From the Complex NP Constraint to everything: On deep extractions across categories

References

Abels, Klaus. 2003. Successive cyclicity, antilocality, and adposition stranding. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Abels, Klaus. 2011. Don’t repair that island! It ain’t broke. Paper presented at Islands in the Contemporary Theory, University of Basque Country, Victoria-Gasteiz.Search in Google Scholar

Bach, Emmon & George M. Horn. 1976. Remarks on ‘Conditions on Transformations’. Linguistic Inquiry 7(2). 265–299.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Mark, Kyle Johnson & Ian Roberts. 1989. Passive arguments raised. Linguistic Inquiry 20(2). 219–251.10.4324/9781315310572-8Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Mark. 2003. Lexical categories: Verbs, nouns, and adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615047Search in Google Scholar

Barros, Matt, Patrick Elliott, & Gary Thoms. 2014. There is no island repair. Ms., Rutgers, University College London, and University of Edinburgh.Search in Google Scholar

Belletti, Adriana. 1988. The Case of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry 19(1). 1–34.Search in Google Scholar

Belletti, Adriana. 1990. Generalized verb movement. Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier.Search in Google Scholar

Belletti, Adriana & Luigi Rizzi. 1981. The syntax of ne: Some theoretical implications. The Linguistic Review 1(2). 117–154.10.1515/tlir.1981.1.2.117Search in Google Scholar

Belletti, Adriana & Luigi Rizzi. 1988. Psych-verbs and theta theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6(3). 291–352.10.1007/BF00133902Search in Google Scholar

Bennis, Hans. 1986. Gaps and dummies. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110889536Search in Google Scholar

Bobaljik, Jonathan & Dianne Jonas. 1996. Subject positions and the roles of TP. Linguistic Inquiry 27(2). 195–236.Search in Google Scholar

Boeckx, Cedric. 2003. Islands and chains: Resumption as stranding. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.63Search in Google Scholar

Boeckx, Cedric. 2005. Some notes on bounding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University manuscript.Search in Google Scholar

Brillman, Ruth & Aron Hirsch. In press. An anti-locality account of English subject/non-subject asymmetries. In CLS 50: Proceedings of the 50th annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Željko. 1994. D-structure, theta-criterion, and movement into theta-positions. Linguistic Analysis 24(3−4). 247–286.Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Željko. 1997. The syntax of nonfinite complementation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Željko. 2001. On the nature of the syntax-phonology interface: Cliticization and related phenomena. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.10.1163/9780585474250Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Željko. 2002. A-movement and the EPP. Syntax 5(3). 167–218.10.1111/1467-9612.00051Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Željko. 2004. Be careful where you float your quantifiers. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22(4). 681–742.10.1007/s11049-004-2541-zSearch in Google Scholar

Bošković, Željko. 2007. On the locality and motivation of Move and Agree: An even more minimal theory. Linguistic Inquiry 38(4). 589–644.10.1162/ling.2007.38.4.589Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Željko. 2008. On successive cyclic movement and the freezing effect of feature checking. In Jutta M. Hartmann, Veronika Hegedüs & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), Sounds of silence: Empty elements in syntax and phonology, 195–233. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Željko. 2011. Rescue by PF deletion, traces as (non)interveners, and the that-trace effect. Linguistic Inquiry 42(1). 1–44.10.1162/LING_a_00027Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Željko. 2012. On NPs and clauses. In Günther Grewendorf & Thomas Ede Zimmermann (eds.), Discourse and grammar: From sentence types to lexical categories, 179–242. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781614511601.179Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Željko. 2013a. Phases beyond clauses. In Lila Schürcks, Anastasia Giannakidou, Urtzi Etxeberria & Peter Kosta (eds.), The nominal structure in Slavic and beyond, 75–128. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9781614512790.75Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Željko. 2013b. Traces do not head islands: What can PF deletion rescue? In Yoichi Miyamoto, Daiko Takahashi, Hideki Maki, Masao Ochi, Koji Sugisaki & Asako Uchibori (eds.), Deep insights, broad perspectives: Essays in honor of Mamoru Saito, 56–93. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Željko. 2014. Now I’m a phase, now I’m not a phase: On the variability of phases with extraction and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 45(1). 27–89.10.1162/LING_a_00148Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Željko. 2015. Deducing the Generalized XP Constraint from phasal spell-out. In Markéta Ziková, Pavel Caha, Mojmír Dočekal (eds.), Slavic languages in the perspective of formal grammar. Proceedings of FDSL 10.5, Brno 2014, 79–99. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Željko. In press a. On the timing of labeling: Deducing comp-trace effects, the subject condition, the adjunct condition, and tucking in from labeling. The Linguistic Review 33(2).10.1515/tlr-2015-0013Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Željko. In press b. Extraction from complex NPs and detachment. In Martin Everaet & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The companion to syntax, second edition. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Bošković, Željko & Howard Lasnik. 2003. On the distribution of null complementizers. Linguistic Inquiry 34(4). 527–546.10.1162/002438903322520142Search in Google Scholar

