Explaining ellipsis without identity*

References

Anand, Pranav & Daniel Hardt. 2016. Antecedent selection for sluicing: Structure and content. In Proceedings of the 2016 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, 1234–1243.10.18653/v1/D16-1131Search in Google Scholar

Anand, Pranav & Jim McCloskey. 2015. Annotating the implicit content of sluices. In Proceedings of the 9th linguistic annotation workshop, 178–187.10.3115/v1/W15-1621Search in Google Scholar

AnderBois, Scott. 2010. Sluicing as anaphora to issues. In Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory, vol. 20, 451–470.10.3765/salt.v20i0.2574Search in Google Scholar

AnderBois, Scott. 2014. The semantics of sluicing: Beyond truth conditions. Language 90(4). 887–926. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2014.0110.Search in Google Scholar

Ariel, Mira. 1988. Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics 24(1). 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700011567.Search in Google Scholar

Ariel, Mira. 1991. The function of accessibility in a theory of grammar. Journal of Pragmatics 16(5). 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90136-l.Search in Google Scholar

Arregui, Ana, Charles CliftonJr., Lyn Frazier & Keir Moulton. 2006. Processing elided verb phrases with flawed antecedents: The recycling hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language 55(2). 232–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.02.005.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Adam C. 2007. Discourse coherence and VP ellipsis with split antecedents. In Proceedings of the sixteenth Amsterdam Colloquium.Search in Google Scholar

Barker, Chris. 2013. Scopability and sluicing. Linguistics and Philosophy 36(3). 187–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-013-9137-1.Search in Google Scholar

Barros, Matthew. 2014. Sluicing and identity in ellipsis. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Bos, Johan. 1993. VP ellipsis in a DRT-implementation. In Sixth conference of the European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Association for Computational Linguistics. Available at: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/E93-1050.10.3115/976744.976794Search in Google Scholar

Brown-Schmidt, Sarah, Donna K. Byron & Michael K. Tanenhaus. 2005. Beyond salience: Interpretation of personal and demonstrative pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language 53(2). 292–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.03.003.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.Search in Google Scholar

Chung, Sandra. 2006. Sluicing and the lexicon: The point of no return. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, vol. 31, 73–91.10.3765/bls.v31i1.896Search in Google Scholar

Chung, Sandra. 2013. Syntactic identity in sluicing: How much and why. Linguistic Inquiry 44(1). 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00118.Search in Google Scholar

Chung, Sandra, William A. Ladusaw & James McCloskey. 1995. Sluicing and logical form. Natural Language Semantics 3(3). 239–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01248819.Search in Google Scholar

Chung, Sandra, William Ladusaw & James McCloskey. 2011. Sluicing: Between structure and inference. In Rodrigo Gutierrez-Bravo, Line Mikkelsen & Eric Potsdam (eds.), Representing language: Essays in honor of Judith Aissen, 31–50.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. 1975. Bridging. In Bonnie L. Nash-Webber & Roger C. Schank (eds.), Theoretical issues in natural language processing. London, UK: Psychology Press.10.3115/980190.980237Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. & Catherine R. Marshall. 1981. Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In Aravind K. Joshi, Bonnie L. Webber & Ivan A. Sag (eds.), Elements of discourse understanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Culicover, Peter W. & Ray Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Culicover, Peter W. & Ray Jackendoff. 2012. Same-except: A domain-general cognitive relation and how language expresses it. Language 88(2). 305–340. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0031.Search in Google Scholar

Dalrymple, Mary, Stuart M. Shieber & Fernando C. N. Pereira. 1991. Ellipsis and higher-order unification. Linguistics and Philosophy 14(4). 399–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00630923.Search in Google Scholar

Elbourne, Paul. 2001. E-type anaphora as NP-deletion. Natural Language Semantics 9(3). 241–288. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014290323028.10.1023/A:1014290323028Search in Google Scholar

Elbourne, Paul. 2008. Ellipsis sites as definite descriptions. Linguistic Inquiry 39(2). 191–220. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2008.39.2.191.Search in Google Scholar

Fiengo, Robert & Robert May. 1994. Indices and identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Search in Google Scholar

Fox, Danny. 1999. Focus, parallelism and accommodation. Semantics and Linguistic Theory 9. 70–90. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v9i0.2819.Search in Google Scholar

Frazier, Lyn. 2013. A recycling approach to processing ellipsis. In Lisa L.-S. Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Diagnosing syntax, 485–501. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602490.003.0024Search in Google Scholar

Frazier, Lyn & John Duff. 2019. Repair or accommodation? Split antecedent ellipsis and the limits of repair. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.728.Search in Google Scholar

