Home Virtual communities: Interaction, identity and authority in digital communication
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Virtual communities: Interaction, identity and authority in digital communication

  • Antonio Reyes

    Antonio Reyes is an Associate Professor at Washington and Lee University. His research focuses on the relationship between language and society, and the way they intertwine and shape each other to create new contexts of meaning and new realities. Particularly, he is interested in developing interdisciplinary theoretical approaches in discourse studies to decode the relation between language and social processes of power and ideology. Tucker Hall, Room 312, 204 W. Washington Street, Washington and Lee University, Lexington, VA 24450, USA. Email: reyesa@wlu.edu

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 23, 2018

Abstract

This paper analyzes two settings of digital communication in which social actors participate, interact and engage differently within virtual communities. Online identities are interactionally and discursively constructed and this process defines differences in groupness, illustrating the nature of those online spaces. This study builds on the notion of Citizen Sociolinguistics, that is, ordinary people producing metacommentaries on language uses, to examine the data in different digital communication settings.

This work analyzes 500 comments posted by readers on the site of the newspaper El País, in response to an article announcing the new Spanish orthographic reforms. Additionally, it analyzes 200 threads of the “Sólo español” (“Spanish only”) sub-forum within WordReference.com. The analysis investigates identity and hierarchy in digital communication as socio-cultural results of linguistic interaction. By analyzing interaction and identity in online spaces, this paper proposes empirical ways to account for differences in virtual communities, reconsiders established criteria such as time and regularity in interaction, and proposes new criteria (hierarchy and authority) to accentuate the distinctions regarding virtual communities.

About the author

Antonio Reyes

Antonio Reyes is an Associate Professor at Washington and Lee University. His research focuses on the relationship between language and society, and the way they intertwine and shape each other to create new contexts of meaning and new realities. Particularly, he is interested in developing interdisciplinary theoretical approaches in discourse studies to decode the relation between language and social processes of power and ideology. Tucker Hall, Room 312, 204 W. Washington Street, Washington and Lee University, Lexington, VA 24450, USA. Email: reyesa@wlu.edu

References

Androutsopoulos, Jannis & Michael Beißwenger. 2008. Introduction: Data and methods in computer-mediated discourse analysis. Language@Internet 5(9), Pages??Search in Google Scholar

Ball, Rodney. 1999. Spelling reform in France and Germany: Attitudes and reactions. Current Issues in Language and Society 6(3–4). 276–280.10.1080/13520529909615562Search in Google Scholar

Baron, Naomi S. 2008. Always on. Language in an online and mobile world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195313055.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Blommaert, Jan. 2009. A market of accents. Language Policy 8. 243–259.10.1007/s10993-009-9131-1Search in Google Scholar

Blommaert, Jan. 2017. Society through the lens of language. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies No. 207.Search in Google Scholar

Blommaert, Jan, Laura Smits & Noura Yacoubi. 2018. Context and its complications. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies No. 208.10.1017/9781108348195.004Search in Google Scholar

Blommaert, Jan & Jef Verschueren. 1999. Debating diversity: Analysing the discourse of tolerance. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Bonnin, Juan E. 2014. Pensar el castellano en internet: Discursos sobre la norma en los foros de Wordreference.com [Thinking Spanish online: Discourses about the norm at Wordreferences.com forums]. In Elvira B. N. de Arnoux (ed.), Temas de glotopolítica: Integración regional sudamericana y panhispanismo [Topics on glottopolitics: South American regional integration and panhispanism], 351–372. Buenos Aires: Biblos.Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 2001. Language and symbolic power. 6th ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bucholtz, Mary. 1999. ‘Why be normal?’: Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society 28(2). 203–223.10.1007/978-1-349-92299-4_15Search in Google Scholar

Bucholtz, Mary & Kira Hall. 2005. Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7(4/5). 585–614.10.1177/1461445605054407Search in Google Scholar

Crystal, David. 2001. Language and the internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139164771Search in Google Scholar

Curwood, Jen Scott, Alecia Marie Magnifico & Jayne C. Lammers. 2013. Writing in the Wild: Writers’ Motivation in Fan–Based Affinity Spaces. The Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 56(8). 677–685.10.1002/JAAL.192Search in Google Scholar

Damar, Marie-Eve. 2010. De la polimorphie du purisme linguistique sur l’Internet [About the multiple forms of linguistic purism about the internet]. Langage et Société 131. 113–130. doi: 10.3917/ls.131.0113.Search in Google Scholar

Dubé, Line, Anne Bourhis & Réal Jacob. 2006. Towards a typology of virtual communities of practice. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management 1. 69–93.10.28945/115Search in Google Scholar

Edwards, John. 2009. Language and identity: An introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511809842Search in Google Scholar

Franco, Daniel A. 2009. WordReference, where words live. Retrieved October 5, 2015, from http://levedesliz.blogspot.com.ar/2009/12/wordreference-where-words-live.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Gee, James Paul. 2004. Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York: Routledge. ISBN: 0-415-31777-0, ISBN: 0-415-31776-2Search in Google Scholar

