isobutyric acid, and 3-hydroxybutyric acid (butyric acid) significantly decreased in AD transgenic mice fecal samples compared to the wild type [68]. Meanwhile, a recent study found dysregulation of gut microbiota correlated with the change in the SCFA level [69], and SCFAs could inhibit Aβ aggregation in vitro [70]. Those results support that SCFAs may play a vital role in AD pathogenesis. But how do SCFAs participate in AD pathogenesis? It is well established that SCFAs play a vital role in maintaining the IEB and BBB structural integrity. The IEB protective effect of SCFAs is mainly through induction of immune tolerance, activation of inflammasomes, and interleukin-18 production. Recent studies showed that SCFAs have a protective effect on IEB against a fructose diet-induced hippocampal neuroinflammation and neuronal impairment [71], and propionate can protect the BBB from oxidative stress [72].
Furthermore, studies have demonstrated that sodium butyrate not only exerts a neuroprotective effect via restoring the BBB [73] and IEB functionality [71] but also improved memory function in the AD model mice via the inhibition activity of histone deacetylases (HDACs) [74,75]. SCFAs demonstrate as HDAC inhibitors and G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activator, involved in NF-κB inactivation [54] and downregulation of the pro-inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor (TNF) [75,76]. By inhibiting HDACs, it was revealed that butyrate and propionate can suppress adaptive immune activity by suppressing the expression of T cell-activating proteins on antigen-presenting cells (APCs) [77]. The immune modulation effect of SCFAs on APCs also plays an important role in neuroinflammation. Additionally, HDAC2 has been demonstrated as an epigenetic regulator involved in synaptic plasticity deficit and cognitive impairment attributed to AD pathogenesis [78]. Frost et al. revealed that acetate can regulate central hypothalamic metabolism and transcellular neurotransmitter biosynthesis cycles [79]. It participates in the tricarboxylic acid cycle in astrocyte and GABA neuroglial biosynthesis in neurons, resulting in reduced appetite. In their study, they highlighted that SCFAs interact with brain metabolism and neurotransmitter biosynthesis (Table 2).
By fecal microbiota transplantation in APP/PS1 transgenic AD model mice, researchers demonstrated that the change in SCFAs is restored along with cognitive deficit and synaptic plasticity [80]. Meanwhile, Wenzel et al. demonstrated that formate could reduce phagocytic activity, inhibit respiratory burst, and reduce the reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in vitro [81]. This study proposed that SCFAs have a modulation effect on disrupted microglial that participate in AD neuroinflammation. On the other hand, gut microbiota or microbial metabolites including SCFAs have shown a detrimental role in another neurodegenerative disease Parkinson’s disease (PD), while antibiotic treatment ameliorates pathophysiology and neuroinflammation in PD animals [82]. This controversial result prompts us to rethink the role of microbiota in neurodegenerative diseases. Collectively, microbiota metabolites including SCFAs, generated and modified by gut microbiota, play a vital role in IEB and BBB modulation and affect the AD microbiota-gut-brain axis, but a controversial role in PD [83]. Hence, through modulating the microbiota composition and metabolites, the IEB and BBB may be viable targets in the microbiota-gut-brain axis. More importantly, by acting as a neuroepigenetic modulator and signaling molecule, SCFAs can regulate immunity and metabolism in the gut or in the host body. This provides us with an intervention approach for reshaping the gut microbiota through dietary ways, which will be discussed in the following part.
The HPA axis is another major regulatory process in the neuroendocrine pathway that closely interacts with the gut microbiota and the brain. Corticotropin-releasing factor, adrenocorticotropic hormone, and glucocorticoids are three principal regulators of the HPA signaling axis [43]. The HPA axis is closely associated with brain function and anxiety or depression-related behaviors by interacting with the immune system, IEB, and BBB [84]. However, a few studies reported the exact mechanism underling the HPA axis in the AD microbiota-gut-brain axis.
4.2 Microbial secretory products in the AD microbiota-gut-brain axis
Gut microbiota plays a vital role in regulating the innate immune system due to the abundance of foreign antigens [85]. Germline-encoded pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) is a vital compartment in the innate immune system as it helps the host to distinguish self and nonself antigens, and respond to changes in the microbial landscape. PRRs can recognize bacterial, fungal, and its associated secretory products such as lipopolysaccharides (LPS), polysaccharide A (PSA), and unique nucleic acid structures by monitoring microorganism-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) or pathogen-associated molecular patterns. Here, we focus on how gut microbiota and its secretory products interact with the innate immune system. This interaction results in the production of AMPs, cytokines, or chemokines, as well as systematic circulation inflammation and barrier impairment, which ultimately lead to neuroinflammation and thus AD pathogenesis.
Bacteroides is the largest phylum of Gram-negative bacteria in the intestinal tract microbiome, which secretes a complex array of pro-inflammatory neurotoxins, and its content correlates with inflammatory signaling and permeability of the BBB. Bacteroides fragilis (B. fragilis) is a nonspore forming, nonmotile, commensal, and obligatory anaerobic bacillus in the human intestines with multiple capabilities for human health maintenance. The secretory products of B. fragilis are highly related to the immune pathways in the microbiota-gut-brain axis.
LPS are a major component of the Gram-negative bacteria cell wall. It is composed of a highly immunogenic class of amphipathic surface glycolipids. LPS can interact with Toll-like receptors (TLRs) by its MAMPs, resulting in innate immune activation and so is often used for inflammation inductor in experimental animal models. LPS can be excreted by Gram-negative bacteria in the human gut and may contribute to the pathogenesis of AD during aging. It has been reported that chronic infusion of LPS into the rat brains successfully reproduced inflammatory and pathological changes similar to AD patients [86], and the Aβ1-42 levels significantly increased in the hippocampal tissue [87]. How does the LPS in the intestine tract influence CNS inflammation? LPS is also transported from the intestine tract to CNS in a gut-periphery-brain manner, resulting in neuroinflammation, which refers to this process as the immune pathway. In the AD pathological condition, the amyloid-beta 42 (Aβ42) peptide can facilitate the entry of LPS into neurons and nuclei [88]. Those studies suggest that LPS may induce neuroinflammation and further result in Aβ accumulation that contributes to AD pathology.
In CNS, LPS can downregulate pre- and post-synaptic proteins and impair the efficient readout of neuronal genetic information in primary human neuronal-glial cell co-culture experiments, which reveals that the CNS synaptic structure and neurotransmission is compromised in LPS-induced neuroinflammation [89,90]. LPS could be recognized by TLR 4 on the microglial depending on the cluster of differentiation 14 (CD14) expression, further resulting in microglial activation and immune cell infiltration [91]. Also, CD14 expression plays a vital role in Aβ clearance [91].
On the other hand, LPS secreted by the B. fragilis, called BF-LPS, can impair biophysiological barriers via cleavage of intercellular proteins, inducing leaky gut, causing LPS. A recent study reported that microbiome-derived BF-LPS levels from the hippocampus and superior temporal lobe neocortex of AD were significantly increased [92,93]. BF-LPS is demonstrated as an exceptionally potent inducer of NF-κB (p50/p65) [94], which is a pro-inflammatory transcription factor, and subsequently, induces pro-inflammatory microRNAs release, such as miRNA-9, miRNA-125b, and miRNA-155 [95,96,97]. Ultimately, the microRNAs can further downregulate the SH3-proline-rich multidomain-scaffolding protein (SHANK3), the triggering receptor in microglial cells (TREM2), and complement factor H [95,97]. This BF-LPS induced NF-κB-mediated pro-inflammation-miRNA signaling may be a potential contributor to AD neuroinflammation. More recently, Yang et al. demonstrated that probiotics could decrease the LPS concentration and the corresponding NF-κB signaling pathway in the AD model mice [98]. The oral treatment with probiotics Bifidobacterium longum (B. longum) also can suppress gut dysbiosis NF-κB activation induced by LPS [99].
These data suggest that LPS may induce neuroinflammation by microglia activation and highlight the potential role of BF-LPS induced NF-κB-mediated inflammation pathway in the microbiota-gut-brain axis. On the other hand, probiotics exhibit a potent protective effect against microbe secreted neurotoxins. This leads to opportunities for probiotic intervention, in which we could rebalance the phylum or microbiota composition in the gut to achieve a balance immune crosstalk between brain and gut.
Alpha synuclein (α-syn), amyloid β (Aβ), tau, and TAR DNA-binding protein 43 are amyloid proteins with prion-like features, and their deposition in the CNS may trigger neurodegenerative disorders [100]. The classical “amyloid cascade” hypothesis in AD suggests that the aggregation of Aβ is a characteristic pathological feature for AD progression. The expression of APP, a major factor in the Aβ biosynthesis, was found to modulate intestine immune phenotype and immune-related disorders. Intriguingly, the gut microbiota is a major source of secretory amyloids. In contrast to amyloid proteins produced by mammals, curli proteins are functional amyloid fibers produced by Escherichia coli (E. coli) during biofilm formation and colonization [101].
Moreover, abundant evidence has demonstrated that microbial amyloids are capable of eliciting cross-seeding or transiently interacting with host amyloidogenic proteins (tau, Aβ, α-syn, and prion) and affect aggregation [102,103,104]. Different forms of amyloid proteins can accelerate the amyloidogenesis of heterologous amyloid proteins [105,106]. Chen et al. demonstrated that oral administration of curli can accelerate α-syn aggregation and increase its deposition in the gut and the brain, priming the innate immune system and neuroinflammation in the CNS [107]. Similarly, Sampson revealed that microbial amyloid subunit of curli (CsgA) can exacerbate aSyn pathology in the gut and the brain [108]. In addition, curli cross-seeding with Aβ was also observed, indicating that amyloid cross-seeding may be mediating AD pathology [109].
