Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
The universality of lexical categories: Comments on Chung
-
Andrew Koontz-Garboden,
Department of Linguistics and English Language, Samuel Alexander Building, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road M13 9PL, Manchester, U.K.
Published/Copyright:
September 26, 2012
Published Online: 2012-09-26
Published in Print: 2012-08-10
©[2012] by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Masthead
- Are lexical categories universal? The view from Chamorro
- Language universals without universal categories
- Roots and features (an acategorial postscript)
- Escaping ethnocentrism in the study of word-class universals
- The universality of lexical categories: Comments on Chung
- Reconstructing multifunctionality
- Reply to the commentaries
- The evolution of verb classes and verb agreement in sign languages
- Response: The apparent reorganization of gesture in the evolution of verb agreement in signed languages
Articles in the same Issue
- Masthead
- Are lexical categories universal? The view from Chamorro
- Language universals without universal categories
- Roots and features (an acategorial postscript)
- Escaping ethnocentrism in the study of word-class universals
- The universality of lexical categories: Comments on Chung
- Reconstructing multifunctionality
- Reply to the commentaries
- The evolution of verb classes and verb agreement in sign languages
- Response: The apparent reorganization of gesture in the evolution of verb agreement in signed languages
