Abstract
We investigate the pronunciation of English compounds ending in -man (e.g. policeman, clergyman, mailman), some of which are usually pronounced with a full vowel in -man (mailman), some usually with a reduced vowel (policeman), while other words vary between the two (businessman, gunman). Is it possible to predict when the vowel is reduced or not? We investigate a number of factors that could play a role in this issue: (i) the age of introduction of the word into the English language, (ii) the frequency of the word in the synchronic language, (iii) the meaning of -man in the specific compound, (iv) number of syllables, (v) stress pattern and (vi) spelling variation. Although some of these points have been discussed in the literature before, we present the first large full-scale quantitative investigation of the question whether any of these factors are reliable predictors of the pronunciation (and if so, which one predicts the pronunciation best), as well as the interaction between these factors.
Acknowledgements
We thank audiences at the Grote Taaldag (Utrecht, 2018) and Shanghai International Studies University for comments and suggestions. Many thanks to Li Yi’ou and Song Zhenjun for helping to gather some of the initial data, and to Joost van de Weijer and an anonymous TLR reviewer for comments on an earlier version.
References
Akaike, Hirotugu. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19(6). 716–723.10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_16Search in Google Scholar
Algeo, John. 1991. Fifty years among the new words. A dictionary of neologisms. Introduction. In John Algeo & Adele S. Algeo (eds.), Fifty years among the new words. A dictionary of neologisms, 1–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.2307/455435Search in Google Scholar
Bergsten, Nils. 1911. A study on compound substantives in English. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Search in Google Scholar
Booij, Geert E. & Matthias Hüning. 2014. Affixoids and constructional idioms. In Ronny Boogaart, Timothy Colleman & Gijsbert Rutten (eds.), Extending the scope of construction grammar, 77–106. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110366273.77Search in Google Scholar
The British National Corpus, version 3 (BNC XML Edition). 2007. Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. URL: http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/.Search in Google Scholar
Cannon, Garland. 1992. Bound-morpheme items: New patterns of derivation. In Otto Hietsch, Claudia Blank, Teresa Kirschner & Otto Hietsch (eds.), Language and Civilization: A concerted profusion of essays and studies in honour of Otto Hietsch, 478–494. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar
Corpus of Contemporary American English. 2015. COCA (1990–2015, 520 million words). http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.Search in Google Scholar
Davies, Christopher. 2005. Divided by a common language: A guide to British and American English. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Search in Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Wallace L. Chafe, Charles Meyer, Sandra A. Thompson, Robert Englebretson & Nii Martey. 2000–2005. Santa Barbara corpus of spoken American English, Parts 1-4. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Search in Google Scholar
Elsen, Hilke. 2009. Affixoide: Nur was benannt wird, kann auch verstanden werden. Deutsche Sprache: Zeitschrift Für Theorie, Praxis, Dokumentation 37. 316–333.10.37307/j.1868-775X.2009.04.03Search in Google Scholar
Fernández, Eva M. & Helen S. Cairns. 2010. Fundamentals of psycholinguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Gahl, Susanne. 2008. ‘Time’ and ‘thyme’ are not homophones: The effect of lemma frequency on word durations in spontaneous speech. Language 84(3). 474–496.10.1353/lan.0.0035Search in Google Scholar
Hüning, Matthias & Geert E. Booij. 2014. From compounding to derivation the emergence of derivational affixes through “constructionalization”. Folia Linguistica 48. 579–604.10.1515/flin.2014.019Search in Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel, Peter Roach, Jane Setter & John Esling. 2011. Cambridge English pronouncing dictionary, 18th edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2002. Thoughts on grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Berlin: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar
Marchand, Hans. 1969. The categories and types of present-day English word-formation: A synchronic-diachronic approach, 2nd edn. Munich: Beck.Search in Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Search in Google Scholar
Peitsara, Kirsti. 2006. MAN-compounds in English. In R. W. McConchie, Olga Timofeeva, Heli Tissari & Tanja Säily (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2005 symposium on new approaches in english historical lexis (HEL-LEX), 113–122. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Search in Google Scholar
Phillips, Betty. 1984. Word frequency and the actuation of sound change. Language 60. 320–342.10.2307/413643Search in Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Harlow: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
R Core Development Team. 2017. R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Search in Google Scholar
Reaney, Percy Hide & Richard Middlewood Wilson. 1991. A dictionary of English surnames. New York: Psychology Press.Search in Google Scholar
Simpson, John A. & Edmund Simon Christopher Weiner. 1989. The Oxford English dictionary, 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Stevens, Christopher M. 2005. Revisiting the affixoid debate: On the grammaticalization of the word. In Torsten Leuschner, Tanja Mortelmans & Sarah De Groodt (eds.), Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen, 71–83. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110925364.71Search in Google Scholar
Thompson, Paul A. & Hilary Nesi. 2001. The British Academic Spoken English (BASE) corpus project. Language Teaching Research 5(3). 263–264.10.1177/136216880100500305Search in Google Scholar
Venables, William N. & Brian D. Ripley. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2Search in Google Scholar
Wells, John C. 1990. Longman pronunciation dictionary. Harlow: Longman.10.1177/003368829002100208Search in Google Scholar
Wells, John C. 2008. Longman pronunciation dictionary, 3rd edn. London: Pearson Education.Search in Google Scholar
Zipf, G. K. 1935. The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Echoicity and contrast in Spanish conditionals
- Topic chains and the interpretation of null subjects. The acquisition of discourse-related strategies in Italian children
- Vowel reduction in English -man compounds
- Quotation as a challenge for feature-driven phases: An argument for Zwart’s merge
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Echoicity and contrast in Spanish conditionals
- Topic chains and the interpretation of null subjects. The acquisition of discourse-related strategies in Italian children
- Vowel reduction in English -man compounds
- Quotation as a challenge for feature-driven phases: An argument for Zwart’s merge