On the other hand, microbial amyloids can be recognized by TLRs 2 as a pathogen due to their structural similarity with Aβ, a phenomenon referred to as molecular mimicry. This results in the priming of the innate immune system, manifested as interaction with CD14, activation of NF-κB, thus leading to neuroinflammation and Aβ aggregation [109]. It has been shown that TLR2, Il-6, and TNF are upregulated in the brain of the animals exposed to curli [107]. By tracking the spread of the pathologic amyloid across different brain sections, Kim et al. demonstrated the capability of microbial amyloid to spread from the gut to the brain via the vagus nerve [110]. Moreover, another study revealed that amyloid proteins in the CNS can transfer to distant organs, such as the stomach by motor vagal projection [111]. The two studies revealed the amyloid proteins’ metastatic ability and showed that the microbial amyloids or microbial secretory products could act as bidirectional communication massagers, thus highlighting the potential of the microbiota-gut-brain axis. However, these studies mainly focused on the role of α-syn in PD. The data on the effect of Aβ on the gut microbial and host amyloidogenesis process remain scant. Collectively, microbial amyloid is able to bidirectionally communicate to the brain via the amyloid proteins cross-seeding, stimulation of the innate immune system, and bidirectional communication via the autonomic or vagus nerve.
PSA is a capsular polysaccharide produced by B. fragilis. PSA is vital for the growth and colonization of B. fragilis. PSA has modulatory effects on the innate and adaptive immune system through the TLR-2, which affects AD neuroinflammation [112,113]. A study showed that oral administration of PSA can promote the expression of immune-regulatory CD4+ T cells CD39, enhancing the migration of T regulatory cells (Treg) to the CNS. This cascade of events reveals how the intestinal commensal microbiome is able to communicate with the CNS through the immune pathway [113]. CD39 (NTPDase 1) is an immune regulatory enzyme with the ability to catalyze pro-inflammatory ATP into less-inflammatory ADP [114]. Whereas PSA has immunomodulation and anti-inflammatory activities, the data do not show its effect on AD neuroinflammation.
4.3 Neural pathway in the AD microbiota-gut-brain axis
The ENS is a major part of the autonomic nervous system and contains more than 100 million neurons. It forms a huge and complex nervous system, capable of controlling gastrointestinal physiology independent of the brain or the spine [115].
Enteric neurons are distributed in myenteric and submucosal ganglia, and the enteric glial cells and neuronal fibers travel the whole intestinal mucosa. In addition, ENS is a key regulator of permeability and function of IEB. The gut has rich innervation and contains more neurons than the spinal cord [116]. The structure and neurochemistry of the ENS are similar to the CNS, and thus the intestinal inflammation or gut dysbiosis may affect the brain's physiologic activities [117]. It was found that the GF mice lead to a reduction in enteric neurons and deficit in gut motility compared to the normal cells [118]. Oral administration of probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri showed increased excitability and decreased potassium channel opening rate in the enteric neurons [119]. Likewise, compared to the normal mice, the excitability of sensory neurons was decreased and the excitability of intestinal bacteria was restored in GF mice [120]. Gut microbiota also plays a vital role in modulating the glial cells in the intestinal mucosa, which are continuously renewed from the gut wall plexi [121].
To explore the potential role of ENS in AD, several studies demonstrated that progressive accumulation of Aβ in the brain was correlated with disease progression in enteric neurons in APP/PS1 transgenic mice, which was manifested as a decrease in the number of enteric neurons and the gut became more susceptible to inflammation [122,123]. In addition, Han et al. revealed that the accumulation of Aβ might activate the enteric resident macrophages, resulting in myenteric nitrergic and cholinergic neurons impairment in the ENS [124].
The vagus nerve (cranial nerve X) is another important neural pathway between the gut and brain in the microbiota-gut-brain axis. It plays both efferent and afferent roles in the communication between the gut and the brain. The vagus nerve comprises a major part of the sensory nerve, which conveys information from distant organs to the CNS. The CNS receives information tonically from the heart, lungs, stomach, and intestines via sensory fibers. Many studies have demonstrated that the vagus nerve plays an important role in the microbiota-gut-brain axis [58,62]. Many gut microbiota or probiotics have cognition modulatory effects dependent on the vagus nerve activity. For example, Bravo et al. revealed that, via the vagus nerve, Lactobacillus rhamnosus (L. rhamnosus) could modify the stress response, behaviors related to anxiety, depression, or cognition, as well as alter central levels of GABA receptors. On the other hand, there were no neurochemical and behavioral benefit effects associated with the L. rhamnosus in vasectomized mice [58].
The vagus nerve in the microbiota-gut-brain axis communicates directly through the vagal nerve pathway or indirectly through the vagal-nerve-mediated immunomodulation pathway [62,124]. For instance, in the direct route, Bercik showed that B. longum NCC3001 could normalize the anxiety-like behavior in gut chronic inflammation mice by innervating vagal afferent terminals, resulting in the upregulation of BDNF in the neural cells of the brain [62]. On the other hand, indirectly, vagal afferent signals from the intestines may instigate an anti-inflammatory reflex and activated efferent response, further resulting in the attenuation of inflammation in the brain [124]. Microbial amyloid not only exhibits pro-inflammatory effects but also influences the brain via the neural communication pathway.
In summary, both the ENS and the vagus nerve may interact with the brain directly, or indirectly, via the nerve-immunity crosstalk. Unfortunately, most of the ENS and vagus nerve studies in the microbiota-gut-brain axis have mainly focused on PD, depression, or anxiety. The data on how gut microbiota affects cognition and memory in AD mediated by ENS and vagus nerve remains scarce.
4.4 The microbiota-gut-brain axis targeted therapy in AD
Owing to the overwhelming evidence of the interaction between the gut microbiota and the development of AD, the microbiota-gut-brain axis has been considered as a potential target for drug development. We summarize currently the microbiota-gut-brain axis targeted therapy in AD, including carbohydrates or natural products, probiotics, and dietary ways, which can modulate the microbiota-gut-brain axis mainly through microbiota rebalance, and immune, metabolism pathway modulation in the AD microbiota-gut-brain axis.
Carbohydrates (monosaccharides, oligosaccharides, polysaccharides, and glycosides) are the primary source of nutrient for the microbiota and has a diverse modulatory effect on the microbiota [125]. Human milk oligosaccharides also showed a vital role in the guide and supporting the assembly of a healthy gut microbiome in infants [126]. GV-971 is an acidic linear marine-derived mixture of oligosaccharides, with a degree of polymerization from 2 to 10. It has completed a phase 3 clinical trial for AD treatment in China [30]. A Multicenter, randomized, double-blind phase 3 clinical trial also demonstrated significant efficacy of GV-971 in improving cognition across all observation periods of a 36-week trial [127]. In AD progression, immune cell infiltration and microglial activation occurred in the brain, resulting in neuroinflammation. It has been shown that GV-971 could ameliorate neuroinflammation by rebalancing the abnormal elevation of amino acids, phenylalanine, and isoleucine metabolism through the gut microbiota. Meanwhile, GV-971 also showed modulation in the immune pathway in the AD microbiota-gut-brain axis, which was characterized by increased peripheral infiltration of immune system cells (peripheral type 1 T-helper, Th1) to allow it local crosstalk with the M1 microglia and triggers the microglia differentiation toward an M1 pro-inflammatory state, thus highlighting the role of oligosaccharides in anti-neuroinflammation through modulating the microbiota metabolism and immune in the microbiota-gut-brain axis [30].
Besides, other studies have revealed that fructo-oligosaccharides and oligosaccharides from Morinda officinalis can ameliorate the learning and cognitive impairment in the AD model mice by reconditioning the diversity and stability of the microbial community [128,129]. For instance, Liuwei Dihuang decoction, a famous prescription in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), contains polysaccharides, glycosides, and oligosaccharides. The oligosaccharide fraction derived from the Liuwei Dihuang decoction ameliorated the AD-like cognitive impairments through remodeling the gut microbiota in a neuroendocrine-immunomodulation pathway manner, in senescence-accelerated mouse prone 8 (SAMP8) [61]. In summary, there has been evidence that carbohydrates remodel the gut microbial composition and regulate host physiology and metabolism, presenting a huge opportunity for developing microbiota-gut-brain axis targeted medicine through the oligosaccharide-based microbiota composition rebalance and metabolism modulation approach (Table 3) [61,130]. Meanwhile, the oligosaccharides from TCM Morinda officinalis possess huge potential in gut microbiota modulation, suggesting its potential value in future drug development.
