Doubly-filled COMPs in Alpine varieties

References

Altmann, Hans. 1993. Satzmodus. In Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds.), Syntax. An international handbook of contemporary research, vol. 1, 1006–1029. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110095869.1.15.1006Search in Google Scholar

Barbiers, Sjef, Johan van der Auwera, Hans Bennis, Eefje Boef, Gunther De Vogelaer & Margret van der Ham. 2005. Syntactische atlas van de nederlandse dialecten. Vol. 1: Text and commentary. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bayer, Josef. 1984. COMP in Bavarian syntax. The Linguistic Review 3. 209–274. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1984.3.3.209.Search in Google Scholar

Bayer, Josef. 2014. Syntactic and phonological properties of wh-operators and wh-movement in Bavarian. In Helmut Weiß & Günther Grewendorf (eds.), Bavarian syntax, 23–50. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.220.02baySearch in Google Scholar

Bayer, Josef. 2015. Doubly-filled Comp, wh head-movement, and derivational economy. In Marc van Oostendorp & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), Representing structure in phonology and syntax, 7–40. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781501502224-002Search in Google Scholar

Bayer, Josef & Ellen Brandner. 2008. Wie oberflächlich ist die syntaktische Variation zwischen Dialekten? Doubly-filled COMP revisited. In Franz Patocka & Guido Seiler (eds.), Dialektale Morphologie, dialektale Syntax: Beiträge zum 2. Kongress der internationalen Gesellschaft für Dialektologie des Deutschen. Wien, 20–23 September 2006, 9–26. Vienna: Praesens.Search in Google Scholar

Bayer, Josef & Ellen Brandner. 2010. On the flexible nature of the left periphery – Doubly-filled Comp revisited. Unpublished Manuscript. University of Constance.Search in Google Scholar

Behaghel, Otto. 1932. Deutsche Syntax: eine geschichtliche Darstellung. Vol. 4: Wortstellung, Periodenbau. Heidelberg: Winter.Search in Google Scholar

Beraldo, Gianluca. 2015. Der doppelt gefüllte Komplementierer (w-Wort + che) im Venezianischen: Ein Arealvergleich. Unpublished term paper, University of Vienna. https://www.academia.edu/36754384/Der_doppelt_gefu_llte_Komplementierer_im_Venezianischen_ein_Arealvergleich.pdf (accessed 20 April 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Bidese, Ermenegildo. 2008. Die diachronische Syntax des Zimbrischen. Tübingen: Narr.Search in Google Scholar

Bidese, Ermenegildo, Andrea Padovan & Alessandra Tomaselli. 2014. The syntax of subordination in Cimbrian and the rationale behind language contact. STUF/Language Typology and Universals 67(4). 489–510. https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2014-0026.Search in Google Scholar

Bidese, Ermenegildo, Andrea Padovan & Claudia Turolla. 2018. Mehrsprachigkeit in den zimbrischen Sprachinseln anhand einiger syntaktischer Phänomene. In Nicole Eller-Wildfeuer, Paul Rössler & Alfred Wildfeuer (eds.), Alpindeutsch. Einfluss und Verwendung des Deutschen im alpinen Raum, 141–163. Regensburg: Edition Vulpes.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Dunstan & Marina Chumakina. 2013. What there might be and what there is: An introduction to canonical typology. In Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville Corbett (eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax, 1–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604326.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Dunstan, Marina Chumakina & Greville Corbett (eds.). 2013. Canonical morphology and syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604326.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam & Howard Lasnik. 1993. The theory of principles and parameters. In Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds.), Syntax. An international handbook of contemporary research, vol. 1, 506–569. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110095869.1.9.506Search in Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville. 2015. Morphosyntactic complexity: A typology of lexical splits. Language 91(1). 145–193. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2015.0003.Search in Google Scholar

