Chinese tag questions: the CP/DP pro-form analysis
-
Liching Livy Chiu
Abstract
This paper investigates the behaviors of tag questions in Chinese and proposes a unifying analysis involving empty CP/DP pro-forms and predication. It is found that there are universally two types of Tag questions – (i) the invariable type and (ii) the (modal) verbal type, which correspond to the question-types in Chinese syntax. Previous research by Culivocer (1992. English tag questions in Universal Grammar. Lingua 88. 193–226) analyzed English tag questions as a pro-IP structure that is bound by a previous sentence. However, in Chinese, two types of tag questions include both A-not-A form and particle form. Furthermore, both the two kinds of tag questions display syntactic predication between the tag and an empty subject pro. An abbreviated “yes-no question” is attached to empty CP/DP constituents in these constructions.
References
Algeo, John. 1988. The tag question in British English: It’s different, I’N’It? English World-Wide 9(2). 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.9.2.03alg.Search in Google Scholar
Arbini, Ronald. 1969. Tag-questions and tag-imperatives in English. Journal of Linguistics 5. 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700002243.Search in Google Scholar
Bouton, Lawrence F. 1990. The imperative tag—a thing apart. World Englishes 9(1). 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971x.1990.tb00685.x.Search in Google Scholar
Chiu, Li-Ching. 2011. The phrasal empty categories in Mandarin Chinese. Taipei: National Tsing Hua University Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Culivocer, Peter. 1992. English tag questions in Universal Grammar. Lingua 88. 193–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(92)90042-h.Search in Google Scholar
Ditte, Kimps. 2007. Declarative constant polarity tag questions: A data-driven analysis of their form, meaning and attitudinal uses. Journal of Pragmatics 39. 270–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.08.003.Search in Google Scholar
Gallego, Ángel. 2006. Phase and ellipsis. Paper Presented at The Conference on Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society. Urbana-Champaign, 13–15 October.Search in Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Nobuko. 2009. Agreement at the CP level: Clause types and the ‘person’ restriction on the subject. In The proceedings of the Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics, vol. 5, 131–152. MITWPL, MIT.Search in Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2016. The syntax of yes and no. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701859.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Hu, Ching-Chi. 2002. Question tags in Taiwan Mandarin: Discourse functions and grammaticalization. Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University MA Thesis.Search in Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15(4). 531–574.Search in Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney. 1970. Two approaches to the analysis of tags. Journal of Linguistics 6. 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700002619.Search in Google Scholar
Hsin, Ai-Li C. 2016. An analysis of Chinese tag questions with a cross-linguistic comparison to English tags. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 14(1). 69–119.Search in Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard. 2006. On ellipsis: Is material that is phonetically absent but semantically present or absent syntactically? Ms. University of Maryland. Paper Presented at the 22nd Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Aalborg University, June 2006. Available at: https://vbn.aau.dk/en/projects/22nd-scandinavian-conference-of-linguistics.Search in Google Scholar
Li, Cai-Lun. 1998. Tag questions in Mandarin Chinese. Taipei: National Cheng-chi University MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar
Li, Mao-ts’ai. 1977. A study of tag questions in English. Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar
Lin, Jo-Wang& Chih-Chen, Jane Tang. 1995. Modals as Verbs in Chinese: a GB perspective. The Bulletin of Institute of History and Philology 66. 53–105.Search in Google Scholar
McGregor, William B. 1995. The English ‘tag question’: A new analysis, is(n’t) it? In Ruqaiya Hasan & Peter H. Fries (eds.), On subject and theme. A discourse functional perspective (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory), 91–121. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.118.04mcgSearch in Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2013. Diagnosing ellipsis. In Lisa L.-S. Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Diagnosing syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602490.003.0026Search in Google Scholar
Pope, Emily Norwood. 1976. Questions and answers in English. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum Sidney, Leech Geoffrey & Svartvik Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7Search in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 3. New York: Oxford University.10.1093/oso/9780195171976.003.0008Search in Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. & Arnold M. Zwicky. 1985. Speech acts distinctions in syntax. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 155–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Winkler, Susanne. 2013. Syntactic diagnostics for extraction of focus from ellipsis site. In Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Diagnosing syntax, Oxford studies in theoretical linguistics, 463–484. Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602490.003.0023Search in Google Scholar
Yang, Barry C.-Y. 2012. Intervention effects and wh-construals. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 21(1). 43–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-011-9080-5.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
