Abstract
Aim
In this research, the effects of two elicitors [jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA)] on the accumulation of essential oils in the seed cultures of Sage (Salvia officinalis L.) were studied.
Materials and methods
This research was conducted at the research field of Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord branch located at 50°56/E longitude, 32°18/N latitude during 2015 and 2016. The study area was classified as semi cold with an average temperature of 11.5°C and semi-arid with 329.9 mm of average rainfall. Seeds of sage were planted under field conditions. The following treatments were applied after the plants had four leaves: water, acetone, JA (0.1051, 0.2102, 0.4204, 0.8408 g/L), SA (0.0138, 0.138, 0.276, 0.552 g/L) and control.
Results
Twenty-seven essential oils were obtained and the most notable were: α-pinene, limonene, β-pinene, camphor, thymol, camphene, thujone-trans, thujone-cis, 1,8-cineole, borneol, borneol acetate, carvacrol, α-humulene, caryophyllene. JA was more effective in stimulating the accumulation of α-pinene, limonene, β-pinene, camphor, thymol, camphene, thujone-trans, thujone-cis, 1,8-cineole, borneol, borneol acetate, carvacrol, α-humulene and caryophyllene.
Conclusion
JA and SA had increasing effects on essential oils. The best treatments were found to be JA 0.1051 g/L, JA 0.2102 g/L and SA 0.138 g/L.
Özet
Amaç
Bu çalışmada iki elisitörün [jasmonic acid (JA) ve salicylic acid (SA)], adaçayının (Salvia officinalis L.) tohum kültürlerinde uçucu yağların birikimi üzerine etkileri araştırılmıştır.
Gereç ve yöntemler
Bu araştırma, 2015 ve 2016 yılları arasında 50°56/E enlem, 32°18/N enleminde bulunan İslam Azad Üniversitesi Shahrekord Şubesi araştırma alanında yürütülmüştür. Çalışma alanı, yarı soğuk, ortalama sıcaklık 11.5°C ve yarı kurak 329.9 mm ortalama yağışa sahip olarak sınıflandırıldı. Ada çayı tohumları tarla koşullarında ekildi. Şu uygulamalar bitkiler 4 yaprak sahibi olduktan sonra uygulandı: su, aseton, JA (0.1051, 0.2102, 0.4204, 0.8408 g/L), SA (0.0138, 0.138, 0.276, 0.552 g/L) ve kontrol.
Bulgular
Yirmi yedi (27) uçucu yağ elde edildi ve en dikkat çekici olanlar şunlardı: α-pinen, limonen, β-pinen, kamfor, timol, kamfen, thujone-trans, thujone-cis, 1,8-sineol, borneol, borneol asetat, karvacrol, α-humulen, karyofilen. JA, α-pinen, limonen, β-pinen, kamfor, timol, kamfen, thujone-trans, thujone-cis, 1,8-sineol, borneol, borneol asetat, karvakrol, α-humulen ve karyofillen birikiminin uyarılmasında daha etkili olmuştur.
Sonuç
JA ve SA esansiyel yağlar üzerinde artan etkilere sahiptir. En iyi uygulamaların JA 0.1051 g/L, JA 0.2102 g/L ve SA 0.138 g/L olduğu bulunmuştur.
Introduction
Salvia officinalis (Lamiaceae) is one of the most important medicinal and aromatic plants, with antioxidant, antimicrobial, spasmolytic, astringent, anti hidrotic and specific sensorial properties. Its essential oil is mainly composed of monoterpens. 1,8-cineole, thujone and camphor are responsible for some of these effects. The extraction of essential oil depends on genetic and environmental properties, as well as the process and fresh weight of the plant. The genus Salvia (Labiatae) contains more than 700 species of which about 200 exist in Iran. Plants belonging to this genus are pharmacologically active and have been used in folk medicine all around the world. Salvia seeds are small and round, with a mucilage layer on their surface which swells in water to give a viscous suspension [1, 2].
Salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) are signal molecules participating in the mechanism of plant resistance to related diseases, especially with the induction of pro-antioxidant system generation in plant tissues. Since both SA and JA improve plant resistance to diseases and improve plant productivity, this combination is applied in agriculture [3, 4]. Salicylic acid, a naturally occurring plant hormone, acts as an important signaling molecule in plants, and has diverse effects on abiotic stress tolerance. The exogenous application of SA may be involved in the regulation of plant physiological processes such as stomata closure, ion uptake and transport, membrane permeability, as well as photosynthesis and growth [5]. Its role in abiotic stress tolerance and osmotic stress has been reported [6, 7]. The phenolic compound of SA plays a vital role in the defense response against many pathogens which induce the expression of many defense related genes [8]. There was an increase in the process of tolerance to different stresses by SA [9], and the greatest effect was found in many elicitors [10]. Low levels of salinity result in a decrease in germination and have no effect on high levels of salinity [11]. SA increased due to resistance to stresses such as salt stress. The foliar application of this elicitor resulted in greater root, shoot and total dry weights of calendula plants under salt stress [12], decreased effects and damage of drought stress on germination and seedlings growth [1], increased photosynthetic pigments, NPK, Fe, Zn, Mn, total carbohydrates and crude protein concentrations in leaves [13]. SA reformed and detoxified super oxide radicals which yielded beneficial physiological and morphological effects and produced a salt tolerant variety [14]. Nutrients significantly increased the number of umbel per coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) but SA had the opposite effect [15]. In pepper, SA increased growth and development [16]. Under Cu-stressed condition, SA induced the synthesis of polypeptides and translocation of Cu and/or increased Cu-binding proteins [17]. SA decreased polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase. It seems that SA can considerably alleviate the oxidative damage that occurs under cold stress condition. SA decreased the activity of antioxidant enzymes, reduced disease severity and increased the amount of secondary compounds in infected and non-infected daisy plants. SA failed to show any stimulatory effect on either cell growth or hypericin production [18]. The application of JA in stressed plants reduced the amount of lipid peroxidation, stimulated the synthesis of antioxidant enzymes, and enhanced the content and yield of artemisinin [3]. The JA elicitor (100 μM) enhanced total isoflavones production and stimulated the accumulation of daidzein and genistein in Puerarialobata [19]. JA reduced transpiration and membrane-lipid peroxidation as expressed by malondialdehyde in strawberry plants [20].
This research was conducted in 2 years, so as to evaluate the effects of the two elicitors [jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA)] on the essential oils content and composition in the seed cultures of Sage (S. officinalis L.).
Materials and methods
Sage (S. officinalis L.) seeds were obtained from the Iranian Seeds and Plant Improvement Institute, and planted in field condition. The following treatments were applied after the plants had four leaves: T1, water; T2, acetone; T3, JA 0.1051 g/L; T4, JA 0.2102 g/L; T5, JA 0.4204 g/L; T6, JA 0.8408 g/L; T7, SA 0.0138 g/L; T8, SA 0.138 g/L; T9, SA 0.276 g/L; T10, SA 0.552 g/L and control (without water, acetone, JA and SA). Field trials were established in 2015 and 2016 at Shahrekord (50°56/E 32°18/N) South Western Iran. The region has an elevation of 2060 m, annual precipitation of 329.9 mm, and average minimum, maximum and annual temperatures of −31°C, 27°C and 12°C, respectively. The soil (Typic calci xerocrepts) physical and chemical properties are shown in Table 1.
Some physical and chemical properties of soil for experiment (0–30) cm.
| Year | Texture | E. C (μmho⋅cm−1) | % | pH | mg⋅kg−1 (ppm) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ntotal | O. C | Kava | Pava | Znava | Mnava | Feava | Cuava | ||||
| 2015 | Loam | 8.1 | 0.11 | 0.2 | 8.2 | 770 | 45 | 0.97 | 11.2 | 8.1 | 1.3 |
| 2016 | Loam | 7.8 | 0.11 | 0.2 | 8.1 | 745 | 44 | 1 | 10.1 | 7.1 | 1.1 |
The topsoil of the experimental plot area was kept moist throughout the growing season when necessary. After soil test, the required nutrients were added to the soil. Seeds were sown in pots in the farm condition on 22 May, 2015 and 20 May, 2016.
Fresh aerial S. officinalis tissues were dried for 10 days at room temperature (25±5°C), and then ground to fine powder using a Moulinex food processor. The essential oil was extracted by heating 50 g of leaf tissue in a 2 L flask with 1 L water, using a heating jacket at 100°C for 3 h in a Clevenger-type apparatus, according to the procedures outlined by the British Pharmacopeia. Voucher specimens (20071-TUH) were those described and deposited in the Herbarium of the Center of Agricultural and Natural Resources of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province, Shahrekord, Iran.
The essential oil content was determined by distilling tissues in Clevenger type apparatus. One thousand gram of plant tissues were placed in 6 L Clevenger-type distillation apparatuses and distilled for 5 h in 3 L of pure water. The quantities of plant oils obtained at the end of distillation were measured in mL and ratios (% w/w) were determined by multiplying oil content with oil density (i.e. 0.858 g⋅cm3). All the essential oil samples were dried over hydrous sodium sulfate, and stored at 4°C until GC and GC-MS analyses.
Ground GC analysis was done using Agilent Technologies 7890 GC equipped with FID and a HP-5MS 5% capillary column. The carrier gas was helium at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. The initial column temperature was 60°C and it was programmed to increase at 4°C/min to 280°C. The split ratio was 40:1. The injector temperature was set at 300°C. GC-MS analyses were conducted on a Thermo Finnegan Trace 2000 GC/MS, made in the USA, employed with a HP-5MS capillary column (30 m long and 0.25 mm wide, and a 0.25 μm of film thickness) using an injector chamber at a temperature of 250°C. Oven temperature was held at 120°C for 5 min and then programmed to reach 280°C at a rate of 10°C/min. The temperature of the detector and injector was 260°C. The composition of the essential oil was identified by comparing retention indices relative to a series of n-alkanes (C7-C24); retention times and mass spectra were those of authentic samples from Wiley’s library [21].
The experiments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications, and 100 plants were used for each trial. All data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the statistical computer package SAS and treatment means were separated using L.S.D multiple range test at p<0.05 level.
Results and discussion
Plant hormone treatment is a simple, eco-friendly and relatively commercially viable method of increasing the synthesis of phytochemicals; therefore, it may be used to improve the quality of the essential oil of sage plants. Most studies have reported that JA and SA are two naturally occurring plant growth regulators involved in various aspects of plant development and response to biotic and abiotic stresses. The reports focused on their beneficial roles on defense mechanisms in stress conditions such as salinity, drought and pathogens. In this research, the role of these phytohormones on the accumulation of the important components in essential oil, was studied in 2 years. JA and SA had increasing effects on the essential oils. It was found that components of β-pinene, thymol, thujone-trans, thujone-cis, 1,8-cineole, borneol, by SA treatments and other components such as camphor, camphene, borneol acetate, and carvacrol, were significantly increased by JA treatments.
The results showed that the best treatments were JA 0.1051, JA 0.2102 g/L and SA 0.138 g/L. After injecting 0.1 μL of each essence in GC-MS, 27 essential oil compositions were obtained of which the most notable were: α-pinene, limonene, β-pinene, camphor, thymol, camphene, thujone-trans, thujone-cis, 1,8-cineole, borneol, borneol acetate, manol, carvacrol, manool, α-humulene and caryophyllene (Tables 2–4). A decrease in thujone-cis led to a decrease in thujone-trans; and in the treatments, carvacrol was obtained, but viridiflorol was not obtained. In JA treatments, the most amount of camphor; carvacrol and thymol; thujone-cis made, camphene, borneol, borneol acetate, α-humulene and caryophyllene made by 0.1051 g/L, 0.2102 g/L and 0.4204 g/L, respectively. In JA treatments, the least amount of carvacrol and thymol; borneol, borneol acetate, α-humulene and caryophyllene; camphene, α-pinene, β-pinene, thujone-trans, thujone-cis and 1,8-cineole produced by 0.1051 g/L, 0.2102 g/L and 0.4204 g/L. In SA treatments; the least amount of borneol, camphor, thujone-trans and thujone-cis; β-pinene, camphene, 1,8-cineole, α-humulene and caryophyllene; thymol and borneol acetate; α-pinene made by 0.0138 g/L, 0.138 g/L, 0.276 g/L and 0.552 g/L, respectively. In SA treatments the most amount of α-pinene, β-pinene, camphene and viridiflorol; thujone-trans, thujone-cis and manol; camphor; thymol, borneol and borneol acetate were produced by 0.0138 g/L, 0.138 g/L, 0.276 g/L and 0.552 g/L, respectively. At 0.1051 and 0.2102 g/L, JA enhanced the production of camphor, thymol and carvacrol. Although 0.138 g/L SA resulted in the same total production of many essential oils like β-pinene, camphor, thymol, thujone-cis, carvacrol, α-humulene and caryophyllene which were less produced in JA (0.1051 and 0.2102 g/L). In all treatments, the control plants made the most amount of borneol acetate and the least amount of α-pinene, β-pinene and camphene. In all treatments, acetone had the greatest amount of limonene, β-pinene and the least amount of borneol acetate. In the water treatment, the most amount of α-pinene, manol, viridiflorol, α-humulene and caryophyllene and the least amount of camphor, borneol, thujone-cis and 1,8-cineole were obtained. The results showed that by increasing carvacrol and borneol acetate, α-humulene and caryophyllene decreased; and on the other hand, by increasing camphor and β-pinene, borneol and viridiflorol decreased. A negative relationship was found among camphene, thujone-trans and thujone-cis (Tables 5 and 6). Limonene was only detected in acetone and the control treatments. Thymol was obtained in all the SA treatments but was only detected in JA 0.2102 g/L. The maximum amount of thujone-trans was produced in SA 0.138 g/L and SA 0.276 g/L treatments. The most and least amounts of 1,8-cineole were obtained in SA 0.276 g/L and the water treatments, respectively. Manool was obtained only in SA 0.138 g/L and water treatments. Carvacrol was detected only in JA treatments, but only viridiflorol was not obtained in these treatments. Significant differences were found between the treatments in 2 years (Table 4). The maximum quantity of essence was detected in JA 0.2102 g/L and SA 0.138 g/L, in 2 years (Figure 1).
Percentage of essential oils compositions in two elicitors [jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA)] in first year.
| Treatment | α-Pinene | Camphene | β-Pinene | 1,8-Cineole | Thujone-cis | Thujone-trans | Camphor | Borneol | Borneol acetate | Carvacrol | Caryophyllene | α-Humulene | Thymol | Viridiflorol | Manol | Limonene |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JA (0.1051 g/L) | 4.2±0.2b | 3.59±0.1c | 2.25±0.2b | 11.52±0.5ab | 28.42±0.6b | 10.6±0.5b | 18.65±0.6a | 2.04±0.1b | 2.52±0.1a | 0.08 ±0.001b | 2.08±0.1b | 5.19±0.4b | 0±0b | 0±0c | 0±0c | 0±0b |
| JA (0.2102 g/L) | 4.08±0.2bc | 3.6±0.2c | 2.38±0.1b | 11.23±0.5b | 25.73±0.8c | 9.89±0.2c | 15.87±0.5b | 1.59±0.2c | 2.23±0.2a | 0.48 ±0.01a | 1.76±0.2c | 3.09±0.1c | 0.35±0.3a | 0±0c | 0±0c | 0±0b |
| JA (0.4204 g/L) | 4.11±0.2bc | 3.52±0.2c | 2.25±0.1b | 10.58±0.5b | 25.85±0.8c | 8.64±0.2c | 16.06±0.5b | 1.88±0.1bc | 2.38±0.1a | 0.09 ±0.001b | 1.88±0.1c | 4.76±0.6c | 0±0b | 0±0c | 0±0c | 0±0b |
| JA (0.8408 g/L) | 3.87±0.2c | 5.25±0.1a | 2.08±0.2b | 9.45±0.5bc | 24.3±0.6c | 8.43±0.5c | 16.45±0.4ab | 1.93±0.1bc | 2.52±0.1a | 0.08 ±0.001b | 2.58±0.1b | 5.89±0.1b | 0±0b | 0±0c | 0±0c | 0±0b |
| SA (0.0138 g/L) | 4.54±0.2b | 4.11±0.2b | 2.79±0.2ab | 12.46±0.4a | 27.75±0.8b | 0.53±0.2d | 15.33±0.7b | 1.69±0.2c | 2.22±0.2a | 0±0c | 1.87±0.2c | 4.04±0.4c | 0.35±0.02a | 3.67±0.4b | 0±0c | 0±0b |
| SA (0.138 g/L) | 3.27±0.1d | 3.01±0.2dc | 1.79±0.2c | 10.8±0.3c | 32.14±0.8a | 12.5±0.6a | 16.55±0.8ab | 1.79±0.1c | 2.18±0.1a | 0±0c | 0±0d | 2.14±0.1c | 0.35±0.05a | 2.21±0.4b | 0.53±0.01b | 0±0b |
| SA (0.276 g/L) | 3.39±0.3d | 3.41±0.4 | 2.52±0.1b | 12.09±0.6a | 29.6±0.6b | 11.8±0.5a | 17.6±0.9a | 1.9±0.24bc | 2.12±0.1a | 0±0c | 1.43±0.2c | 3.23±0.3c | 0.28±0.06a | 2.49±0.6b | 0±0c | 0±0b |
| SA (0.552 g/L) | 3.06±0.2d | 3.41±0.1c | 2.1±0.3bc | 12.05±0.6a | 28.6±0.4b | 10.6±0.5b | 16.4±0.5ab | 3±0.1a | 2.32±0.2a | 0±0c | 1.43±0.2c | 4.2±0.3c | 0.4±0.1a | 2.22±0.2b | 0±0c | 0±0b |
| Aceton | 4.11±0.2b | 3.51±0.2c | 3.19±0.2a | 10.46±0.5bc | 27.36±0.7b | 11±0.5a | 17.93±0.8a | 1.68±0.2c | 2.01±0.1a | 0±0c | 0±0d | 4.47±0.2bc | 0±0b | 3.05±0.1b | 0±0c | 1.69±0.1a |
| Water | 5.32±0.2a | 3.27±0.1c | 2.33±0.1b | 4.8±0.7e | 21.78±0.6d | 6.61±0.5c | 9.67±0.1d | 0.74±0.1d | 0±0b | 0±0c | 4.06±0.7a | 11.49±0.9a | 0±0b | 10.16±0.5a | 5.36±0.3a | 0±0b |
| Control | 2.64±0.1e | 2.68±0.2d | 1.43±0.1c | 7.18±0.3d | 25.13±0.6c | 7.3±0.4c | 15.46±0.9c | 1.9±0.4bc | 2.62±0.1a | 0±0c | 2.24±0.4b | 6.32±0.6b | 0±0b | 8±0.4a | 0±0c | 1.44±0.1a |
| C. V | 0.8 | 0.9 | 2.6 | 1 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 3.9 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 10.1 | 5.2 | 1.5 |
Means in each column followed by the same letters are not significantly different (p<0.05).
Percentage of essential oils composition in two elicitors [jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA)] in second year.
| Treatment | α-Pinene | Camphene | β-Pinene | 1,8-Cineole | Thujone-cis | Thujone-trans | Camphor | Borneol | Borneol acetate | Carvacrol | Caryophyllene | α-Humulene | Thymol | Viridiflorol | Manol | Limonene |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JA (0.1051 g/L) | 4.4±0.1b | 3.79±0.1c | 2.65±0.2b | 11.82±0.4b | 28.02±0.6c | 11±0.5b | 18.85±0.6a | 2.44±0.1b | 2.3±0.1a | 0.08 ±0.01b | 2.48±0.01d | 5.49±0.4c | 0±0b | 0±0e | 0±0c | 0±0c |
| JA (0.2102 g/L) | 4.28±0.2b | 3.8±0.2c | 2.78±0.1b | 11.53±0.5b | 25.53±0.8d | 10.31±0.2b | 16.07±0.5b | 1.99±0.2c | 2.03±0.2a | 0.28 ±0.01a | 2.2±0.02e | 3.29±0.1e | 0.75±0.3a | 0±0e | 0±0c | 0±0c |
| JA (0.4204 g/L) | 4.31±0.1b | 3.82±0.2c | 2.65±0.1b | 10.88±0.5c | 25.65±0.8d | 9.06±0.2c | 16.26±0.5b | 2.22±0.1b | 2.18±0.1ab | 0.09 ±0.01b | 2.22±0.01e | 4.96±0.6c | 0±0b | 0±0e | 0±0c | 0±0c |
| JA (0.8408 g/L) | 4.07±0.2bc | 5.55±0.1a | 2.48±0.2b | 9.75±0.2d | 23.83±0.6e | 8.83±0.5c | 16.65±0.4b | 2.27±0.1b | 2.3±0.1ab | 0.08 ±0.01b | 2.98±0.01b | 6.11±0.1b | 0±0b | 0±0e | 0±0c | 0±0c |
| SA (0.0138 g/L) | 4.74±0.2b | 4.41±0.2b | 3.2±0.2a | 12.76±0.4a | 27.55±0.8c | 0.93±0.2d | 15.53±0.7b | 2.1±0.2b | 2.02±0.2ab | 0±0c | 2.23±0.02e | 4.24±0.4c | 0.75±0.02a | 4.07±0.4c | 0±0c | 0±0c |
| SA (0.138 g/L) | 3.47±0.1c | 3.31±0.1c | 2.2±0.3bc | 11.39±0.3b | 31.94±0.8a | 13.25±0.6a | 16.75±0.8b | 2.2±0.1b | 1.92±0.1b | 0±0c | 0±0g | 2.34±0.4e | 0.75±0.05a | 2.61±0.4d | 0.33±0.01b | 0±0c |
| SA (0.276 g/L) | 3.59±0.3c | 3.71±0.4c | 2.52±0.1b | 12.69±0.6a | 29.49±0.6b | 11.88±0.5b | 17.4±0.9a | 2.3±0.2b | 1.88±0.1b | 0±0c | 1.83±0.02f | 3.03±0.3e | 0.68±0.06a | 2.89±0.6d | 0±0c | 0±0c |
| SA (0.552 g/L) | 3.26±0.2c | 3.71±0.1c | 2.5±0.1b | 12.65±0.6a | 28.4±0.4bc | 11±0.5b | 16.6±0.5b | 3.2±0.1a | 2.1±0.2ab | 0±0c | 1.83±0.02f | 4±0.3c | 0.8±0.01a | 2.62±0.2d | 0±0c | 0±0c |
| Aceton | 4.31±0.2b | 3.81±0.2c | 3.59±0.2a | 11.06±0.5b | 27.16±0.7c | 11.4±0.5b | 18.17±0.8a | 1.88±0.2c | 1.8±0.1b | 0±0c | 0±0g | 4.27±0.2c | 0±0b | 3.45±0.1c | 0±0c | 1.29±0.1a |
| Water | 5.52±0.2a | 3.57±0.1c | 2.73±0.1b | 5.44±0.7f | 21.58±0.6f | 7±0.5c | 9.87±0.1c | 0.94±0.1d | 0±0c | 0±0c | 4.46±0.07a | 11.29±0.9a | 0±0b | 10.56±0.5a | 5.16±0.3a | 0±0c |
| Control | 2.84±0.1d | 2.98±0.2d | 1.83±0.1c | 7.78±0.3e | 24.93±0.6de | 7.43±0.4c | 15.66±0.9b | 2.11±0.1b | 2.42±0.4a | 0±0c | 2.64±0.04c | 6.12±0.6b | 0±0b | 8.39±0.4b | 0±0c | 1.04±0.1b |
| C. V | 0.7 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 3.1 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 0.2 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 10.5 | 5.1 | 1.1 |
Means in each column followed by the same letters are not significantly different (p<0.05).
Complex analysis of variance of main of essential oils in sage plants that are affected by JA, SA, aceton and water.
| Source of variation | Degree of freedom | Mean of square | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| α-Pinene | Camphene | β-Pinene | 1,8-Cineole | Thujone-cis | Thujone-trans | Camphor | Borneol | Borneol acetate | α-Humulene | Viridiflorol | Limonene | Caryophyllene | Carvacrol | Thymol | Manol | ||
| Year (Y) | 1 | 0.0001a | 0.0002a | 0.0004a | 0.0001a | 0.0001a | 0.0002a | 0.0013a | 0.0014a | 0.0012a | 0.0002a | 0.001a | 0.0001a | 0.0002a | 0.0012a | 0.0001a | 0.0012a |
| R/Y | 4 | 0.00013a | 0.00012a | 0.00012a | 0.0012a | 0.00013a | 0.0012a | 0.0005a | 0.0007b | 0.0009b | 0.0007a | 0.00054a | 0.00012a | 0.00012a | 0.00022a | 0.00023a | 0.0029b |
| T (JA, SA, water and aceton)×Y | 18 | 0.00007b | 0.00005a | 0.0012a | 0.0005a | 0.00077b | 0.00055a | 0.00017a | 0.00035a | 0.00037a | 0.00025a | 0.00047a | 0.00045a | 0.00035a | 0.00006a | 0.00017b | 0.00057a |
| E | 36 | 0.00005 | 0.00004 | 0.000032 | 0.000057 | 0.00009 | 0.00008 | 0.00007 | 0.00004 | 0.00005 | 0.000032 | 0.00001 | 0.00023 | 0.00078 | 0.00004 | 0.00005 | 0.00005 |
| Coefficient of variation | 0.74 | 1 | 2.4 | 1 | 2.9 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 3.74 | 10.3 | 1.2 | 4.74 | 0.22 | 3.6 | 5.1 | |
ns, a and b: Non significant, significant at the 5% and 1% levels of probability, respectively.
Correlation coefficients between measured essential oil content and composition in sage plants that are affected by JA, SA, aceton and water in first year.
| Traits | Essential oil content (1) | α-Pinene (2) | Camphene (3) | β-Pinene (4) | 1,8-Cineole (5) | Thujone-cis (6) | Thujone-trans (7) | Camphor (8) | Borneol (9) | Borneol acetate (10) | Carvacrol (11) | Caryophyllene (12) | α-Humulene (13) | Thymol (14) | Viridiflorol (15) | Manol (16) | Limonene (17) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.49b | 0.87b | 0.63b | 0.78b | 0.62b | 0.02 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.1 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| 2 | – | – | 0.2 | 0.9b | 0.2 | 0.49a | 0.58b | 0.8b | 0.9b | 0.8b | 0.3 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.8b | 0.2 | 0.8b | 0.8b |
| 3 | – | – | – | 0.03 | 0.59b | −0.62b | −0.63b | −0.52b | 0.3 | 0.4a | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| 4 | – | – | – | – | 0.1 | 0.8b | 0.65b | −0.6b | 0.8b | 0.7b | −0.3 | 0.3 | −0.2 | 0.7b | 0.3 | 0.7b | 0.7b |
| 5 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.02 | 0.3 | 0.3 | −0.2 | 0.5b | −0.2 | 0.3 | −0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| 6 | – | – | – | – | – | – | −0.5b | 0.8b | 0.8b | 0.9b | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.7b | 0.2 | 0.7b | 0.7b |
| 7 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.9b | 0.8b | 0.8b | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.7b | 0.2 | 0.7b | 0.7b |
| 8 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | −0.8b | 0.8b | 0.1 | −0.3 | 0.3 | 0.6b | −0.3 | 0.6b | 0.6b |
| 9 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.8b | 0.2 | 0.1 | −0.1 | 0.8b | 0.1 | 0.8b | 0.8b |
| 10 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | −0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.7b | 0.3 | 0.6b | 0.6b |
| 11 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | −0.43a | −0.7b | 0.22 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| 12 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | −0.4a | 0.3 | −0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| 13 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.1 | 0.3 | −0.1 | −0.1 |
| 14 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.3 | 0.9b | 0.9b |
| 15 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| 16 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.8b |
ns, a and b: Non significant, significant at the 5% and 1% levels of probability, respectively.
Correlation coefficients between measured essential oil content and composition in sage plants that are affected by JA, SA, aceton and water in second year.
| Traits | Essential oil content (1) | α-Pinene (2) | Camphene (3) | β-Pinene (4) | 1,8-Cineole (5) | Thujone-cis (6) | Thujone-trans (7) | Camphor (8) | Borneol (9) | Borneol acetate (10) | Carvacrol (11) | Caryophyllene (12) | α-Humulene (13) | Thymol (14) | Viridiflorol (15) | Manol (16) | Limonene (17) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | 0.41 | 0.55b | 0.66b | 0.77b | 0.62b | 0.81b | 0.72b | 0.02 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.1 | 0.08 | 0.1 |
| 2 | – | – | 0.32 | 0.41a | 0.42a | 0.33a | 0.22 | 0.27 | 0.35 | 0.58b | 0.43a | 0.45a | 0.38a | 0.58a | 0.62b | 0.58b | 0.64a |
| 3 | – | – | – | 0.23 | 0.39a | −0.22 | −0.52b | 0.12 | 0.34 | 0.64a | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| 4 | – | – | – | – | 0.1 | 0.8b | 0.65b | −0.6b | 0.8b | 0.7b | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.7b | 0.3 | 0.7b | 0.5b |
| 5 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.2 | 0.24 | 0.42 | 0.43a | 0.31 | 0.21 | 0.65b | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| 6 | – | – | – | – | – | – | −0.78b | 0.82b | 0.84b | 0.65b | 0.3 | 0.16 | 0.61b | 0.57b | 0.21 | 0.67b | 0.64a |
| 7 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.9b | 0.8b | 0.8b | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.7b | 0.2 | 0.7b | 0.3 |
| 8 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | −0.58b | 0.85b | 0.15 | 0.33 | 0.31 | 0.64b | −0.32 | 0.64b | 0.15 |
| 9 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.8b | −0.2 | 0.1 | −0.1 | 0.8b | 0.1 | 0.8b | 0.3 |
| 10 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | −0.15 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.7b | 0.3 | 0.6b | 0.5b |
| 11 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | −0.53b | −0.47a | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| 12 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.4a | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4a |
| 13 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.16 | 0.55b | 0.54b | 0.45a |
| 14 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.55b | 0.69b | 0.56b |
| 15 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.5b | 0.8b |
| 16 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.5b |
ns, a and b: Non significant, significant at the 5% and 1% levels of probability, respectively.
![Figure 1: Means of essential oil concentration [JA (μL) and SA (mM)] in treatments in 2 years in 50 g of shoot dry matter.Means in each column followed by the same letters are not significantly different (p<0.05).](/document/doi/10.1515/tjb-2017-0183/asset/graphic/j_tjb-2017-0183_fig_001.jpg)
Means of essential oil concentration [JA (μL) and SA (mM)] in treatments in 2 years in 50 g of shoot dry matter.
Means in each column followed by the same letters are not significantly different (p<0.05).
Various concentrations of elicitors produced different results. At low concentrations, SA did not have any inhibitory effect and made many components but at higher concentrations, it reduced the protein and essential oils content [22, 23]. A concentration of 0.138 g/L of SA, had a stimulating effect while 0.138 g/L and 0.552 g/L concentration had varying degrees of inhibitive effects; therefore, SA had a bidirectional physiological effect in a concentration-dependent manner. JA and SA-treated plants produced greater quantities of camphene, 1,8-cineole, thujone-cis, thujone-trans, camphor, borneol, borneol acetate, carvacrol and thymol. The accumulation of phenolic compounds was stimulated with SA at low concentrations. In Salvia miltiorrhiza [24], mung bean [6], Caraway [25], Ziziphus spina-christi [26], Cucumber [16], Marigold [12] as well as Basil and majoram [5] also showed the decreasing effects of a higher concentration of SA (foliar application) and otherwise showed its beneficial uses at low dosages. In this research, it was found that although some essential oils have a higher concentration of SA as compared with other treatments, but generally, the best SA treatment was 0.138 g/L. However, many researchers have shown that SA has various effects on plant growth and development [6, 27, 28] but the field application of SA requires optimum physiological concentration to increase nitrogen use efficiency, particularly during germination and seedling growth [29, 30]. An increase in phenolic compounds and flavones was observed in cells, after JA elicitation. In contrast, anthocyanins were in lower amounts in JA treatment [31]. Similar with SA, JA has various effects on components. In Salvia miltiorrhiza [32], Brugmansia candida [19], Hypericum perforatum L. [31], Eleutherococcus senticosus [33], Sweet Basil [13], Kudzu [7], Panax ginseng [4], and Glycyrrhiza glabra [11], it was found that at low and high concentrations of JA, some components were either decreased or increased. Under water stress, JA increased total sugars, essential oil and major component and decreased the concentrations of total amino acids and proline [16, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40]. The results of this research are similar to the findings of Xiao et al. [32] and Dong et al. [24]. The research condition and many attributes such as the edaphic properties, affected the efficacy of JA.
Conclusion
This study showed the beneficial consumption of elicitors. JA and SA had increasing effects on essential oils composition. The best treatments were JA 0.1051 g/L, JA 0.2102 g/L and SA 0.138 g/L. Twenty-seven essential oils were obtained and the most notable were: α-pinene, limonene, β-pinene, camphor, thymol, camphene, thujone-trans, thujone-cis, 1,8-cineole, borneol, borneol acetate, carvacrol, α-humulene, and caryophyllene. JA was more effective in stimulating the accumulation of α-pinene, limonene, β-pinene, camphor, thymol, camphene, thujone-trans, thujone-cis, 1,8-cineole, borneol, borneol acetate, carvacrol, α-humulene and caryophyllene. At 0.1051 and 0.2102 g/L, JA enhanced the production of camphor, thymol and carvacrol. Although 0.138 g/L SA led to the same total production, many essential oils like β-pinene, camphor, thymol, thujone-cis, carvacrol, manol, α-humulene and caryophyllene were less produced in JA (0.1051 and 0.2102 g/L); only α-pinene, β-pinene, camphene, 1,8-cineole, and veridiflorol were produced better in JA (0.1051 and 0.2102 g/L). Although the results showed the profit of JA (0.1051 and 0.2102 g/L) and SA (0.138 g/L) as compared to other treatments in 2 years but to determine the effects of climate and edaphic conditions on Sage, more studies must be performed. Also, the treatment of different species with SA and JA was inevitable.
Conflict of interest: There is no conflict of interest.
References
1. Baghizadeh A, Hajmohammadrezaei M. Effect of drought stress and its interaction with ascorbate and salicylic acid on Okra (Hibiscus esculents L.) germination and seedling growth. J Stress Physiol Biochemist 2011;7:55–65.Suche in Google Scholar
2. Wang SY. Methyl jasmonate reduces water stress in strawberry. Plant Growth Reg 1999;18:127–34.10.1007/PL00007060Suche in Google Scholar
3. Aftab T, Masroor M, Khan A, Idrees M. Methyl jasmonate counteracts boron toxicity by preventing oxidative stress and regulating antioxidant enzyme activities and artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua L. Protoplasma 2011;248:601–12.10.1007/s00709-010-0218-5Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
4. Babar Ali M, Hahn EJ, Paek KY. Methyl jasmonate and salicylic acid induced oxidative stress and accumulation of phenolics in Panax ginseng bioreactor root suspension cultures. Molecules 2007;12:607–21.10.3390/12030607Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
5. Gharib FA. Effect of salicylic acid on the growth, metabolic activities and oil content of basil and marjoram. Inter J Agr Biol 2007;9:294–301.Suche in Google Scholar
6. Nazar R, Iqbal N, Syeed S, Khan NA. Salicylic acid alleviates decreases in photosynthesis under salt stress by enhancing nitrogen and sulfur assimilation and antioxidant metabolism differentially in two mungbean cultivars. J Plant Physiol 2011;168:807–15.10.1016/j.jplph.2010.11.001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
7. Thiem B, Krawczyk A. Enhanced isoflavones accumulation in methyl jasmonate-treated in-vitro cultures of Pueraria lobata Ohwi. Herla Molonica 2010;56:48–56.Suche in Google Scholar
8. Joseph B, Jini D, Sujatha S. Insight into the role of exogenous salicylic acid on plants grown under salt environment. Asian J Crop Sci 2010;2:226–35.10.3923/ajcs.2010.226.235Suche in Google Scholar
9. Rahimi AR, Mashayekhi K, Dordipour E. Effect of salicylic acid and mineral nutrition on fruit yield and yield components of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.). J Agri Sci Nat Res 2009;16:149–56.Suche in Google Scholar
10. Coste A, Laurian V, Halmagyi A, Coldea G. Effects of plant growth regulators and elicitors on production of secondary metabolites in shoot cultures of Hypericum hirsutum and Hypericum maculatum. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 2011;106:279–88.10.1007/s11240-011-9919-5Suche in Google Scholar
11. Shabani L, Ehsanpour AA, Asghari G, Emami J. Glycyrrhizin production by in-vitro cultured Glycyrrhiza glabra elicited by methyl jasmonate and salicylic acid. Russian J Plant Physiol 2009;56:621–6.10.1134/S1021443709050069Suche in Google Scholar
12. Bayat H, Alirezaie M, Neamati H. Impact of exogenous salicylic acid on growth and ornamental characteristics of calendula (Calendula officinalis L.) under salinity stress. J Stress Physiol Biochemist 2012;8:258–67.Suche in Google Scholar
13. Kim SK, Kim JT, Jang SW, Lee SC. Exogenous effect of gibberellins and jasmonate on tuber enlargement of Dioscorea opposita. Agro Res 2005;3:39–44.Suche in Google Scholar
14. Gunes A, Inal A, Alpaslan M. Effects of exogenously applied salicylic acid on the induction of multiple stress tolerance and mineral nutrition in maize (Zea mays L.). Arch Agro Soil Sci 2005;51:687–95.10.1080/03650340500336075Suche in Google Scholar
15. Mendoza AB, Godina FR, Torres VR, Rodriguez HR. Chilly seed treatment with salicylic and sulfosalicylic acid midifies seedling epidermal anatomy and cold stress tolerance. Crop Res 2002;24:19–25.Suche in Google Scholar
16. Mardani H, Bayat H, Saeidnejad AH, Rezaie E. Assessment of salicylic acid impacts on seedling characteristic of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) under water stress. Not Sci Biol 2012;4:112–5.10.15835/nsb417258Suche in Google Scholar
17. EL Tayeb MA, EL Enany AE, Ahmed NL. Salicylic acid alleviates the copper toxicity in sunflower seedlings. Inter J Bot 2006;2:380–7.10.3923/ijb.2006.380.387Suche in Google Scholar
18. Van Breusegem F, Vraneva E, Dat JT. The role of active oxygen species in plant signal transduction. Plant Sci 2001;161:405–14.10.1016/S0168-9452(01)00452-6Suche in Google Scholar
19. Spollansky TC, Alvarez SP, Giulietti AM. Effect of jasmonic acid and aluminum on production of tropane alkaloids in hairy root cultures of Brugmansia candida. Elect J Biotechnol 2000;3:72–5.10.2225/vol3-issue1-fulltext-6Suche in Google Scholar
20. Walker TS, Bais HP, Vivanco JM. Jasmonic acid-induced hypericin production in cell suspension cultures of Hypericum perforatum L. (St. John’s wort). Phytochemist 2002;60:289–93.10.1016/S0031-9422(02)00074-2Suche in Google Scholar
21. Adams RP. Identification of essential oil components by gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy. Carol Stream, USA: Allured Publishing Corp., 2001.Suche in Google Scholar
22. Canakci S. Effect of salicylic acid on fresh weight change, chlorophyll and protein amount of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) seedlings. J Biol Sci 2008;8:431–5.10.3923/jbs.2008.431.435Suche in Google Scholar
23. Meher HC, Singh GH. Salicylic acid-induced glutathione status in tomato crop and resistance to root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid & White) Chitwood. J Xenobiotics 2011;1:22–8.10.4081/xeno.2011.e5Suche in Google Scholar
24. Dong J, Wan G, Liang Z. Accumulation of salicylic acid-induced phenolic compounds and raised activities of secondary metabolic and antioxidative enzymes in Salvia miltiorrhiza cell culture. J Biotech 2010;148:99–104.10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.05.009Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
25. Esfeiny Farahani M, Paknejad F, Bakhteyari Moghadam M. The effect of salicylic acid in variuos application on yield and morphological characters of Caraway (Carum carvi). Iranian J Crop Eco Physiol 2011;3:188–95.Suche in Google Scholar
26. Galal A. Improving effects of salicylic acid on the multipurpose tree Ziziphus spina-christi (L.) willd tissue culture. Am J Plant Sci 2012;3:947–52.10.4236/ajps.2012.37112Suche in Google Scholar
27. Shakeel S, Mansoor S. Pretreatment effect of salicylic acid on protein and hydrolytic enzymes in salt stressed Mung bean seedlings. Asian J Agr Sci 2012;4:122–5.Suche in Google Scholar
28. Yu Ye K, Yastreb TO, Karpets YV, Miroshnichenko NK. Influence of salicylic and succinic acids on antioxidant enzymes activity, heat resistance and productivity of Panicum miliaceum L. J Stress Physiol Biochemist 2011;7:154–63.Suche in Google Scholar
29. Khan NA, Syeed SH, Iqbal N. Application of salicylic acid increases contents of nutrients and antioxidative metabolism in mung bean and alleviates adverse effects of salinity stress. Inter J Plant Biol 2010;1:1–8.10.4081/pb.2010.e1Suche in Google Scholar
30. Kumar SP, Varun Kumar C, Bandana B. Effects of salicylic acid on seedling growth and nitrogen metabolism in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). J Stress Physiol Biochemist 2010;6:102–13.Suche in Google Scholar
31. Gadzovska S, Maury SP, Hage D. Jasmonic acid elicitation of Hypericum perforatum L cell suspensions and effects on the production of phenylpropanoids and naphtodianthrones. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 2007;89:1–13.10.1007/s11240-007-9203-xSuche in Google Scholar
32. Xiao Y, Gao SH, Di P, Zhang L. Methyl jasmonate dramatically enhances the accumulation of phenolic acids in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy root cultures. Physical Plant 2009;137:1–9.10.1111/j.1399-3054.2009.01257.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed
33. Shohael AM, Murthy EJ, Paek KY. Methyl jasmonate induced overproduction of eleutherosides in somatic embryos of Eleutherococcus senticosus cultured in bioreactors. Elect J Biotech 2007;10:633–7.10.2225/vol10-issue4-fulltext-13Suche in Google Scholar
34. Sheteawi SA. Improving growth and yield of salt-stressed soybean by exogenous application of jasmonic acid and ascobin. Inter J Agr Biol 2007;9:473–8.Suche in Google Scholar
35. Sorial ME, El-Gamal SM, Gendy AA. Response of sweet basil to Jasmonic acid application in relation to different water supplies. Bioscience Res 2010;7:39–47.Suche in Google Scholar
36. Khavarinezhad RA, Asadi, A. The effect of salicylic acid on some of the secondary metabolites (Saponins and Anthocynins) and induction of antimicrobial resistance in Bellis Perennis L. Iran J Med Aroma Plant 2006;21:553–86.Suche in Google Scholar
37. Mady MA. Effect of foliar application with salicylic acid and vitamin E on growth and productivity of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Plant J Agr Sci Mansoura Univ 2009;34:6735–46.10.21608/jpp.2009.118654Suche in Google Scholar
38. Senaratn T, Touchell D, Bunn E, Dixon K. Acetyl salicylic acid (Asprin) and salicylic acid induce multiple stress tolerance in bean and tomato plants. Plant Growth Reg 2000;30:157–61.10.1023/A:1006386800974Suche in Google Scholar
39. Shahba Z, Baghizadeh A, Yosefi M. The salicylic acid effect on the tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.) germination, growth and photosynthetic pigment under salinity stress (NaCl). J Stress Physiol Biochemist 2010;6:4–16.Suche in Google Scholar
40. Kachroo A, Kachroo P. Salicylic acid-jasmonic acid and ethylene mediated regulation of plant defense signaling. Gen Eng 2007;28:55–83.10.1007/978-0-387-34504-8_4Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Betaine treatment decreased serum glucose and lipid levels, hepatic and renal oxidative stress in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats
- Oxidative stress and response of antioxidant system in Nostoc muscorum exposed to different forms of Zinc
- An investigation on Trakya region Oak (Quercus spp.) honeys of Turkey: their physico-chemical, antioxidant and phenolic compounds properties
- Effects of Shiranuhi flower extracts and fractions on lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory responses in murine RAW 264.7 cells
- Evaluation of resveratrol organogels prepared by micro-irradiation: fibroblast proliferation through in vitro wound healing
- Ecological and phytochemical attributes of endemic Ferula gummosa Boiss. at vegetative and generative stages
- Characterization of calmodulin in the clam Anodonta woodiana: differential expressions in response to environmental Ca2+ and Cd2+
- Foliar application effects of salicylic acid and jasmonic acid on the essential oil composition of Salvia officinalis
- Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of four Astragalus species growing wild in Turkey
- Differences in structure, allergenic protein content and pectate lyase enzyme activity of some Cupressaceae pollen
- In vitro bioactivities and subacute toxicity study of O. basilicum, T. vulgaris and R. officinalis
- Wendlandia exserta: a pertinent source of antioxidant and antimicrobial agent
- Effects of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) on a scleroderma model of fibrosis
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Betaine treatment decreased serum glucose and lipid levels, hepatic and renal oxidative stress in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats
- Oxidative stress and response of antioxidant system in Nostoc muscorum exposed to different forms of Zinc
- An investigation on Trakya region Oak (Quercus spp.) honeys of Turkey: their physico-chemical, antioxidant and phenolic compounds properties
- Effects of Shiranuhi flower extracts and fractions on lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory responses in murine RAW 264.7 cells
- Evaluation of resveratrol organogels prepared by micro-irradiation: fibroblast proliferation through in vitro wound healing
- Ecological and phytochemical attributes of endemic Ferula gummosa Boiss. at vegetative and generative stages
- Characterization of calmodulin in the clam Anodonta woodiana: differential expressions in response to environmental Ca2+ and Cd2+
- Foliar application effects of salicylic acid and jasmonic acid on the essential oil composition of Salvia officinalis
- Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of four Astragalus species growing wild in Turkey
- Differences in structure, allergenic protein content and pectate lyase enzyme activity of some Cupressaceae pollen
- In vitro bioactivities and subacute toxicity study of O. basilicum, T. vulgaris and R. officinalis
- Wendlandia exserta: a pertinent source of antioxidant and antimicrobial agent
- Effects of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) on a scleroderma model of fibrosis