Evaluative Stances in Persuasive Essays by Undergraduate Students: Focusing on Appreciation Resources

References

Ballard, Brigid & JohnClanchy.1997. Study abroad: A manual for Asian students, rev. edn. Kuala Lumpur: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Belcher, Diana.1995. Writing critically across the curriculum. In DianaBelcher & GeorgeBraine (eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy, 135–154. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Coffin, Caroline.1996. Exploring literacy in school history. Erskineville, NSW: NSW Department of School Education.Search in Google Scholar

Coffin, Caroline.1997. Constructing and giving value to the past: An investigation into secondary school history. In FrancisChristine & JamesMartin (eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school, 196–230. London: Cassell.Search in Google Scholar

Coffin, Caroline.2000. History as discourse: Construal of time, cause and appraisal. Sydney: The University of New South Wales PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Coffin, Caroline & KieranO’Halloran. 2006. The role of appraisal and corpora in detecting covert evaluation. Functions of Language13(1). 77–110.10.1075/fol.13.1.04cofSearch in Google Scholar

Connor, Ulla.2004. Intercultural rhetoric research: Beyond texts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes4. 291–304.10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.003Search in Google Scholar

Eggins, Susan.1997. Analysing casual conversation. London & New York: Cassell.Search in Google Scholar

Graham, Phillip.2002. Predication and propagation: A method for analysing evaluative meanings in technology policy. Text22(2). 227–268.10.1515/text.2002.009Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. & C.Matthiessen.2004. An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edn. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Hood, Susan.2004. Appraising research: Taking a stance in academic writing. Sydney: The University of Technology Sydney PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Hood, Susan.2006. The persuasive power of prosodies: Radiating values in academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes5(1). 37–49.10.1016/j.jeap.2005.11.001Search in Google Scholar

Hood, Susan.2010. Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230274662Search in Google Scholar

Hunston, Susan.2000. Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and value in persuasive texts. In SusanHunston & GeoffThompson (eds.), Evaluation in text, 176–206. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken.2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Iedema, Rick.2004. Post-bureaucracy: Re-organising emotion. Paper presented at the SFL Friday Seminar, University of Sydney.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Sook Hee. 2006. The use of interpersonal resources in argumentative/persuasive essays by East-Asian ESL and Australian tertiary students. Sydney: The University of Sydney PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Sook Hee. 2007. An application of multiple coding for the analysis of Attitude in an academic argument. Journal of Linguistics and the Human Sciences3(2). 165–190.10.1558/lhs.v3i2.165Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Sook Hee. 2008a. A framework for the analysis of argumentative/persuasive essays from an interpersonal perspective. Text and Talk28(2). 239–270.10.1515/TEXT.2008.011Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Sook Hee. 2008b. The use of interpersonal resources in argumentative/persuasive essays: Cross-cultural and grade-based differences in academic essays by East-Asian ESL and Australian tertiary students. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Sook Hee. 2008c. Attitude in undergraduate persuasive essays. Journal of Prospect23(3). 43–57.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Sook Hee. 2010a. Attribution in high-and low-graded persuasive essays by tertiary students. Functions of Language17(2). 181–206.10.1075/fol.17.2.02leeSearch in Google Scholar

Lee, Sook Hee. 2010b. Differences in the use of appraisal resources between L1 and L2 writers: Focusing on Graduation system. Journal of Issues in Intercultural Communication3(1). 23–45.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Sook Hee. 2013. Argument structure as an interactive resource by undergraduate students. Journal of Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 9(2), 273–299.Search in Google Scholar

Lemke, Jay.1998. Resources for attitudinal meaning: Evaluative orientation in text semantics. Functions of Language5(1). 34–56.10.1075/fol.5.1.03lemSearch in Google Scholar

Macken-Horarik, Mary. 2003. Appraisal and special instructiveness of narrative. Text23(2). 285–312.10.1515/text.2003.012Search in Google Scholar

Macken-Horarik, Mary & JamesMartin (eds.). 2003. Negotiating heteroglossia: Social perspectives on evaluation. [Special issue]. Text. 23(2).10.1515/text.2003.012Search in Google Scholar

Martin, James.1995a. Reading positions/positioning readers: Judgement in English. Journal of Prospect10(2). 27–37.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, James.1995b. Text and clause: Fractal resonance. Text15(1). 5–42.10.1515/text.1.1995.15.1.5Search in Google Scholar

Martin, James.1997. Analysing genre: Functional parameters. In JamesMartin & FrancisChristie (eds.), Genre institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school, 339. London: Cassell.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, James.2000. Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In SusanHunston & GeoffThompson (eds.), Evaluation in text, 142–175. London: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, James & DavidRose.2007 [2003]. Working with discourse. Meaning beyond the clause, 2nd edn. London & New York: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, James & PeterWhite.2007 [2005]. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English, 2nd edn. London & New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Moore, T. J.2011. Critical thinking and language: The challenge of generic skills and disciplinary discourses. New York: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Painter, Caroline.1999. Learning through language in early childhood. London: Cassell.Search in Google Scholar

Rothery, John & MareeStenglin.1997. Exploring experience through narrative. In FrancisChristie & JamesMartin (eds.), Genres and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school, 222–244. London: Pinter.Search in Google Scholar

Rothery, John & MareeStenglin.2000. Interpreting literature the role of appraisal. In LeonardUnsworth (ed.), Researching language in schools and communities: Functional linguistic perspectives, 222–243. London: Cassell.Search in Google Scholar

Sinclair, J. M.1987. The nature of the evidence. In J. M.Sinclair (ed.), Looking up: An account of the COBUILD project in lexical computing. London: Collins.Search in Google Scholar

Stapleton, Paul.2002. Critiquing voice as a viable pedagogical tool in L2 writing: Returning the spotlight to ideas. Journal of Second Language Writing11(3). 177–190.10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00070-XSearch in Google Scholar

Thompson, Geoff.2001. Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader. Journal of Applied Linguistics22(1). 5877.10.1093/applin/22.1.58Search in Google Scholar

White, Peter.1998. Telling media tales: The news story as rhetoric. Sydney: The University of Sydney PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

White, Peter.2004. An overview of Appraisal theory. http://www.grammatics.com/appraisal (accessed 4 April 2004).Search in Google Scholar

Woodward-Kron, Robyn. 2002. Critical analysis versus description? Examining the relationship in successful student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes1. 121–143.10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00013-9Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Siew Mei. 2005. Investigating evaluative language in undergraduate argumentative essays. Singapore: National University of Singapore PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Siew Mei. 2008. Investigating the effectiveness of arguments in undergraduate essays from an evaluation perspective. Journal of PROSPECT: An Australian Journal of TESOL23(3). 59–75.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Siew Mei & AllisonDesmond. 2003. Exploring appraisal in claims of student writers in argumentative essays. Journal of Prospect: An Australian Journal of TESOL18(3). 71–91.Search in Google Scholar