Legal constraints and judicial discretion in sentencing practice: Appraisal analysis of the sentencing remarks for Terri Palmer
-
Xin Dai
Xin Dai is currently a PhD student in Cardiff University. Her research interests include discourse analysis, systemic functional linguistics, and forensic linguistics. Address for correspondence: School of English, Communication and Philosophy, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3EU, UK. Email: daix3@cardiff.ac.uk
Abstract
In the sentencing of murder cases in England and Wales, it is required by law that judges must take into consideration the factors listed in sentencing laws and guidelines (henceforth statutory factors). However, judges also have the discretion to include factors that are not listed in such laws or guidelines (henceforth non-statutory factors). This paper explores judges’ positioning towards legal constraints and judicial discretion in sentencing by applying the Appraisal framework to analyse statutory and non-statutory factors in the sentencing remarks for a randomly selected murder case. The major analytical findings are that, with regard to statutory factors, attitudes are implicit and are mainly presented through heteroglossia, while, with regard to non-statutory factors, attitudes are explicit and are mainly presented through monoglossia. These different appraisal features of statutory and non-statutory factors reflect the constraints of sentencing laws and guidelines on the judge’s sentencing practice, and the judge’s full play of judicial discretion in the sentencing of this case. It is expected that findings of this study could add to current understanding of sentencing practice, while its analytical procedure could facilitate appraisal analysis of more sentencing remarks, which would, in turn, complement socio-legal studies on sentencing practice.
About the author
Xin Dai is currently a PhD student in Cardiff University. Her research interests include discourse analysis, systemic functional linguistics, and forensic linguistics. Address for correspondence: School of English, Communication and Philosophy, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3EU, UK. Email: daix3@cardiff.ac.uk
Acknowledgements
The writing of this paper owes a lot to the guidance of Dr Gerard O’Grady and Dr Chris Heffer, to whom I express my sincere gratitude. I also thank the anonymous reviewers for their useful suggestions. The generous funding by the China Scholarship Council is acknowledged.
References
Ashworth, Andrew. 2013. The struggle for supremacy in sentencing. In Andrew Ashworth & Julian Roberts (eds.), Sentencing guidelines: Exploring the English model, 15–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684571.003.0002Search in Google Scholar
Ashworth, Andrew. 2015. Sentencing and criminal justice. 6th edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107415270Search in Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. The dialogic imagination (translated by Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist). Austin: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2006. Evaluation in media discourse: Analysis of a newspaper corpus. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2009. Lanague patterns and attitude. Functions of Language 16(2). 165–192.10.1075/fol.16.2.01bedSearch in Google Scholar
Bouhours, Brigitte & Kathleen Daly. 2007. Youth sex offenders in court: An analysis of judicial sentencing remarks. Punishment & Society 9(4). 371–394.10.1177/1462474507080473Search in Google Scholar
Chen, Ruina & Haitao Liu. 2016. A discursive analytical path of appellate court opinions: Evaluation of ideological positioning in Bush v. Gore 2000. Text & Talk 36(4). 391–415.10.1515/text-2016-0018Search in Google Scholar
Easton, Susan & Christine Piper. 2016. Sentencing and punishment: The quest for justice. 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/he/9780198744825.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Gelsthorpe, Loraine & Nicola Padfield (eds.). 2011. Exercising discretion: Decision-making in the criminal justice system and beyond. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781843924470Search in Google Scholar
Hall, Guy, Marion Whittle & Courtney Field. 2016. Themes in judges’ sentencing remarks for male and female domestic murderers. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 23(3). 395–412.10.1080/13218719.2015.1080142Search in Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael & Christian Matthiessen. 1999. Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael & Christian Matthiessen. 2014. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203783771Search in Google Scholar
Hutton, Neil. 2006. Sentencing as a social practice. In Sarah Armstrong & Lesley McAra (eds.), Perspectives on punishment: The contours of control, 155–174. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Körner, Henrike. 2000. Negotiating authority: The logogenesis of dialogue in common law judgements. Australia: University of Sydney PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar
Lee, Sook Hee. 2007. An application of multiple coding for the analysis of attitude in an academic argument. Linguistics & the Human Sciences 3(2). 165–190.10.1558/lhs.v3i2.165Search in Google Scholar
Lowenstein, Max. 2016. Emotive riot sentencing remarks: Qualitative analysis of the English judicial perspective. Internet Journal of Criminology. Available at: https://www.internetjournalofcriminology.com/peer-reviewed-articles.Search in Google Scholar
Martin, Jim. 2000. Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In Susan Hunston & Geoffrey Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, 142–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Martin, Jim. 2004. Mourning: How we get aligned. Discourse & Society 15(2-3). 321–344.10.1177/0957926504041022Search in Google Scholar
Martin, Jim & David Rose. 2003. Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar
Martin, Jim & Peter White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230511910Search in Google Scholar
Miller, Donna. 2002. Multiple judicial opinions as specialized sites of engagement: Conflicting paradigms of valuation and legitimation in Bush v. Gore 2000. In Maurizio Gotti, Dorothee Heller & Marina Dossena (eds.), Conflict and negotiation in specialized texts, 119–141. Bern: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar
Miller, Donna. 2016. On negotiating the hurdles of corpus-assisted appraisal analysis. In Sian Alsop & Sheena Gardner (eds.), Systemic functional linguistics in the digital age, 211–228. Sheffield: Equinox.Search in Google Scholar
Miller, Donna & Jane Johnson. 2009. Strict vs. nurturant parents? A corpus-assisted study of congressional positioning on the war in Iraq. In John Morley & Paul Bayley (eds.), Corpus assisted discourse studies on the Iraq conflict: Wording the war, 34–73. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Miller, Donna & Antonella Luporini. 2018. Software-assisted systemic socio-semantic stylistics: Appraising tru* in J.M. Coetzee’s Foe. In Stella Neumann, Rebekah Wegener & Anje Oesterie (eds.), On verbal art: Essays in honour of Ruqaiya Hasan, 53–79. London: Equinox.Search in Google Scholar
Mitchell, Barry. 2013. Sentnecing guidelines for murder: From political schedule to prinicpled guidelines. In Andrew Ashworth & Julian Roberts (eds.), Sentencing guidelines: Exploreing the English model, 52–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684571.003.0004Search in Google Scholar
Padfield, Nicola. 2013. Exploring the success of sentencing guidelines. In Andrew Ashworth & Julian Roberts (eds.), Sentencing guidelines: Exploring the English model, 31–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684571.003.0003Search in Google Scholar
Potts, Amanda & Siobhan Weare. 2018. Mother, monster, Mrs, I: A critical evaluation of gendered naming strategies in English sentencing remarks of women who kill. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 31. 21–52.10.1007/s11196-017-9523-zSearch in Google Scholar
Smith, David. 2014. Wider and deeper: The future of criminology in Europe. European Journal of Criminology 11(1). 3–22.10.1177/1477370813500885Search in Google Scholar
Stith, Kate & Jose Cabranes. 1998. Fear of judging: Sentencing guidelines in the federal courts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Tata, Cyrus. 2007. Sentencing as craftwork and the binary epistemologies of the discretionary decision process. Social & Legal Studies 16(3). 425–447.10.1177/0964663907079767Search in Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. 2014. Affect and emotion, target-value mismathces and Russian dolls: Refining the apprisal model. In Geoff Thompson & Laura Alba-Juez (eds.), Evaluation in context, 47–66. Amesterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.242.03thoSearch in Google Scholar
White, Peter. 2006. Evaluative semantics and ideological positioning in journalistic discourse. In Inger Lassen, Jeanne Strunck & Torben Vestergaard (eds.), Mediating ideology in text and image: Ten critical studies, 37–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.18.05whiSearch in Google Scholar
Whittle, Marion & Guy Hall. 2018a. The use of alcohol and/or drugs in intimate partner homicide: Themes in judges’ sentencing remarks. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 25(3). 404–416.10.1080/13218719.2017.1418145Search in Google Scholar
Whittle, Marion & Guy Hall. 2018b. Intimate partner homicide: Themes in judges’ sentencing remarks. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 25(6). 922–943.10.1080/13218719.2018.1482571Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Legal constraints and judicial discretion in sentencing practice: Appraisal analysis of the sentencing remarks for Terri Palmer
- Reproduced, reinterpreted, lost: Trajectories of scientific knowledge across contexts
- Third turn position in British election phone-in conversations
- “To have or not to have a boyfriend?” Large identities in small stories
- ‘You wanted to know about expat life’: Authenticating identity in blogs about transnational relocation
- Language teachers’ narratives of professional experience in online class discussions
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Legal constraints and judicial discretion in sentencing practice: Appraisal analysis of the sentencing remarks for Terri Palmer
- Reproduced, reinterpreted, lost: Trajectories of scientific knowledge across contexts
- Third turn position in British election phone-in conversations
- “To have or not to have a boyfriend?” Large identities in small stories
- ‘You wanted to know about expat life’: Authenticating identity in blogs about transnational relocation
- Language teachers’ narratives of professional experience in online class discussions
