Home Three-dimensional finite element analysis and research of leakage magnetic field of flake, pit, through-hole defect in petroleum pipelines
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Three-dimensional finite element analysis and research of leakage magnetic field of flake, pit, through-hole defect in petroleum pipelines

  • Feng Zhou

    received the B.S. degree in power system and its automation from Hefei University of technology, Anhui Province, China, in 1992, and the Ph.D. degree in electric machines and electric apparatus from Harbin institute of technology, Heilongjiang Province, China, in 2005. His research interests include large motor comprehensive physical field simulation, electric power system information and intelligent remote viewing, Intelligent instrument and testing technology, etc.

    ORCID logo EMAIL logo
    , Yu Chen

    received the B.E. degree in University of Jinan, ShanDong Province, China, in 2019. Since 2020, he has been studying at Shandong University of Science and Technology, majoring in Power System and Automation, master of Engineering. His research direction is electric machine design and manufacture.

    , Han Zhao

    received the B.E. degree in Electrical Engineering and Automation from ShanDong jianzhu University, ShanDong Province, China, in 2019. Since 2019, he has been studying at Shandong University of Science and Technology, majoring in Power System and Automation, master of Engineering. His research direction is electric machine design and manufacture.

    and Heng Hu

    received the B.S. degree in integrated circuit design and integrated system from Harbin University of Science and Technology, Heilongjiang Province, China, in 2009, and the master’s degree in electrical engineering from Harbin University of Science and Technology, Heilongjiang Province, China, in 2014. From 2014 on, he has been a researcher, Heilongjiang Electric Power Research Institute, Harbin, China. His research interests include electromagnetic calculation and electrical equipment test.

Published/Copyright: October 26, 2022

Abstract

Flake, pit and through-hole defects are the three common types of defects in oil pipelines. In practical testing applications, it is necessary to clarify the magnetic leakage characteristics of different defects and set reasonable detection points to distinguish different types of defects accurately and quantify the degree of each defect precisely. In this paper, the leakage magnetic field of flaky, pitted and through-hole tube wall defect is analyzed. Using three-dimensional finite element simulation, the spatial stereo model of leakage magnetic field is inverted by extracting the data of characteristic nodes. The distribution of the leakage magnetic field in space, for the radial and circumferential components is obtained. On this basis, the effect on the main components of magnetic leakage field at different locations in space is determined, and the best of placing a potential sensor for detecting three kinds of defects in space are derived. This provides a basis for determining sensor locations in magnetic leakage detection devices, inverting defect models from multi-sensor data and accurately quantifying the degree of defects.

Abstrakt

An Erdölpipelines gibt es normalerweise drei Fehlerarten, nämlich Schuppenfehler, Grubenfehler und Durchgangslochfehler. Bei praktischen Inspektion und Anwendungen müssen die jeweiligen Eigenschaften des magnetischen Streuflusses von unterschiedlichen Fehlern deutlich geklärt und angemessene Inspektionspunkte festgelegt werden, um die unterschiedlichen Fehlerarten genau zu erkennen sowie das Ausmaß des einzelnen Fehlers richtig zu quantifizieren. In dieser Arbeit wird das magnetische Streuflussfeld des Schuppenfehlers, Grubenfehlers und Durchgangslochfehlers an Pipelines analysiert, die dreidimensionale Finite-Elemente-Simulation verwendet, um Daten der Merkmal-Knoten zu extrahieren und das räumliche dreidimensionale Modell des Streuflussfeldes zu invertieren. Dadurch wird die räumliche Verteilung des magnetischen Streuflussfeldes erhalten, einschließlich der räumlichen Verteilung der radialen und umlaufenden Komponenten. Auf dieser Grundlage wird geklärt, welche Komponenten das magnetische Streuflussfeld an unterschiedlichen Orten im Raum hauptsächlich beeinflussen und die besten Inspektionspositionen für die drei Fehlerarten im Raum werden auch vorgeschlagen, wodurch die Grundlage zur Bestätigung von Sensorstandorten in Inspektionsgeräten des magnetischen Streuflussfeldes, zur Invertierung des Fehlermodells mit Verwendung von Multiplex-Sensordaten und zur genauen Quantifizierung des Ausmaß dess Fehlers gebildet wird.


Corresponding author: Feng Zhou, College of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China, E-mail:

About the authors

Feng Zhou

received the B.S. degree in power system and its automation from Hefei University of technology, Anhui Province, China, in 1992, and the Ph.D. degree in electric machines and electric apparatus from Harbin institute of technology, Heilongjiang Province, China, in 2005. His research interests include large motor comprehensive physical field simulation, electric power system information and intelligent remote viewing, Intelligent instrument and testing technology, etc.

Yu Chen

received the B.E. degree in University of Jinan, ShanDong Province, China, in 2019. Since 2020, he has been studying at Shandong University of Science and Technology, majoring in Power System and Automation, master of Engineering. His research direction is electric machine design and manufacture.

Han Zhao

received the B.E. degree in Electrical Engineering and Automation from ShanDong jianzhu University, ShanDong Province, China, in 2019. Since 2019, he has been studying at Shandong University of Science and Technology, majoring in Power System and Automation, master of Engineering. His research direction is electric machine design and manufacture.

Heng Hu

received the B.S. degree in integrated circuit design and integrated system from Harbin University of Science and Technology, Heilongjiang Province, China, in 2009, and the master’s degree in electrical engineering from Harbin University of Science and Technology, Heilongjiang Province, China, in 2014. From 2014 on, he has been a researcher, Heilongjiang Electric Power Research Institute, Harbin, China. His research interests include electromagnetic calculation and electrical equipment test.

  1. Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

[1] G. S. Park and S. H. Park, “Analysis of the velocity-induced eddy current in MFL type NDT,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 663–666, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2004.824717.Search in Google Scholar

[2] M. Rostami Kandroodi, B. Nadjar Araabi, M. Mansoob Bassiri, and M. Nili Ahmadabadi, “Estimation of depth and length of defects from magnetic flux leakage measurements: verification with simulations, experiments, and pigging data,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 1–10, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2016.2631525.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Y. Ma, R. He, and J. Chen, “A method for improving SNR of drill pipe leakage flux testing signals by means of magnetic concentrating effect,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 1–7, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2015.2427272.Search in Google Scholar

[4] H. Kikuchi, K. Sato, I. Shimizu, Y. Kamada, and S. Kobayashi, “Feasibility study of application of MFL to monitoring of wall thinning under reinforcing plates in nuclear power plants,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 3963–3966, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2011.2147296.Search in Google Scholar

[5] H. M. Kim and G. S. Park, “A new sensitive excitation technique in nondestructive inspection for underground pipelines by using differential coils,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 1–4, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2017.2713042.Search in Google Scholar

[6] H. Ewald, “3-dimensional magnetic leakage field sensor in nondestructive testing,” in Proceedings of the 20th IEEE Instrumentation Technology Conference (Cat. No.03CH37412), vol. 2, 2003, pp. 1309–1311.10.1109/IMTC.2003.1207963Search in Google Scholar

[7] S. Hosseingholizadeh, T. Filleter, and A. N. Sinclair, “Enhancement of defect characterization with AC magnetic flux leakage: far-side defect shape estimation and sensor lift-off compensation,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 1–11, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2022.3157794.Search in Google Scholar

[8] F. Li, J. Feng, S. Lu, J. Liu, and Y. Yao, “Convolution neural network for classification of magnetic flux leakage response segments,” in 2017 6th Data Driven Control and Learning Systems (DDCLS), 2017, pp. 152–155.10.1109/DDCLS.2017.8068061Search in Google Scholar

[9] C. K. Okolo and T. Meydan, “Axial magnetic field sensing for pulsed magnetic flux leakage hairline crack detection and quantification,” in 2017 IEEE Sensors, 2017, pp. 1–3.10.1109/ICSENS.2017.8233983Search in Google Scholar

[10] M. Ravan, R. K. Amineh, S. Koziel, N. K. Nikolova, and J. P. Reilly, “Sizing of 3-D arbitrary defects using magnetic flux leakage measurements,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 1024–1033, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2009.2037008.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Z. Wu, Y. Deng, J. Liu, and L. Wang, “A reinforcement learning-based reconstruction method for complex defect profiles in MFL inspection,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 70, pp. 1–10, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2021.3052000.Search in Google Scholar

[12] S. Hosseingholizadeh, T. Filleter, and A. N. Sinclair, “Evaluation of a magnetic dipole model in a DC magnetic flux leakage system,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 1–7, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2019.2897669.Search in Google Scholar

[13] R. Saranya, J. Daniel, A. Abudhahir, and N. Chermakani, “Comparison of segmentation techniques for detection of defects in non-destructive testing images,” in 2014 International Conference on Electronics and Communication Systems (ICECS), 2014, pp. 1–6.10.1109/ECS.2014.6892787Search in Google Scholar

[14] D. A. G. Trevino, S. M. Dutta, F. H. Ghorbel, and M. Karkoub, “An improved dipole model of 3-D magnetic flux leakage,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 1–7, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2015.2475429.Search in Google Scholar

[15] P. Karuppasamy, A. Abudhahir, M. Prabhakaran, et al.., “Model-based optimization of MFL testing of ferromagnetic steam generator tubes,” J. Nondestr. Eval., vol. 35, p. 5, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-015-0320-x.Search in Google Scholar

[16] G. Yu, J. Liu, H. Zhang, and C. Liu, “An iterative stacking method for pipeline defect inversion with complex MFL signals,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 3780–3788, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2019.2933171.Search in Google Scholar

[17] X.-B. Li, X. Li, L. Chen, et al.., “Numerical simulation and experiments of magnetic flux leakage inspection in pipeline steel,” J. Mech. Sci. Technol., vol. 23, pp. 109–113, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-008-1005-5.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-05-27
Revised: 2022-08-29
Accepted: 2022-10-11
Published Online: 2022-10-26
Published in Print: 2022-11-25

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/teme-2022-0078/html
Scroll to top button