Abstract
This study argues against the verb-raising analysis of Japanese Non-Constituent Coordination (NCC), and consequently supports an alternative analysis with no recourse to verb movement in Narrow Syntax. I show that the verb-raising analysis under-generates regarding VP-fronting in Japanese. Furthermore, I point out that this analysis makes wrong predictions about the scope between heads and elements inside NCC. I conclude that there is no syntactic V-to-T-to-C verb-raising in Japanese NCC.
Funding source: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Award Identifier / Grant number: JP21K00574
Acknowledgment
I would like to thank Naoki Fukui, Takaomi Kato, Toru Ishii, Yushi Sugimoto, Takanobu Nakamura, Taihei Asada, Dai Ando, and Takakazu Nagamori for their valuable comments and insightful discussions. Thanks also go to anonymous reviewers of The Linguistic Review and the audience at the 11th edition of the Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (WAFL 11) at York in 2015. This project is supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) Grant Number JP21K00574. Any shortcomings and remaining errors are of course mine.
-
Research funding: This project is supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) Grant Number JP21K00574.
References
Aoyagi, Hiroshi. 1998. On the nature of particles in Japanese and its theoretical implications. California: University of Southern California Doctoral Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Aoyagi, Hiroshi. 2006. Nihongo no joshi to kinoohanchu [Particles and functional categories in Japanese]. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Search in Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh & Stefan Keine. 2015. Verb cluster formation and the semantics of head movement. In Ulrike Steindl, Thomas Borer, Huilin Fang, Alfredo Pardo, Peter Guekguezian, Brian Hsu, Charlie O’Hara & Iris Ouyang (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd West coast conference on formal linguistics, 82–91. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1996. Non-constituent coordination, wrapping and multimodal categorial grammars. In Maria Luisa Dalla Chiara, Kees Doets, Daniele Mundici & Johan Benthem (eds.), Structures and norms in science, 347–368. Berlin/New York: Springer.10.1007/978-94-017-0538-7_21Search in Google Scholar
Fukui, Naoki & Hiromu Sakai. 2003. The visibility guideline for functional categories: Verb raising in Japanese and related issues. Lingua 113. 321–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-3841(02)00080-3.Search in Google Scholar
Fukushima, Kazuhiko. 2003. Verb-raising and numeral classifiers in Japanese: Incompatible bedfellows. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 12. 313–347. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026155032277.10.1023/A:1026155032277Search in Google Scholar
Funakoshi, Kenshi. 2014. Syntactic head movement and its consequences. University of Maryland Doctoral Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Funakoshi, Kenshi. 2020. Verb-raising and VP-fronting in Japanese. The Linguistic Review 37. 117–146. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2019-2036.Search in Google Scholar
Hacquard, Valentine. 2006. Aspects of modality. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Doctoral Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Hayashi, Shintaro & Tomohiro Fujii. 2015. String vacuous head movement: The case of V-te in Japanese. Gengo Kenkyu 147. 31–55.Search in Google Scholar
Heim, Irene & Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Hoji, Hajime. 1998. Null object and sloppy identity in Japanese. Linguistic Inquiry 29. 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438998553680.Search in Google Scholar
Kageyama, Taro. 1993. Bunpoo to gokeesei [Grammar and word formation]. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Kishimoto, Hideki. 2007. Negative scope and head raising in Japanese. Lingua 117. 247–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.01.003.Search in Google Scholar
Kobayashi, Ryoichiro. 2016. Japanese V-te V compounds as post-syntactic compounds. Studies in Generative Grammar 26. 223–238. https://doi.org/10.15860/sigg.26.2.201605.223.Search in Google Scholar
Koizumi, Masatoshi. 2000. String vacuous overt verb raising. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9. 227–285. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008311420647.10.1023/A:1008311420647Search in Google Scholar
Kubota, Yusuke. 2015. Nonconstituent coordination in Japanese as constituent coordination: An analysis in hybrid type-logical categorial grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 46. 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00174.Search in Google Scholar
Lechner, Winfried. 2006. An interpretive effect of head movement. In Mara Frascarelli (ed.), Phases of interpretation, 45–70. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110197723.2.45Search in Google Scholar
Matushansky, Ora. 2006. Head movement in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 37. 69–109. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438906775321184.Search in Google Scholar
Nomura, Masashi. 2005. Nominative Case and AGREE(ment). University of Connecticut Doctoral Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Otani, Kazuyo & John Whitman. 1991. V-raising and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 22. 345–358.Search in Google Scholar
Penka, Doris. 2002. Kein muss kein Problem sein. Universität Tübingen Master’s thesis.Search in Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2010. Agreement and head movement: Clitics, incorporation, and defective goals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262014304.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Doctoral Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Sakai, Hiromu. 1998. Feature checking and morphological merger. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 8. 189–201.Search in Google Scholar
Sakai, Hiromu. 2000. Kotenteki ruikeiron-to hikaku toogoron [Classical typology and comparative syntax]. Kyooto Daigaku Gengogaku Kenkyuu 19. 117–146.Search in Google Scholar
Sato, Yosuke & Shintaro Hayashi. 2018. String-vacuous head movement in Japanese: New evidence from verb-echo answers. Syntax 21. 72–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12148.Search in Google Scholar
Sato, Yosuke & Masako Maeda. 2021. Syntactic head movement in Japanese: Evidence from verb-echo answers and negative scope reversal. Linguistic Inquiry 52. 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00380.Search in Google Scholar
Steedman, Mark. 1990. Gapping as constituent coordination. Linguistics and Philosophy 13. 207–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00630734.Search in Google Scholar
Tada, Hiroaki. 1992. Nominative objects in Japanese. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 14. 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1515/jjl-1992-0105.Search in Google Scholar
Takano, Yuji. 2002. Surprising constituents. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11. 243–301. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1016011311546.10.1023/A:1016011311546Search in Google Scholar
Tanabe, Tomoya & Ryoichiro Kobayashi. to appear. Remarks on verb echo answers and head movement in Japanese. Proceedings of the 58th Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar
von Stechow, Arnim. 1993. Die aufgaben der syntax. In Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds.), 1. Halbband: An international handbook of contemporary research, 1–88. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110095869.1.1.1Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Coordination versus separation: difference of gapping between Chinese and English and its prosodic attribution
- On the verb-raising analysis of non-constituent coordination in Japanese
- Force mismatch in clausal ellipsis
- Simplifying the theoretical treatment of wager verbs
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Coordination versus separation: difference of gapping between Chinese and English and its prosodic attribution
- On the verb-raising analysis of non-constituent coordination in Japanese
- Force mismatch in clausal ellipsis
- Simplifying the theoretical treatment of wager verbs