Home Ethnopolitical discourse among ordinary Malaysians: diverging accounts of “the good-old days” in discussing multiculturalism
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Ethnopolitical discourse among ordinary Malaysians: diverging accounts of “the good-old days” in discussing multiculturalism

  • Richard Buttny

    Richard Buttny received his PhD in Communication Studies from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. His research interests include accounts, reported speech, cultural discourses, and environmental discourses.

    EMAIL logo
    , Azirah Hashim

    Azirah Hashim is Professor at the Faculty of Languages and Linguistics and Dean of the Humanities and Ethics Research Cluster at the University of Malaya. Her research interests are in professional discourse, language contact, and language and law.

    and Kiranjit Kaur

    Kiranjit Kaur received her PhD from the University of Maryland, USA, in Mass Communication. Her research areas include media and culture, media and gender, media ethics and public relations.

Published/Copyright: May 25, 2013

Abstract

A small group of ethnically diverse Malaysians was assembled to discuss the state of multiculturalism in Malaysia. Discursive analysis was used to get at the participants' accounting practices and constructions of multiculturalism. Participants' accounts revealed an increasing social distance between the Malays and the non-Malays, but differing assessments and explanations for such group boundaries. Participants' accounts drew on both their own experiences and on broader ethnopolitical discourses to tell their side. Participants used various voicing practices to represent or evaluate the current situation and how it became this way. Religion, especially Islam, was used as an ethnopolitical discourse and was articulated in different ways. For instance, the Malays invoked being Muslim as the primary source of identity and imagined community, while the non-Malays cited the politicization of Islam as a cause for the increasing boundary between groups. Despite these differences participants seemed willing to engage on these “sensitive issues” through criticism and defensive accounts sequences.

About the authors

Richard Buttny

Richard Buttny received his PhD in Communication Studies from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. His research interests include accounts, reported speech, cultural discourses, and environmental discourses.

Azirah Hashim

Azirah Hashim is Professor at the Faculty of Languages and Linguistics and Dean of the Humanities and Ethics Research Cluster at the University of Malaya. Her research interests are in professional discourse, language contact, and language and law.

Kiranjit Kaur

Kiranjit Kaur received her PhD from the University of Maryland, USA, in Mass Communication. Her research areas include media and culture, media and gender, media ethics and public relations.

Published Online: 2013-05-25
Published in Print: 2013-05-24

©[2013] by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/text-2013-0013/pdf
Scroll to top button