Quotation as a challenge for feature-driven phases: An argument for Zwart’s merge

References

Abels, K. 2012. The italian left periphery: A view from locality. Linguistic Inquiry 43(1). 229–254.10.1162/LING_a_00084Search in Google Scholar

Ackema, P. & A. Neeleman. 2004. Beyond morphology: Interface conditions on word formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267286.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Alexiadou, A., E. Anagnostopoulou, & S. Wurmbrand. 2014. Movement vs. long distance agree in raising: Disappearing phases and feature valuation. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society Annual Meeting 43. 1–12.Search in Google Scholar

Arsenijević, B. & W. Hinzen. 2012. On the absence of x-within-x recursion in human grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 43(3). 423–440.10.1162/LING_a_00095Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, J. 1988. Quotation. Noûs 22(3). 399–418.10.2307/2215710Search in Google Scholar

Bianchi, V. & C. Chesi. 2014. Subject islands, reconstruction, and the flow of the computation. Linguistic Inquiry 45(4). 525–569.10.1162/LING_a_00166Search in Google Scholar

Bianchi, V. & C. Chesi. 2015. On a pp/dp asymmetry in extraction. In E. D. Domenico, C. Hamann, & S. Matteini (ed.), Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti, 47–65. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, Amsterdam.10.1075/la.223.03biaSearch in Google Scholar

Bobaljik, J. D. & S. Wurmbrand. 2013. Suspension across domains. In O. Matushansky & A. Marantz (eds.), Distributed morphology today: Morphemes for Morris Halle, 185–198. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262019675.003.0011Search in Google Scholar

Boeckx, C. 2008a. Aspects of the syntax of agreement. New York-London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203930335Search in Google Scholar

Boeckx, C. 2008b. Bare syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Boeckx, C. 2010. Why edges are needed. In A. M. Di Sciullo & V. Hill (eds.), Edges, heads, and projections. Interface properties, 11–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.156.04boeSearch in Google Scholar

Boeckx, C. 2012a. Phases beyond explanatory adequacy. In Á. J. Gallego (ed.), Phases: Developing the framework, 45–66. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110264104.45Search in Google Scholar

Boeckx, C. 2012b. Syntactic islands. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139022415Search in Google Scholar

Boeckx, C. 2015. Elementary syntactic structures: Prospects of a feature-free syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524391Search in Google Scholar

Boolos, G. 1995. Quotational ambiguity. In P. Leonardi & M. Santambrogio (eds.), On quine: New essays, 283–296. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Borer, H. 2013. Structuring sense: Volume III: Taking form, vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263936.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Borer, H. 2014a. The category of roots. In A. Alexiadou, H. Borer & F. Schäfer (eds.), The syntax of roots and the roots of syntax, 112–148. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665266.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Borer, H. 2014b. Wherefore roots? Theoretical Linguistics 40(3/4). 343–359.10.1515/tl-2014-0016Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Ž. 2016a. Getting really edgy: On the edge of the edge. Linguistic Inquiry 47(1). 1–33.10.1162/LING_a_00203Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Ž. 2016b. What is sent to spell-out is phases, not phasal complements. Ms.10.4312/linguistica.56.1.25-66Search in Google Scholar

Bruening, B. 2016. Alignment in syntax: Quotative inversion in English. Syntax 19(2). 111–155.10.1111/synt.12121Search in Google Scholar

Chesi, C. & A. Moro. 2015. The subtle dependency between Competence and Performance. In J. Gallego Ángel & D. Ott (eds), 50 years later: reflections on Chomsky’s aspects, 33–46. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 77. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In D. M. R. Martin & J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2001. Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: a life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 3, 104–131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195171976.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2005. Three factors in language design. Linguistic inquiry 36(1). 1–22.10.1162/0024389052993655Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2007. Approaching UG from Below. In U. Sauerland & H.-M. Gärtner (eds.), Interfaces + recursion = language?, 1–29. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110207552-001Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2008. On Phases. In R. Freidin, C. Otero & M. L. Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean–Roger Vergnaud, 133–167. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130. 33–49.10.1075/la.223.01choSearch in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2015a. A discusion with Naoki Fukui and Mihoko Zushi. Sophia Linguistica 64. 70–97.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2015b. Problems of projection: extensions. In E. D. Domenico, C. Hamann & S. Matteini (eds.), Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti, 1–16. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.223.01choSearch in Google Scholar

