Abstract
Objectives
The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between systemic oxidative balance, and the severity of the disease in patients with COVID 19.
Methods
Sixty-four patients were divided into three groups according to the severity of the disease: mild (n=28), moderate (n=11) and severe (n=25). Twenty-four healthy controls included to the study. Proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6 and TNF-α), D-dimer, fibrinogen, total oxidative status (TOS), total antioxidant status (TAS) were measured and oxidative stress index (OSI) was calculated.
Results
The mean age of severe group was significantly higher than the other groups (p=0.001). TAS levels were significantly decreased in all patient groups compared to controls, while serum TOS and OSI levels were significantly different in all three stages of the disease. Serum IL-6 and TNF- α levels were significantly elevated in severe group compared to other groups. TOS and OSI levels were also significantly correlated with IL-6, CRP, ferritin, fibrinogen, LDH and D-dimer.
Conclusions
TOS and OSI levels are an indicator of systemic oxidative balance in COVID-19 and related to the disease severity. They can be an important marker for evaluating the disease severity and used in the management of patients with COVID-19.
Öz
Amaç
Bu çalışmanın amacı COVID 19 hastalarında sistemik oksidatif denge ile hastalık şiddeti arasındaki ilişkiyi değerlendirmektir.
Gereç ve Yöntem
Altmış dört hasta, hastalık şiddetine göre hafif (n=28), orta (n=11) ve şiddetli (n=25) olmak üzere üç gruba ayrıldı. Yirmi dört sağlıklı kontrol çalışmaya dahil edildi. Proinflamatuar sitokinler (IL-6 ve TNF-α), D-dimer, fibrinojen, total oksidan status (TOS) ile total antioksidan status (TAS) düzeyleri ölçüldü ve oksidatif stres indeksi (OSI) hesaplandı.
Bulgular
Şiddetli grubun yaş ortalaması diğer gruplara göre anlamlı derecede yüksekti (p0,001). TAS seviyeleri kontrollere kıyasla tüm hasta gruplarında anlamlı olarak azalırken, serum TOS ve OSI seviyeleri hastalığın her üç evresinde de anlamlı olarak farklıydı. Şiddetli grupta serum IL-6 ve TNF-α seviyeleri diğer gruplara göre anlamlı derecede yüksekti. TOS ve OSI seviyeleri ayrıca IL-6, CRP, ferritin, fibrinojen, LDH ve D-dimer ile anlamlı korelasyon gösterdi.
Sonuç
TOS ve OSI düzeyleri, COVID-19’da sistemik oksidatif dengenin bir göstergesidir ve hastalık şiddeti ile ilişkilidir. Hastalık şiddetini değerlendirmek için önemli bir belirteç olabilir ve COVID-19 hastalarının yönetiminde kullanılabilir.
Introduction
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global pandemic and caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) affecting the whole world emerges in a broad spectrum. It can cause serious complications such as respiratory failure, sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and organ damage especially in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia [1].
Previous studies revealed that severely ill patients prone to have a high concentration of various inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α). The overproduction of these pro-inflammatory cytokines has been described as a cytokine storm. It causes an increased systemic inflammatory response and multiorgan failure due to vascular hyperpermeability and may contribute to the higher mortality rates in patients with COVID-19 [2, 3].
Pathophysiological processes such as increase in cytokine release and inflammation are frequently encountered in respiratory viral infections, including COVID-19 and accordingly, may be related to oxidative stress. Recent studies described that increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antioxidant defense mechanisms deprivation have a very important role in the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV infection [4-6]. It has been suggested that ARDS in patients with COVID-19 depends on activation of the oxidative stress that is coupled with inflammatory machinery and resulting in an increased pro-inflammatory host response [4]. Various mechanisms have been suggested to explain increased ROS generation, including increased angiotensin II, a prooxidant and pro-inflammatory substance, due to angiotensin-converting enzyme II (ACE) II inhibition (I), respiratory burst generating superoxide radicals and H2O2 by activated macrophages and neutrophils (II), ROS production by heme and iron released by damaged erythrocytes (III), hypoxemia caused by alveolar edema (IV) [7]. Although previous studies have revealed a relationship between systemic oxidative stress and viral diseases such as HCV [8], there is not enough data in the literature for SARS-CoV-2 infection.
This study aimed to determine the relationship between systemic oxidative balance and inflammation and their roles in the severity of the disease at different stages of patients with COVID-19.
Materials and methods
Patients and control groups
Sixty-four patients with laboratory-confirmed and clinically-diagnosed COVID-19 admitted to Hatay Mustafa Kemal University Hospital Infectious Diseases and Chest Diseases COVID-19 Policlinic were enrolled in the study. Ethical approval was obtained by the Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health (2020-05-15T14_35_18) and the Institutional Ethics Committee of Hatay Mustafa Kemal University (ethical no: 2020/69). WHO interim guidance for COVID‐19 was used to diagnose the patients. Three groups were created depending on the severity of the disease: mild group, moderate group, and severe group. The mild group consisted of symptomatic patients without viral pneumonia or hypoxia and without computed tomography (CT) findings. The moderate group consisted of patients with CT findings and clinical signs of pneumonia and severe group consisted of patients with the moderate symptoms plus SpO2 ≤90% and/or respiratory rate >30 breaths/min with CT findings. Patients under the age of 18 years old, missing medical data, having pregnancy and malignancy were excluded from the study. Patients having comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, coronary heart disease (CHD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), chronic pulmonary disease (CPD) and patients with CT findings of pneumonia excluded from mild group.
