Abstract
This paper presents an overview of phonological relationships that are “intermediate” between contrast and allophony. As has been observed for many years, such intermediate relationships occur widely in the world's languages, yet they are often simply relegated to being exceptional cases or ignored in linguistic analyses. While there is a set of criteria that can be used to define relationships, these criteria may conflict with one another or be inadequate in certain cases. Thus, relationships may be intermediate for a number of reasons, including issues with: the concept of predictability of distribution; the existence of foreign or specialized strata of a language; variability and gradience; frequency; theory-internal classifications; and phonetic factors. Each of these is discussed in turn, with examples from the literature. In addition to this basic typology of intermediate phonological relationships, the paper also lays out a number of different kinds of approaches that have been taken to accommodate intermediate relationships in the phonological grammar and summarizes the issues to be resolved in future work.
©[2013] by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Masthead
- a gente: pronominal status and agreement revisited
- Prosodically constrained non-local doubling
- A typology of intermediate phonological relationships
- A new approach to prosodic grouping
- A unified account of consonant gemination in external sandhi in Italian: Raddoppiamento Sintattico and related phenomena
- σ strikes back: A defense of headedness and constituency in phonology
Articles in the same Issue
- Masthead
- a gente: pronominal status and agreement revisited
- Prosodically constrained non-local doubling
- A typology of intermediate phonological relationships
- A new approach to prosodic grouping
- A unified account of consonant gemination in external sandhi in Italian: Raddoppiamento Sintattico and related phenomena
- σ strikes back: A defense of headedness and constituency in phonology