De Belder, M. & J. Van Craenenbroeck. 2015. How to merge a root. Linguistic Inquiry 46(4). 625–655.10.1162/LING_a_00196Search in Google Scholar

De Vries, M. 2006. Reported direct speech in Dutch. Linguistics in the Netherlands 23(1). 212–223.10.1075/avt.23.21vriSearch in Google Scholar

De Vries, M. 2007. Invisible constituents? Parentheses as b-merged adverbial phrases. In N. Dehé & Y. Kavalova (eds.), Parentheticals, 203–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.106.11vriSearch in Google Scholar

De Vries, M. 2008. The representation of language within language: A syntactico-pragmatic typology of direct speech. Studia Linguistica 62(1). 39–77.10.1111/j.1467-9582.2007.00142.xSearch in Google Scholar

De Vries, M. 2012. Notes on the syntax of quotation. Conference presentation: Quotation. Perspecitives from Philosophy and Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Dummett, M. 1991. The Logical Basis of Metaphysics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Embick, D. 2015. The morpheme: A theoretical introduction. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9781501502569Search in Google Scholar

Emonds, J. 1970. Root and structure-preserving transformations. Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Emonds, J. 2001. Lexicon and grammar: The English syntacticon. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110872996Search in Google Scholar

Epstein, S. D., H. Kitahara & D. Seely. 2016. Phase cancellation by external pair-merge of heads. The Linguistic Review 33(1). 87–102.10.4324/9780367343699-2Search in Google Scholar

Fortuny, J. 2008. The Emergence of Order in Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.119Search in Google Scholar

Fortuny Andreu, J. & B. Corominas Murtra. 2009. Some formal considerations on the generation of hierarchically structured expressions. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 8. 99–111.10.5565/rev/catjl.143Search in Google Scholar

Frampton, J. & S. Gutmann. 1999. Cyclic computation, a computationally efficient minimalist syntax. Syntax 2(1). 1–27.10.1111/1467-9612.00012Search in Google Scholar

Frampton, J. & S. Gutmann. 2002. Crash-proof syntax. In T. D. S. Samuel David Epstein (ed.), Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program, 90–105. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470755662.ch5Search in Google Scholar

Frampton, J. & S. Gutmann. 2006. How sentences grow in the mind: Agreement and selection in an efficient minimalist syntax. In C. Boeckx (ed.), Agreement Systems, 121–157. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.92.08fraSearch in Google Scholar

Gallego, A. J. 2010. Phase Theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.152Search in Google Scholar

Gallego, A. J. 2016. Lexical items and feature bundling. Consequences for microparametric approaches to variation. In L. Eguren, O. Fernández-Soriano & A. Mendikoetxea (eds.), Rethinking Parameters, 133–169. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190461737.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Gallego, A. J. & J. Uriagereka. 2015. Head movement in the clausal domain. In A. Fábregas, J. Mateu & M. Putnam (eds.), Contemporary Linguistic Parameters, 227–249. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Gaskin, R. & D. J. Hill. 2013. Reach’s puzzle and mention. dialectica 67(2). 201–222.10.1111/1746-8361.12021Search in Google Scholar

Geach, P. T. 1980. Quotation and semantics. In P. T. Geach (ed.), Logic Matters, 189–211. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520352391-007Search in Google Scholar

Ginzburg, J. & R. Cooper. 2014. Quotation via dialogical interaction. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 23(3). 287–311.10.1007/s10849-014-9200-5Search in Google Scholar

Grano, T. & H. Lasnik. 2016. How to neutralize a finite clause boundary: Phase theory and the grammar of bound pronouns. Ms., Indiana University and University of Maryland.Search in Google Scholar

Griffiths, J. 2015a. Parenthetical verb constructions, fragment answers, and constituent modification. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 33(1). 191–229.10.1007/s11049-014-9256-6Search in Google Scholar