In our study, 24 age- and gender-matched healthy individuals without any acute/chronic infections, chronic diseases such as CHD, DM, CKD and CPD, a rheumatological disease were included as a control group. Demographic and laboratory data were collected from the hospital information system. Written informed consent was obtained from all COVID-19 patients and control subjects prior to entry. The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Specimen collection
Venous blood samples were collected from COVID-19 patients and healthy controls for serum separation. After centrifugation at 1,500 × g for 10 min, all serum samples were portioned and stored at −80 °C.
Biochemical analysis
Serum albumin, total protein, creatinine levels, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatine kinase (CK), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activities were assayed by an autoanalyzer using spectrophotometric method (Siemens Advia 1800 Chemistry System, Newark, Germany). Ferritin levels were performed via immunometric assay (Siemens Advia Centaur XP Immunassay System, Newark, Germany). CRP levels were determined by nephelometric method (Siemens BN II System Marburg, Germany). Leukocyte, neutrophils, lymphocytes and platelet counts were determined by Mindray BC 6000 (MINDRAY Co., Shenzhen, China). D-dimer levels were studied on VIDAS D-Dimer Exclusion™ II (BioMérieux, France) and fibrinogen was measured on STA Compact Max (Stago, USA).
Serum oxidative stress parameters
Serum total oxidant status (TOS) and total antioxidant status (TAS) were measured by a colorimetric method which was described by Erel (Rel Assay Diag., Turkey) [9, 10]. TAS results were expressed as mmol Trolox Eq/L and the results of TOS were given as µmol H2O2 equivalent per liter (µmol H2O2 Eq/L). Oxidative Stress Index (OSI) was calculated as follows: OSI (arbitrary unit)=TOS (µmol H2O2 Eq/L)/TAS (µmol Trolox Eq/L) × 100 [11].
ELISA measurements
Serum IL-6 and TNF-α concentrations were assayed using commercially avaliable kits by ELISA method (Thermoscientific MultiscanGo; Elabscience, catalog no, respectively: E-EL-H0109 and E-EL-H0102). The assay ranges for the TNF-α kit were 7.81–500 pg/mL, analytical sensitivity 4.69 pg/mL and the intra- and interassay coefficients of variance (CV%) were 6.22 and 5.29%, respectively. The assay ranges for the IL-6 kit were 7.81–500 pg/mL, analytical sensitivity 4.69 pg/mL and the intra- and interassay coefficients of variance (CV%) were 6.72 and 6.61%, respectively. The results were presented as pg/mL.
PCR analysis
All COVID-19 patients were confirmed positively by RT-PCR using specimens derived from oropharyngeal swabs prior to or during the hospitalization [12]. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay (Montania 4896 Real-Time PCR Instrument, Anatolia Diagnostics Inc, Istanbul, Turkey) was conducted according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Bioeksen R&D Tech. Ltd, Istanbul, Turkey).
Statistical analysis
Categorical data and continuous variables were expressed as numbers/percentages and mean ± SD or SEM, respectively. The distribution of the continuous variables was studied by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. One Way ANOVA Test (Post hoc: LSD) was applied to analyze normally distributed data. Kruskal Wallis Test (Post hoc: Mann Whitney U Test) was applied to analyze non-normally distributed data. The Chi-square test was used for categorical data. We also used covariance analysis (ANCOVA) to assess the differences between the groups after adjusting age for the potential confounder effect. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the potential value of oxidative stress parameters in disease severity of patients with COVID-19. Correlations were assessed using the Spearman test. All statistical procedures were studied using SPSS 24.0 (IBM Corporation, NY, USA). Values of p<0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
The demographic characteristics of 64 patients and 24 healthy individuals participating in the study are given in Table 1. The mean age of the patients with the severe group was significantly higher than the other groups (p<0.001, Table 1).
Demographic characteristics of healthy controls and patient groups.
Control, n=24 | Mild, n=28 | Moderate, n=11 | Severe, n=25 | Total, n=88 | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age, mean ± SD, years | 38.29 ± 8.23 | 39.99 ± 13.58 | 43.82 ± 12.48 | 57.76 ± 13.75a,b,c | – | <0.001* ,a,b,c |
Sex, n, % | 0.122** | |||||
Female | 11 (45.8%) | 6 (21.4%) | 2 (18.2%) | 11 (44.0%) | 30 (34.1%) | |
Male | 13 (54.2%) | 22 (78.6%) | 9 (81.8%) | 14 (56.0%) | 58 (65.9%) |
-
*One way ANOVA test (Post hoc: LSD); **Chi-square test; aComparison between control and severe group. bComparison between mild and severe group. cComparison between moderate and severe group. Bold values show p<0.05 and considered statistically significant.
The clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients are given in Table 2. Comorbidities including DM (17%), hypertension (12.5%), CHD (14%), CKD (4.6%) and CPD (7.8%) were observed in 22 patients (34.4%) participating in the study.
Clinical characteristics of patient groups.
All patients, n=64 | Mild, n=28 | Moderate, n=11 | Severe, n=25 | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Any of the following | |||||
Diabetes | 11 (17%) | 0 | 1 (9%) | 10 (40%) | |
Hypertension | 8 (12.5%) | 0 | 1 (9%) | 7 (28%) | |
Coronary heart disease | 9 (14%) | 0 | 1 (9%) | 8 (32%) | |
Chronic kidney disease | 3 (4.6%) | 0 | 0 | 3 (12%) | |
Chronic pulmonary disease | 5 (7.8%) | 0 | 0 | 5 (20%) | |
Comorbidity (total) | 22 (34.4) | 0 | 3 (27%)b | 19 (76%)a | <0.001 |
Non-comorbidity | 42 (65.6%) | 28 (100%) | 8 (73%)b | 6 (24%)a | <0.001 |
-
aComparison between mild and severe group. bComparison between mild and moderate group.
Biochemical data of the patients and the healthy subjects are shown in Table 3. Serum levels of lymphocytes in the severe group significantly decreased and LDH, CRP, D-dimer and fibrinogen levels were significantly increased compared to mild, moderate and control groups.
Biochemical parameters in control and patient groups.
Parameters | Control, n=24 | Mild, n=28 | Moderate, n=11 | Severe, n=25 | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leukocyte, ×10 9 /L | 6.13 ± 0.92 | 6.29 ± 1.64 | 6.34 ± 1.29 | 7.75 ± 6.05 | 0.923* |
Neutrophils, ×10 9 /L | 3.72 ± 0.93 | 4.13 ± 1.75 | 4.29 ± 0.84 | 5.56 ± 5.22 | 0.173** |
Lymphocytes, ×10 9 /L | 2.15 ± 0.60 | 1.43 ± 0.53 a | 1.28 ± 0.41 b | 1.18 ± 0.48 c | <0.001* ,a,b,c |
Platelet, ×10 9 /L | 241.87 ± 69.11 | 218.82 ± 51.37 | 208.81 ± 132.14 | 199.16 ± 63.37 | 0.233** |
ALT, U/L | 21.62 ± 8.54 | 24.00 ± 8.24 | 28.45 ± 16.99 | 33.49 ± 39.21 | 0.280** |
AST, U/L | 19.91 ± 4.90 | 28.50 ± 9.96 | 29.09 ± 10.53 | 44.40 ± 37.16 c,e,f |
<0.001**
,c
0,008** ,e,f |
Creatinine, mg/dL | 0.70 ± 0.11 | 0.75 ± 0.15 | 0.77 ± 0.11 | 0.97 ± 0.49 c,e |
0.001**
,c
0.005** ,e |
Albumin, g/L | 41.4 ± 3.9 | 41.1 ± 4.2 | 40.6 ± 2.0 | 39.1 ± 3.3 | 0.138** |
Total protein, g/L | 66.6 ± 6.0 | 65.3 ± 4.7 | 65.1 ± 3.3 | 64.4 ± 4.9 | 0.504** |
CK, U/L | 72.85 ± 21.37 | 88.75 ± 32.23 | 94.72 ± 22.98 | 158.40 ± 203.36 c,e |
0.008**
,c
0.025** ,e |
LDH, U/L | 144.41 ± 17.4 | 204.35 ± 28.00 a | 244.09 ± 40.65 b | 348.16 ± 150.76 c,e,f |
0.012**
,a
0.002** ,b <0.001** ,c,e,f |
Ferritin, mg/dL | 34.25 ± 24.99 | 78.11 ± 24.17 a | 186.70 ± 125.63 b | 369.24 ± 333.98 c,e,f |
0.035**
,a,b
<0.001** ,c,e 0.012** ,f |
CRP, mg/L | 32.2 ± 2.8 | 50.3 ± 24.3 a | 134.3 ± 173.0 b | 623.2 ± 590.6 c,e,f |
<0.001*
,a,c,e
0.001* ,b 0.002* ,f |
D-dimer, ng/dL | 108.41 ± 19.10 | 249.32 ± 78.12 a | 618.03 ± 471.02 b,d | 1,091.72 ± 1,276.72 c,e |
<0.001*
,a,b,c,e
0.001* ,d |
Fibrinogen, mg/dL | 233.62 ± 25.6 | 325.10 ± 63.80 a | 408.09 ± 126.11 b | 462.16 ± 194.84 c,e |
0.007**
,a
<0.001** ,b,c,e |
-
The data are expressed as mean ± SD. ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CK, creatine kinase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; CRP, C-reactive protein. *Kruskal Wallis Testi (Post hoc: Mann Whitney U Testi); **One way ANOVA test (Post hoc: LSD). aComparison between control and mild group. bComparison between control and moderate group. cComparison between control and severe group. dComparison between mild and moderate group. eComparison between mild and severe group. fComparison between moderate and severe group. Bold values show p<0.05 and considered statistically significant.
Oxidative stress parameters (TAS, TOS and OSI) and pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6 and TNF-α) are shown in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. TAS levels were significantly decreased in all study groups compared to controls (mild p=0.026, moderate p=0.027 and severe p=0.001). On the other hand IL-6, TNF-α, TOS and OSI levels were significantly elevated in the severe group compared to other groups (p<0.001). However, the significant difference of IL-6, TOS and OSI levels between severe and other groups still existed after adjusting for the age (Figures 1D–F and 2CD–FC Figures 1D–F and 2C Figures 1D–F and 2C Figures 1D–F and 2C, D).

One way ANOVA test (Post hoc: LSD) was applied for figure 1a, 1b and 1c. Data were expressed as mean ± SD. a) TAS, total antioxidant status. *p=0.026, **p=0.027, ***p=0.001. b) TOS, total oxidant status. *p<0.001 c) OSI, oxidative stress index. *p<0.001, **p=0.007, ***p=0.014. The levels of TAS, TOS and OSI adjusted for the age were presented in figure 1d, 1e and 1f. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. d) *p=0.004, e) *p<0.0001, **p=0.001, ***p=0.005, ****p=0.031, f) *p>0.0001, p=0.002, p=0.025.

One way ANOVA test (Post hoc: LSD) was applied for figure 1a and 1b. Data were expressed as mean ± SD. a) IL-6: Interleukin-6. *p=0.014, **p=0.016, ***p<0.001. b) TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α. *p<0.001, **p=0.018, ***p=0.010, ****p=0.025 The levels of IL-6 and TNF-α adjusted for the age were presented in figure 1c and 1d. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. d) *p<0.0001, **p=0.003.
The correlation of pro-inflammatory and oxidative stress parameters were given in Table 4. Serum levels of TOS and OSI showed a positive moderate correlation with IL-6, CRP, ferritin, fibrinogen and D-dimer. And IL-6 levels were correlated with TNF-α, CRP, ferritin, fibrinogen and D-dimer.
Correlations between oxidative stress parameters, inflammation markers and coagulation markers.
Parameters | TAS, n=88 | TOS, n=88 | OSI, n=88 | IL-6, n=88 | TNF-α, n=88 | CRP, n=88 | Ferritin, n=88 | Fibrinogen, n=88 | D-dimer, n=88 | LDH, n=88 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAS | r-Value | −0.360 | −0.597 | −0.266 | NS | −0.253 | NS | NS | −0.326 | −0.261 | |
p-Value | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.012 | 0.018 | 0.002 | 0.014 | |||||
TOS | r-Value | −0.360 | 0.899 | 0.469 | NS | 0.569 | 0.447 | 0.463 | 0.646 | 0.587 | |
p-Value | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||
OSI | r-Value | −0.597 | 0.899 | 0.447 | NS | 0.532 | 0.414 | 0.392 | 0.619 | 0.506 | |
p-Value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||
IL-6 | r-Value | −0.266 | 0.469 | 0.447 | 0.592 | 0.647 | 0.511 | 0.485 | 0.591 | 0.587 | |
p-Value | 0.012 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
CRP | r-Value | −0.253 | 0.569 | 0.532 | 0.647 | 0.262 | 0.649 | 0.696 | 0.724 | 0.702 | |
p-Value | 0.018 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.014 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
Ferritin | r-Value | NS | 0.447 | 0.414 | 0.511 | NS | 0.649 | 0.570 | 0.656 | 0.669 | |
p-Value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||||
Fibrinogen | r-Value | NS | 0.463 | 0.392 | 0.485 | 0.220 | 0.696 | 0.570 | 0.608 | 0.743 | |
p-Value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.039 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||
LDH | r-Value | −0.261 | 0.587 | 0.506 | 0.587 | 0.284 | 0.702 | 0.669 | 0.743 | 0.767 | |
p-Value | 0.014 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.007 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
-
TAS, total antioxidant status; TOS, total oxidant status; OSI, oxidative stress index; IL-6, interleukin-6; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alfa; CRP, C-reactive protein; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; CK, creatinine kinase.
We performed ROC analyses to evaluate the diagnostic potential for the disease severity and detect the optimal cut-off values of laboratory, inflammatory and oxidative stress parameters in COVID-19 patients (Table 5 and Figure 3). We detected that areas under the ROC curve for TAS, TOS, OSI, ferritin, fibrinogen, D-dimer, TNF-α, IL-6 and CRP were 0.7077, 0.9557, 0.8890, 0.8210, 0.9443, 0.9925, 0.6852, 0.8730 and 0.8812, respectively. Also 95% confidence intervals for TOS, OSI, ferritin, fibrinogen, D-dimer, IL-6 and CRP were 0.9169–0.9946, 0.8236–0.9544, 0.7343–0.9076, 0.8983–0.9904, 0.9805–1.005, 0.7981–0.9480 and 0.8125–0.9499, respectively (p<0.0001).
Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and optimal cut-off values of TAS, TOS, OSI, ferritin, fibrinogen, D-dimer, TNF-α, IL-6 and CRP in patients with COVID-19.
Variables | AUC (95% CI) | Sensitivity % | Specificity % | Cut-off | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAS | 0.7077 (0.5848–0.8306) | 66.7 | 67.2 | 1.61 | =0.0028 |
TOS | 0.9557 (0.9169–0.9946) | 89.1 | 87.5 | 14.68 | <0.0001 |
OSI | 0.8890 (0.8236–0.9544) | 79.7 | 79.2 | 9.15 | <0.0001 |
Ferritin | 0.8210 (0.7343–0.9076) | 71.9 | 70.8 | 45.50 | <0.0001 |
Fibrinogen | 0.9443 (0.8983–0.9904) | 87.5 | 87.5 | 265.50 | <0.0001 |
D-dimer | 0.9925 (0.9805–1.005) | 96.9 | 95.8 | 143 | <0.0001 |
TNF-α | 0.6852 (0.5514–0.8190) | 64.1 | 62.5 | 35.3 | =0.008 |
IL-6 | 0.8730 (0.7981–0.9480) | 73.4 | 75.0 | 27.9 | <0.0001 |
CRP | 0.8812 (0.8125–0.9499) | 81.3 | 83.3 | 3.25 | <0.0001 |
-
AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; TAS, total antioxidant status; TOS, total oxidant status; OSI, oxidative stress index; IL-6, interleukin-6; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alfa; CRP, C-reactive protein.

AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; TAS, total antioxidant status; TOS, total oxidan status; OSI, oxidative stress index; IL-6, interleukin-6; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alfa; CRP, C-reactive protein.
Multiple regression analyses indicating CRP, D-dimer, fibrinogen, IL-6, LDH and ferritin with OSI in patients with COVID-19 are shown in Table 6. These results revealed that CRP and IL-6 might explain and the regression model was statistically significant (p<0.001 and p=0.022, respectively).
Multiple regression analysis indicating CRP, D-dimer, fibrinogen, IL-6, LDH and ferritin with OSI in patients with COVID-19.
Parameters | B | Std. error | p-Value | F | Adjusted R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRP | 0.073 | 0.021 | 0.001 | 5.49 | 0.236 |
D-dimer | −0.001 | 0.001 | 0.339 | ||
Fibrinogen | −0.008 | 0.004 | 0.066 | ||
IL-6 | 0.107 | 0.046 | 0.022 | ||
LDH | 0.006 | 0.008 | 0.501 | ||
Ferritin | −0.004 | 0.003 | 0.193 |
-
Model significance: p<0.001.
Discussion
This is the first study evaluating the systemic oxidative stress parameters in COVID-19 patients and their relationship with inflammation and disease severity. We found a significant deprivation in antioxidant defense mechanism and an increase in total oxidative stress in COVID-19 patients. TOS levels were also significantly different between study groups and related to disease severity. We also found a significant correlation in TOS and calculated OSI levels among IL-6, ferritin, D-dimer, CRP and fibrinogen. Serum pro-inflammatory cytokine levels were significantly different in mild, moderate and severe groups and IL-6 were significantly correlated with TNF-α, CRP, ferritin, fibrinogen and D-dimer.
There is strong evidence that deterioration of the antioxidant defense mechanism leads to increased oxidative stress [13]. Previous studies have suggested that the imbalance in oxidant and antioxidant systems plays an important role in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 [4, 14]. There is also a strong relationship between oxidative stress and inflammation caused by innate and adaptive immune systems in the disease progress [3, 15]. In the current study a significant increase was observed in TOS and OSI levels of study groups compared to controls (Figure 1). We also found that TOS and OSI levels were significantly different between severe moderate and mild groups (Figure 1). TOS levels measurement is based on the oxidation of Fe2+ to Fe3+ in acidic medium due to the presence of oxidant species [10]. And it is used to evaluate total oxidative stress. However OSI level is a better indicator for systemic balance because it is calculated as TOS and TAS ratio [11]. Up to now, there is no study in literature evaluating systemic oxidative balance using OSI in COVID-19. There are several mechanisms explaning increased oxidative stress in COVID-19. It has been shown that SARS-CoV-2 virus enters into alveolar epithelial cells by binding to ACE II receptors and blocks its activity. Diminished ACE II activity leads to increased angiotensin II levels, which has oxidant and pro-inflammatory properties [16]. The lungs are the primary affected organs in COVID-19. Virus infection also causes alveolar edema together with inflammation and leads to decreased oxygen saturation, which is another well-known contributor factor in ROS production [17]. Our results indicate that increased systemic oxidative stress is related to disease severity in patients with COVID-19. We also found that TOS and calculated OSI levels were correlated with ferritin, CRP, IL-6, fibrinogen and D-dimer levels. Additionally, area under the ROC curve for TOS and OSI were 0.9169–0.9946 (at cut-off value of 14.68 µmol H2O2 Eq/L) and 0.8236–0.9544 (at cut-off value of 9.15 arbitrary unit), respectively (p<0.0001). The area under the ROC curve for TOS and OSI were similar to D-dimer, fibrinogen and CRP (Table 5) and also the changes in calculated OSI levels were due to TOS levels. Therefore, TOS and OSI levels can be a new predictor marker for the disease severity and used in the management of the disease.
We also evaluated inflammatory cytokine levels. Serum IL-6 and CRP levels were significantly increased in the patient groups compared to the controls (Figure 2 and Table 3). IL-6 were also significantly different between severe, moderate and mild groups. Serum IL-6 levels seem related to disease severity. There is a moderate correlation between IL-6 and CRP (Table 4) and IL-6 were correlated with OSI values (r=0.447, p<0.001). Area under the ROC curve for IL-6 and CRP were 0.7981–0.9480 and 0.8125–0.9499, respectively (p<0.0001). Moreover, multiple regression analyses showed that 23% of the alterations in OSI values might be explained by CRP and IL-6, and the regression model was statistically significant (p<0.001 and 0.022, Table 6). These results implicate that IL-6 and CRP significantly contributed to the changes in the OSI levels. Besides, increased pro-inflammatory cytokines are related with systemic oxidative balance and play a role together in the progression of the disease. These findings also support the previous studies suggesting a positive feedback loop between inflammation and oxidative stress in COVID-19.
Ferritin is another inflammatory marker and several studies have shown that ferritin levels were increased in COVID-19 [18]. In the current study we found higher ferritin levels in all study groups compared to controls (Table 3). Ferritin is an acute phase reactant and plays an important role in iron metabolism. Free iron is highly toxic for tissues because it causes oxidative damage through fenton reaction. In a recent study, Liu W et al. suggested that viral proteins attack hemoglobin beta chains and lead to iron relase, which make contribution to the tissue damage [19]. Ferritin is used to storage free iron in tissues to prevent oxidative stress. Therefore, increased ferritin levels in COVID-19 is an expected result and can be related to prevention of iron toxicity [18]. However, in our study, ferritin levels were more prominent in patients with severe disease (p<0.001) and correlated with systemic oxidative (TOS and OSI) and inflammatory (IL-6, CRP) parameters (Table 4).
Another contributing factor responsible for disturbed oxidative balance is excessive consumption of antioxidant substrates. It has been shown in many disorders including pulmoner diseases, HIV infections, and age related disorders [20, 21]. The excessive consumption of antioxidants can contribute to the disease progression in SARS CoV-2 infection [14]. Previous studies showed that SARS-CoV-2 virus reduce glutathione production [14, 22, 23]. But there is no study evaluating TAS levels in COVID-19. In this study, we evaluated serum TAS levels and found significant decrease in mild, moderate and severe groups compared to healthy controls (Figure 1). TAS assay shows total antioxidant capacity and briefly based on the principle of initiating colored dianisidyl radicals due to hydroxyl radicals produced by fenton reaction. Potential antioxidant substrates in serum such as vitamin C, reduced glutathione, bilirubin and uric acid are suppressed the color formation depending on their concentrations as an indicator of serum total antioxidant capacity [9]. It can be suggested that decreased TAS levels may be due to the consumption of serum antioxidants including glutathione in COVID-19 patients. And this consumption is initiated from the early stage of the disease (Figure 1).
It is well known that fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products and D-dimer increase in COVID-19 [3, 15]. We found significant elevation in levels of fibrinogen and D-dimer in patient groups and confirmed the previous studies (Table 3). However, we found significant correlations between fibrinogen and D-dimer levels with TOS, OSI, IL-6, CRP and ferritin. These results implicate that fibrinogen and D-dimer levels are related to the increased oxidative stress and inflammation in COVID-19.
COVID-19 patients with comorbidities have a poor prognosis and underlying diseases such as hypertension, cardiac disease etc. have been reported as risk factors for severe disease and death. Of the 64 patients included in our study, 22 (34.4%, Table 2) patients had comorbidities including DM, hypertension, CHD, CKD, and CPD. Consistent with the literature, the rate of comorbidities in patients in the severe group was higher than other groups [24, 25]. Serum AST, CK, LDH activites and creatinine levels were significantly higher only in severe group compared to controls. But only CK and LDH levels were above the reference ranges. LDH enzyme levels indicate heart, lung, kidney, muscle tissue and erythrocyte damage. It increases due to multipl organ damage in COVID-19 patients [3, 26]. In this study, LDH enzyme activities were correlated with oxidative stress and inflammatory parameters (Table 4). Our study results support that the increasing LDH levels were associated with disease severity in COVID-19.
The small sample size due to single-center design is one of the limitations of this study. Another limitation is that critically ill patients were not included in the study group.
Conclusions
In the present study, TOS and OSI levels were increased due to the disease severity and showed a positive correlation with other prognostic markers, including inflammatory and coagulation markers. The measurement of TOS levels and calculated OSI values, an inexpensive and automated method, can be an important marker for evaluating the disease severity and used in the management of COVID-19 patients.
References
1. Jose, RJ, Manuel, A. COVID-19 cytokine storm: the interplay between inflammation and coagulation. Lancet Respir Med 2020;8:e46–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30216-2.Search in Google Scholar
2. Zhang, C, Wu, Z, Li, JW, Zhao, H, Wang, GQ. Cytokine release syndrome in severe COVID-19: interleukin-6 receptor antagonist tocilizumab may be the key to reduce mortality. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2020;55:105954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105954.Search in Google Scholar
3. Ponti, G, Maccaferri, M, Ruini, C, Tomasi, A, Ozben, T. Biomarkers associated with COVID-19 disease progression. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2020;57:389–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2020.1770685.Search in Google Scholar
4. Delgado-Roche, L, Mesta, F. Oxidative stress as key player in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) infection. Arch Med Res 2020;51:384–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.04.019.Search in Google Scholar
5. Smits, SL, de Lang, A, van den Brand, JM, Leijten, LM, van IJcken, WF, Eijkemans, MJ, et al.. Exacerbated innate host response to SARS-CoV in aged non-human primates. PLoS Pathog 2010;6:e1000756. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000756.Search in Google Scholar
6. van den Brand, JM, Haagmans, BL, van Riel, D, Osterhaus, AD, Kuiken, T. The pathology and pathogenesis of experimental severe acute respiratory syndrome and influenza in animal models. J Comp Pathol 2014;151:83–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcpa.2014.01.004.Search in Google Scholar
7. Sönmez, D, Özcan, O. COVID-19 patogenezinde oksidatif stresin rolü. In: Yücel, D, editör. COVID-19 Pandemisinde Tıbbi Biyokimyanın Artan Rolü. 1. Baskı. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri; 2021:68–74 pp.Search in Google Scholar
8. Zhang, Z, Rong, L, Li, YP. Flaviviridae viruses and oxidative stress: implications for viral pathogenesis. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2019;2019:1409582. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1409582.Search in Google Scholar
9. Erel, O. A novel automated method to measure total antioxidant response against potent free radical reactions. Clin Biochem 2004;37:112–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2003.10.014.Search in Google Scholar
10. Erel, O. A new automated colorimetric method for measuring total oxidant status. Clin Biochem 2005;38:1103–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2005.08.008.Search in Google Scholar
11. Soylu Karapinar, O, Pinar, N, Özcan, O, Özgür, T, Dolapçıoğlu, K. Protective effect of alpha-lipoic acid in methotrexate-induced ovarian oxidative injury and decreased ovarian reserve in rats. Gynecol Endocrinol 2017;33:653–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2017.1306847.Search in Google Scholar
12. Saatçi, E. Newly developed diagnostic methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Turk J Biochem 2020;45:465–74. https://doi.org/10.1515/tjb-2020-0218.Search in Google Scholar
13. Sies, H. Oxidative stress: a concept in redox biology and medicine. Redox Biol 2015;4:180–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2015.01.002.Search in Google Scholar
14. Suhail, S, Zajac, J, Fossum, C, Lowater, H, McCracken, C, Severson, N, et al.. Role of oxidative stress on SARS-CoV (SARS) and SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection: a review. Protein J 2020;39:644–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-020-09935-8.Search in Google Scholar
15. Schönrich, G, Raftery, MJ, Samstag, Y. Devilishly radical NETwork in COVID-19: oxidative stress, neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), and T cell suppression. Adv Biol Regul 2020;77:100741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbior.2020.100741.Search in Google Scholar
16. Casalino, L, Gaieb, Z, Goldsmith, JA, Hjorth, CK, Dommer, AC, Harbison, AM, Fogarty, CA, Barros, EP, Taylor, BC, McLellan, JS, Fadda, E, Amaro, RE. Beyond shielding: the roles of glycans in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. ACS Cent Sci 2020;6:1722–1734.10.1021/acscentsci.0c01056Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
17. Derouiche, S. Oxidative stress associated with SARS-Cov-2 (COVID-19) increases the severity of the lung disease – a systematic review. J Infect Dis Epidemiol 2020;6:121.10.23937/2474-3658/1510121Search in Google Scholar
18. Cheng, L, Li, H, Li, L, Liu, C, Yan, S, Chen, H, et al.. Ferritin in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Lab Anal 2020;34:e23618. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23618.Search in Google Scholar
19. Liu, W, Li, H. COVID-19: attacks the 1-beta chain of hemoglobin and captures the porphyrin to inhibit human heme metabolism. ChemRxiv Preprint 2020. 10.26434/chemrxiv.11938173.v9.Search in Google Scholar
20. Cecchini, R, Cecchini, AL. SARS-CoV-2 infection pathogenesis is related to oxidative stress as a response to aggression. Med Hypotheses 2020;143:110102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110102.Search in Google Scholar
21. Ivanov, AV, Valuev-Elliston, VT, Ivanova, ON, Kochetkov, SN, Starodubova, ES, Bartosch, B, et al.. Oxidative stress during HIV infection: mechanisms and consequences. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2016;2016:8910396. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8910396.Search in Google Scholar
22. Polonikov, A. Endogenous deficiency of glutathione as the most likely cause of serious manifestations and death in COVID-19 patients. ACS Infect Dis 2020;6:1558–62. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00288.Search in Google Scholar
23. Horowitz, RI, Freeman, PR, Bruzzese, J. Efficacy of glutathione therapy in relieving dyspnea associated with COVID-19 pneumonia: a report of two cases. Respir Med Case Rep 2020;30:101063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmcr.2020.101063.Search in Google Scholar
24. Kaur, N, Gupta, I, Singh, H, Karia, R, Ashraf, A, Habib, A, et al.. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 6635 COVID-19 patients: a pooled analysis. SN Compr Clin Med 2020 Jul 9:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-020-00393-y [Epub ahead of print].Search in Google Scholar
25. Özger, HS, Aysert Yildiz, P, Gaygisiz, Ü, Dikmen, AU, Gülmez, ZD, Yıldız, M, et al.. The factors predicting pneumonia in COVID-19 patients: preliminary results of a university hospital in Turkey. Turk J Med Sci 2020 Jun 30. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-2005-385 [Epub ahead of print].Search in Google Scholar
26. Aggarwal, S, Garcia-Telles, N, Aggarwal, G, Lavie, C, Lippi, G, Henry, BM. Clinical features, laboratory characteristics, and outcomes of patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): early report from the United States. Diagnosis (Berl) 2020;7:91–6. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2020-0046.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Serdar Doğan et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Call for emergency action to limit global temperature increases, restore biodiversity, and protect health
- Review Article
- HPLC and LC-MS/MS measurement methods for the quantification of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and related metabolites
- Research Articles
- Oxidative stress index can be a new marker related to disease severity in COVID-19
- Immature platelet fraction: is a novel early predictive marker for disease severity in patients with Covid-19 pneumonia?
- Comparison of biochemical and immunological biomarker levels of patients with COVID-19 with healthy individuals
- Biochemistry laboratory errors and patient safety: Turkey data
- Amino acid metabolism disorders and PAH gene mutations in Southeastern Anatolia Region
- Blood lead level in school going children of Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
- Opinion Paper
- An important source of preanalytical error in medical laboratories: centrifugation
- Research Articles
- Effects of eccentric exercise-induced delayed onset muscle soreness on endoplasmic reticulum stress-related markers
- Increased vitamin D binding protein levels are associated with irritable bowel syndrome
- Effects of resveratrol against scattered radiation-induced testicular damage in rats
- Estradiol differentially regulates DUX4, β-catenin and PAX3/PAX7 in primary myoblasts of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy patients
- Evaluation of potential tumor markers that may predict neoadjuvant treatment efficiency in rectal cancer
- Association of CYP2D6*4 gene polymorphism with early papillary thyroid carcinoma
- Influence of calcitonin gene-related peptide on model mice with acute pancreatitis
- The effects of oral steroid therapy on prolidase enzyme activity in patients with nasal polyps
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Call for emergency action to limit global temperature increases, restore biodiversity, and protect health
- Review Article
- HPLC and LC-MS/MS measurement methods for the quantification of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and related metabolites
- Research Articles
- Oxidative stress index can be a new marker related to disease severity in COVID-19
- Immature platelet fraction: is a novel early predictive marker for disease severity in patients with Covid-19 pneumonia?
- Comparison of biochemical and immunological biomarker levels of patients with COVID-19 with healthy individuals
- Biochemistry laboratory errors and patient safety: Turkey data
- Amino acid metabolism disorders and PAH gene mutations in Southeastern Anatolia Region
- Blood lead level in school going children of Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
- Opinion Paper
- An important source of preanalytical error in medical laboratories: centrifugation
- Research Articles
- Effects of eccentric exercise-induced delayed onset muscle soreness on endoplasmic reticulum stress-related markers
- Increased vitamin D binding protein levels are associated with irritable bowel syndrome
- Effects of resveratrol against scattered radiation-induced testicular damage in rats
- Estradiol differentially regulates DUX4, β-catenin and PAX3/PAX7 in primary myoblasts of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy patients
- Evaluation of potential tumor markers that may predict neoadjuvant treatment efficiency in rectal cancer
- Association of CYP2D6*4 gene polymorphism with early papillary thyroid carcinoma
- Influence of calcitonin gene-related peptide on model mice with acute pancreatitis
- The effects of oral steroid therapy on prolidase enzyme activity in patients with nasal polyps