Home Experimental Investigation of the Effect of the Probe Support Tail Structure on the Compressor Cascade Flow Field
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Experimental Investigation of the Effect of the Probe Support Tail Structure on the Compressor Cascade Flow Field

  • Honghui Xiang EMAIL logo , Ning Ge , Jie Gao , Rongfei Yang and Minjie Hou
Published/Copyright: December 20, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Aiming at resolving the problem of measuring probe blockage effect in the performance experiments of high loaded axial flow compressors, an experimental investigation of the probe support disturbance effect on the compressor cascade flow field was conducted on a transonic plane cascade test facility. The influence characteristics of the probe support tail structure on the cascade downstream flow field under different operation conditions were revealed through the detailed analysis of the test data. The results show that the aerodynamic coupling effect between the upstream probe support wake and the downstream cascade flow field is very intense. Some factors, i. e. inlet Mach number, probe support tail structure, circumferential installing position of probe, and axial distance from the probe support trailing edge to the downstream cascade, are found to have the most impact on the probe disturbance intensity. Under high speed inlet flow condition, changing probe support tail structure can’t inhibit probe support disturbance intensity effectively. Whereas under low speed inlet flow condition, compared with the cylindrical probe, the elliptic probe can inhibit probe support wake loss and reduce disturbance effects on the downstream cascade flow field.

Funding statement: This work has been supported by the Jiangsu Province ordinary university graduate research innovation project (No. KYLX15_0260).

Nomenclature

H

height of blade

L

distance from probe to the wall

Pt

total pressure

P

static pressure

Tt

total temperature

T

static temperature

δ

total pressure loss coefficient

ρ

flow density

V

flow velocity

x

measurement position of blade surface static pressure

R

long axis radius

r

short axis radius

Subscripts
1

inlet

2

outlet

w

wall

References

1. Grosvenor AD, Taylor DA, Bucher JR, Aarnio MJ, Brown PM, Draper RD, et al. Measured and predicted performance of a high pressure ratio supersonic compressor rotor. ASME Paper GT2008-50150, 2008.10.1115/GT2008-50150Search in Google Scholar

2. Adamczyk JJ, Hansen JL, Prahst PS. A post test analysis of a high-speed two-stage axial flow compressor. ASME Paper GT2007-28057, 2007.10.1115/GT2007-28057Search in Google Scholar

3. Dudzinski TJ, Krause LN. Effect of inlet geometry on flow-angle characteristics of miniature total pressure tubes. NASA Technical Note, NASA-TN-D-6406, 1971.Search in Google Scholar

4. Jones MJ, Birch NT, Bradbrook SJ. Evolutions in aircraft engine design and a vision for the future. ISABE Paper 2001–1014, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

5. Broichhausen KD, Ziegler KU. Supersonic and transonic compressors: past, status and technology trends. ASME Paper GT2005-69067, 2005.10.1115/GT2005-69067Search in Google Scholar

6. Treaster AL, Yocum AM. The calibration and application of five-hole probe. ISA Trans 1979;18(3):23–34.10.21236/ADA055870Search in Google Scholar

7. Bubeck H, Heneka A. Measuring errors of pneumatic multi-hole-probes. Measuring techniques for transonic and supersonic flow in cascades and turbomachines. In: 7th Symposium on Measuring Techniques and Supersonic Flow in Cascade Turbomachines, TechnisheHochschule Aachen, 1984.Search in Google Scholar

8. Chernoray V, Hjarne J. Improvement the accuracy of multihole probe measurements in velocity gradients. ASME Paper GT2008-50492, 2008.10.1115/GT2008-50492Search in Google Scholar

9. Gilarranz JL, Ranz AJ, Kopko JA, Sorokes JM. On the use of five-hole probes in the testing of industrial centrifugal compressors. ASME J Turbomach 2005;127:91–106.10.1115/1.1812319Search in Google Scholar

10. Coldrick S, Ivey PC, Wells RG. The influence of compressor aerodynamics on pressure probes: Part 2 numerical models. ASME Paper GT2004-53241, 2004.10.1115/GT2004-53241Search in Google Scholar

11. Mersinligil M, Brouckaert JF, Courtiade N, Ottavy X. A high temperature high bandwidth fast response total pressure probe for measurements in a multistage axial compressor. ASME Paper GT2011-45558, 2011.10.1115/GT2011-45558Search in Google Scholar

12. Bolt CR, Lee D, Mc Donald PW. Rotor redesign for a highly loaded 1800 ft/sec tip speed fan-II. Final performance report. NASA-5523-92, 1980.Search in Google Scholar

13. Coldrick S, Ivey P, Wells R. Considerations for using 3D pneumatic probes in high speed axial compressors. ASME Paper GT-2002-30045, 2002.10.1115/GT2002-30045Search in Google Scholar

14. Lepicovsky J. Effects of a rotating aerodynamic probe on the flow field of a compressor rotor. NASA/CR-2008-215215, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

15. Ma HW, Li SH, Wei W. Effects of probe support on the flow field of a low-speed axial compressor. J Therm Sci 2014;23(2):120–6.10.1007/s11630-014-0685-7Search in Google Scholar

16. Ma HW, Li SH, Wei W. Effects of probe support on the stall characteristics of a low-speed axial compressor. J Therm Sci 2016;25(1):43–9.10.1007/s11630-016-0832-4Search in Google Scholar

17. He X, Ma HW, Ren ML, Xiang HH. Numerical investigation of the effects of an airfoil-probe on the flow field in an axial-compressor stator cascade. ISABE-2011-1205, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

18. He X, Ma HW, Ren ML, Xiang HH. Investigation of the effects of airfoil-probes on the aerodynamic performance of an axial compressor. Chinese J Aeronaut 2012;25(4):517–23.10.1016/S1000-9361(11)60415-9Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-11-19
Accepted: 2016-12-06
Published Online: 2016-12-20
Published in Print: 2019-03-26

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 30.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2016-0071/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button