Griffiths, J. 2015b. Speaker and quote reduced parenthetical clauses. In S. Schneider, J. Glikman, & M. Azanzi (eds.), Parenthetical Verbs, 71–102. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110376142-005Search in Google Scholar

Harwood, W., M. Hladnik, S. Leufkens, T. Temmerman, N. Corver, & J. van Craenenbroeck. 2016. Idioms: Phasehood and Projection. Ms.Search in Google Scholar

Hinzen, W. 2015. Nothing is Hidden: Contextualism and the Grammar-Meaning Interface. Mind & Language 30(3). 259–291.10.1111/mila.12080Search in Google Scholar

Hinzen, W., M. Sheehan, & U. Reichard. 2014. Intensionality, grammar, and the sententialist hypothesis. In P. Kosta, S. Franks, T. Radev-Bork, & L. Schürks (eds.), Minimalism and Beyond: Radicalizing the Interfaces, 315–349. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/lfab.11.13hinSearch in Google Scholar

Hornstein, N. & J. Uriagereka. 2002. Reprojections. In S. Epstein & D. Seely (eds.), Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program, 106–132. Malden, Mass: Wiley Online Library.10.1002/9780470755662.ch6Search in Google Scholar

i Planas, F. 2014. On quotative recomplementation: Between pragmatics and morphosyntax. Lingua 146. 39–74.10.1016/j.lingua.2014.04.007Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, K. 2003. Towards an etiology of adjunct islands. Nordlyd 31(1). 187–215.10.7557/12.25Search in Google Scholar

Kluck, M. & M. de Vries. 2015. On v2, gaps, and operators in comment and reporting parentheticals. In S. Shneider, J. Glikman & M. Avanzi (eds.), Parenthetical Verbs, 103–132. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110376142-006Search in Google Scholar

Koeneman, O. N. C. J. 2000. The flexible nature of verb movement. Utrecht: Utrecht University PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Koster, J. 2007. Structure preservingness, internal merge, and the strict locality of triads. In S. Karimi, V. Samiian, & W. K.Wilkins (eds.), Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation, 188–205. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.101.10kosSearch in Google Scholar

Kremers, J. 2015. Morphology is in the eye of the beholder. Linguistische Berichte 2015(243). 245–294.10.46771/2366077500243_3Search in Google Scholar

Kuratowski, C. 1921. Sur la notion de l’ordre dans la théorie des ensembles. Fundamenta mathematicae 1(2). 161–171.10.4064/fm-2-1-161-171Search in Google Scholar

Larson, R. 2011. Clauses, propositions, and phases. In A. M. Di Sciullo & C. Boeckx (eds.), The Biolinguistic Enterprise. New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty, 366–391. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lechner, W. 2007. Interpretive effects of head movement. Ms., University of Athens.10.1515/9783110197723.2.45Search in Google Scholar

Lechner, W. 2010. On the orthodoxy of head movement. Paper presented at the conference Verb movement: Its nature, triggers, and effects, University of Amsterdam/CASTL, 11-12 December.Search in Google Scholar

Lobina, D. J. 2017. A Computational Investigation into the Representation and Processing of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Maier, E. 2007. Quotation marks as monsters, or the other way around. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Amsterdam Colloquium, 145–150.Search in Google Scholar

Maier, E. 2008. Breaking quotations. In S. Satoh, et al. (eds.), New frontiers in artificial intelligence, 187–200. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-78197-4_18Search in Google Scholar

Maier, E. 2014a. Mixed quotation: The grammar of apparently transparent opacity. Semantics and Pragmatics 7(7). 1–67.10.3765/sp.7.7Search in Google Scholar

Maier, E. 2014b. Pure quotation. Philosophy Compass 9(9). 615–630.10.1111/phc3.12149Search in Google Scholar

Maier, E. 2017. Mixed quotation. Ms., University of Groningen.Search in Google Scholar

Mathew, R. 2015. Head Movement in Syntax. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.224Search in Google Scholar

Matushansky, O. 2008. On the linguistic complexity of proper names. Linguistics and Philosophy 31(5). 573–627.10.1007/s10988-008-9050-1Search in Google Scholar