Cornips, Leonie & Cecilia Poletto. 2005. On standardising syntactic elicitation techniques (part 1). Lingua 115. 939–957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2003.11.004.Search in Google Scholar

de Haan, Germen J. & Fred Weerman. 1986. Finiteness and verb fronting in Frisian. In Hubert Haider & Martin Prinzhorn (eds.), Verb second phenomena in Germanic languages, 77–110. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110846072.77Search in Google Scholar

Döhmer, Caroline. 2017. Aspekte der luxemburgischen Syntax. Unpublished PhD thesis, Université du Luxembourg.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations, 366–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199213733.003.0011Search in Google Scholar

Fanselow, Gisbert, Matthias Schlesewsky, Ralf Vogel & Thomas Weskott. 2011. Animay effects on crossing wh-movement in German. Linguistics 49(4). 657–683. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.021.Search in Google Scholar

Fleischer, Jürg. 2004. A typology of relative clauses in German dialects. In Bernd Kortmann (ed.), Dialectology meets typology. Dialect grammar from a cross-linguistic perspective, 211–243. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197327.211Search in Google Scholar

Fleischer, Jürg. 2006. Dative and indirect object in German dialects: Evidence from relative clauses. In Daniel Hole, André Meinunger & Werner Abraham (eds.), Datives and other cases: Between argument structure and event structure, 213–238. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.75.10fleSearch in Google Scholar

Gansleweit, Klaus-Dieter & Joachim Wiese (eds.). 2001. Brandenburg-Berlinisches Wörterbuch. Vol. 4: Schwabbel bis Zylinderputzer, Nachträge. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Grewendorf, Günther. 1988. Aspekte der deutschen Syntax. Eine Rektions-Bindungs-Analyse. Tübingen: Narr.Search in Google Scholar

Grimshaw, Jane. 1997. Projections, heads and optimality. Linguistic Inquiry 28. 373–422.Search in Google Scholar

Hack, Franziska Maria. 2012. The syntax and prosody of interrogatives: Evidence from varieties spoken in Northern Italy. Unpublished PhD thesis, Oxford University.Search in Google Scholar

Hack, Franziska Maria & Georg A. Kaiser. 2013. Zur Syntax von Fragesätzen im Rätoromanischen. In Georges Darms (ed.), Akten des V. Rätoromanischen Kolloquiums: Lavin 2011, 137–161. Tübingen: Francke.Search in Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane. 1992. Theory and description in generative syntax. A case study in West Flemish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Holler, Anke. 2001. An HPSG analysis of German Wh-interrogatives. In Walt Detmar Meurers & Tibor Kiss (eds.), Constraint-based approaches to Germanic syntax, 67–100. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Jäger, Agnes. 2000. Unterspezifikation am Beispiel des Pronomens was. Zur Grammatik eines w-Elements. MA thesis, University of Jena.Search in Google Scholar

Kabak, Bariş & René Schiering. 2006. The phonology and morphology of function word contractions. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 9. 53–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-005-4533-8.Search in Google Scholar

Kathol, Adreas. 2000. Linear syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198237341.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Keenan, Edward & Bernard Comrie. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8(1). 63–99.10.4324/9781315880259-11Search in Google Scholar

Keenan, Edward & Bernard Comrie. 1979. Data on the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy. Language 55(2). 333–351. https://doi.org/10.2307/412588.Search in Google Scholar

König, Ekkehard & Peter Siemund. 2013. Satztyp und Typologie. In Jörg Meibauer, Markus Steinbach & Hans Altmann (eds.), Satztypen des Deutschen, 846–873. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110224832.846Search in Google Scholar

Larsson, Ida. 2014. Double complementizers. Nordic Atlas of Language Structures (NALS) 1. 447–457.10.5617/nals.5413Search in Google Scholar

Lenz, Alexandra, Timo Ahlers & Martina Werner. 2014. Zur Dynamik bairischer Dialektsytax – eine Pilotstudie. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 81(1). 1–33.10.25162/zdl-2014-0001Search in Google Scholar

Lindström, Eva. 1995. Animacy in interrogative pronouns. In Inger Moen, Hanne Gram Simonsen & Helge Lødrup (eds.), Papers from the XVth scandinavian conference of linguistics, 307–315. Oslo: University of Oslo, Department of Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Lösch, Wolfgang, Wolfgang Fahning & Susanne Wiegand (eds.). 1990. Thüringisches Wörterbuch. Vol. 6: T–Z, Quellen- und Literaturverzeichnis. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Marušič, Franc. 2008. CP under control. In Gerhild Zybatow, Luka Szucsich, Uwe Junghanns & Roland Meyer (eds.), Formal description of Slavic languages, 408–422. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Marušič, Franc, Petra Mišmaš, Vesna Plesničar, Tina Razboršek & Tina Šuligoj. 2015. On a potential counter-example to Merchant’s Sluicing-COMP generalization. Grazer Linguistische Studien 83. 47–65.Search in Google Scholar

Mayerthaler, Eva & Willi Mayerthaler. 1990. Apects of Bavarian syntax or “Every language has at least two parents”. In Jerold A. Edmondson, Crawford Feagin & Peter Mühlhäusler (eds.), Development and diversity. Language variation across time and space. A festschrift for Charles-James N. Bailey, 371–429. Dallas: The Summer Institute of Linguistics and The University of Texas at Arlington.Search in Google Scholar

Mioto, Carlos & Maria Cristina Figueiredo Silva. 1995. Wh qu = Wh é que? Revista de documentação de estudos em lingüística teórica e aplicada 11. 301–311.Search in Google Scholar

Mioto, Carlos & Maria Lobo. 2016. Wh-movement: Interrogatives, relatives and clefts. In Willem Leo Wetzels, João Costa & Sergio Menuzzi (eds.), The handbook of Portuguese linguistics, 275–293. Chichester: Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118791844.ch15Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Stefan. 1999. Deutsch Syntax deklarativ. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar für das Deutsche. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783110915990Search in Google Scholar

Näf, Anton. 1992. Herre, wie bin ich mit liebe alsus verirret! Zu den Exklamativsätzen in Gottfrieds “Tristan”. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 20. 37–63.10.1515/zfgl.1992.20.1.37Search in Google Scholar

Penner, Zvi & Thomas Bader. 1995. Issues in the syntax of subordination: A comparative study of the complementizer system in Germanic, Romance, and Semitic languages with special reference to Bernese Swiss German. In Zvi Penner (ed.), Topics in Swiss German syntax, 73–289. Bern: Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Pohl, Heinz-Dieter. 1989. Kleine Kärntner Mundartkunde mit Wörterbuch. Klagenfurt: Heyn.Search in Google Scholar

Poletto, Cecilia. 2000. The higher functional field. Evidence from Northern Italian dialects. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195133561.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Poletto, Cecilia & Laura Vanelli. 1997. Gli introduttori delle frasi interrogative nei dialetti settentrionali. In Paola Benincà & Cecilia Poletto (eds.), Strutture interrogative dell’Italia settentrionali, 105–118. Padova: Centro di Studio per la Dialettologia Italiana.10.1515/9783110910346.145Search in Google Scholar

Priestly, Tom. 1993. Slovene. In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic languages, 388–451. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Rabanus, Stefan, Ermenegildo Bidese & Silvia Dal Negro. 2019. Deutsch als Minderheitensprache in Italien. In Joachim Herrgen, Peter Auer & Jürgen Erich Schmidt (eds.), Language and space. An international handbook of linguistic variation, vol. 4. Deutsch, 1096–1114. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110261295-042Search in Google Scholar

Radford, Andrew. 1988. Transformational grammar. A first course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511840425Search in Google Scholar

Rowley, Anthony R. 2010. Deskriptive Grammatik des Deutsch-Fersentalerischen (Mòcheno). Frankfurt a. M.: Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg. http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/14831 (accessed 20 April 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Rowley, Anthony R. 2017. Bavaria germanica oder Ladinia submersa? In Alexandra Lenz, Ludwig Maximilian Breuer, Tim Kallenborn, Peter Ernst, Manfred Michael Glauninger & Franz Patocka (eds.), Bayerisch-österreichische Varietäten zu Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts – Dynamik, Struktur, Funktion, 479–494. Stuttgart: Steiner.Search in Google Scholar

Schallert, Oliver. 2014. Die Syntax der Ersatzinfinitivkonstruktion: Typologie und Variation. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Search in Google Scholar

Schallert, Oliver. 2019. Verbstellungsvariation bei Exklamativen aus diachroner Perspektive. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (PBB) 141(4). 477–506. https://doi.org/10.1515/bgsl-2019-0030.Search in Google Scholar

Schallert, Oliver, Alexander Dröge & Jeffrey Pheiff. 2018. Doubly-filled COMPs in Dutch and German: A bottom-up approach. Unpublished manuscript, University of Munich and University of Marburg. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/003979 (accessed 20 April 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Schönenberger, Manuela. 2010. ‘‘Optional’’ doubly-filled COMPs (DFCs) in wh-complements in child and adult Swiss German. In Merete Anderssen, Kristine Bentzen & Marit Westergaard (eds.), Variation in the input: Studies in the acquisition of word order, 33–64. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-9207-6_3Search in Google Scholar

Seiler, Guido. 2004. On three types of dialect variation and their implications for linguistic theory. Evidence from verb clusters in Swiss German dialects. In Bernd Kortmann (ed.), Dialectology meets typology. Dialect grammar from a cross-linguistic perspective, 367–399. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197327.367Search in Google Scholar

Seiler, Guido. 2010. Investigating language in space: Questionnaire and interview. In Peter Auer & Jürgen Erich Schmidt (eds.), Language and space. An international handbook of linguistic variation, vol. 1, 512–527. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110220278.512Search in Google Scholar

Spescha, Arnold. 1989. Grammatica sursilvana. Cura: Casa editura per mieds d’instrucziun.Search in Google Scholar

Struckmeier, Volker & Sebastian Kaiser. 2019. When insubordination is an artefact (of sentence type theories). In Karin Beijering, Gunther Kaltenböck & María Sol Sansiñena (eds.), Insubordination. Theoretical and empirical issues, 320–348. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110638288-011Search in Google Scholar

Wasow, Thomas. 1997. Remarks on grammatical weight. Language Variation and Change 9. 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500001800.Search in Google Scholar

Weber, Albert & Eugen Dieth. 1987. Zürichdeutsche Grammatik. Ein Wegweiser zur guten Mundart, 3rd edn. Zürich: Rohr.Search in Google Scholar

Weiß, Helmut. 1998. Syntax des Bairischen. Studien zur Grammatik einer natürlichen Sprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783110912487Search in Google Scholar

Weiß, Helmut. 2004. Vom Nutzen der Dialektsyntax. In Franz Patocka & Peter Wiesinger (eds.), Morphologie und Syntax deutscher Dialekte und Historische Dialektologie des Deutschen, 21–41. Vienna: Edition Präsens.Search in Google Scholar

Weiß, Helmut. 2013. Satztyp und Dialekt. In Jörg Meibauer, Markus Steinbach & Hans Altmann (eds.), Satztypen des Deutschen, 764–785. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110224832.764Search in Google Scholar

Weiß, Helmut. 2017. SyHD-Atlas: Doubly-filled COMP. http://www.syhd.info/apps/atlas/#doubly-filled-comp (accessed 20 April 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Weiß, Helmut. 2019. Rebracketing (Gliederungsverschiebung) and the early merge principle. Diachronica 36(4). 509–545.10.1075/dia.00015.weiSearch in Google Scholar

Wöllstein, Angelika. 2010. Topologisches Satzmodell. Heidelberg: Winter.Search in Google Scholar

Zwicky, Arnold M. 2002. I wonder what kind of construction that this example illustrates. In David I. Beaver, Luis D. Casillas Martinez, Brady Z. Clark & Stefan Kaufmann (eds.), The construction of meaning, 219–248. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar