Home Morality-in-interaction: Toddlers’ recyclings of institutional discourses of feeling during peer disputes in daycare
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Morality-in-interaction: Toddlers’ recyclings of institutional discourses of feeling during peer disputes in daycare

  • Amy Kyratzis

    Amy Kyratzis is Professor of Education at the University of California, Santa Barbara. She uses ethnography and talk-in-interaction to understand children’s peer interactions and language socialization of one another. Her current research examines how bilingual preschool children of Mexican heritage in California use multimodal resources and code-switching to negotiate interactional footings and linguistic identities. Her articles have appeared in First Language, Research on Language and Social Interaction, Discourse Processes, Journal of Pragmatics, and other journals.

    EMAIL logo
    and Bahar Köymen

    Bahar Köymen is a lecturer in Developmental Psychology at the University of Manchester. Her research interests include development of communication and social cognition. Her current research investigates the emergence and development of human reasoning. Her articles have appeared in Child Development, Developmental Psychology, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology and other journals.

Published/Copyright: September 2, 2020

Abstract

Everyday discursive practices comprising “emotion talk” constitute a site where morality is socialized. Yet few studies have examined how emotional expressions are assembled and serve as integral parts of the unfolding action in multi-party, remedial interchanges involving caregivers and children in early care settings. This paper examines a particular type of emotion talk, complement constructions with verbs of feeling (“want”) and saying (e.g., “Are you saying ‘no don’t stand on me’?) primed by caregivers as part of a curriculum encouraging children to use their words to express their feelings so children become sensitized to one another’s hurt feeling during peer disputes. The data were drawn from a larger corpus of video recordings of children’s naturalistic interaction collected over two years in two toddler-infant daycare centers with children aged 12–30 months. A talk-in-interaction approach was adopted. The syntactic formats provided to children by caregivers, and how children and caregivers recycled and laminated utterances with different kinds of modalities over turns, uncovered usually unarticulated normative socio-cultural assumptions regarding the shaping of affect at the daycare. The results illustrate how affective work in remedial interchanges provides a resource for participants to articulate moral values and underscore children’s agency.


Corresponding author: Amy Kyratzis, Gevirtz Graduate School of Education, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA, E-mail:

About the authors

Amy Kyratzis

Amy Kyratzis is Professor of Education at the University of California, Santa Barbara. She uses ethnography and talk-in-interaction to understand children’s peer interactions and language socialization of one another. Her current research examines how bilingual preschool children of Mexican heritage in California use multimodal resources and code-switching to negotiate interactional footings and linguistic identities. Her articles have appeared in First Language, Research on Language and Social Interaction, Discourse Processes, Journal of Pragmatics, and other journals.

Bahar Köymen

Bahar Köymen is a lecturer in Developmental Psychology at the University of Manchester. Her research interests include development of communication and social cognition. Her current research investigates the emergence and development of human reasoning. Her articles have appeared in Child Development, Developmental Psychology, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology and other journals.

Appendix: Transcription symbols
[ Left square bracket The beginning of overlapping talk
] Right square bracket The end of overlapping talk
. Period Falling intonation
? Question mark Rising intonation
, Comma Continuing intonation
- Dash Abrupt cut-off
= Equal sign Talk produced without transition-space
: Column Prolonged sound.
warm Underlining Prominent syllable
YOU’LL All caps Loud speech
° Degree sign Quiet speech
(X) X’s in parentheses Undecipherable speech, X=1 syllable
(warm) Words in parentheses Uncertain transcription
{[ac]} “ac” in brackets Accelerated speech
(0.5) Number in parentheses Pause of designated no. seconds
Upwards arrow Heightened pitch
((smiling)) Double parentheses Transcriber’s comments

References

Burdelski, Matthew. 2010. Socializing politeness routines: Action, other-orientation, and embodiment in a Japanese preschool. Journal of Pragmatics 42(6). 1606–1621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.11.007.Search in Google Scholar

Cekaite, Asta. 2013. Socializing emotionally and morally appropriate peer group conduct through classroom discourse. Linguistics and Education 24. 511–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2013.07.001.Search in Google Scholar

Cekaite, Asta & Ann-Carita Evaldsson. 2008. Staging linguistic identities and negotiating monolingual norms in multiethnic school settings. International Journal of Multilingualism 5. 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710802387588.Search in Google Scholar

Cekaite, Asta & Malva Kvist Holm. 2017. The comforting touch: Tactile intimacy and talk in managing children’s distress. Research on Language and Social Interaction 50(2). 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1301293.Search in Google Scholar

Clancy, Patricia. 1986. The acquisition of communicative style in Japanese. In Bambi Schieffelin & Elinor Ochs (eds.), Language socialization across cultures, 213–250. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620898.011Search in Google Scholar

Cook-Gumperz, Jenny & Amy Kyratzis. 2001. Child discourse. In Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen & Heidi Hamilton (eds.), A handbook of discourse analysis, 590–611. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.10.1002/9780470753460.ch31Search in Google Scholar

Evaldsson, Ann-Carita & Fritz, Sahlström. 2014. Metasociolinguistic stance taking and the appropriation of bilingual identities in everyday peer language practices. In Asta, Cekaite, Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Vibeke Grøver & Eva Teubal (eds.), Children’s peer talk: Learning from each other, 149–168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139084536.012Search in Google Scholar

Evaldsson, Ann-Carita & Johanna Svahn. 2017. Staging social aggression: Affective stances and moral character work in girls’ gossip telling. Research on Children and Social Interaction 1(1). 77–104. https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.32351.Search in Google Scholar

Gerber, Magda & Allison Johnson. 1998. Your self-confident baby: How to encourage your child’s natural abilities – from the very start. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1971. Relations in public. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1981. Footing. In Erving Goffman, Forms of talk, 124–159. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.10.1515/semi.1979.25.1-2.1Search in Google Scholar

Gonzalez-Mena, Janet & Dianne W. Eyer. 2001. Infants, toddlers, and caregivers: A curriculum of respectful, responsive care and education, 6th edn. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 2013. The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics 46. 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles & Marjorie, Harness Goodwin. 2004. Participation. In Alessandro Duranti (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology, 222–244. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996522.ch10Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles, Marjorie, Harness Goodwin & David Olsher. 2002. Producing sense with nonsense syllables: Turn and sequence in the conversations of a man with severe aphasia. In Barbara Fox, Cecilia Ford, and Sandra Thompson (eds.), The language of turn and sequence, 56–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.4324/9781003060994-27Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 1990. He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among black children. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 2006. The hidden life of girls: Games of stance, status, and exclusion. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470773567Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. (2007). Participation and embodied action in preadolescent girls’ assessment activity. Research on Language and Social Interaction 40(4). 353–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701471344.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness, Asta, Cekaite, & Charles Goodwin. 2012. Emotion as stance. In Anssi Peräkylä & Marja Leena Sorjonen (eds.), Emotion in interaction, 16–63. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730735.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness & Amy, Kyratzis. 2011. Peer language socialization. In Alessandro Duranti, Elinor Ochs & Bambi Schieffelin (eds.), The handbook of language socialization, 39–419. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444342901.ch16Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie Harness & Amy, Kyratzis. 2014. Language and gender in peer interactions among children and youth. In Miriam Meyerhoff & Susan Ehrlich (eds.), The Handbook of language, gender, and sexuality, 509–528. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118584248.ch26Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Sarah Jean. 2017. Multimodality and footing in peer correction in reading picture books. Linguistics and Education 41. 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2017.07.004.Search in Google Scholar

Kemp, Jacqueline L. & Amy Kyratzis. 2018. Moral order among a friendship group of preschool boys. Research on Children and Social Interaction 2(2). 235–261. https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.37390.Search in Google Scholar

Kidwell, Mardi. 2005. Gaze as social control: How very young children differentiate “The Look” from a “Mere Look” by their adult caregivers. Research on Language and Social Interaction 38(4). 417–449. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3804_2.Search in Google Scholar

Köymen, Bahar. 2010. “I said ‘I don’t want him do it’”: Toddlers’ usage of complement constructions within interactions in daycare. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Santa Barbara: University of California.Search in Google Scholar

Köymen, Bahar & Amy Kyratzis. 2014. Dialogic syntax and complement constructions in toddlers’ peer interactions. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3). 497–521. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0028.Search in Google Scholar

Kyratzis, Amy. 2001. Emotion talk in preschool same-sex friendship groups: Fluidity over time and context. [Special issue]. Early Education and Development 12. 359–391. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed1203_5.Search in Google Scholar

Kyratzis, Amy. 2009. “He take one of my tools!” vs. “I’m building”: Transitivity and the grammar of accusing, commanding, and perspective-sharing in toddler’s peer disputes. In Jiansheng Guo, Elena Lieven, Nancy Budwig, Susan, M. Ervin-Tripp, Keiko Nakamura & Seyda Özçaliskan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the study of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, 41–54. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Kyratzis, Amy. 2017. Peer ecologies for learning how to read: Exhibiting reading, orchestrating participation, and learning over time in bilingual Mexican-American preschoolers’ play enactments of reading to a peer. Linguistics and Education 41. 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2017.07.005.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Cathrin & Ann-Carita Evaldsson. 2012. Affordances for participation: Children’s appropriation of rules in a Reggio Emilia School. Mind, Culture, and Activity 19. 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2011.632049.Search in Google Scholar

Ochs, Elinor & Bambi Schieffelin. 1989. Language has a heart. Text 9(1). 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.7.Search in Google Scholar

Ochs, Elinor & Bambi Schieffelin. 2011. The theory of language socialization. In Alessandro Duranti, Elinor Ochs & Bambi Schieffelin (eds.), The handbook of language socialization, 1–22. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444342901.ch1Search in Google Scholar

Sterponi, Laura. 2009. Accountability in family discourse: Socialization into norms and standards and negotiation of responsibility in Italian dinner conversations. Childhood 16(4). 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568209343269.Search in Google Scholar

Tarım, Seyda Deniz & Amy Kyratzis. 2012. Challenging and orienting to monolingual school norms in Turkish American children’s peer disputes and classroom negotiations at a U.S. Turkish Saturday school. In Susan Danby & Maryanne Theobald (eds.), Disputes in everyday life: Social and moral orders of children and young people (Sociological Studies of Children and Youth, Volume 15), 193–220. Bingley, West Yorkshire, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.10.1108/S1537-4661(2012)0000015012Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-09-02
Published in Print: 2020-09-25

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/text-2020-2081/html
Scroll to top button