Matushansky, O. 2015. The other francis bacon: on non-bare proper names. Erkenntnis 80(2). 335–362.10.1007/s10670-014-9703-0Search in Google Scholar

Mendelsohn, R. L. 2005. The Philosophy of Gottlob Frege. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511497964Search in Google Scholar

Muysken, P. & H. C. van Riemsdijk. 1986. Features and projections. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110871661Search in Google Scholar

Neeleman, A., E. Titov, H. Van De Koot, & R. Vermeulen. 2009. A syntactic typology of topic, focus and contrast. In J. van Craenenbroeck (ed.), Alternatives to cartography, 15–52. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110217124.15Search in Google Scholar

Newmeyer, F. J. 2015. Parentheticals and the grammar of complementation. In S. Schneider, J. Glikman & M. Avanzi (eds.), Parenthetical Verbs, 13–38. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110376142-003Search in Google Scholar

Pafel, J. 2011. Two dogmas on quotation. In E. Brendel, J. Meibauer & M. Steinbach (eds.), Understanding Quotation, 249–276. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110240085.249Search in Google Scholar

Pagin, P. & D. Westerståhl. 2010. Pure quotation and general compositionality. Linguistics and Philosophy 33(5). 381–415.10.1007/s10988-011-9083-8Search in Google Scholar

Partee, B. H. 1973. The syntax and semantics of quotation. In S. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Hale, pages 410–418. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, D. & E. Torrego. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In K. Simin, V. Samiian, & W. K. Wilkins (eds.), Phrasal and Clausal Architecture, 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.101.14pesSearch in Google Scholar

Phillips, C. 2013. Parser-grammar relations: We don’t understand everything twice. In Montserrat Sanz, Itziar Laka & Michael K. Tanenhaus (eds.), Language down the garden path: the cognitive and biological basis for linguistic structure, 294–315. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677139.003.0017Search in Google Scholar

Potts, C. 2007. The dimensions of quotation. In C. Barker & P. Jacobson (eds.), Direct compositionality, 405–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199204373.003.0012Search in Google Scholar

Reach, K. 1938. The name relation and the logical antinomies. The journal of symbolic logic 3(3). 97–111.10.2307/2267594Search in Google Scholar

Read, S. 1997. Quotation and reach’s puzzle. Acta Analytica 19. 9–20.Search in Google Scholar

Richards, M. D. 2007. On feature inheritance: An argument from the phase impenetrability condition. Linguistic Inquiry 38(3). 563–572.10.1162/ling.2007.38.3.563Search in Google Scholar

Richards, M. D. 2012. On feature inheritance, defective phases, and the movement-morphology connection. In Á. Gallego (ed.), Phases: Developing the Framework, 195–232. Berlin/New York: Walter De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110264104.195Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In A. Belletti, (ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, Volume 3, 223–251. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195171976.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, I. 1991. Excorporation and Minimality. Linguistic Inquiry 22(1). 209–218.10.4324/9781315310572-10Search in Google Scholar

Rudnev, P. 2015. Dependency and discourse-configurationality: a study of Avar. Groningen: University of Groningen.Search in Google Scholar

Saka, P. 2013. Quotation. Philosophy Compass 8(10). 935–949.10.1111/phc3.12069Search in Google Scholar

Sakamoto, Y. 2016. Phases and argument ellipsis in japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 25(3). 243–274.10.1007/s10831-016-9145-6Search in Google Scholar

Schlenker, P. 1999. Propositional attitudes and indexicality: a cross categorial approach. Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Schlenker, P. 2015. Visible meaning: Sign language and the foundations of semantics. Ms., Institut Jean-Nicod and New York University.Search in Google Scholar

Sharvit, Y. 2008. The puzzle of free indirect discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy 31(3). 353–395.10.1007/s10988-008-9039-9Search in Google Scholar

Sharvit, Y. 2011. Covaluation and unexpected bt effects. Journal of Semantics 55–106.10.1093/jos/ffq012Search in Google Scholar

Sheehan, M. & W. Hinzen. 2011. Moving towards the edge. Linguistic Analysis 37(3–4). 405–458.Search in Google Scholar