Summary of the microbiota-gut-brain axis targeted therapy in AD
| Drug categories | Drug | Effect | Experimental subject | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbohydrates or natural products | Prebiotic fructooligosaccharides | Regulated the gut microbiota-GLP-1/GLP-1R pathway | APP/PS1 transgenic AD model mice | [138] |
| Fructooligosaccharides from Morinda officinalis | Prebiotic effect; regulating the composition and metabolism of the gut microbiota | D-galactose- and Aβ1-42-induced deficient rats | [129] | |
| Oligosaccharides from Morinda officinalis | Regulated cholesterol, L-valine, and L-acetylcarnitine in serum | APP/PS1 transgenic AD model mice | [128] | |
| GV-971 (mixture of acidic linear oligosaccharides) | Regulating amino acid metabolism; alleviates neuroinflammation by shaping the gut microbiota | APP/PS1 transgenic AD model mice | [30] | |
| An oligosaccharide fraction derived from Liuwei Dihuang decoction | Alterations in the gut microbiota-neuroendocrine immunomodulation network; influenced the relative abundance of these intestinal microbiomes | SAMP8 | [61] | |
| Camellia oil | Modulated the expression of immune-related cytokines by inhibiting RAGE/NF-κB signaling; enhanced autophagy; regulated microglial activation | SAMP8 | [128] | |
| Sesamol | Improved the generation of microbial metabolites SCFAs; prevented gut barrier damages and systemic inflammation; improved synapse ultrastructure and inhibited Aβ accumulation | ApoE transgenic AD model mice | [139] | |
| Probiotic | Lactobacillus plantarum DR7 | Reduction in Wolbachia; an increase of Stenotrophomonas and Acetobacter | Drosophila melanogaster AD model | [140] |
| Bifidobacterium breve strain A1 | Metabolite acetate partially ameliorated the cognitive decline in AD mice; suppressed the hippocampal expressions of inflammation and immune-reactive genes | Intracerebroventricular injection of Aβ25–35 or Aβ1–42 induced AD model mice | [141] | |
| Probiotic supplementation (Lactobacillus casei W56, Lactococcus lactis W19, Lactobacillus acidophilus W22, Bifidobacterium lactis W52, Lactobacillus paracasei W20, Lactobacillus plantarum W62, Bifidobacterium lactis W51, Bifidobacterium bifidum W23, and Lactobacillus salivarius W24) | Increased in Faecalibacterium prausnitzii; activation of macrophages or dendritic cells | AD patients | [142] | |
| Probiotic-4 (Bifidobacterium lactis, Lactobacillus casei, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Lactobacillus acidophilus) | Protective effect on IEB and BBB; inhibition of TLR4 and RIG-I-mediated NF-κB signaling pathway and inflammatory responses; seduced LPS in plasma and cerebral | SAMP8 | [98] | |
| Bifidobacterium longum | Inhibited gut microbiota endotoxin production; reduced blood LPS levels; suppressed NF-κB activation and TNF-α expression | 5 × transgenic AD model mice | [99] | |
| Probiotic formulation (Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175) | Attenuated the decremental effect of LPS on memory through BDNF expression | Lipopolysaccharide induced neuroinflammation-associated disorders in the AD rat model | [23] | |
| Streptococcus thermophilus, bifidobacteria (Bifidobacterium longum, B. breve, B. infantis), lactobacilli (Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. plantarum, L. paracasei, L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, L. brevis) | Activated SIRT1 pathway; promoted antioxidant and neuroprotective effects | 3 × transgenic AD model mice | [143] | |
| Clostridium butyricum | Protection against microglial-mediated neuroinflammation mediated by the metabolite butyrate; suppressed NF-κB activation; inhibit the production of TNF and IL-1β in the brain | APP/PS1 Transgenic AD model Mice | [132] | |
| Lactobacillus plantarum MTCC1325 | Ameliorated cognition deficits; restored Ach, and the histopathological features | D-Galactose-induced AD model mice | [144] | |
| Probiotic strains (Lactobacillus plantarum NCIMB 8826, Lactobacillus fermentum NCIMB 5221 and Bifidobacteria longum spp. infantis NCIMB 702255) | Metabolic stability, immune signaling, oxidative and mitochondrial stress through the gut-brain-axis | Drosophila melanogaster AD model | [145] | |
| Bifidobacterium bifidum BGN4 and Bifidobacterium longum | Improvement in mental flexibility test and stress score; relative abundance of gut bacteria reduced; increased serum BDNF level; | AD patients | [146] | |
| Dietary ways | KD | Enhanced brain vascular and BBB function; increased beneficial gut microbiota; improved metabolic profile; reduced mTOR and increased eNOS protein expressions; increased Akkermansia muciniphila and Lactobacillus abundance; reduced Desulfovibrio and Turicibacter abundance | Mice | [147] |
| Modified Mediterranean-ketogenic diet | Reduced fecal lactate and acetate while increasing propionate and butyrate; modulated the gut microbiome and metabolites in association with improved AD biomarkers in the cerebrospinal fluid | AD patients | [148] | |
| Dietary fiber | Interfering with the assembly of Aβ1-40 and Aβ1-42 peptides into soluble neurotoxic Aβ aggregates | In vitro | [149] | |
| Dietary inulin | Increased SCFAs, tryptophan-derived metabolites, bile acids, glycolytic metabolites, and scyllo-inositol in the gut; rebalanced the beneficial microbiota composition and host metabolism; reduced inflammatory gene expression in the hippocampus | APOE4 transgenic (E4FAD) mice | [70] | |
| Bioactive food | Abated neuroinflammation and oxidative stress; decreased astrocyte and microglial activation; restored the microbiota composition, LPS, and propionate levels in the gut | 3 × Transgenic AD model mice | [150] | |
| MIND | Associated with a slower rate of cognitive decline | Study of volunteers living in retirement communities and senior public housing units | [135] |
mTOR, mechanistic target of rapamycin; eNOS, endothelial nitric oxide synthase; BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; TLR4, toll-like receptor 4; RIG-I, retinoic-acid-inducible gene-I; LPS, lipopolysaccharides; IEB, intestinal epithelial barrier; BBB, blood–brain barrier; SCFAs, short-chain fatty acids; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; IL-1β, interleukin-1β.
Many recent studies have illustrated the diverse benefits of probiotic therapy potential in AD. Generally, probiotic exhibits anti-inflammatory and antioxidative effects in the AD microbiota-gut-brain axis against the detrimental effect of microbial secretory products [131]. Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus are two major probiotic genera with beneficial effects on neurodegeneration diseases (Table 3). Specifically, Bifidobacterium longum can reduce LPS-stimulated NF-κB activation and inflammatory in the hippocampus [99]. Yang et al. demonstrated that probiotic-4 (Bifidobacterium lactis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Lactobacillus casei) attenuated aging-related disruption of IEB and BBB, reduced LPS in plasma and cerebral, characterized by inhibition of the NF-κB inflammatory signaling pathway [98]. The studies elucidated that the two genera contain anti-inflammation effect on the NF-κB-induced immune response pathway. In addition, Sun et al. demonstrated that Clostridium butyricum attenuated microglia-mediated neuroinflammation, indexed by the TNF-α and IL1β expression in the brain, were reduced by butyrate [132]. Taken together, in the AD pathological state, probiotics can modulate the metabolism of gut SCFAs, alter the composition of the microbiota, and reduce the inflammatory responses mediated by the microbiota-gut-brain axis (Table 3). However, still, the limitations exist. Numerous reports have proposed the probiotic use to deleterious effects such as sepsis, immunoreactivity, and gene transfer resulting in pathogenic antibiotic resistance [133].
The ketogenic diet (KD), which is high fat and low carbohydrate diet, has been widely used as therapy for neurological disorders. The diet acts by increasing the beneficial gut microbiota as well as improving the metabolic profile (Table 3). On the other hand, another study showed that inulin, a dietary nondigestible carbohydrate fiber, can rebalance the beneficial microbiota composition and host metabolism in the cecum, periphery, and brain. Inulin increases the levels of SCFAs, scyllo-inositol, bile acids, glycolytic, and tryptophan metabolites [70]. Three closely related diets including Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), Mediterranean diet, and Mediterranean-DASH diets, also called Mediterranean-DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay (MIND), were demonstrated to be linked to neuroprotection and dementia prevention and showed a slower rate of cognitive decline [134]. The effect of MIND was better than the Mediterranean diet and DASH [134,135]. Therefore, collectively, diet intervention or nutrition therapy that targets the microbiota-gut-brain axis plays a vital role in the microbiota-gut-brain axis through modulating gut microbiota metabolites (Table 3).
5 Conclusions and perspectives
Microbes and other organisms co-evolve in a process referred to as symbiosis (such as legume-rhizobia symbiosis, sometimes even displayed as a genetic material exchange) or mutual exclusion (such as penicillin inhibit competitors, exhibit as natural selection and survival of the fittest). This biological relationship highlights the beneficial or harmful effects of gut microbiota in human physiological and pathological events. The data on the interplay between the intestines and CNS in AD pathogenesis is still limited. Here, we illustrated the communication between gut microbiota and the brain (the microbiota-gut-brain axis), and its potential roles in AD pathology (Figure 2).
Impact of the gut microbiota on the microbiota-gut-brain axis in health and AD. It is well established that stable gut microbiota is the foundation for normal gut physiology and participate in heath signaling along the microbiota-gut-brain axis (right-hand side of this figure). The intestinal dysbiosis cascade and inappropriate microbiota-gut-brain axis signaling (right-hand side of this figure), just like the amyloid cascade hypothesis, oxidative stress, and genetic factors, have increasingly become a major research interest in AD pathogenesis. Meanwhile, the intestinal dysbiosis cascade may be a tractable target for AD drug development.
Gut microbiota can interact with CNS through the microbiota-gut-brain axis via microbial secretions, metabolic intervention, and neural stimulation. In addition, we summarize the regulatory pathways of the microbiota-gut-brain axis such as the immune, neural, neuroendocrine, or metabolic pathways. We also highlight the significant roles of IEB and BBB in the microbiota-gut-brain axis. In AD pathogenesis, there is progressive perturbation between the gut microbiota and host co-metabolic relationship. This shift leads to gut dysbiosis and secretion of microbial products and metabolites, which may affect the CNS metabolic state and immune balance through the microbiota-gut-brain axis. It is well established that LPS stimulates the CNS innate immune response and microglial activation through the immune pathways. In fact, PSA has been associated with the migration of T regulatory cells to the CNS. However, its potential roles in AD remain elusive.
Jiang et al. have discussed the gut microbiota and AD [136]. They have provided a comprehensive overview of the connection between AD and gut microbiota including experimental evidence, microbiota-gut-brain axis, and highlighted the potential role of bacterial secretion in AD.
However, they mainly focused on the evidence that gut microbiota impacts AD, but without systematic elaboration on how the microbiota affects AD pathogenesis, including classification on the regulatory role of the immune and endocrine pathway. Moreover, the relationship between pathogenesis and microbiota is still uncertain: Is the microbiota change the cause or, instead, is it just a consequence of lifestyle, or other uncertain factor changes associated with the disease? Can it become a drug target to treat AD or other neurodegenerative diseases that need to be further studied?
