Simplifying the theoretical treatment of wager verbs

References

Abusch, Dorit. 2004. On the temporal composition of infinitives. In Jacqueline Guéron & Jacqueline Lecarme (eds.), The syntax of time, 27–53. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6598.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Atlas, Jay David & Stephen Levinson. 1981. It-clefts, informativeness, and logical form. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, 1–61. New York, New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bermel, Neil & Luděk Knittl. 2012. Corpus frequency and acceptability judgments: A study of morphosyntactic variants in Czech. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 8(2). 241–275. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2012-0010.Search in Google Scholar

Bouton, Lawrence. 1969. Identity constraints on the do-so rule. Research on Language and Social Interaction 1. 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351816909389118.Search in Google Scholar

Bruening, Benjamin. 2014. Word formation is syntactic: Adjectival passives in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32(2). 363–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-014-9227-y.Search in Google Scholar

Bruening, Benjamin. 2018. CPs move rightward, not leftward. Syntax 21(4). 362–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12164.Search in Google Scholar

Bruening, Benjamin. 2019. Passive do so. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 37(1). 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-018-9408-1.Search in Google Scholar

Carlson, Greg. 1979. Generics and atemporal when. Linguistics and Philosophy 3(1). 49–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00578448.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1980. On binding. Linguistic Inquiry 11(1). 1–46.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1998. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 15. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Department of Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1999. Derivation by phase. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Department of Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Beyond explanatory adequacy. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Ms..Search in Google Scholar

Dowty, David. 1979. Word meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7Search in Google Scholar

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1973. On the nature of island constraints. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Frazier, Lyn. 1978. On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Frazier, Lyn & Janet Dean Fodor. 1978. The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition 6(4). 291–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(78)90002-1.Search in Google Scholar

Gazdar, Gerald. 1979. Pragmatics: Implicature, presupposition, and logical form. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 2008. The nature of generalization in language. Cognitive Linguistics 20(1). 93–127. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2009.005.Search in Google Scholar

Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3, 41–58. New York, New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hallman, Peter. 2004. Constituency and agency in VP. In Vineeta Chand, Ann Kelleher, Angelo J. Rodríguez & Benjamin Schmeiser (eds.), West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 23, 304–317. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hallman, Peter. 2013. Predication and movement in passive. Lingua 125(1). 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.09.002.Search in Google Scholar

Horn, Laurence. 1978. Lexical incorporation, implicature, and the least effort hypothesis. In Donka Farkas, Wesley Jacobsen & Karol Todrys (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on the Lexicon, 196–209. Chicago, Illinois: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar

Horn, Laurence. 1984. Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R- based implicature. In Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications (GURT ’84), 11–42. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Houser, Michael John. 2010. The syntax and semantics of do so anaphora. Berkeley, CA: University of California Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530Search in Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1924. The philosophy of grammar. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Search in Google Scholar

Karttunen, Lauri. 1971. Implicative verbs. Language 47(2). 340–358. https://doi.org/10.2307/412084.Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S. 1981. On certain differences between French and English. Linguistic Inquiry 12(3). 349–371.Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S. 1984. Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris.10.1515/9783111682228Search in Google Scholar

Kenny, Anthony. 1963. Action, emotion, and will. London, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Mair, Christian. 1990. Infinitival complement clauses in English: A study of syntax in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

McCawley, James. 1978. Conversational implicature and the lexicon. In Peter Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, 245–259. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368873_009Search in Google Scholar

Michaelis, Laura. 2011. Stative by construction. Linguistics 49(6). 1359–1399. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.038.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Philip. 2013. Usage preferences: The case of the English verbal anaphor do so. In Stefan Müller (ed.), 20th International Conference on Head-Driven phrase structure Grammar (HPSG), 121–139. Stanford: CSLI Publications. http://csli-publications.stanford.edu/HPSG/2013 (accessed 26 April 2022).10.21248/hpsg.2013.7Search in Google Scholar

Moulton, Keir. 2009. Clausal complementation and the wager-class. In Anisa Schardl, Martin Walkow & Muhammad Abdurrahman (eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual North East Linguistics Society, vol. 2, 165–178. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Search in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, David. 2019. Exfoliation: Towards a derivational theory of clause size. Unpublished ms., Version 2.0. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/004440 (accessed 26 April 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Polinsky, Maria & Eric Potsdam. 2001. Long-distance agreement and topic in Tsez. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19(3). 583–646. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010757806504.10.1023/A:1010757806504Search in Google Scholar

Postal, Paul. 1974. On raising. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Postal, Paul. 1993. Some defective paradigms. Linguistic Inquiry 24(2). 347–364.Search in Google Scholar

Rezac, Milan. 2013. Case and licensing: Evidence from ECM + DOC. Linguistic Inquiry 44(2). 299–319. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00129.Search in Google Scholar

Rooryck, Johan. 2000. Configurations of sentential complementation: Perspectives from Romance languages. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Schachter, Jacquelyn & Virginia Yip. 1990. Why does anyone object to subject extraction? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12(4). 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100009487.Search in Google Scholar

Stowell, Tim. 1982. The tense of infinitives. Linguistic Inquiry 13(3). 561–570.Search in Google Scholar

Stowell, Tim. 1983. Subjects across categories. The Linguistic Review 2(3). 285–312.10.1515/tlir-1983-020305Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Barry. 1977. Tense and continuity. Linguistics and Philosophy 1(2). 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00351103.Search in Google Scholar

Wurmbrand, Susi. 2014. Tense and aspect in English infinitives. Linguistic Inquiry 45(3). 403–447. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00161.Search in Google Scholar