Home Subject-auxiliary inversion: A natural category
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Subject-auxiliary inversion: A natural category

  • Adele E. Goldberg and Alex Del Giudice
Published/Copyright: December 6, 2005
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
The Linguistic Review
From the journal Volume 22 Issue 2-4

Abstract

This article argues that subject auxiliary inversion in English (SAI) provides an example of a syntactic generalization that is strongly motivated by a family of closely related functions. Recognition of the functional properties of each subconstruction associated with SAI allows us to predict many seemingly arbitrary properties of SAI: e.g., its (partial) restriction to appear in main clauses, the fact that the inversion only involves the first auxiliary, and the fact that its use in comparatives is more limited. The dominant feature of SAI, being nonpositive, is also argued to motivate the syntactic form of SAI. It is suggested that attention to the rich data inherent in language and to findings in categorization research simultaneously serves to reinforce and benefit our understanding of both language and categorization more generally.

:
Published Online: 2005-12-06
Published in Print: 2005-12-12

Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG

Downloaded on 29.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.411/html
Scroll to top button