Gee, James Paul. 2005. Semiotic social spaces and affinity spaces: From the age of mythology to today’s schools. In David Barton & Karin Tusting (eds.), Beyond communities of practice: Language, power and social context, pages?? Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, ISBN: 978052154492410.1017/CBO9780511610554.012Search in Google Scholar

Hanna, Barbara E. & Juliana De Nooy. 2009. Learning language and culture via public internet discussion forums. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian.10.1057/9780230235823Search in Google Scholar

Hara, Noriko, Pnina Shachaf & S. Sharon Stoerger. 2009. Online communities of practice typology revisited. Journal of Information Science 35(6). 740–757.10.1177/0165551509342361Search in Google Scholar

Hayes, Elizabeth & James Paul Gee. 2010. Public pedagogy through videogames: Design, resources, and affinity spaces. In Jennifer. A. Sandlin, Brian D. Schultz & Jake Burdick (eds.), Handbook of public pedagogy: Education and learning beyond schooling, 185–193. New York, NY: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Herring, Susan C. & Jannis Androutsopoulos. 2015. Computer-mediated discourse 2.0. In Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton & Deborah Schiffrin (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis 2nd edn., 127–151 Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118584194.ch6Search in Google Scholar

Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Fans, bloggers and gamers: Exploring participatory culture. New York: New York University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kytölä, Samu. 2013. Multilingual language use and metapragmatic reflexivity in finnish internet football forums. A study in the sociolinguistics of globalization. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä University Printing House.Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1989. The exact description of the speech community: Short-a in Philadelphia. In Ralph Fasold & Deborah Schiffrin (eds.), Language change and variation, 1–57. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.52.02labSearch in Google Scholar

Lave, Jean & Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355Search in Google Scholar

Liddicoat, Anthony J. & Richard B. Baldauf. 2008. Language planning in local contexts: Agents, contexts and interactions. In Anthony J. Liddicoat & Richard B. Baldauf (eds.), Language planning and policy: Language planning in local contexts, 3–17. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847690647-002Search in Google Scholar

Magnifico, Alecia Marie. 2012. The game of neopian writing. In Elisabeth R. Hayes & Sean C. Duncan (eds.), Learning in videogame affinity spaces, 212–234. New York: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Meunier, Deborah & Laurence. Rosier. 2012. La langue qui fâche: Quand la norme qui lâche suscite l’insulte [The languages that angers: When the lack of a norm raises the insult]. Argumentation Et Analyse Du Discourse 8. 2–13. doi: 10.4000/aad.1285.Search in Google Scholar

Moore, Robert. 2015. Citizen sociolinguistics: The return of the repressed. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies No. 148.Search in Google Scholar

Osthus, Dietmar. 2004. Le bon usage d’internet – Le discours normatif sur la toile [The proper use of the internet – normative discourse about screens]. Retrieved from http://www.dietmar-osthus.de/ norme.htmSearch in Google Scholar

Patrick, Peter L. 2004. The speech community. In JK Chambers, Peter Trudgill & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), Handbook of language variation and change, pages?? Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Reyes, Antonio. 2013. Don’t touch my language: Attitudes toward institutional language reforms. Current Issues in Language Planning 14. 337–357. doi: 10.1080/14664208.2013.812946.Search in Google Scholar

Reyes, Antonio & Juan E. Bonnin. 2016. Negotiating use, norm and authority in online language forums. Current Issues in Language Planning. doi: 10.1080/14664208.2016.1220280.Search in Google Scholar

Rymes, Betsy. 2014. Communication beyond language: Everyday encounters with diversity. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203129616Search in Google Scholar

Rymes, Betsy & Andrea R. Leone. 2014. Citizen sociolinguistics: A new media methodology for understanding language and social life. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 29. 25–43.Search in Google Scholar

Shuling, Liao & En-yi Chou. 2012. Intention to adopt knowledge through virtual communities: Posters vs lurkers. Online Information Review 36. 442–461. doi: 10.1108/14684521211241440.Search in Google Scholar

Varis, Piia & Xuan Wang. 2011. Superdiversity on the internet: A case from China. Diversities 13(2). 70–83.Search in Google Scholar

Wenger, Etienne, Richard McDermott & William M. Snyder. 2002. Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Search in Google Scholar

Yoo, C.Y. 2011. Modeling audience interactivity as the gratification-seeking process in online newspapers. Communication Theory 21. 67–89.10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01376.xSearch in Google Scholar

Yus, Francisco. 2001. Ciberpragmática. El uso del lenguaje en Internet [Cyber pragmatics: The use of language on the Internet]. Barcelona: Ariel.Search in Google Scholar

Yus, Francisco. 2005. Attitudes and emotions through written texts: The case of textual deformation in internet chat rooms. Pragmalingüística 13. 147–174.10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2005.i13.09Search in Google Scholar

Yus, Francisco. 2011. Cyberpragmatics. Internet-mediated communication in context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.213Search in Google Scholar

Zappavigna, Michele. 2011. Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media &Society 13(5). 788–806.10.1177/1461444810385097Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-11-23
Published in Print: 2018-12-19

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 17.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/text-2018-2020/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button