Regardless, so far, the microbiota-gut-brain axis targeted treatment opens a new avenue for neurodegenerative disease therapy. Moreover, GV-971 has been shown to work by regulating gut microbiota dysbiosis, alleviating neuroinflammation, and ameliorating intestinal metabolism. It has not only unveiled the efficacy of the microbiota-gut-brain axis targeted AD therapeutic strategy but also provide a huge opportunity on novel potential drug candidates, the carbohydrates [30]. Carbohydrates form the primary nutrient source for microbiota and have a wide spectrum of modulatory effects on the microbiota [125]. There is, therefore, a need to interrogate the huge chemical space in carbohydrates. Accumulating evidence has robustly demonstrated that carbohydrates from diverse sources such as natural products, TCM, and marine-derived products, have a significant effect on remodeling gut metabolism and rebalancing the microbiota (Table 3). In addition, oligosaccharides derived from TCM have antineoplastic, neuroprotective, antidiabetic effects [137]. TCM might provide valuable resources for future development of the microbiota-gut-brain axis targeted treatment, as TCM theory always suggest that treat disease holistically. The concept of the microbiota-gut-brain axis suggests that remodeling the gut microbiota may be a tractable and novel therapeutic strategy for AD and other neurodegenerative diseases. Diet therapy also proposes a whole new way of preventing chronic or other neurodegenerative diseases through remodeling the gut progressively.
-
Funding information: This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant 81660644, and Guangzhou Huashang College Natural Science Fund of young scholars under grant 2021HSQX53.
-
Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Data availability statement: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
[1] Methé BA, Nelson KE, Pop M, Creasy HH, Giglio MG, Huttenhower C, et al. A framework for human microbiome research. Nature. 2012;486(7402):215–21. 10.1038/nature11209.Search in Google Scholar
[2] Wenk GL. Neuropathologic changes in Alzheimer’s disease. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64(Suppl 9):7–10.Search in Google Scholar
[3] Wenk GL. Neuropathologic changes in Alzheimer’s disease: potential targets for treatment. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67(Suppl 3):3–7.Search in Google Scholar
[4] Tse KH, Herrup K. Re-imagining Alzheimer’s disease – the diminishing importance of amyloid and a glimpse of what lies ahead. J Neurochem. 2017;143(4):432–44. 10.1111/jnc.14079.Search in Google Scholar
[5] Long JM, Holtzman DM. Alzheimer disease: an update on pathobiology and treatment strategies. Cell. 2019;179(2):312–39. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.09.001.Search in Google Scholar
[6] Pawelec G. Age and immunity: what is “immunosenescence”? Exp Gerontol. 2018;105:4–9. 10.1016/j.exger.2017.10.024.Search in Google Scholar
[7] Sochocka M, Diniz BS, Leszek J. Inflammatory response in the CNS: friend or foe? Mol Neurobiol. 2017;54(10):8071–89. 10.1007/s12035-016-0297-1.Search in Google Scholar
[8] Heneka MT, Carson MJ, El Khoury J, Landreth GE, Brosseron F, Feinstein DL, et al. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(4):388–405. 10.1016/s1474-4422(15)70016-5.Search in Google Scholar
[9] Cai QY, Liu XL, Zhang XQ, Liu YX, Li M, Zhao CZ, et al. Anti-neuroinflammation activity of acetylpuerarin mediated by a PKC-δ-dependent caspase signaling pathway: in vivo and in vitro studies. Die Pharm. 2016;71(10):575–82. 10.1691/ph.2016.6660.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[10] Gao J, He H, Jiang W, Chang X, Zhu L, Luo F, et al. Salidroside ameliorates cognitive impairment in a d-galactose-induced rat model of Alzheimer’s disease. Behav Brain Res. 2015;293:27–33. 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.06.045.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[11] Huang YC, Tsay HJ, Lu MK, Lin CH, Yeh CW, Liu HK, et al. Astragalus membranaceous-polysaccharides ameliorates obesity, hepatic steatosis, neuroinflammation and cognition impairment without affecting amyloid deposition in metabolically stressed APPswe/PS1dE9 mice. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(12):2746. 10.3390/ijms18122746.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[12] Karlawish J, Jack CR, Rocca WA, Snyder HM, Carrillo MC. Alzheimer’s disease: the next frontier-special report 2017. Alzheimer’s Dementia J Alzheimer’s Assoc. 2017;13(4):374–80. 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.02.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[13] Nash AK, Auchtung TA, Wong MC, Smith DP, Gesell JR, Ross MC, et al. The gut mycobiome of the human microbiome project healthy cohort. Microbiome. 2017;5(1):153. 10.1186/s40168-017-0373-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[14] Proctor LM. The human microbiome project in 2011 and beyond. Cell Host Microbe. 2011;10(4):287–91. 10.1016/j.chom.2011.10.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[15] Qin J, Li R, Raes J, Arumugam M, Burgdorf KS, Manichanh C, et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature. 2010;464(7285):59–65. 10.1038/nature08821.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[16] Consortium HMP. A framework for human microbiome research. Nature. 2012;486(7402):215–21. 10.1038/nature11209.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[17] Gilbert JA, Blaser MJ, Caporaso JG, Jansson JK, Lynch SV, Knight R. Current understanding of the human microbiome. Nat Med. 2018;24(4):392–400. 10.1038/nm.4517.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[18] Wen L, Duffy A. Factors influencing the gut microbiota, inflammation, and type 2 diabetes. J Nutr. 2017;147(7):1468s–75s. 10.3945/jn.116.240754 Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[19] Gérard P. Gut microbiota and obesity. Cell Mol Life Sci CMLS. 2016;73(1):147–62. 10.1007/s00018-015-2061-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[20] Acharya C, Sahingur SE, Bajaj JS. Microbiota, cirrhosis, and the emerging oral-gut-liver axis. JCI Insight. 2017;2(19):e94416. 10.1172/jci.insight.94416.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[21] Tang WH, Kitai T, Hazen SL. Gut microbiota in cardiovascular health and disease. Circulat Res. 2017;120(7):1183–96. 10.1161/circresaha.117.309715.Search in Google Scholar
[22] Million M, Diallo A, Raoult D. Gut microbiota and malnutrition. Microb Pathogen. 2017;106:127–38. 10.1016/j.micpath.2016.02.003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[23] Tillisch K. The effects of gut microbiota on CNS function in humans. Gut Microbes. 2014;5(3):404–10. 10.4161/gmic.29232.Search in Google Scholar
[24] Cryan JF, Dinan TG. Mind-altering microorganisms: the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13(10):701–12. 10.1038/nrn3346.Search in Google Scholar
[25] Sharon G, Sampson TR, Geschwind DH, Mazmanian SK. The central nervous system and the gut microbiome. Cell. 2016;167(4):915–32. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.027.Search in Google Scholar
[26] Harach T, Marungruang N, Duthilleul N, Cheatham V, Mc Coy KD, Frisoni G, et al. Reduction of Abeta amyloid pathology in APPPS1 transgenic mice in the absence of gut microbiota. Sci Rep. 2017;7:41802. 10.1038/srep41802.Search in Google Scholar
[27] Minter MR, Zhang C, Leone V, Ringus DL, Zhang X, Oyler-Castrillo P, et al. Antibiotic-induced perturbations in gut microbial diversity influences neuro-inflammation and amyloidosis in a murine model of Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30028. 10.1038/srep30028.Search in Google Scholar
[28] Akbari E, Asemi Z, Daneshvar Kakhaki R, Bahmani F, Kouchaki E, Tamtaji OR, et al. Effect of probiotic supplementation on cognitive function and metabolic status in Alzheimer’s disease: a randomized, double-blind and controlled trial. Front Aging Neurosci. 2016;8:256. 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00256.Search in Google Scholar
[29] Van Nood E, Vrieze A, Nieuwdorp M, Fuentes S, Zoetendal EG, de Vos WM, et al. Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(5):407–15. 10.1056/NEJMoa1205037.Search in Google Scholar
[30] Wang X, Sun G, Feng T, Zhang J, Huang X, Wang T, et al. Sodium oligomannate therapeutically remodels gut microbiota and suppresses gut bacterial amino acids-shaped neuroinflammation to inhibit Alzheimer’s disease progression. Cell Res. 2019;29(10):787–803. 10.1038/s41422-019-0216-x.Search in Google Scholar
[31] Guarner F, Malagelada JR. Gut flora in health and disease. Lancet (London, Engl). 2003;361(9356):512–9. 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12489-0.Search in Google Scholar
[32] Quigley EM. Gut bacteria in health and disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;9(9):560–9.Search in Google Scholar
[33] Tierney BT, Yang Z, Luber JM, Beaudin M, Wibowo MC, Baek C, et al. The landscape of genetic content in the gut and oral human microbiome. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;26(2):283–95.e8. 10.1016/j.chom.2019.07.008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[34] Rinninella E, Raoul P, Cintoni M, Franceschi F, Miggiano G, Gasbarrini A, et al. What is the healthy gut microbiota composition? a changing ecosystem across age, environment, diet, and diseases. Microorganisms. 2019;7(1):14. 10.3390/microorganisms7010014.Search in Google Scholar
[35] Tomasello G, Mazzola M, Leone A, Sinagra E, Zummo G, Farina F, et al. Nutrition, oxidative stress and intestinal dysbiosis: Influence of diet on gut microbiota in inflammatory bowel diseases. Biomed Pap Med Faculty Univ Palacky Olomouc Czechoslovakia. 2016;160(4):461–6. 10.5507/bp.2016.052.Search in Google Scholar
[36] Valdes AM, Walter J, Segal E, Spector TD. Role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health. BMJ (Clin Res ed). 2018;361:k2179. 10.1136/bmj.k2179.Search in Google Scholar
[37] Chambers ES, Preston T, Frost G, Morrison DJ. Role of gut microbiota-generated short-chain fatty acids in metabolic and cardiovascular health. Curr Nutr Rep. 2018;7(4):198–206. 10.1007/s13668-018-0248-8.Search in Google Scholar
[38] Schoeler M, Caesar R. Dietary lipids, gut microbiota and lipid metabolism. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2019;20(4):461–72. 10.1007/s11154-019-09512-0.Search in Google Scholar
[39] Dantzer R, Konsman JP, Bluthé RM, Kelley KW. Neural and humoral pathways of communication from the immune system to the brain: parallel or convergent? Autonomic Neurosci Basic Clin. 2000;85(1–3):60–5. 10.1016/s1566-0702(00)00220-4.Search in Google Scholar
[40] Bäumler AJ, Sperandio V. Interactions between the microbiota and pathogenic bacteria in the gut. Nature. 2016;535(7610):85–93. 10.1038/nature18849.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[41] Desai MS, Seekatz AM, Koropatkin NM, Kamada N, Hickey CA, Wolter M, et al. A dietary fiber-deprived gut microbiota degrades the colonic mucus barrier and enhances pathogen susceptibility. Cell. 2016;167(5):1339–53.e21. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.043.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[42] Gershon MD. 5-Hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) in the gastrointestinal tract. Curr Op Endocrinol Diabetes Obesi. 2013;20(1):14–21. 10.1097/MED.0b013e32835bc703.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[43] Farzi A, Fröhlich EE, Holzer P. Gut microbiota and the neuroendocrine system. Neurotherap J Am Soc Exp Neuro Therap. 2018;15(1):5–22. 10.1007/s13311-017-0600-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[44] Sampson TR, Mazmanian SK. Control of brain development, function, and behavior by the microbiome. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17(5):565–76. 10.1016/j.chom.2015.04.011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[45] Calvani R, Picca A, Lo Monaco MR, Landi F, Bernabei R, Marzetti E. Of microbes and minds: a narrative review on the second brain aging. Front Med. 2018;5:53. 10.3389/fmed.2018.00053.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[46] Gareau MG, Wine E, Rodrigues DM, Cho JH, Whary MT, Philpott DJ, et al. Bacterial infection causes stress-induced memory dysfunction in mice. Gut. 2011;60(3):307–17. 10.1136/gut.2009.202515.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[47] Fujii Y, Nguyen TTT, Fujimura Y, Kameya N, Nakamura S, Arakawa K, et al. Fecal metabolite of a gnotobiotic mouse transplanted with gut microbiota from a patient with Alzheimer’s disease. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2019;83(11):2144–52. 10.1080/09168451.2019.1644149.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[48] Vogt NM, Kerby RL, Dill-Mcfarland KA, Harding SJ, Merluzzi AP, Johnson SC, et al. Gut microbiome alterations in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):13537. 10.1038/s41598-017-13601-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[49] Cattaneo A, Cattane N, Galluzzi S, Provasi S, Lopizzo N, Festari C, et al. Association of brain amyloidosis with pro-inflammatory gut bacterial taxa and peripheral inflammation markers in cognitively impaired elderly. Neurobiol Aging. 2017;49:60–8. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.08.019.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[50] Zhuang ZQ, Shen LL, Li WW, Fu X, Zeng F, Gui L, et al. Gut microbiota is altered in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimer’s Disease: JAD. 2018;63(4):1337–46. 10.3233/jad-180176.Search in Google Scholar
[51] Spadoni I, Zagato E, Bertocchi A, Paolinelli R, Hot E, Di Sabatino A, et al. A gut-vascular barrier controls the systemic dissemination of bacteria. Sci (N York, NY). 2015;350(6262):830–4. 10.1126/science.aad0135.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[52] O’toole PW, Cooney JC. Probiotic bacteria influence the composition and function of the intestinal microbiota. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2008;2008:175285. 10.1155/2008/175285.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[53] Rooks MG, Garrett WS. Gut microbiota, metabolites and host immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16(6):341–52. 10.1038/nri.2016.42.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[54] Usami M, Kishimoto K, Ohata A, Miyoshi M, Aoyama M, Fueda Y, et al. Butyrate and trichostatin A attenuate nuclear factor kappaB activation and tumor necrosis factor alpha secretion and increase prostaglandin E2 secretion in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Nutr Res (N York, NY). 2008;28(5):321–8. 10.1016/j.nutres.2008.02.012.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[55] O'mahony SM, Clarke G, Borre YE, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Serotonin, tryptophan metabolism and the brain-gut-microbiome axis. Behav Brain Res. 2015;277:32–48. 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.07.027.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[56] Yunes RA, Poluektova EU, Dyachkova MS, Klimina KM, Kovtun AS, Averina OV, et al. GABA production and structure of gadB/gadC genes in Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains from human microbiota. Anaerobe. 2016;42:197–204. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.10.011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[57] Wall R, Cryan JF, Ross RP, Fitzgerald GF, Dinan TG, Stanton C. Bacterial neuroactive compounds produced by psychobiotics. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;817:221–39. 10.1007/978-1-4939-0897-4_10.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[58] Bravo JA, Forsythe P, Chew MV, Escaravage E, Savignac HM, Dinan TG, et al. Ingestion of Lactobacillus strain regulates emotional behavior and central GABA receptor expression in a mouse via the vagus nerve. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S Am. 2011;108(38):16050–5. 10.1073/pnas.1102999108.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[59] Forsythe P, Bienenstock J, Kunze WA. Vagal pathways for microbiome-brain-gut axis communication. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;817:115–33. 10.1007/978-1-4939-0897-4_5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[60] Bonaz B, Sinniger V, Pellissier S. Anti-inflammatory properties of the vagus nerve: potential therapeutic implications of vagus nerve stimulation. J Physiol. 2016;594(20):5781–90. 10.1113/jp271539.Search in Google Scholar
[61] Wang J, Lei X, Xie Z, Zhang X, Cheng X, Zhou W, et al. CA-30, an oligosaccharide fraction derived from Liuwei Dihuang decoction, ameliorates cognitive deterioration via the intestinal microbiome in the senescence-accelerated mouse prone 8 strain. Aging. 2019;11(11):3463–86. 10.18632/aging.101990.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[62] Bercik P, Park AJ, Sinclair D, Khoshdel A, Lu J, Huang X, et al. The anxiolytic effect of Bifidobacterium longum NCC3001 involves vagal pathways for gut-brain communication. Neurogastroenterol Motil Off J Eur Gastrointest Motility Soc. 2011;23(12):1132–9. 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01796.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[63] Li G, Young KD. Indole production by the tryptophanase TnaA in Escherichia coli is determined by the amount of exogenous tryptophan. Microbiol (Reading, Engl). 2013;159(Pt 2):402–10. 10.1099/mic.0.064139-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[64] Hartai Z, Juhász A, Rimanóczy A, Janáky T, Donkó T, Dux L, et al. Decreased serum and red blood cell kynurenic acid levels in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurochem Int. 2007;50(2):308–13. 10.1016/j.neuint.2006.08.012.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[65] Giil LM, Midttun Ø, Refsum H, Ulvik A, Advani R, Smith AD, et al. Kynurenine pathway metabolites in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimer’s Disease JAD. 2017;60(2):495–504. 10.3233/jad-170485.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[66] Widner B, Leblhuber F, Walli J, Tilz GP, Demel U, Fuchs D. Tryptophan degradation and immune activation in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neural Transmission (Vienna, Austria: 1996). 2000;107(3):343–53. 10.1007/s007020050029.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[67] Theofylaktopoulou D, Midttun Ø, Ulvik A, Ueland PM, Tell GS, Vollset SE, et al. A community-based study on determinants of circulating markers of cellular immune activation and kynurenines: the Hordaland health study. Clin Exp Immunol. 2013;173(1):121–30. 10.1111/cei.12092.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[68] Zheng J, Zheng SJ, Cai WJ, Yu L, Yuan BF, Feng YQ. Stable isotope labeling combined with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for comprehensive analysis of short-chain fatty acids. Anal Chim Acta. 2019;1070:51–9. 10.1016/j.aca.2019.04.021.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[69] Kong Y, Jiang B, Luo X. Gut microbiota influences Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis by regulating acetate in Drosophila model. Future Microbiol. 2018;13:1117–28. 10.2217/fmb-2018-0185.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[70] Hoffman JD, Yanckello LM, Chlipala G, Hammond TC, McCulloch SD, Parikh I, et al. Dietary inulin alters the gut microbiome, enhances systemic metabolism and reduces neuroinflammation in an APOE4 mouse model. PLoS One. 2019;14(8):e0221828. 10.1371/journal.pone.0221828.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[71] Li JM, Yu R, Zhang LP, Wen SY, Wang SJ, Zhang XY, et al. Dietary fructose-induced gut dysbiosis promotes mouse hippocampal neuroinflammation: a benefit of short-chain fatty acids. Microbiome. 2019;7(1):98. 10.1186/s40168-019-0713-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[72] Hoyles L, Snelling T, Umlai UK, Nicholson JK, Carding SR, Glen RC, et al. Microbiome-host systems interactions: protective effects of propionate upon the blood-brain barrier. Microbiome. 2018;6(1):55. 10.1186/s40168-018-0439-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[73] Li H, Sun J, Wang F, Ding G, Chen W, Fang R, et al. Sodium butyrate exerts neuroprotective effects by restoring the blood-brain barrier in traumatic brain injury mice. Brain Res. 2016;1642:70–8. 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.03.031.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[74] Govindarajan N, Agis-Balboa RC, Walter J, Sananbenesi F, Fischer A. Sodium butyrate improves memory function in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model when administered at an advanced stage of disease progression. J Alzheimer’s Disease JAD. 2011;26(1):187–97. 10.3233/jad-2011-110080.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[75] Bourassa MW, Alim I, Bultman SJ, Ratan RR. Butyrate, neuroepigenetics and the gut microbiome: can a high fiber diet improve brain health? Neurosci Lett. 2016;625:56–63. 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.02.009.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[76] Vinolo MA, Rodrigues HG, Hatanaka E, Sato FT, Sampaio SC, Curi R. Suppressive effect of short-chain fatty acids on production of proinflammatory mediators by neutrophils. J Nutritional Biochem. 2011;22(9):849–55. 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2010.07.009.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[77] Singh N, Thangaraju M, Prasad PD, Martin PM, Lambert NA, Boettger T, et al. Blockade of dendritic cell development by bacterial fermentation products butyrate and propionate through a transporter (Slc5a8)-dependent inhibition of histone deacetylases. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(36):27601–8. 10.1074/jbc.M110.102947.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[78] Wu J, Liu C, Zhang L, Qu CH, Sui XL, Zhu H, et al. Histone deacetylase-2 is involved in stress-induced cognitive impairment via histone deacetylation and PI3K/AKT signaling pathway modification. Mol Med Rep. 2017;16(2):1846–54. 10.3892/mmr.2017.6840.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[79] Frost G, Sleeth ML, Sahuri-Arisoylu M, Lizarbe B, Cerdan S, Brody L, et al. The short-chain fatty acid acetate reduces appetite via a central homeostatic mechanism. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3611. 10.1038/ncomms4611.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[80] Sun J, Xu J, Ling Y, Wang F, Gong T, Yang C, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation alleviated Alzheimer’s disease-like pathogenesis in APP/PS1 transgenic mice. Transl Psychiatry. 2019;9(1):189. 10.1038/s41398-019-0525-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[81] Wenzel TJ, Gates EJ, Ranger AL, Klegeris A. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) alone or in combination regulate select immune functions of microglia-like cells. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2020;105:103493. 10.1016/j.mcn.2020.103493.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[82] Sampson TR, Debelius JW, Thron T, Janssen S, Shastri GG, Ilhan ZE, et al. Gut microbiota regulate motor deficits and neuroinflammation in a model of Parkinson’s disease. Cell. 2016;167(6):1469–80.e12. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.018.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[83] Mulak A. A controversy on the role of short-chain fatty acids in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disorders Off J Mov Disord Soc. 2018;33(3):398–401. 10.1002/mds.27304.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[84] Mosaferi B, Jand Y, Salari AA. Gut microbiota depletion from early adolescence alters anxiety and depression-related behaviours in male mice with Alzheimer-like disease. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):22941. 10.1038/s41598-021-02231-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[85] Lathrop SK, Bloom SM, Rao SM, Nutsch K, Lio CW, Santacruz N, et al. Peripheral education of the immune system by colonic commensal microbiota. Nature. 2011;478(7368):250–4. 10.1038/nature10434.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[86] Hauss-Wegrzyniak B, Vraniak PD, Wenk GL. LPS-induced neuroinflammatory effects do not recover with time. Neuroreport. 2000;11(8):1759–63. 10.1097/00001756-200006050-00032.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[87] Kahn MS, Kranjac D, Alonzo CA, Haase JH, Cedillos RO, McLinden KA, et al. Prolonged elevation in hippocampal Aβ and cognitive deficits following repeated endotoxin exposure in the mouse. Behav Brain Res. 2012;229(1):176–84. 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.01.010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[88] Lukiw WJ, Li W, Bond T, Zhao Y. Facilitation of gastrointestinal (GI) tract microbiome-derived lipopolysaccharide (LPS) entry into human neurons by amyloid beta-42 (Aβ42) peptide. Front Cell Neurosci. 2019;13:545. 10.3389/fncel.2019.00545.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[89] Zhao Y, Sharfman NM, Jaber VR, Lukiw WJ. Down-regulation of essential synaptic components by GI-tract microbiome-derived lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in LPS-treated human neuronal-glial (HNG) cells in primary culture: relevance to Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Front Cell Neurosci. 2019;13:314. 10.3389/fncel.2019.00314.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[90] Zhao Y, Cong L, Lukiw WJ. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) accumulates in neocortical neurons of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) brain and impairs transcription in human neuronal-glial primary co-cultures. Front Aging Neurosci. 2017;9:407. 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00407.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[91] Lien E, Means TK, Heine H, Yoshimura A, Kusumoto S, Fukase K, et al. Toll-like receptor 4 imparts ligand-specific recognition of bacterial lipopolysaccharide. J Clin Invest. 2000;105(4):497–504. 10.1172/jci8541.Search in Google Scholar
[92] Zhao Y, Jaber V, Lukiw WJ. Secretory products of the human GI tract microbiome and their potential impact on Alzheimer’s disease (AD): detection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in AD Hippocampus. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:318. 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00318.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[93] Zhao Y, Cong L, Jaber V, Lukiw WJ. Microbiome-derived lipopolysaccharide enriched in the perinuclear region of Alzheimer’s disease brain. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1064. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01064.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[94] Lukiw WJ. Bacteroides fragilis Lipopolysaccharide and inflammatory signaling in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1544. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01544.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[95] Alexandrov P, Zhai Y, Li W, Lukiw W. Lipopolysaccharide-stimulated, NF-kB-, miRNA-146a- and miRNA-155-mediated molecular-genetic communication between the human gastrointestinal tract microbiome and the brain. Folia Neuropathol. 2019;57(3):211–9. 10.5114/fn.2019.88449.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[96] Hill JM, Pogue AI, Lukiw WJ. Pathogenic microRNAs common to brain and retinal degeneration; recent observations in Alzheimer’s disease and age-related macular degeneration. Front Neurol. 2015;6:232. 10.3389/fneur.2015.00232.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[97] Lukiw WJ, Zhao Y, Cui JG. An NF-kappaB-sensitive micro RNA-146a-mediated inflammatory circuit in Alzheimer disease and in stressed human brain cells. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(46):31315–22. 10.1074/jbc.M805371200.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[98] Yang X, Yu D, Xue L, Li H, Du J. Probiotics modulate the microbiota-gut-brain axis and improve memory deficits in aged SAMP8 mice. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2020;10(3):475–87. 10.1016/j.apsb.2019.07.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[99] Lee HJ, Lee KE, Kim JK, Kim DH. Suppression of gut dysbiosis by Bifidobacterium longum alleviates cognitive decline in 5XFAD transgenic and aged mice. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):11814. 10.1038/s41598-019-48342-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[100] Walker LC, Jucker M. Amyloid by default. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14(6):669–70. 10.1038/nn.2853.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[101] Vidakovic L, Singh PK, Hartmann R, Nadell CD, Drescher K. Dynamic biofilm architecture confers individual and collective mechanisms of viral protection. Nat Microbiol. 2018;3(1):26–31. 10.1038/s41564-017-0050-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[102] Chorell E, Andersson E, Evans ML, Jain N, Götheson A, Åden J, et al. Bacterial chaperones CsgE and CsgC differentially modulate human α-synuclein amyloid formation via transient contacts. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0140194. 10.1371/journal.pone.0140194.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[103] Evans ML, Chorell E, Taylor JD, Åden J, Götheson A, Li F, et al. The bacterial curli system possesses a potent and selective inhibitor of amyloid formation. Mol Cell. 2015;57(3):445–55. 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.12.025.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[104] Lundmark K, Westermark GT, Olsén A, Westermark P. Protein fibrils in nature can enhance amyloid protein A amyloidosis in mice: cross-seeding as a disease mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S Am. 2005;102(17):6098–102. 10.1073/pnas.0501814102.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[105] Katorcha E, Makarava N, Lee YJ, Lindberg I, Monteiro MJ, Kovacs GG, et al. Cross-seeding of prions by aggregated α-synuclein leads to transmissible spongiform encephalopathy. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13(8):e1006563. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006563.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[106] Brettschneider J, Del Tredici K, Lee VM, Trojanowski JQ. Spreading of pathology in neurodegenerative diseases: a focus on human studies. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;16(2):109–20. 10.1038/nrn3887.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[107] Chen SG, Stribinskis V, Rane MJ, Demuth DR, Gozal E, Roberts AM, et al. Exposure to the functional bacterial amyloid protein curli enhances alpha-synuclein aggregation in aged Fischer 344 rats and Caenorhabditis elegans. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34477. 10.1038/srep34477.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[108] Sampson TR, Challis C, Jain N, Moiseyenko A, Ladinsky MS, Shastri GG, et al. A gut bacterial amyloid promotes α-synuclein aggregation and motor impairment in mice. eLife. 2020;9:e53111. 10.7554/eLife.53111.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[109] Friedland RP. Mechanisms of molecular mimicry involving the microbiota in neurodegeneration. J Alzheimer’s Disease JAD. 2015;45(2):349–62. 10.3233/jad-142841.Search in Google Scholar
[110] Kim S, Kwon SH, Kam TI, Panicker N, Karuppagounder SS, Lee S, et al. Transneuronal propagation of pathologic α-synuclein from the gut to the brain models Parkinson’s disease. Neuron. 2019;103(4):627–41.e7. 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.05.035.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[111] Ulusoy A, Phillips RJ, Helwig M, Klinkenberg M, Powley TL, Di Monte DA. Brain-to-stomach transfer of α-synuclein via vagal preganglionic projections. Acta Neuropathol. 2017;133(3):381–93. 10.1007/s00401-016-1661-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[112] Mazmanian SK, Liu CH, Tzianabos AO, Kasper DL. An immunomodulatory molecule of symbiotic bacteria directs maturation of the host immune system. Cell. 2005;122(1):107–18. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[113] Wang Y, Begum-Haque S, Telesford KM, Ochoa-Repáraz J, Christy M, Kasper EJ, et al. A commensal bacterial product elicits and modulates migratory capacity of CD39(+) CD4 T regulatory subsets in the suppression of neuroinflammation. Gut Microbes. 2014;5(4):552–61. 10.4161/gmic.29797.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[114] Dwyer KM, Deaglio S, Gao W, Friedman D, Strom TB, Robson SC. CD39 and control of cellular immune responses. Purinergic Signal. 2007;3(1–2):171–80. 10.1007/s11302-006-9050-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[115] Mowat AM, Agace WW. Regional specialization within the intestinal immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14(10):667–85. 10.1038/nri3738.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[116] Neunlist M, Van Landeghem L, Mahé MM, Derkinderen P, des Varannes SB, Rolli-Derkinderen M. The digestive neuronal-glial-epithelial unit: a new actor in gut health and disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10(2):90–100. 10.1038/nrgastro.2012.221.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[117] Uesaka T, Young HM, Pachnis V, Enomoto H. Development of the intrinsic and extrinsic innervation of the gut. Devel Biol. 2016;417(2):158–67. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.04.016.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[118] Gustafsson BE, Midtvedt T, Strandberg K. Effects of microbial contamination on the cecum enlargement of germfree rats. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1970;5(4):309–14.10.1080/00365521.1970.12096595Search in Google Scholar
[119] Kunze WA, Mao YK, Wang B, Huizinga JD, Ma X, Forsythe P, et al. Lactobacillus reuteri enhances excitability of colonic AH neurons by inhibiting calcium-dependent potassium channel opening. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13(8b):2261–70. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00686.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[120] Mcvey Neufeld KA, Mao YK, Bienenstock J, Foster JA, Kunze WA. The microbiome is essential for normal gut intrinsic primary afferent neuron excitability in the mouse. Neurogastroenterol Motil Off J Eur Gastrointest Motility Soc. 2013;25(2):183-e88. 10.1111/nmo.12049.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[121] Kabouridis PS, Lasrado R, Mccallum S, Chng SH, Snippert HJ, Clevers H, et al. Microbiota controls the homeostasis of glial cells in the gut lamina propria. Neuron. 2015;85(2):289–95. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.037.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[122] Puig KL, Lutz BM, Urquhart SA, Rebel AA, Zhou X, Manocha GD, et al. Overexpression of mutant amyloid-β protein precursor and presenilin 1 modulates enteric nervous system. J Alzheimer’s Disease JAD. 2015;44(4):1263–78. 10.3233/jad-142259.Search in Google Scholar
[123] Semar S, Klotz M, Letiembre M, Van Ginneken C, Braun A, Jost V, et al. Changes of the enteric nervous system in amyloid-β protein precursor transgenic mice correlate with disease progression. J Alzheimer’s Disease JAD. 2013;36(1):7–20. 10.3233/jad-120511.Search in Google Scholar
[124] Han X, Tang S, Dong L, Song L, Dong Y, Wang Y, et al. Loss of nitrergic and cholinergic neurons in the enteric nervous system of APP/PS1 transgenic mouse model. Neurosci Lett. 2017;642:59–65. 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.01.061.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[125] Francisco ÉC, Franco TT, Wagner R, Jacob-Lopes E. Assessment of different carbohydrates as exogenous carbon source in cultivation of cyanobacteria. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2014;37(8):1497–505. 10.1007/s00449-013-1121-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[126] Thomson P, Medina DA, Garrido D. Human milk oligosaccharides and infant gut bifidobacteria: molecular strategies for their utilization. Food Microbiol. 2018;75:37–46. 10.1016/j.fm.2017.09.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[127] Xiao S, Chan P, Wang T, Hong Z, Wang S, Kuang W, et al. A 36-week multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 clinical trial of sodium oligomannate for mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s dementia. Alzheimer’s Res Ther. 2021;13(1):62. 10.1186/s13195-021-00795-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[128] Xin Y, Diling C, Jian Y, Ting L, Guoyan H, Hualun L, et al. Effects of oligosaccharides from morinda officinalis on gut microbiota and metabolome of APP/PS1 transgenic mice. Front Neurol. 2018;9:412. 10.3389/fneur.2018.00412.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[129] Chen D, Yang X, Yang J, Lai G, Yong T, Tang X, et al. Prebiotic effect of fructooligosaccharides from Morinda officinalis on Alzheimer’s disease in rodent models by targeting the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Front Aging Neurosci. 2017;9:403. 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00403.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[130] Wu XM, Tan RX. Interaction between gut microbiota and ethnomedicine constituents. Nat Product Rep. 2019;36(5):788–809. 10.1039/c8np00041g.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[131] Arora K, Green M, Prakash S. The microbiome and Alzheimer’s disease: potential and limitations of prebiotic, synbiotic, and probiotic formulations. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:537847. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.537847.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[132] Sun J, Xu J, Yang B, Chen K, Kong Y, Fang N, et al. Effect of Clostridium butyricum against microglia-mediated neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease via regulating gut microbiota and metabolites butyrate. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2020;64(2):e1900636. 10.1002/mnfr.201900636.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[133] Tran N, Zhebrak M, Yacoub C, Pelletier J, Hawley D. The gut-brain relationship: investigating the effect of multispecies probiotics on anxiety in a randomized placebo-controlled trial of healthy young adults. J Affect Disord. 2019;252:271–7. 10.1016/j.jad.2019.04.043.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[134] Van Den Brink AC, Brouwer-Brolsma EM, Berendsen AAM, van de Rest O. The mediterranean, dietary approaches to stop hypertension (DASH), and mediterranean-DASH intervention for neurodegenerative delay (MIND) diets are associated with less cognitive decline and a lower risk of Alzheimer’s disease-a review. Adv Nutr (Bethesda, Md). 2019;10(6):1040–65. 10.1093/advances/nmz054.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[135] Morris MC, Tangney CC, Wang Y, Sacks FM, Bennett DA, Aggarwal NT. MIND diet associated with reduced incidence of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dementia: J Alzheimer’s Assoc. 2015;11(9):1007–14. 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.11.009.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[136] Jiang C, Li G, Huang P, Liu Z, Zhao B. The gut microbiota and Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimer’s Disease: JAD. 2017;58(1):1–15. 10.3233/jad-161141.Search in Google Scholar
[137] Chen XY, Wang RF, Liu B. An update on oligosaccharides and their esters from traditional chinese medicines: chemical structures and biological activities. Evidence-based Complement Alternative Med eCAM. 2015;2015:512675. 10.1155/2015/512675.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[138] Sun J, Liu S, Ling Z, Wang F, Ling Y, Gong T, et al. Fructooligosaccharides ameliorating cognitive deficits and neurodegeneration in APP/PS1 transgenic mice through modulating gut microbiota. J Agric Food Chem. 2019;67(10):3006–17. 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b07313.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[139] Yuan T, Chu C, Shi R, Cui T, Zhang X, Zhao Y, et al. ApoE-dependent protective effects of sesamol on high-fat diet-induced behavioral disorders: regulation of the microbiome-gut-brain axis. J Agric Food Chem. 2019;67(22):6190–201. 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b01436.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[140] Tan FHP, Liu G, Lau SA, Jaafar MH, Park YH, Azzam G, et al. Lactobacillus probiotics improved the gut microbiota profile of a Drosophila melanogaster Alzheimer’s disease model and alleviated neurodegeneration in the eye. Beneficial Microbes. 2020;11(1):79–89. 10.3920/bm2019.0086.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[141] Kobayashi Y, Sugahara H, Shimada K, Mitsuyama E, Kuhara T, Yasuoka A, et al. Therapeutic potential of Bifidobacterium breve strain A1 for preventing cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):13510. 10.1038/s41598-017-13368-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[142] Leblhuber F, Steiner K, Schuetz B, Fuchs D, Gostner JM. Probiotic supplementation in patients with Alzheimer’s dementia – an explorative intervention study. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2018;15(12):1106–13. 10.2174/1389200219666180813144834.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[143] Bonfili L, Cecarini V, Cuccioloni M, Angeletti M, Berardi S, Scarpona S, et al. SLAB51 probiotic formulation activates SIRT1 pathway promoting antioxidant and neuroprotective effects in an AD mouse model. Mol Neurobiol. 2018;55(10):7987–8000. 10.1007/s12035-018-0973-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[144] Nimgampalle M, Kuna Y. Anti-Alzheimer properties of probiotic, Lactobacillus plantarum MTCC 1325 in Alzheimer’s disease induced Albino rats. J Clin Diagnostic Research: JCDR. 2017;11(8):Kc01. 10.7860/jcdr/2017/26106.10428.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[145] Westfall S, Lomis N, Prakash S. A novel synbiotic delays Alzheimer’s disease onset via combinatorial gut-brain-axis signaling in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0214985. 10.1371/journal.pone.0214985.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[146] Kim CS, Cha L, Sim M, Jung S, Chun WY, Baik HW, et al. Probiotic supplementation improves cognitive function and mood with changes in gut microbiota in community-dwelling older adults: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. J Gerontol Ser A. 2021;76(1):32–40. 10.1093/gerona/glaa090.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[147] Ma D, Wang AC, Parikh I, Green SJ, Hoffman JD, Chlipala G, et al. Ketogenic diet enhances neurovascular function with altered gut microbiome in young healthy mice. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):6670. 10.1038/s41598-018-25190-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[148] Neth BJ, Mintz A, Whitlow C, Jung Y, Solingapuram Sai K, Register TC, et al. Modified ketogenic diet is associated with improved cerebrospinal fluid biomarker profile, cerebral perfusion, and cerebral ketone body uptake in older adults at risk for Alzheimer’s disease: a pilot study. Neurobiol Aging. 2020;86:54–63. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.09.015.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[149] Wang D, Ho L, Faith J, Ono K, Janle EM, Lachcik PJ, et al. Role of intestinal microbiota in the generation of polyphenol-derived phenolic acid mediated attenuation of Alzheimer’s disease β-amyloid oligomerization. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2015;59(6):1025–40. 10.1002/mnfr.201400544.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[150] Syeda T, Sanchez-Tapia M, Pinedo-Vargas L, Granados O, Cuervo-Zanatta D, Rojas-Santiago E, et al. Bioactive food abates metabolic and synaptic alterations by modulation of gut microbiota in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimer’s Disease JAD. 2018;66(4):1657–82. 10.3233/jad-180556.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Si-Ran Zhong et al., published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the same Issue
- Research Articles
- Ulinastatin alleviates traumatic brain injury by reducing endothelin-1
- IKBIP is a novel EMT-related biomarker and predicts poor survival in glioma
- Pelargonidin ameliorates MCAO-induced cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats by the action on the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway
- Vertebral plate and ligament composite laminoplasty in spinal cord tumor surgery: Analysis of 94 patients
- Anti-inflammatory genes in PBMCs post-spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage
- Calumenin contributes to epithelial-mesenchymal transition and predicts poor survival in glioma
- The effect of dietary supplementation with high- or low-dose omega-3 fatty acid on inflammatory pathology after traumatic brain injury in rats
- Dysregulated gene-associated biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease and aging
- Inhibition of lncRNA H19/miR-370-3p pathway mitigates neuronal apoptosis in an in vitro model of spinal cord injury (SCI)
- Euxanthone inhibits traumatic spinal cord injury via anti-oxidative stress and suppression of p38 and PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in a rat model
- Role of exosomal miRNAs in brain metastasis affected by radiotherapy
- Resveratrol against 6-OHDA-induced damage of PC12 cells via PI3K/Akt
- A new surgical method of treatment spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage
- Chronic restraint stress impairs cognition via modulating HDAC2 expression
- Naringin attenuates cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats by inhibiting endoplasmic reticulum stress
- Intracerebral hemorrhage with tentorial herniation: Conventional open surgery or emergency stereotactic craniopuncture aspiration surgery?
- miR-380-5p facilitates NRF2 and attenuates cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury-induced neuronal cell death by directly targeting BACH1
- Nervonic acid amends motor disorder in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease
- Lepidium sativum as candidate against excitotoxicity in retinal ganglion cells
- circ_0030018 promotes glioma proliferation and metastasis
- Vitamin D3 reduces hippocampal NR2A and anxiety in nicotine withdrawal mice
- Frontoparietal anodal tDCS reduces ketamine-induced oscillopathies
- Tripchlorolide attenuates β-amyloid generation by inducing NEP activity in N2a/APP695 cells
- Canstatin represses glioma growth by inhibiting formation of VM-like structures
- WNK3 promotes the invasiveness of glioma cell lines under hypoxia by inducing the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition
- miR-485-5p alleviates Alzheimer’s disease progression by targeting PACS1
- Toxic effects of formaldehyde and the protective effect of docosahexaenoic acid in Drosophila
- Chopstick operation training with the left non-dominant hand
- Labor Analgesia reduces the risk of postpartum depression: A cohort study
- Nicotine induced ototoxicity in rat cochlear organotypic cultures
- Altered cerebellum functional network on newly diagnosed drug-naïve Parkinson’s disease patients with anxiety
- Therapeutic value of the metabolomic active neurotransmitter isorhynchophylline in the treatment of spontaneously hypertensive rats by regulating neurotransmitters
- Risky decision-making following prefrontal D1 receptor manipulation
- Cerebrospinal fluid electrolytes and acid-base in diabetic patients
- circ_0082375 promotes the progression of glioma by regulating Wnt7B
- Cryptotanshinone ameliorates CUS-induced depressive-like behaviors in mice
- A novel strategy for driving car brain–computer interfaces: Discrimination of EEG-based visual-motor imagery
- Galvanic vestibular stimulation with low intensity improves dynamic balance
- Neuropeptide changes in an improved migraine model with repeat stimulations
- Neuroprotective effects of the Chrysophyllum perpulchrum extract against an Alzheimer-like rat model of β amyloid1-40 intrahippocampal injection
- Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing hepatocyte growth factor ameliorate hypoxic–ischemic brain damage in neonatal rats
- Leaky gut biomarkers in casein- and gluten-rich diet fed rat model of autism
- Altered sleep intensity upon DBS to hypothalamic sleep–wake centers in rats
- Review Articles
- The potential antiepileptogenic effect of neuronal Cx36 gap junction channel blockage
- Acupuncture and oxytocinergic system: The promising treatment for autism
- Hormones in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) animal models
- Immunoregulation and antidepressant effect of ketamine
- Review: Pelvic nerves – from anatomy and physiology to clinical applications
- Sustained delivery of neurotrophic factors to treat spinal cord injury
- Benefits of vitamin D supplementation to attenuate TBI secondary injury?
- Effects of gut microbiota and probiotics on Alzheimer’s disease
- Functional roles of the microbiota-gut-brain axis in Alzheimer’s disease: Implications of gut microbiota-targeted therapy
- Commentary
- Evaluating the translational value of postmortem brain reperfusion technology
- Case Report
- A novel KCNT1 mutation in a Chinese family with severe autosomal-dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy
- Spinocerebellar ataxia type 40: A case report and literature review
- Basal ganglia infarction and COVID-19 infection in an elderly patient: A case report
- Rapid Communication
- Ultrasound-guided ethyl alcohol injection to the deep branch of the ulnar nerve to relieve hand spasticity in stroke patients: A case series
- Erratum
- Erratum to “Ulinastatin alleviates traumatic brain injury by reducing endothelin-1”
- Special Issue “Neuroinflammation: from basic to clinical perspectives”
- The clinical significance of glutathione peroxidase 2 in glioblastoma multiforme
Articles in the same Issue
- Research Articles
- Ulinastatin alleviates traumatic brain injury by reducing endothelin-1
- IKBIP is a novel EMT-related biomarker and predicts poor survival in glioma
- Pelargonidin ameliorates MCAO-induced cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats by the action on the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway
- Vertebral plate and ligament composite laminoplasty in spinal cord tumor surgery: Analysis of 94 patients
- Anti-inflammatory genes in PBMCs post-spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage
- Calumenin contributes to epithelial-mesenchymal transition and predicts poor survival in glioma
- The effect of dietary supplementation with high- or low-dose omega-3 fatty acid on inflammatory pathology after traumatic brain injury in rats
- Dysregulated gene-associated biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease and aging
- Inhibition of lncRNA H19/miR-370-3p pathway mitigates neuronal apoptosis in an in vitro model of spinal cord injury (SCI)
- Euxanthone inhibits traumatic spinal cord injury via anti-oxidative stress and suppression of p38 and PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in a rat model
- Role of exosomal miRNAs in brain metastasis affected by radiotherapy
- Resveratrol against 6-OHDA-induced damage of PC12 cells via PI3K/Akt
- A new surgical method of treatment spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage
- Chronic restraint stress impairs cognition via modulating HDAC2 expression
- Naringin attenuates cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats by inhibiting endoplasmic reticulum stress
- Intracerebral hemorrhage with tentorial herniation: Conventional open surgery or emergency stereotactic craniopuncture aspiration surgery?
- miR-380-5p facilitates NRF2 and attenuates cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury-induced neuronal cell death by directly targeting BACH1
- Nervonic acid amends motor disorder in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease
- Lepidium sativum as candidate against excitotoxicity in retinal ganglion cells
- circ_0030018 promotes glioma proliferation and metastasis
- Vitamin D3 reduces hippocampal NR2A and anxiety in nicotine withdrawal mice
- Frontoparietal anodal tDCS reduces ketamine-induced oscillopathies
- Tripchlorolide attenuates β-amyloid generation by inducing NEP activity in N2a/APP695 cells
- Canstatin represses glioma growth by inhibiting formation of VM-like structures
- WNK3 promotes the invasiveness of glioma cell lines under hypoxia by inducing the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition
- miR-485-5p alleviates Alzheimer’s disease progression by targeting PACS1
- Toxic effects of formaldehyde and the protective effect of docosahexaenoic acid in Drosophila
- Chopstick operation training with the left non-dominant hand
- Labor Analgesia reduces the risk of postpartum depression: A cohort study
- Nicotine induced ototoxicity in rat cochlear organotypic cultures
- Altered cerebellum functional network on newly diagnosed drug-naïve Parkinson’s disease patients with anxiety
- Therapeutic value of the metabolomic active neurotransmitter isorhynchophylline in the treatment of spontaneously hypertensive rats by regulating neurotransmitters
- Risky decision-making following prefrontal D1 receptor manipulation
- Cerebrospinal fluid electrolytes and acid-base in diabetic patients
- circ_0082375 promotes the progression of glioma by regulating Wnt7B
- Cryptotanshinone ameliorates CUS-induced depressive-like behaviors in mice
- A novel strategy for driving car brain–computer interfaces: Discrimination of EEG-based visual-motor imagery
- Galvanic vestibular stimulation with low intensity improves dynamic balance
- Neuropeptide changes in an improved migraine model with repeat stimulations
- Neuroprotective effects of the Chrysophyllum perpulchrum extract against an Alzheimer-like rat model of β amyloid1-40 intrahippocampal injection
- Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing hepatocyte growth factor ameliorate hypoxic–ischemic brain damage in neonatal rats
- Leaky gut biomarkers in casein- and gluten-rich diet fed rat model of autism
- Altered sleep intensity upon DBS to hypothalamic sleep–wake centers in rats
- Review Articles
- The potential antiepileptogenic effect of neuronal Cx36 gap junction channel blockage
- Acupuncture and oxytocinergic system: The promising treatment for autism
- Hormones in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) animal models
- Immunoregulation and antidepressant effect of ketamine
- Review: Pelvic nerves – from anatomy and physiology to clinical applications
- Sustained delivery of neurotrophic factors to treat spinal cord injury
- Benefits of vitamin D supplementation to attenuate TBI secondary injury?
- Effects of gut microbiota and probiotics on Alzheimer’s disease
- Functional roles of the microbiota-gut-brain axis in Alzheimer’s disease: Implications of gut microbiota-targeted therapy
- Commentary
- Evaluating the translational value of postmortem brain reperfusion technology
- Case Report
- A novel KCNT1 mutation in a Chinese family with severe autosomal-dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy
- Spinocerebellar ataxia type 40: A case report and literature review
- Basal ganglia infarction and COVID-19 infection in an elderly patient: A case report
- Rapid Communication
- Ultrasound-guided ethyl alcohol injection to the deep branch of the ulnar nerve to relieve hand spasticity in stroke patients: A case series
- Erratum
- Erratum to “Ulinastatin alleviates traumatic brain injury by reducing endothelin-1”
- Special Issue “Neuroinflammation: from basic to clinical perspectives”
- The clinical significance of glutathione peroxidase 2 in glioblastoma multiforme