Fu, Jingqi, Thomas Roeper & Hagit Borer. 2001. The VP within process nominals: Evidence from adverbs and the VP anaphor do-so. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19(3). 549–582. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010654105760.10.1023/A:1010654105760Search in Google Scholar

Futrell, Richard & Roger P. Levy. 2017. Noisy-context surprisal as a human sentence processing cost model. In Proceedings of the 15th conference of the European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Long papers, vol. 1, 688–698.10.18653/v1/E17-1065Search in Google Scholar

Futrell, Richard, Edward Gibson & Roger P. Levy. 2020. Lossy-context surprisal: An information-theoretic model of memory effects in sentence processing. Cognitive Science 44(3). e12814. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12814.Search in Google Scholar

Geach, Peter T. 1962. Reference and generality: An examination of some medieval and modern theories. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, Edward & James Thomas. 1999. Memory limitations and structural forgetting: The perception of complex ungrammatical sentences as grammatical. Language & Cognitive Processes 14(3). 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909699386293.Search in Google Scholar

Ginzburg, Jonathan. 1992. Questions, queries and facts: A semantics and pragmatics for interrogatives. Stanford, CA: Stanford University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Ginzburg, Jonathan. 2012. The interactive stance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697922.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Ginzburg, Jonathan & Ivan A. Sag. 2000. Interrogative investigations. Stanford, CA: CSLI publications.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. & Florent Perek. 2018. Ellipsis in construction grammar. In Jeroen van Craenenbroeck & Tanja Temmerman (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ellipsis, 188–204. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198712398.013.8Search in Google Scholar

Grant, Margaret, Charles Clifton Jr & Lyn Frazier. 2012. The role of non-actuality implicatures in processing elided constituents. Journal of Memory and Language 66(1). 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.09.003.Search in Google Scholar

Grosz, Barbara J. 1977. The representation and use of focus in dialogue understanding. Tech. rep. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.Search in Google Scholar

Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg & Ron Zacharski. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language. 274–307. https://doi.org/10.2307/416535.Search in Google Scholar

Hale, Kenneth & Samuel J. Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Kenneth Hale (ed.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hankamer, Jorge. 1978. On the nontransformational derivation of some null VP anaphors. Linguistic Inquiry 9(1). 66–74.Search in Google Scholar

Hankamer, Jorge & Ivan A. Sag. 1976. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7(3). 391–428.Search in Google Scholar

Hardt, Daniel. 1990. A corpus-based survey of VP ellipsis. Ms. University of Pennsylvania.Search in Google Scholar

Hardt, Daniel. 1992. VP ellipsis and semantic identity. Semantics and Linguistic Theory 2. 145–162. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v2i0.3043.Search in Google Scholar

Hardt, Daniel. 1993. Verb phrase ellipsis: Form, meaning, and processing. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Hardt, Daniel. 1994. Sense and reference in dynamic semantics. In Proceedings of the Ninth Amsterdam Colloquium, 333–348.Search in Google Scholar

Hartman, Jeremy. 2009. When e-givenness over-predicts identity. In Fourth Brussels conference on generative linguistics ellipsis workshop, vol. 4.Search in Google Scholar

Hinds, John & Nobuo Okada. 1975. Backward pronominalization across coordinate structures. Linguistic Inquiry 6(2). 330–335.Search in Google Scholar

Jager, Gerhard. 2001. Indefinites and sluicing. A type logical approach. In Proceedings of the 13th Amsterdam Colloquium.Search in Google Scholar

Jager, Gerhard. 2005. Anaphora and type logical grammar, vol. 24. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.Search in Google Scholar

Jarvella, Robert J. 1971. Syntactic processing of connected speech. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 10(4). 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(71)80040-3.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Kyle. 2001. What vp ellipsis can do, and what it can’t, but not why. In The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, 439–479. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.10.1002/9780470756416.ch14Search in Google Scholar

Karttunen, Lauri. 1969. Pronouns and variables. In Fifth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 108–115.Search in Google Scholar

Karttunen, Lauri. 1976. Discourse referents. In Notes from the linguistic underground, 363–385. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.10.1163/9789004368859_021Search in Google Scholar

Katzir, Roni. 2007. Structurally-defined alternatives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30(6). 669–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9029-y.Search in Google Scholar

Kehler, Andrew. 1993a. A discourse copying algorithm for ellipsis and anaphora resolution. In Proceedings of the sixth conference on European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 203–212.10.3115/976744.976769Search in Google Scholar

Kehler, Andrew. 1993b. The effect of establishing coherence in ellipsis and anaphora resolution. In Proceedings of the 31st annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 62–69.10.3115/981574.981583Search in Google Scholar

Kehler, Andrew. 2000. Coherence and the resolution of ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 23(6). 533–575. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005677819813.10.1023/A:1005677819813Search in Google Scholar

Kehler, Andrew. 2002. Another problem for syntactic (and semantic) theories of vp-ellipsis. Snippets 5. 11–12.Search in Google Scholar

Kehler, Andrew. 2016. On qud-based licensing of strict and sloppy ambiguities. Semantics and Linguistic Theory 25. 512–532. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v25i0.3071.Search in Google Scholar

Kehler, Andrew. 2019. Ellipsis and discourse. In Jeroen van Craenenbroeck & Tanja Temmerman (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ellipsis, 314–341. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198712398.013.13Search in Google Scholar

Kehler, Andrew & Gregory Ward. 2007. Event reference and semantic transparency. In Western conference on linguistics, vol. 18, 115–127.Search in Google Scholar

Kertz, Laura. 2008. Focus structure and acceptability in verb phrase ellipsis. In Natasha Abner & Jason Bishop (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th west coast conference on formal linguistics, 283291.Search in Google Scholar

Kertz, Laura. 2013. Verb phrase ellipsis: The view from information structure. Language 89(3). 390428. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2013.0051.Search in Google Scholar

Khullar, Payal, Kushal Majmundar & Manish Shrivastava. 2020. NoEl: An annotated corpus for noun ellipsis in English. In Proceedings of the 12th language resources and evaluation conference, 34–43.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Christina S. & Jeffrey T. Runner. 2018. The division of labor in explanations of verb phrase ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 41(1). 41–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-017-9220-0.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Christina S., Gregory M. Kobele, Jeffrey T. Runner & John T. Hale. 2011. The acceptability cline in VP ellipsis. Syntax 14(4). 318–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2011.00160.x.Search in Google Scholar

Klein, Ewan. 1987. VP ellipsis in DR theory. In Studies in discourse representation theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers, 161–187.10.1515/9783112420027-008Search in Google Scholar

Kroll, Margaret. 2019. Polarity reversals under sluicing. Semantics and Pragmatics 12(18). 1–49. https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.12.18.Search in Google Scholar

Lasnik, Howard. 1995. Case and expletives revisited: On greed and other human failings. Linguistic Inquiry. 615–633.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1969. Convention: A philosophical study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univeristy Press.Search in Google Scholar

Liptak, Aniko. 2015. Identity in ellipsis: An introduction. Lingua 166. 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.08.003.Search in Google Scholar

Merchant, Jason. 1999. E-Type A’-traces under sluicing. In The proceedings of the seventeenth west coast conference on formal linguistics, vol. 30, 478–492.Search in Google Scholar

Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199243730.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Merchant, Jason. 2004. A deletion solution to the sloppy ellipsis puzzle. Talk presented at the 75th annual meeting of the Linguistics Society of America, Chicago, IL. Available at: http://home.uchicago.edu/merchant/pubs/LSA2004.handout.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Merchant, Jason. 2013a. Polarity items under ellipsis. In Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Diagnosing syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602490.003.0022Search in Google Scholar

Merchant, Jason. 2013b. Voice and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 44(1). 77–108. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00120.Search in Google Scholar

Merchant, Jason. 2019. Ellipsis: A survey of analytical approaches. In Jereon van Craenenbroek & Tanja Temmerman (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ellipsis, chap. 1, 19–45. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198712398.013.2Search in Google Scholar

Messick, Troy, Andres Saab & Luis Vicente. 2016. Deep properties of a surface anaphor: On the contextual restriction of sluicing sites. Unpublished manuscript.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Philip. 2011. The choice between verbal anaphors in discourse. In Discourse anaphora and anaphor resolution colloquium, 82–95.10.1007/978-3-642-25917-3_8Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Philip & Barbara Hemforth. 2014. Verb phrase ellipsis with nominal antecedents. Unpublished manuscript.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Philip & Geoffrey K Pullum. 2013. Exophoric VP ellipsis. In Philip Hofmeister & Elisabeth Norcliffe (eds.), The core and the periphery: Data-driven perspectives on syntax inspired by Ivan A. Sag, 5–32.Search in Google Scholar

Nash-Webber, Bonnie Lynn. 1977. Inference in an approach to discourse anaphora. Center for the Study of Reading. Technical Report No. 77.Search in Google Scholar

Nykiel, Joanna. 2010. Whatever happened to English sluicing. In Studies in the history of the English Language V: Variation and change in English grammar and Lexicon: Contemporary approaches, chap. 3, vol. 5, 37–66. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110220339.1.37Search in Google Scholar

Paape, Dario L. J. F. 2016. Filling the silence: Reactivation, not reconstruction. Frontiers in Psychology 7. 27. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00027.Search in Google Scholar

Poppels, Till. 2020. Towards a referential theory of ellipsis. La Jolla, CA: University of California San Diego dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Poppels, Till & Andrew Kehler. 2018. Overcoming the identity crisis: Novel evidence for a referential theory of verb phrase ellipsis. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, vol. 53, 403–4017.Search in Google Scholar

Poppels, Till & Andrew Kehler. 2019. Reconsidering asymmetries in voice-mismatched verb phrase ellipsis. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.738.Search in Google Scholar

Poppels, Till & Andrew Kehler. to appear. Ellipsis and the QUD: Sluicing with nominal antecedents. In Andreas Konietzko & Susanne Winkler (eds.), Information structure and ambiguity. Berlin: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Postal, Paul. 1969. Anaphoric islands. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, vol. 5, 205–239.Search in Google Scholar

Prince, Ellen F. 1981. Towards a taxonomy of given/new information. In Peter, Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 223–254. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Craige. 1998. Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Unpublished manuscript.10.3765/sp.5.6Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Craige. 2012. Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics 5(6). 1–69. https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.5.6.Search in Google Scholar

Rønning, Ola, Daniel Hardt & Søgaard Anders. 2018. Sluice resolution without hand-crafted features over brittle syntax trees. In Proceedings of the 2018 conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, volume 2 (short papers), 236–241.10.18653/v1/N18-2038Search in Google Scholar

Rooth, Mats. 1992. Ellipsis redundancy and reduction redundancy. In Proceedings of the Stuttgart Ellipsis Workshop, vol. 29.Search in Google Scholar

Ross, John. 1969. Guess who? In Papers from the fifth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 252–286.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199645763.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Rudin, Deniz. 2019. Head-based syntactic identity in sluicing. Linguistic Inquiry 50(2). 253–283. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00308.Search in Google Scholar

Sag, Ivan A. 1976. Deletion and logical form. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Sag, Ivan A. & Jorge Hankamer. 1984. Toward a theory of anaphoric processing. Linguistics and Philosophy 7(3). 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00627709.Search in Google Scholar

Schachter, Paul. 1977. Does she or doesn’t she? Linguistic Inquiry 8(4). 763–767.Search in Google Scholar

Schwarz, Bernhard. 2000. Topics in ellipsis. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Schwarzschild, Roger. 1999. GIVENness, AvoidF and other constraints on the placement of accent. Natural Language Semantics 7(2). 141–177. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008370902407.10.1023/A:1008370902407Search in Google Scholar

Sproat, Richard & Gregory Ward. 1987. Pragmatic considerations in anaphoric island phenomena. In Proceedings of the 23rd annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, vol. 23, 321–335.Search in Google Scholar

Tancredi, Christopher D. 1992. Deletion, deaccenting, and presupposition. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Thoms, Gary. 2015. Syntactic identity, parallelism and accommodated antecedents. Lingua 166. 172198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.04.005.Search in Google Scholar

Tic Douloureux, P. R. N. 1971. A note on one’s privates. In Studies out in left field: Defamatory essays presented to James D. McCawley on the occasion of his 33rd or 34th birthday, 45–52. Edmonton & Champaign: Linguistic Research, Inc.10.1075/z.63.15douSearch in Google Scholar

Tomioka, Satoshi. 2008. A step-by-step guide to ellipsis resolution. In Kyle Johnson (ed.), Topics in ellipsis, chap. 9, 210–228. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511487033.009Search in Google Scholar

Van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen & Jason Merchant. 2013. Ellipsis phenomena. In Marcel den Dikken (ed.), Cambridge handbook of generative syntax, chap. 19, 701–745. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804571.025Search in Google Scholar

Vicente, Luis. 2019. Sluicing and its subtypes. In Jereon van Craenenbroek & Tanja Temmerman (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ellipsis (Oxford handbooks), chap. 20. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198712398.013.22Search in Google Scholar

Ward, Gregory & Andrew Kehler. 2005. Syntactic form and discourse accessibility. In António Branco, Tony McEnery, Ruslan Mitkov (eds.), Anaphora processing: linguistic, cognitive and computational modelling, 365–384.10.1075/cilt.263.21warSearch in Google Scholar

Ward, Gregory, Richard Sproat & Gail McKoon. 1991. A pragmatic analysis of so-called anaphoric islands. Language 67(3). 439–474. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1991.0003.Search in Google Scholar

Wasow, Thomas. 1972. Anaphoric relations in English. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Webber, Bonnie Lynn. 1978. A formal approach to discourse anaphora. Tech. rep. Cambirdge, MA: Bolt Beranek & Newman Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Edwin S. 1977. Discourse and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 8(1). 101–139.Search in Google Scholar