Abstract
Much debate in prosodic phonology has centered on the question of recursive prosodic layers versus independent constituents. Recently, Downing and Kadenge (Downing, Laura & Maxwell Kadenge. 2015. Prosodic stems in Zezuru Shona. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 33(3). 291–305, Downing, Laura & Maxwell Kadenge. 2020. Re-placing the PStem in the prosodic hierarchy. The Linguistic Review 37(3). 433–461) have advocated for a unique prosodic constituent, the PStem, to match stem-level phonology. They argue that the stem level should not be sensitive to canonically word-level phenomena such as minimality and culminativity. Alternatively, Itô and Mester (Itô, Junko & Armin Mester. 2007. Prosodic adjunction in Japanese compounds. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. 97–111 et seq.) propose that the PStem/PrWd division can be collapsed into recursive PrWd levels, in which any recursive layer can have any given set of properties. In this paper, I hope to add to this debate by showing that Downing and Kadenge’s idea of specifically stem-level processes is falsifiable in light of new empirical evidence from a number of unrelated languages. In terms of the recursion question, I show that there are two types of language behavior with respect to stem- versus word-level phonology: one in which stem and word are the loci of the distinct processes, and one in which stem and word show the same behavior (“recursive identity”). I conclude by showing that arguments intending to reduce recursive identity to cyclicity encounter their own suite of problems.
References
Arnhold, Anja, Richard J. Compton & Emily Elfner. 2018. Prosody and wordhood in South Baffin Inuktitut. In Proceedings of the 21st Workshop on Structure and Constituency in Languages of the Americas, 30–39. Vancouver: Univ. BC Working Papers in Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar
Barrie, Mike. 2022. On reducing prosodic categories to phases. Presented at AJL7 (7th Asian Junior Linguistics Conference).Search in Google Scholar
Bennett, Ryan. 2016. Mayan phonology. Language and Linguistics Compass 10(10). 469–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12148.Search in Google Scholar
Bennett, Ryan. 2018. Recursive prosodic words in Kaqchikel (Mayan). Glossa 3(1). 1–33. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.550.Search in Google Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 2017. Stratal phonology. In Stephen J. Hannahs & Anna Bosch (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Phonological Theory, 100–134. Abingdon: Routledge.10.4324/9781315675428-5Search in Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 1996. Cliticization as prosodic integration: The case of Dutch. The Linguistic Review 13. 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1996.13.3-4.219.Search in Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2006. Inflection and derivation. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, 2nd edn., vol. 5, 654–661. Oxford: Elsevier.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00115-2Search in Google Scholar
Buckley, Eugene & John Gluckman. 2012. Syntax and prosody in Kashaya phrasal accent. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 18. 21–30.Search in Google Scholar
Buller, Barbara, Ernest Buller & Daniel Everett. 1993. Stress placement, syllable structure, and minimality in Banawá. International Journal of American Linguistics 59(3). 280–293. https://doi.org/10.1086/466199.Search in Google Scholar
Cassimjee, Farida. 1994. IsiXhosa tonology: An optimal domains theory. In LINCOM studies in African linguistics, vol. 29. Munich: LINCOM EUROPA.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by Step: Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in Language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004Search in Google Scholar
Coon, Jessica, Nico Baier & Theodore Levine. 2021. Mayan agent focus and the ergative extraction constraint: Facts and fictions revisited. Language 97(2). 269–332. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2021.0019.Search in Google Scholar
Corbett, Graville. 2007. Canonical typology, suppletion and possible words. Language 83(1). 8–42. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2007.0006.Search in Google Scholar
Dąbkowski, Maximillian. To appear. Two grammars of A’ingae glottalization: A case for cophonologies by phase. To appear in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.Search in Google Scholar
Dąbkowski, Maximillian. 2021. A’ingae syntax conditions the representation of glottalization. Talk given at the 28th Manchester Phonology Meeting, May 28 2021.Search in Google Scholar
Dolatian, Hossep. 2021. Cyclicity and prosodic misalignment in Armenian stems. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 39(3). 843–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-020-09487-7.Search in Google Scholar
Dolatian, Hossep. 2022. Output-conditioned and non-local allomorphy in Armenian theme vowels. The Linguistic Review 40(1). 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2022-2104.Search in Google Scholar
Downing, Laura. 1998a. On the prosodic misalignment on onsetless syllables. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16(1). 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005968714712.10.1023/A:1005968714712Search in Google Scholar
Downing, Laura. 1998b. Prosodic misalignment and reduplication. In Geert Booij (ed.), Yearbook of Morphology 1997, 83–120. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-011-4998-3_4Search in Google Scholar
Downing, Laura. 1999. Prosodic stem ≠ prosodic word in Bantu. In Tracy Allan Hall & Ursula Kleinhenz (eds.), Studies on the Phonological Word, vol. 174, 73–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.174.05dowSearch in Google Scholar
Downing, Laura. 2000. Morphological and prosodic constraints on Kinande verbal reduplication. Phonology 17(1). 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/s095267570000381x.Search in Google Scholar
Downing, Laura. 2006. Canonical forms in prosodic morphology, vol. 12. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286393.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Downing, Laura & Maxwell Kadenge. 2015. Prosodic stems in Zezuru Shona. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 33(3). 291–305. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2015.1108766.Search in Google Scholar
Downing, Laura & Maxwell Kadenge. 2020. Re-placing the PStem in the prosodic hierarchy. The Linguistic Review 37(3). 433–461. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2020-2050.Search in Google Scholar
Elenbaas, Nine & René Kager. 1999. Ternary rhythm and the lapse constraint. Phonology 16. 273–329. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675799003772.Search in Google Scholar
Elfner, Emily. 2012. Syntax-prosody interactions in Irish. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Elkins, Noah. 2020. Prefix independence: Typology and theory. Los Angeles: UCLA Masters thesis.Search in Google Scholar
Flack, Kathryn. 2009. Constraints on onsets and codas of words and phrases. Phonology 26(2). 269–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675709990133.Search in Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. Universals of Language 2. 73–113.Search in Google Scholar
Guekguezian, Peter Ara. 2017a. Templates as the interaction of recursive word structure and prosodic well-formedness. Phonology 34(1). 81–120. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675717000045.Search in Google Scholar
Guekguezian, Peter Ara. 2017b. Prosodic recursion and syntactic cyclicity inside the word. Los Angeles, CA: USC dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1995. Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, Kristine A. 2007. Prosodic and grammatical domains in Limbu. Himalayan Linguistics 8. 1–34. https://doi.org/10.5070/h98023041.Search in Google Scholar
Hyde, Brett. 2002. A restrictive theory of metrical stress. Phonology 19. 313–359. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675703004391.Search in Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry. 1987. Prosodic domains in Kukuya. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5(3). 311–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00134552.Search in Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry. 2006. Word-prosodic typlogy. Phonology 23. 225–257. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675706000893.Search in Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M., Sharon Inkelas & Galen Sibanda. 2009. Morphosyntactic correspondence in Bantu reduplication. The nature of the word: Essays in honor of Paul Kiparsky, 273–309. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7894.003.0017Search in Google Scholar
Itô, Junko. 1990. Prosodic minimality in Japanese. Papers from the parasession on the syllable in the Chicago Linguistics Society, 213–239.Search in Google Scholar
Itô, Junko & Armin Mester. 2003. Weak layering and word binarity. In Takeru Honma, Masao Okazaki, Toshiyuki Tabata & Shin-ichi Tanaka (eds.), A Festschrift for Professor Shosuke Haraguchi on the Occasion of His Sixtieth Birthday, 26–65. Tokyo: Kaitakusya.Search in Google Scholar
Itô, Junko & Armin Mester. 2007. Prosodic adjunction in Japanese compounds. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 55. 97–111.Search in Google Scholar
Itô, Junko & Armin Mester. 2009a. The extended prosodic word. In Janet Grijzenhout & Baris Kabak (eds.), Phonological Domains: Universals and Derivations, 135–194. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110219234.2.135Search in Google Scholar
Itô, Junko & Armin Mester. 2009b. The onset of the prosodic word. In Steve Parker (ed.), Phonological argumentation: Essays on evidence and motivation, 227–260. London: Equinox.Search in Google Scholar
Itô, Junko & Armin Mester. 2012. Recursive prosodic phrasing in Japanese. In Toni Borowsky, Shigeto Kawahara, Takahito Shinya & Mariko Sugahara (eds.), Prosody matters: Essays in honor of Elisabeth Selkirk, 280–303. London: Equinox.Search in Google Scholar
Itô, Junko & Armin Mester. 2013. Prosodic subcategories in Japanese. Lingua 124. 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.08.016.Search in Google Scholar
Itô, Junko & Armin Mester. 2021. Recursive prosody and the prosodic form of compounds. Languages 6(2). 65, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6020065.Search in Google Scholar
Julien, Marie. 2002. Syntactic heads and word formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195149500.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Kaisse, Ellen M. & Patricia A. Shaw. 1985. On the theory of lexical phonology. Phonology 2(1). 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675700000361.Search in Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Lexical morphology and phonology. Linguistics in the morning calm: Selected papers from SICOL-1981, 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 2000. Opacity and cyclicity. The Linguistic Review 16. 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2000.17.2-4.351.Search in Google Scholar
Kisseberth, Charles & David Odden. 2003. Tone. In Derek Nurse & Gérard Philippson (eds.), The Bantu Languages, 1st edn. (Routledge Language Family Descriptions), 59–70. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Ladd, Robert D. 1986. Intonational phrasing: The case for recursive prosodic structure. Phonology 3. 311–340. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675700000671.Search in Google Scholar
Lionnet, Florian. 2019. The colon as a separate prosodic category: Tonal evidence from Paicî (Oceanic, New Caledonia). In Proceedings of the 36th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL), 250–259. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Search in Google Scholar
Martínez-Paricio, Violeta. 2012. Superfeet as recursion. In Proceedings of the 30th west coast conference on formal linguistics (WCCFL), 259–269. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Search in Google Scholar
Martínez-Paricio, Violeta. 2013. An exploration of minimal and maximal feet. Tromsø: University of Tromsø dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Martínez-Paricio, Violeta & René Kager. 2015. The binary-to-ternary rhythmic continuum in stress typology: Layered feet and non-intervention constraints. Phonology 32. 459–504. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675715000287.Search in Google Scholar
Martínez-Paricio, Violeta & René Kager. 2016. Metrically conditioned pitch and layered feet in Chugach Alutiiq. Loquens 3(2). 1–13.10.3989/loquens.2016.030Search in Google Scholar
Martínez-Paricio, Violeta & René Kager. 2018. The internally layered foot in Dutch. Linguistics 56(1). 69–114. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0037.Search in Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 1998. Morpheme structure constraints and paradigm occultation. In M. Catherine Gruber, Derrick Higgins, Kenneth Olson & Tamra Wysocki (eds.), CLS 32, Part 2: The Panels, 123–150. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar
McCarthy, John & Alan Prince. 1986. Prosodic morphology. Ms., UMass: Amherst and Brandeis University.Search in Google Scholar
McCarthy, John & Alan Prince. 1993. Generalized alignment. In Yearbook of morphology, 79–153. The Netherlands: Springer.10.1007/978-94-017-3712-8_4Search in Google Scholar
Meinschaefer, Judith. 2005. The prosodic domain of Italian trocamento is not the clitic group. Konstanz: Universität Konstantz, Arbeitspapier Nr. 118.Search in Google Scholar
Meinschaefer, Judith. 2006. Trocamento and the phonological phrase in Florentine Italian. Italian Journal of Linguistics 18. 295–324.Search in Google Scholar
Miller, Taylor Lampton & Hannah Sande. 2021. Is word-level recursion actually recursion? Languages 6. 3–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6020100.Search in Google Scholar
Mkochi, Winfred & Lee Bickmore. 2021. Tone and the prosodic stem in Malawian CiTonga. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 42(2). 253–277. https://doi.org/10.1515/jall-2021-2021.Search in Google Scholar
Mohanan, Karuvannur Puthanveettil. 1986. The theory of lexical phonology. MA: Kluwer Academic Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Myers, Scott P. 1987. Tone and the structure of words in Shona. Amherst: UMass Amherst dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Myers, Scott P. 1998. AUX in Bantu morphology and phonology. In Larry Hyman & Charles Kisseberth (eds.), Theoretical Aspects of Bantu Tone, 231–264. Stanford: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Odden, David. 1995. The status of onsetless syllables in Kikerewe. Ohio State University: Working Papers in Linguistics 47. 89–110.Search in Google Scholar
Ọla Orie, Ọlanikẹ & Douglas Pulleyblank. 2002. Yoruba vowel elision: Minimality effects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20(1). 101–156. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014266228375.10.1023/A:1014266228375Search in Google Scholar
Patal Majzul, Lolmay Filiberto. 2007. Rusoltzij ri Kaqchikel: Diccionario estándar bilingüe Kaqchikel-Español. Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala: Cholsamaj.Search in Google Scholar
Peperkamp, Sharon. 1997. Prosodic words. The Hague: University of Amsterdam dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Sande, Hannah. 2017. Distributing morphologically conditioned phonology: Three case studies from Guébie. Berkeley, CA: UC Berkeley dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Sande, Hanna. 2019. A unified account of conditioned phonological alternations: Evidence from Guébie. Language 95(3). 456–497. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2019.0053.Search in Google Scholar
Sande, Hannah, Peter Jenks & Sarah Inkelas. 2020. Cophonologies by ph(r)ase. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 38(4). 1211–1261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-020-09467-x.Search in Google Scholar
Schiering, René, Balthasar Bickel & Kristine A. Hildebrandt. 2010. The prosodic word is not universal, but emergent. Journal of Linguistics 43(3). 657–709. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226710000216.Search in Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1986. Phonology and syntax: The relationship between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1996. The prosodic structure of function words. In Jerry L. Morgan & Katherine Demuth (eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition, 187–213. New York and London: Psychology Press.Search in Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2011. The syntax-phonology interface. In John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan C. L. Yu (eds.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 2nd edn., 435–484. Hoboken: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444343069.ch14Search in Google Scholar
Tyler, Matthew. 2019. Simplifying match word: Evidence from English functional categories. Glossa 4(1). 15. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.631.Search in Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan. 1999. Multiple spell0out. Current Studies in Linguistics Series 32. 251–282.Search in Google Scholar
Vigário, Marina. 2010. Prosodic structure between the prosodic word and the phonological phrase: Recursive nodes or an independent domain? The Linguistic Review 27. 485–530. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2010.017.Search in Google Scholar
Vogel, Irene. 1999. Subminimal constituents in prosodic phonology. In Mike Davenport & S. J. Hannahs (eds.), Issues in phonological structure, 249–267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.196.14vogSearch in Google Scholar
Vogel, Irene. 2019. Life after the strict layer hypothesis: Prosodic structure geometry. In Hongming Zhong & Youying Qian (eds.), Prosodic Studies, 9–60. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781351212878-2Search in Google Scholar
Vogel, Irene & Angeliki Athanasopoulou. 2016. Psycholinguistic evidence for the Composite Group. Proceedings of the International Conference of Experimental Linguistics (ExLing), St. Petersburg, Russia, 1–4. Athens: ExLing Society.Search in Google Scholar
Wagner, Michael. 2005. Prosody and recursion. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Walker, Rachel & Fidèle Mpiranya. 2005. On triggers and opacity in coronal harmony. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 31(1). 383–396. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v31i1.880.Search in Google Scholar
Weber, Natalie. 2020. Syntax, prosody, and metrical structure in blackfoot. Vancouver, BC: UBC dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
White, James, René Kager, Tal Linzen, Giorgos Markopoulos, Alexander Martin, Andrew Nevins, Sharon Peperkamp, Krisztina Polgárdi, Nina Topintzi & Ruben van De Vijver. 2018. Preference for locality is affected by the prefix/suffix asymmetry: Evidence from artificial language learning. Proceedings of the Northeast Linguistic Society (NELS) 3. 207–220.Search in Google Scholar
Wolf, Matthew Adam. 2008. Optimal interleaving: Serial phonology-morphology interaction in a constraint-based model. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Zeller, Jochen. 2013. In Defence of Head Movement: Evidence from Bantu. In Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Diagnosing Syntax, online edn Oxford: Oxford Academic.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602490.003.0005Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston