Home Interpreting real and fictional worlds in interaction: A socio-cognitive approach to reading group talk
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Interpreting real and fictional worlds in interaction: A socio-cognitive approach to reading group talk

  • Sara Whiteley EMAIL logo and David Peplow
Published/Copyright: August 6, 2020

Abstract

This paper analyses how representations of real life and fictional worlds are combined and differentiated in the talk produced in literary reading groups. We adopt a socio-cognitive approach to reading group interaction, which combines discourse analysis and Text World Theory to examine the social and cognitive processes enacted in examples of such talk. Text World Theory is a cognitive linguistic discourse analysis framework which examines the mental spaces (“worlds”) cued by language-in-use and the ontological relations between those worlds. This combined framework is applied to four extracts of reading group talk and facilitates the discussion of the structural, referential and representational aspects of the interaction. Our analysis considers the insights which reading group talk provides into the complex relationships between text and talk. We argue that ontological shifting in reading group talk performs various functions, such as claiming expertise, doing humour and play, and mitigating face-threatening disagreement. Talking about texts allows people these options for shifting between representations of real life and fictional worlds and this may go some way towards accounting for the popularity of such groups in contemporary culture.


Corresponding author: Sara Whiteley, School of English, The University of Sheffield, Jessop West, 1 Upper Hanover Street, Sheffield, S3 7RA, England, UK, E-mail:

Appendix 1 Transcription key

Transcript featureKey
(.)brief pause – less than 0.5 s
(0.5)timed pause
=latching – no pause between speakers' turns
[yeah

[yeah
simultaneous speech
EXACtlyspeaker places emphasis on word or phrase
>yes<speaker speeds-up
<no>speaker slows down
:::drawn-out sound
Xxxxxxinaudible speech
((laughter))paralinguistic feature, nonverbal communication feature, or transcriber's note

References

Allington, Daniel. 2011. ‘It actually painted a picture of the village and the sea and the bottom of the sea’: Reading groups, cultural legitimacy, and description in narrative (with particular reference to John Steinbeck’s The Pearl). Language and Literature 20(4). 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947011398558.Search in Google Scholar

Allington, Daniel & Bethan Benwell. 2012. Reading the reading experience: An ethnomethodological approach to ‘booktalk’. In Anouk Lang (ed.), From codex to hypertext: Reading at the turn of the twenty-first century, 217–233. Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts Press.Search in Google Scholar

Benwell, Bethan. 2009. ‘A pathetic and racist and awful character’: ethnomethodological approaches to the reception of diasporic fiction. Language and Literature 18(3). 300–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947009105855.Search in Google Scholar

Benwell, Bethan. 2012. Commonsense anti-racism in book group talk: The role of reported speech. Discourse and Society 23(4). 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926512441106.Search in Google Scholar

Boyd, William. 2013. Solo. London: Vintage.Search in Google Scholar

Browse, Sam. 2018. Cognitive rhetoric: The cognitive poetics of political discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lal.31Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. 1992. Areas of language use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620539Search in Google Scholar

Crace, Jim. 2013. Harvest. London: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William A. 2009. Towards a social cognitive linguistics. In Vyvian Evans & Stéphanie Pourcel (eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics, 395–420. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.24.25croSearch in Google Scholar

Emmott, Catherine. 1997. Narrative comprehension: A discourse perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198236498.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Extence, Gavin. 2013. The universe versus Alex Woods. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Giles. 1994. Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511624582Search in Google Scholar

Geerarts, Dirk, Gitte Kristiansen & Yves Peirsman (eds.). 2010. Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110226461Search in Google Scholar

Gavins, Joanna. 2007. Text world theory: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748629909Search in Google Scholar

Gerrig, Richard J. 1993. Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven: Westview Press.10.12987/9780300159240Search in Google Scholar

Harder, Peter. 2010. Meaning in mind and society: A functional contribution to the social turn in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110216059Search in Google Scholar

Hartley, Jenny. 2002. The reading groups book: 2002-2003 edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199255962.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Herman, David. 2002. Story logic: Problems and possibilities of narrative. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ingarden, Roman. 1973a. The literary work of art: An investigation on the borderlines of ontology, logic and theory of literature. (trans. G. Grobowicz). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ingarden, Roman. 1973b. The cognition of the literary work of art. (trans. R. A. Crowley and K. Olson). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kingsolver, Barbara. 2012. Flight behaviour. London: Harper Collins.Search in Google Scholar

Littleton, Karen & Neil Mercer. 2013. Interthinking: Putting talk to work. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203809433Search in Google Scholar

Long, Elizabeth. 2003. Book Clubs: Women and the uses of reading in everyday life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mahato, Swatilekha. 2015. Women and nature: Eco-feminist reading of Barbara Kingsolver’s Prodigal Summer and Flight Behaviour. International Journal of English Language, Literature and Humanities 3(4). 631–639. https://ijellh.com/OJS/index.php/OJS/article/view/515.Search in Google Scholar

Myers, Greg. 2009. Stylistics and ‘reading-in-talk.’. Language and Literature 18(3). 338–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947009105857.Search in Google Scholar

Peplow, David, Joan Swann, Paola Trimarco & Sara Whiteley. 2016. The Discourse of Reading Groups: Integrating Cognitive and Sociocultural Perspectives. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315850900Search in Google Scholar

Peplow, David. 2011. ‘Oh, I’ve known a lot of Irish people’: Reading groups and the negotiation of literary interpretation. Language and Literature 20(4). 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947011401964.Search in Google Scholar

Peplow, David. 2016. Talk about books: A study of reading groups. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar

Phelan, James. 2005. Living to tell about it: A rhetoric and ethics of character narration. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In: J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190927431.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Psathas, George. 1995. Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks: Sage.10.4135/9781412983792Search in Google Scholar

Radway, Janice. 1991. Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy and Popular Literature, 2nd edn. North Carolina: The University of North Carolina Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ryan, Marie-Laure. 1991a. Possible worlds and accessibility relations: A semantic typology of fiction. Poetics Today 12(3). 553–576. https://doi.org/10.2307/1772651.Search in Google Scholar

Ryan, Marie-Laure. 1991b. Possible worlds, artificial intelligence and narrative theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.10.2307/431530Search in Google Scholar

Ryan, Marie-Laure. 1998. The text as world versus the text as game: Possible worlds semantics and postmodern theory. Journal of Literary Semantics 27(3). 137–163. https://doi.org/10.1515/jlse.1998.27.3.137.Search in Google Scholar

Ryan, Marie-Laure. 2010. Possible-worlds theory. In David Herman, Manfred Jahn & Marie-Laure Ryan (eds.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. London: Routledge. https://search-proquest-com.sheffield.idm.oclc.org/docview/2137930457?accountid=13828 (accessed 30 March 2020).10.4324/9780203932896Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1984. Notes on methodology. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 21–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511665868.005Search in Google Scholar

Stockwell, Peter. 2002. Cognitive poetics: An introduction. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Stockwell, Peter. 2009. Texture: A cognitive aesthetics of reading. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748631209Search in Google Scholar

Swann, Joan & Daniel Allington. 2009. Reading groups and the language of literary texts: A case study in social reading. Language and Literature 18(3). 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947009105852.Search in Google Scholar

Te Molder, Hedwig & Jonathan Potter (eds.). 2005. Conversation and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511489990Search in Google Scholar

van Dijk, Teun A. 2006. Discourse, context and cognition. Discourse Studies 8(1). 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059565.Search in Google Scholar

van Dijk, Teun A. 2014. Discourse and knowledge: A sociocognitve approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107775404Search in Google Scholar

Verhagen, Arie 2005. Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wagner-Martin, Linda. 2014. Barbara Kingsolver’s world: Nature, art and the twenty-first century. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar

Werth, Paul. 1999. Text worlds: Representing conceptual space in discourse. Harlow: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Whiteley, Sara. 2011. Text world theory, real readers and emotional responses to the remains of the day. Language and Literature 20(1). 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947010377950.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-08-06
Published in Print: 2021-01-27

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 30.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/text-2020-2072/html
Scroll to top button