Home Conformity assessment of photo-optical measurement data registration in legal metrology
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Conformity assessment of photo-optical measurement data registration in legal metrology

Ensuring admissibility as evidence of measurement data retrieved from legacy utility meters
  • Marko Esche

    Marko Esche received his master’s degree and PhD in electrical engineering from Technische Universität Berlin in 2009 and 2014 respectively. He joined PTB in 2014. Since 2016 he leads the PTB working group 8.51 “Metrological Software”. His research interests lie in the field of digitalization of the metering infrastructure and software risk assessment.

    EMAIL logo
    , Martin Nischwitz

    Martin Nischwitz received his master’s degree in electrical engineering from Technische Universität Berlin in 2018. He joined PTB afterwards and currently works in the field of drafting and harmonizing international standards in the field of legal metrology. His research interests are distributed systems with a focus on byzantine fault tolerant systems.

    , Manuel Schmidt

    Manuel Schmidt received his bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Berliner Hochschule für Technik (former Beuth Hochschule für Technik) in 2021. After some work experiences in embedded engineering, he joined the Physikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt in 2021. Since then he has worked as a software engineer and currently develops solutions for automatic pen testing.

    , Reinhard Meyer

    Reinhard Meyer received his diploma in computer science from Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin in 2007. After some work experiences as research associate at Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft and the German Aerospace Center, he joined the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt in 2012. Since then, he has worked in the field of software examination and is interested in operating system hardening for measuring instruments.

    and Marco Elfroth

    Marco Elfroth joined the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt in 1994 and became a member of the PTB working group 8.51 “Metrological Software” in 2014. He received his bachelor’s degree in computer science from Ostfalia Hochschule für angewandt Wissenschaften in 2019. He actively contributes to national and international standardization committees with a focus on smart metering.

Published/Copyright: June 10, 2022

Abstract

The rollout of smart meters in Europe requires solutions for the transition from the existing metering system to the digital metering infrastructure. Connecting legacy meters to the new digital backends is one of the major challenges for the transitory phase. Here, the requirements for performing valid registration of measurement values from legacy meters are derived from the legal metrological framework of the European Union. Threats on the process of registration are then determined based on these requirements and subsequently evaluated. A prototypical implementation, making use of photo-optical technology is presented, illustrating how applicable requirements may be covered. With the help of a risk assessment, the critical aspects of the implementation are identified to highlight how actual implementations might be further improved.

Zusammenfassung

Die Einführung intelligenter Messsysteme in Europa erfordert Lösungen für einen nahtlosen Übergang zwischen bestehenden Messsystemen und der digitalen Messinfrastruktur. Bestandszähler an neu entstehende digitale Messdatenverarbeitungssysteme anzubinden, stellt eine der größten Herausforderungen für die Übergangsphase des Rollouts dar. Die Anforderungen an die eine rechtssichere Erfassung von Messwerten aus Bestandszählern werden hier aus dem gesetzlichen metrologischen Rahmenwerk der Europäischen Union abgeleitet. Basierend auf diesen Anforderungen werden Bedrohungen auf den Erfassungsprozess abgeleitet und anschließend evaluiert. In diesem Rahmen wird eine prototypische Implementierung auf Basis foto-optischer Mechanismen vorgestellt mit dem Ziel eine Möglichkeit zur Erfüllung der anwendbaren Anforderungen aufzuzeigen. Mittels einer Risikoanalyse des Systems werden die kritischen Aspekte der vorgeschlagenen Implementierung identifiziert und verdeutlicht, wie real existierende Lösungen verbessert werden können.

About the authors

Marko Esche

Marko Esche received his master’s degree and PhD in electrical engineering from Technische Universität Berlin in 2009 and 2014 respectively. He joined PTB in 2014. Since 2016 he leads the PTB working group 8.51 “Metrological Software”. His research interests lie in the field of digitalization of the metering infrastructure and software risk assessment.

Martin Nischwitz

Martin Nischwitz received his master’s degree in electrical engineering from Technische Universität Berlin in 2018. He joined PTB afterwards and currently works in the field of drafting and harmonizing international standards in the field of legal metrology. His research interests are distributed systems with a focus on byzantine fault tolerant systems.

Manuel Schmidt

Manuel Schmidt received his bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Berliner Hochschule für Technik (former Beuth Hochschule für Technik) in 2021. After some work experiences in embedded engineering, he joined the Physikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt in 2021. Since then he has worked as a software engineer and currently develops solutions for automatic pen testing.

Reinhard Meyer

Reinhard Meyer received his diploma in computer science from Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin in 2007. After some work experiences as research associate at Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft and the German Aerospace Center, he joined the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt in 2012. Since then, he has worked in the field of software examination and is interested in operating system hardening for measuring instruments.

Marco Elfroth

Marco Elfroth joined the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt in 1994 and became a member of the PTB working group 8.51 “Metrological Software” in 2014. He received his bachelor’s degree in computer science from Ostfalia Hochschule für angewandt Wissenschaften in 2019. He actively contributes to national and international standardization committees with a focus on smart metering.

References

1. “Verordnung über das Inverkehrbringen und die Bereitstellung von Messgeräten auf dem Markt sowie über ihre Verwendung und Eichung (MessEV)”, Federal Law Gazette, December 2014.Search in Google Scholar

2. “Gesetz über den Messstellenbetrieb und die Datenkommunikation in intelligenten Energienetzen (MsbG)”, Federal Law Gazette, August 2016.Search in Google Scholar

3. M. Esche, F. Grasso Toro and F. Thiel, “Representation of attacker motivation in software risk assessment using attack probability trees”, in Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), 2017.10.15439/2017F112Search in Google Scholar

4. Federal Network Agency, “Monitoringbericht 2021”, Federal Network Agency, Bonn, 2021.Search in Google Scholar

5. Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), “Technical Guideline TR-03147 Assurance Level Assessment of Procedures for Identity Verification of Natural Persons, Version 1.0.4”, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

6. M. Esche, M. Schmidt, M. Nischwitz, M. Elfroth, S. Heller, M. Beermann, M. Asbach, B. Krausz and M. Lierfeld, “Theoretical Considerations on Photo-Optical Measurement Data Registration Admissible as Evidence in Legal Metrology (to be published)”, in Sensoren und Messsysteme 2022, 2022.10.1515/teme-2022-0033Search in Google Scholar

7. “Gesetz über das Inverkehrbringen und die Bereitstellung von Messgeräten auf dem Markt, ihre Verwendung und Eichung sowie über Fertigpackungen (MessEG)”, Federal Law Gazette, July 2013.Search in Google Scholar

8. B. Harmon and T. Barker, “Optical character recognition (OCR) and coded data for lagacy instrument data transfer”. US Patent 20170116493, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

9. “The DLMS communication survival kit”, icube software, Online. Available: https://icube.ch/DLMSSurvivalKit/dsk1.html. [Accessed 08 February 2022].Search in Google Scholar

10. P. Homaj, “Communication– DLMS/COSEM protocol”, 06 April 2021. [Online]. Available: https://d2000.ipesoft.com/blog/dlms-cosem-protocol/. [Accessed 08 February 2022].Search in Google Scholar

11. N. Pohlmann, J.-H. Frintrop, R. Widdermann and T. Ziegler, “Wenn der Softbot menschliche Identität bestätigt. Videoident-Verfahren II: Die Technik”, Die Bank, vol. 6, pp. 66–70, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

12. Rundschreiben 3/2017 (GW) – Videoidentifizierungsverfahren, Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

13. “ISO/IEC 18045:2008 Information technology – Security techniques – Methodology for IT security evaluation”, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-03-03
Accepted: 2022-05-20
Published Online: 2022-06-10
Published in Print: 2023-02-23

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/teme-2022-0033/html
Scroll to top button