Sudo, Y. 2013. Metalinguistic quantification: Evidence from japanese wh-doublets. Ms., Institut Jean Nicod.Search in Google Scholar

Sugimoto, Y. 2016. De-phasing effect: External pair-merge of phase head and non-phase head. Paper presented at GLOW 2016, Goettingen, 5-7 April.Search in Google Scholar

Suñer, M. 2000. The syntax of direct quotes with special reference to spanish and english. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 18(3). 525–578.10.1007/s11049-007-9022-0Search in Google Scholar

Tarski, A. 1983. The concept of truth in formalized languages. In J. Corcoran (ed.), Logic, semantics, metamathematics: papers from 1923 to 1938, 152–278. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Trotzke, A. & Lahne, A. 2011. Recursion as derivational layering: an amendment to zwart. Biolinguistics 5(4). 335–346.10.5964/bioling.8865Search in Google Scholar

Trotzke, A. & J.-W. Zwart. 2014. The complexity of narrow syntax: Minimalism, representational economy, and simplest merge. In F. J. Newmeyer & L. B. Preston (eds.), Measuring grammatical complexity, 128–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685301.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Truckenbrodt, H. 2006. On the semantic motivation of syntactic verb movement to c in german. Theoretical Linguistics 32(3). 257–306.10.1515/TL.2006.018Search in Google Scholar

Uriagereka, J. 2008. Syntactic anchors: On semantic structuring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511481482Search in Google Scholar

Werning, M. 2005. Right and wrong reasons for compositionality. In M. Werning, E. Machery & G. Schurz (ed.), The compositionality of meaning and content, 285–309. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.10.1515/9783110323627.285Search in Google Scholar

Werning, M. 2012. Quotation as marked referential imitation: A compositional analysis of an allegedly opaque phenomenon. Paper presented at Quotation. Perspecitives from Philosophy and Linguistics, Bochum, 27-29 September.Search in Google Scholar

Wiese, R. 1996. Phrasal compounds and the theory of word syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 27(1). 183–193.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, E. 2011. Regimes of Derivation in Syntax and Morphology. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203830796Search in Google Scholar

Wiślicki, J. 2014. Semantics of quotation. Proceedings of PhML 2014 238–249.Search in Google Scholar

Wiślicki, J. 2016. Roots and root typing: evidence from discontinuity. Paper presented at Incontro di Grammatica Generativa 42, Lecce, 18-20 February.Search in Google Scholar

Wurmbrand, S. 2013. QR and selection: Covert evidence for phasehood. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society Annual Meeting 42. 277–290.Search in Google Scholar

Wurmbrand, S. 2017. Stripping and Topless Complements. Linguistic Inquiry 48(2).10.1162/LING_a_00245Search in Google Scholar

Zwart, J.-W. 2003. On the format of dependency relations. Paper presented at Harvard University, 10 November.Search in Google Scholar

Zwart, J.-W. 2004a. Assymetric merge. Paper presented at the University of Michigan, 23 March.Search in Google Scholar

Zwart, J.-W. 2004b. The format of dependency relations. merge. Paper presented at Indiana University, June-July.Search in Google Scholar

Zwart, J.-W. 2009. Prospects for top-down derivation. Catalan Journal of Linguisitcs 8. 161–187.10.5565/rev/catjl.146Search in Google Scholar

Zwart, J.-W. 2011a. Recursion in language: A layered-derivation approach. Biolinguistics 5(1–2). 043–056.10.5964/bioling.8829Search in Google Scholar

Zwart, J.-W. 2011b. Structure and order: Asymmetric Merge. In C. Boeckx (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, 96–117. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199549368.013.0005Search in Google Scholar

Zwart, J.-W. 2013. Language innateness. Debate with Dan Everett, University of Groningen, 12 September.Search in Google Scholar

Zwart, J.-W. 2015. Top-down derivation, recursion, and the model of grammar. In A. Trotzke & J. Bayer, (eds.), Syntactic complexity across interfaces, 25–42. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9781614517900.25Search in Google Scholar

Zwart, J.-W. 2017. Eliminating External Merge. Ms., University of Groningen.Search in Google Scholar