Browning, Maggie. 1996. CP recursion and that-t effects. Linguistic Inquiry 27(2). 237–255.Search in Google Scholar

Carstens, Vicki. 2010. Head-movement in Bantu DPs. Paper presented at the 41st annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, University of Pensylvania, 22–24 October.Search in Google Scholar

Carstens, Vicki, Norbert Hornstein & Daniel Seely. 2014. Head movement in Problems of Projection. Ms., University of Missouri, University of Maryland, and Eastern Michigan University.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In Stephen Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle, 232–286. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1980. On binding. Linguistic Inquiry 11(1). 1–46.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130(1). 33–49.10.1075/la.223.01choSearch in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of A’-dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2006. Restructuring and functional heads: The catography of syntactic structures. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Culicover, Peter & Michael Rochemont. 1992. Adjunct extraction from NP and the ECP. Linguistic Inquiry 23(3). 496–501.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, William D. & Stanley William Dubinsky. 2003. On extraction from NPs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21(1). 1–37.10.1023/A:1021891610437Search in Google Scholar

den Dikken, Marcel. 1999. On the structural representation of possession and agreement: The case of (anti-)agreement in Hungarian possessed nominal phrases. In István Kenesei (ed.), Crossing boundaries. 137–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.182.10dikSearch in Google Scholar

den Dikken, Marcel. 2007. Phase extension: Contours of a theory of the role of head movement in phrasal extraction. Theoretical Linguistics 33(1). 1–41.10.1515/TL.2007.001Search in Google Scholar

den Dikken, Marcel. 2006. Relators and linkers: The syntax of predication, predicate inversion, and copulas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Erlewine, Michael. In press. Anti-locality and optimality in Kaqchikel agent focus. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.10.1007/s11049-015-9310-zSearch in Google Scholar

Gallego, Ángel & Juan Uriagereka. 2007. Conditions on sub-extraction. In Luis Eguren & Olga Fernández-Soriano (eds.), Coreference, modality, and focus, 45–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.111.04galSearch in Google Scholar

Grohmann, Kleanthes. 2003. Prolific domains: On the antilocality of movement dependencies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.66Search in Google Scholar

Harwood, Will. 2013. Being progressive is just a phase: Celebrating the uniqueness of progressive aspect under a phase-based analysis. Ghent: Ghent University dissertation.10.1007/s11049-014-9267-3Search in Google Scholar

Herschensohn, Julia. 1992 Case marking and French psych verbs. Lingvisticae Investigationes 16(1). 21–40.10.1075/li.16.1.03herSearch in Google Scholar

Hiraiwa, Ken. 2005. Dimensions of symmetry in syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Holmberg, Anders & Thorbjörg Hróarsdóttir. 2003. Agreement and movement in Icelandic raising constructions. Lingua 113(10). 997–1019.10.1016/S0024-3841(02)00162-6Search in Google Scholar

Hornstein, Norbert & Amy Weinberg. 1981. Case theory and preposition stranding. Linguistic Inquiry 12(1). 55–91.Search in Google Scholar

Hornstein, Norbert & Jacek Witkos. 2003. Yet another approach to existential constructions. In Lars-Olof Delsing, Cecilia Falk, Gunlög Josefsson & Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson (eds.), Grammar in focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack, 167–184. Lund: Lund University.Search in Google Scholar

Horrocks, Geoffrey & Melita Stavrou. 1987. Bounding theory and Greek syntax: Evidence for wh-movement in NP. Journal of Linguistics 23. 79–108.10.1017/S002222670001104XSearch in Google Scholar

