Marked Themes in academic writing: a comparative look at the sciences and humanities

References

Bazerman, Charles. 1988. Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Search in Google Scholar

Borg, Erik. 2003. Discourse community. ELT Journal 57(4). 398–400. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.4.398.Search in Google Scholar

Cargill, Margaret & Patrick O’Connor. 2009. Writing scientific research articles: Strategies and steps. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Carter, Ronald & Michael McCarthy. 2006. Cambridge grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chan, Swee Heng & Seyed Foad Ebrahimi. 2012. Marked themes as context frames In research article abstracts. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies 12(4). 1147–1164.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Qi. 2019. Theme-rheme structure in Chinese doctoral students’ research writing – from the first draft to the published paper. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 37. 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.12.004.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Florence. 1989. Developing competence in academic discourse: The role of language awareness. University of Liverpool English Language Unit Working Paper No. 1. Liverpool: University of Liverpool.Search in Google Scholar

Drees, Willem B. 2021. What are the humanities for? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Endler, John A. 2015. Writing scientific papers, with special reference to Evolutionary Ecology. Evolutionary Ecology 29. 65–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-015-9773-8.Search in Google Scholar

Fontaine, Lise. 2013. Analysing English grammar: A systemic functional introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139026635Search in Google Scholar

Fries, Peter H. & Gillian Francis. 1992. Exploring theme: Problems for research. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics 6. 45–59.Search in Google Scholar

Gosden, Hugh. 1992. Discourse functions of marked theme in scientific research articles. English for Specific Purposes 11(3). 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(05)80010-9.Search in Google Scholar

Grech, Victor. 2019. Writing a scientific paper (WASP): An overview of differences in styles between the sciences and the humanities. Early Human Development 129. 96–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.12.008.Search in Google Scholar

Green, Christopher F., Elsie R. Christopher & Jacquelin Kam Mei Lam. 2000. The incidence and effects on coherence of marked themes in interlanguage texts: A corpus-based enquiry. English for Specific Purposes 19(12). 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00014-3.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. 1967a. Notes on transitivity and theme in English (part 1). Journal of Linguistics 3(1). 37–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700012949.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. 1967b. Notes on transitivity and theme in English (part 2). Journal of Linguistics 3(2). 199–244. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700016613.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. 1968. Notes on transitivity and theme in English (part 3). Journal of Linguistics 4(2). 179–215. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700001882.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. & James R. Martin. 1993. Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar, 4 edn. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203783771Search in Google Scholar

Henderson, Juliet. 2023. What might the ‘art of critique’ in humanities and social sciences academic writing look like? Teaching in Higher Education 28(1). 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1767058.Search in Google Scholar

Hogsette, David S. 2019. Writing that makes sense, 2 edn. Eugene: Resource Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Hunt, Kellogg W. 1965. Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. Champaign: National Council of Teachers of English.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 2002. Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics 34(8). 1091–1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 2015. Genre, discipline and identity. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 19. 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.005.Search in Google Scholar

Kies, Daniel. 1988. Marked themes with and without pronominal reinforcement: Their meaning and distribution in discourse. In Erich H. Steiner & Roert Veltman (eds.), Pragmatics, discourse and text: Some systemically inspired approaches, 47–75. London: Pinter Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Kinneavy, James L. 1980. A theory of discourse. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Search in Google Scholar

Kong, Kenneth Chak Chung. 2004. Marked themes and thematic patterns in abstracts, advertisements and administrative documents. Word 55(3). 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2004.12098204.Search in Google Scholar

Kronick, David A. 1962. A history of scientific and technical periodicals: The origins and development of the scientific and technological press 1665–1790. New York: Scarecrow Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kuo, Chih-Hua. 1999. The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes 18(2). 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00058-6.Search in Google Scholar

Leong, Ping Alvin. 2020. The passive voice in science writing through the ages: A diachronic study. Text & Talk 40(4). 467–489. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2020-2066.Search in Google Scholar

Leong, Ping Alvin. 2021a. The passive voice in scholarly writing: A diachronic look at science and history. Finnish Journal of Linguistics 34(2021). 77–102.Search in Google Scholar

Leong, Ping Alvin. 2021b. Writing in the sciences and humanities: A clause-complex perspective. Word 67(2). 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2021.1909866.Search in Google Scholar

Leong, Ping Alvin. 2022. Thematic and rhematic progression in science writing: A pilot study. Journal of Language and Literature 22(1). 238–254. https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v22i1.4117.Search in Google Scholar

Leong, Ping Alvin, Audrey Lin Lin Toh & Soo Fun Chin. 2018. Examining structure in scientific research articles: A study of thematic progression and thematic density. Written Communication 35(3). 286–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088318767378.Search in Google Scholar

MacDonald, Susan Peck. 2010. Professional academic writing in the humanities and social sciences. Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, James Robert, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Clare Painter. 1997. Working with functional grammar. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Martínez, Iliana A. 2005. Native and non-native writers’ use of first person pronouns in the different sections of biology research articles in English. Journal of Second Language Writing 14(3). 174–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.06.001.Search in Google Scholar

Morris, Paul. 1996. Community beyond tradition. In Paul Heelas, Scott Lash & Paul Morris (eds.), Detraditionalization: Critical reflections on authority and identity, 223–249. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Rørvik, Sylvi & Marte Monsen. 2018. Marked themes in English and Norwegian academic texts in the field of didactics. Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies 9(1). 43–68. https://doi.org/10.15845/bells.v9i1.1521.Search in Google Scholar

SCImago. 2020. SCImago Journal and Country Rank. http://www.scimagojr.com/ (accessed 23 October 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Stoian, Claudia Elena & Daniel Dejica. 2016. Theme–rheme analysis of English and Romanian tourism websites. In Daniel Dejica, Gyde Hansen, Peter Sandrini & Iulia Para (eds.), Language in the digital era. Challenges and perspectives, 14–28. Warsaw: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110472059-004Search in Google Scholar

Swales, John M. 1981. Aspects of article introductions. Birmingham: Aston University.Search in Google Scholar

Swales, John M. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Thelwall, Mike. 2019. The rhetorical structure of science? A multidisciplinary analysis of article headings. Journal of Informetrics 13(2). 555–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.03.002.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, Geoff. 2014. Introducing functional grammar, 3 edn.. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203785270Search in Google Scholar

Webster, Jonathan J. 2019. Key terms in the SFL model. In Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schoenthal (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 35–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316337936.004Search in Google Scholar

Wilkinson, Antoinette Miele. 1992. Jargon and the passive voice: Prescriptions and proscriptions for science writing. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 22(3). 319–325. https://doi.org/10.2190/4HUR-13KR-K1DF-B52D.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Ian A. 2009. Discourse style and theme–rheme progression in biomedical research article discussions. Languages in Contrast 9(2). 225–266. https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.9.2.03wil.Search in Google Scholar

Zaiontz, Charles. 2023. Real statistics using excel. http://www.real-statistics.com/ (accessed 11 March 2023).Search in Google Scholar