Hunter, Tim. 2010. Relating movement and adjunction in syntax and semantics. College Park, MD: University of Maryland dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Ishii, Toru. 1999. Cyclic spell-out and the that-trace effect. In Sonya Bird, Andrew Carnie, Jason D. Haugen & Peter Norquest (eds.), Proceedings of the west coast conference on formal linguistics, vol. 18, 220–231. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Kyle. 1991. Object positions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9(4). 577–636.10.1007/BF00134751Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Kyle. 1992. Scope and binding theory. Syntax and semantics 26. 259–275.Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard. 1981. ECP extensions. Linguistic Inquiry 12(1). 93–133.Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard. 1984. Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783111682228Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul, and Carol Kiparsky. 1970. Fact. In Manfred Bierwisch & Karl E. Heidolph (eds.), Progress in linguistics, 143–173. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Landau, Idan. 2009. The locative syntax of experiencers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8387.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lasnik, Howard. 1995. Case and expletives revisited. Linguistic Inquiry 26(4). 615–633.Search in Google Scholar

Lasnik, Howard & Myung-Kwan Park. 2011. Evidence from pseudogapping and VP ellipsis in English. College Park & Seoul: University of Maryland and Dongguk University Manuscript.Search in Google Scholar

Lasnik, Howard & Mamoru Saito. 1992. Move α: Conditions on its application and output. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Legate, Julie. 2003. Some interface properties of the phase. Linguistic Inquiry 34(3). 506–516.10.1162/ling.2003.34.3.506Search in Google Scholar

Li, Yafei. 1993. Barriers in terms of categories. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Manuscript.Search in Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape for syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2). 201–225.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Roger. 2001. Null case and the distribution of PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 32(1). 141–166.10.1162/002438901554612Search in Google Scholar

McCloskey, James. 2000. Quantifier float and wh-movement in an Irish English. Linguistic Inquiry 31(1). 57–84.10.1162/002438900554299Search in Google Scholar

Messick, Troy. 2012. Ellipsis and reconstruction in tough-infinitives. In Nobu Goto, Koichi Otaki, Atsushi Sato & Kensuke Takita (eds.), Proceedings of generative linguistics in the old word in Asia IX, 173–185. Tsu: Mie University.Search in Google Scholar

Moro, Andrea. 1997. The raising of predicates. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519956Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Gereon. 2014. The short life cycle of external arguments in passive derivations. Paper presented at International Conference on Generative Linguistics and Philosophy, Goethe Universität, 27–29 June.Search in Google Scholar

Nemoto, Naoko. 1991. Scrambling and conditions on A-movement. In Dawn Bates (ed.), Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, vol. 10, 349–358. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nissenbaum, Jon. 2014. Un-building statives: A case for the non-existence of the passive morpheme. Presented at the University of Connecticut, 14 March.Search in Google Scholar

Nunes, Jairo. 2009. Dummy prepositions and the licensing of null subjects in Brazilian Portuguese. In Enoch Aboh, Elisabeth van der Linden, Josep Quer, & Petra Sleeman (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory. Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Amsterdam 2007, 243–265. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/rllt.1.13nunSearch in Google Scholar

Nunes, Jairo & Juan Uriagereka. 2000. Cyclicity and extraction domains. Syntax 3(1). 20–43.10.1111/1467-9612.00023Search in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, David. 1992. Zero Syntax, vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Manuscript.Search in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Reinhart, Tanya. 1980. On the position of extraposed clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 11(3). 621–624.Search in Google Scholar

Reuland, Eric. 1983. Governing -ing. Linguistic Inquiry 14(1). 101–136.Search in Google Scholar

Riqueros, José. 2013. Spanish nominal(ization) patterns. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 2006. On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Lisa Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Wh-movement: Moving on, 97–133. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi & Ur Shlonsky. 2007. Strategies of subject extraction. In Hans-Mrtin Gärtner & Uli Sauerland (eds.), Interfaces+Recursion=Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics, 115–116. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Ian. 1991. NP-movement, crossover, and chain formation. In Hubert Haider & Netter Klaus (eds), Representation and derivation in the theory of grammar, 17–52. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-3446-0_2Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Ian. 2014. On the interpretation of certain arbitrary pronouns. Paper presented at International Conference on Generative Linguistics and Philosophy, Goethe Universität, 27–29 June.Search in Google Scholar

Rochette, Anne. 1988. Semantic and syntactic aspects of romance sentential. Cambridge, MA: MIT Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Rodman, Robert. 1977. Concerning the NP constraint. Linguistic Inquiry 8(1). 181–184.Search in Google Scholar

Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Roussou, Anna. 1994 The syntax of complementizers. London: University College London Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Sabel, Joachim. 2000. Expletives as features. In Roger Billerey & Brook Danielle Lillehaugen (eds.), Proceedings of the west coast conference on formal linguistics, vol. 19, 101–114. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Search in Google Scholar

Safir, Kenneth. 1985. Syntactic chains. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Saito, Mamoru & Keiko Murasugi. 1999. Subject predication within IP and DP. In Kyle Johnson & Ian Roberts (eds.), Beyond principles and parameters, 167–188. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-4822-1_7Search in Google Scholar

Schoorlemmer, Erik. 2013. Genitive noun complements in Serbo-Croatian. In Steven Franks, Markus Dickinson, George Fowler, Melissa Whitcombe & Ksenia Zanon (eds.), Proceedings of formal approaches to Slavic linguistics, vol. 21, 289–302. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Selkirk, Elizabeth. 1977. Some remarks on noun phrase structure. In Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal syntax, 285–316. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sportiche, Dominique. 1988. A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 19(3). 425–449.Search in Google Scholar

Stepanov, Arthur. 2001. Cyclic domains in syntactic theory. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Stepanov, Arthur. 2007. The end of CED? Syntax 10(1). 80–126.10.1111/j.1467-9612.2007.00094.xSearch in Google Scholar

Stepanov, Arthur. 2012. Voiding island effects via head movement. Linguistic Inquiry 43(4). 680–693.10.1162/ling_a_00111Search in Google Scholar

Stjepanović, Sandra. 1999. What do second position cliticization, scrambling, and multiple wh-fronting have in common. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Stowell, Timothy. 1981. Origins of phrase structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Takita, Kensuke, Nobu Goto & Yoshiyuki Shibata. In press. Labeling through Spell-Out. The Linguistic Review 33(2).10.1515/tlr-2015-0018Search in Google Scholar

Takahashi, Daiko. 1994. Minimality of movement. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Takahashi, Masahiko. 2011. Some consequences of case-marking in Japanese. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Talić, Aida. 2013. Extraordinary complement extraction: PP-complements and inherently case-marked nominal complements. Studies in Polish Linguistics 8(3). 127–150.Search in Google Scholar

Talić, Aida. In press. Adverb extraction, specificity, and structural parallelism. Canadian Journal of Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Ticio, Emma. 2005. Locality and anti-locality in Spanish DPs. Syntax 8(3). 229–286.10.1111/j.1467-9612.2005.00080.xSearch in Google Scholar

Truswell, Robert. 2010. Events, phrases, and questions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577774.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Uchiumi, Tohoru. 2005. Raising and arbitrary control. In Claire Gurski (ed.), Proceedings of the 2005 Annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, 1–12. http://westernlinguistics.ca/Publications/CLA-ACL/CLA-ACL2005.htm.Search in Google Scholar

Uriagereka, Juan. 1988. On government. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Uriagereka, Juan. 1999. Multiple spell-out. In Sam Epstein & Norbert Hornstein (eds.), Working minimalism, 251–282. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1997. Push chains and drag chains: Complex predicate split in Dutch. In Shigeo Tonoike (ed.), Scrambling, 7–33. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Watanabe, Akira. 1993. Larsonian CP Recursion, factive complements, and selection. In Amy Schafer (ed.), NELS 23: Proceedings of the 23rd annual meeting of the north east linguistic society, 523–537. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Search in Google Scholar

Wurmbrand, Susi. 2001. Infinitives: Restructuring and clause structure. Berlin: de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Wurmbrand, Susi. 2013a. QR and selection: Covert evidence for phasehood. In Stefan Keine & Shayne Sloggett (eds.), NELS 42: Proceedings of the 42nd annual meeting of the north east linguistic society, 277–290. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Search in Google Scholar

Wurmbrand, Susi. 2013b. Tagalog infinitives: Consequences for the theory of phases, voice marking, and extraction. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut Manuscript.Search in Google Scholar

Wurmbrand, Susi. 2014. Tense and aspect in English infintives. Linguistic Inquiry 45(3). 403–447.10.1162/LING_a_00161Search in Google Scholar

Zaring, Laurie. 1994. On the relationship between subject pronouns and clausal arguments. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12(3). 515–569.10.1007/BF01118138Search in Google Scholar

Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1983. On the notion “Adjunct Subject” and a class of raising predicates. In Isabelle Haïk & Diane Massam (eds.), Papers in grammatical theory. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 5, 195–231. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar